sorryyou all switching jobs and been busy as of late.

redskins will take wr goodley from baylor

I LIKED PETTINE WHEN THEY SIGNED HIM,. I LIKE HOW HE HANDLES INTERVIEWS AND HOW HE SEEMS TO RUN THE TEAM IN HIS IMAGE. IF IT WASNT FOR A MEDLING GM WHO KNOWS HOW FAR THAT WAS GOING. BUT COULDNTHAVE BEEN HELPING PETTINE LAST YEAR AS A ROOKIE HEAD COACH.

I LIKE THE DIRECTION AND ATTITUDE HE IS TAKING THE TEAM.

OLD GREGORY IS FALLING AS OF RIGHT NOW DUE TO FAILED DRUG TEST AT THE COMBINE AND OTHER OFF FIELD ISSUES STARTING TO SURFACE.

been palying with this since i found it last week.

Round 1 Pick 18 (K.C.): Andrus Peat, OT, Stanford (A-)
Round 1 Pick 19: Eddie Goldman, DT, Florida State (B+)
Round 2 Pick 11: Breshad Perriman, WR, UCF (A)
Round 2 Pick 17 (K.C.): Byron Jones, CB, Connecticut (B+)
Round 3 Pick 13: Arie Kouandjio, OG, Alabama (A-)
Round 3 Pick 24 (DET): Bryce Petty, QB, Baylor (
Round 3 Pick 31 (SEA): Eric Rowe, CB/FS, Utah (B-)
Round 4 Pick 12: Anthony Chickillo, DE, Miami (Fla.) (A-)
Round 4 Pick 16: B.J. Finney, C, Kansas State (A)
Round 5 Pick 11: Bryce Hager, ILB, Baylor (
Round 6 Pick 13: Derrick Lott, DT, Chattanooga (C-)
Round 6 Pick 26: Casey Pierce, TE, Kent State (
Round 7 Pick 12: Austin Hill, WR, Arizona (A)

redskins 3rd round pick Tre Jackson Guard Florida St. 6-4 323lbs

sorry everyone wife took me to Vegas for my birthday. thats why i missed my pick and than i got busy at work when i returned.

@secondwave said:

In what scenario would you guys consider drafting Tevin Coleman? Perhaps third round?

I wouldn't mind if our first four picks looked like:

1-12. DT - Danny Shelton

1-19. OT - TJ Clemmings (or La'el Collins)

2. WR - Dorial Green-Beckham

3. RB - Tevin Coleman

I don't believe he'll fall past the third round. I actually think he'll end up being a better runningback than Melvin Gordon and on the same level as a healthy Todd Gu

I like this a lot but would rather have the wide reciver from Georgia Chris Conley less of a risk off field and same physically atributes as Beckum

i think Funchess is being projected as a 2nd round TE pass catching type by some experts mocks. Kiper has him rated a a Julius Thomas type.

alright who is on the clock and how much time do they officially have right now.. i need to plan my pick at 5.

Offer him a 2 year deal with incentives and use him the way the Patriots did. he played less snaps last year with the rotation they had in NE. Would be a solid run stuffer on 1st and 2nd down. than pulll him on 3rds. rotate Him Taylor and Kitchen would be a nice rotation. Would be interesting to see Taylor play DE next to Him.

if thats the case switch me out of the Chargers and put me on ther Redskins at 5.. if we get to the Chargers and no one has picked them ill take them also. in 8 weeks i wanna make at least one pick. hahaha

if we go 2 teams give me Cards at 24.

Agreed Cobb would be an excellent pick up but he wil be looking for a SB contender i think. Dont see him being thrilled coming to cleveland were we cant figure out who our Qb will be from one season to the next. And that is the biggest reason we are settleing for these smaller quick rather than fast receivers. and these good route runners who are where they are suppose to be when they are suppose to be there type receivers. Qbs on our roster arent boasting the strongest arms either.

parker is 6-2

White is 6-3

beckum with off field baggage is 6-5

Stong from Ari. is 6-3.

our Big receiver would be our draft pick. my only point to Shorts is he is a veteran who can help the rookie get going.

@tim-couch-pulls-out said:

Except that Shorts is just a slightly taller, slightly slower version of both Hawkins and Gabriel. He's not a #1 WR, he's not a slot receiver, he is solely a #2, which is what we don't need.

Our roster is full of sub 6'0", shifty receivers. We need a tall red zone threat, not just another undersized, mediocre guy. We need someone to contest 50/50 balls. Right now, the fade is not in our arsenal. We need someone to target in the red zone. Shorts isn't that guy.

I like Shorts, just as I like Garcon. I like all Mt. Union guys. But he's just not needed. His skillset is one that two of our receivers already possess.

Really 6"0.. Lafell is 6:2 Hartline is 6'2 and the rest of the Patriots receivers outside Gronk are barely 6ft. and there are not the fastest receiver group in the NFL either.The top 10 receivers from 2014 season only 4 are over 6ft. Johnson, Bryant, Jones, and Nelson. the rest at 6ft or shorter.

Point is tall reveivers are beginning to not be so improtant. and we need after the catch shifty guys in Cleveland weather.

@tim-couch-pulls-out said:

I'm not sure why would need Shorts, especially if we're going to be drafting a wide receiver.

Did you read what quoted, i think i pointed out why you sign Shorts. not all rookie receivers come out Calvin Johnson. Some take time. Shorts would give the Rookie time to transition to the NFL. How many 1st round WR picks are bust cause they dont develope fast enough or ever to the game.

here are the top 10

Sylvester Morris 2000 draft 21st pick KC

Jay Soward 2000 draft 29th pick Jags

David Terrell 2001 draft 8th pick Bears

Freddie Mitchel 2001 draft 25th pick Eagles

Ashlie Lelie 2002 draft 19th pick Broncos

Charlie Johnson 2003 draft 2nd pick Lions

Reggie Williams 2004 draft 9th pick Jags

Troy Wlliamson 2005 draft 7th pick Vikings

Mike Williams 2005 draft 10th pick Lions

Ted Ginn 2007 draft 7th pick Dolphins

Chargers

Id point out Cecil is a deep threat that can play if it takes the rookie a little time to adjust to the NFL game which we have seen happen with rookie receivers,. They all dont come out blazing the field some take time. and Shorts would give them time to adjust if needed.

SIGN Hartline and Ginn returner/slot guy. and try an lure Shorts. a

and draft the Best receiver who ever falls to 12 that you think can be your #1.

your reciever core would be

Draft pick lets say its Parker from Lousiville

#2 Shorts

#3 Hartline

#4 Hawkins

#5 Gabriel

#6 Ginn

Thats not a bad corp.

id cut Benjamin since his knee injury has not been the same. but maybe keep him on as a 7th guy returner

Watching that video it is more interesting to watch Tannehill. he looks at other recievers but he always looks where Hartline is suppose to be and is always there. Hartlines catchs are forward and getting down not taking that big hit. He isnt a burner he is a accurate route safety blanket receiver that we havent had in a long time. Hartline is always at the sticks and knows where he needs to get to for the first watch his head he catches the ball and looks for the sticks and get as close to them as he can. we dont need burners at reciever we needs guys that catch and get 1str downs.