So, man made global warmng- "ice caps are melting! we are all goin to die..." again, NONSENSE
-
Jesus I was reading that and I thought it was just AI. WTF is a "climate scold"?
I also think it is hilarious that climate change deniers constantly mention the climate has changed in the past, as if anyone is disputing that.
But the attack on expertise in this country continues. Every single climatologist across the globe is now clearly just a liberal shill. They're ALL in on it, all paid for by Biden or something. Ridiculous.
I'll have to look into the data later. But decades of ice loss and then an "anomalous" ice gain for a few years, specifically in that location, doesn't disprove climate change. Deniers, as evidenced by this board, love taking one specific thing, misinterpreting it, and then using it at reason to ignore the mountain of evidence on the other side.
-
Antarctica, that icy continent that encompasses the South Pole, has been a source of panic for the climate scolds for years. It was, only a few million years ago, covered in temperate forest. Now it's covered in ice, as the world is a chillier place than it once was. Yes, the planet's climate does change, and through most of Earth's history, it's been warmer than it is today.
Nevertheless, climate scolds love to loudly proclaim, "Antarctica is melting!" The problem is, it just ain't so. We have discussed this problem with the climate scolds' focus on the southern island continent before:
Our southernmost continent is, we’ve been told, the suffocating canary in the global coal mine. The more ice loss in Antarctica, the greater trouble we’re in. So what do we make of a study which found that between 2021 and 2023, there was a record-breaking increase in the Antarctic Ice Sheet?
We mark it down as another in a long line of misses from the global warming zealots.
“Notably, four major glaciers in the Wilkes Land–Queen Mary Land region of East Antarctica reversed their previous pattern of accelerated mass loss from 2011 to 2020 and instead showed significant mass gain during the 2021 to 2023 period,” says an article in SciTechDaily summarizing the report from Tongji University researchers.
How could such an unanticipated event happen?
“The study points to anomalous precipitation as the primary driver, suggesting that natural variability plays a significant role in short-term ice sheet changes,” says climate site Watts Up With That? It also “underscores the complexity of Antarctica’s ice system and the pitfalls of oversimplified climate narratives.”
Forgot to insert this
The whole “growing ice sheets” phenomenon could be interpreted a couple different ways in Antarctica. The phenomenon of global warming has been a thing for a few decades and theoretically we’ve been doing things to mitigate it, so this could be seen as a “see guys, the things we are doing are working!” type thing.
The whole “growing ice sheets” phenomenon could be interpreted a couple different ways in Antarctica. The phenomenon of global warming has been a thing for a few decades and theoretically we’ve been doing things to mitigate it, so this could be seen as a “see guys, the things we are doing are working!” type thing.
Based on what I've seen we're nowhere close to that yet.
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
Jesus I was reading that and I thought it was just AI. WTF is a "climate scold"?
I also think it is hilarious that climate change deniers constantly mention the climate has changed in the past, as if anyone is disputing that.
But the attack on expertise in this country continues. Every single climatologist across the globe is now clearly just a liberal shill. They're ALL in on it, all paid for by Biden or something. Ridiculous.
I'll have to look into the data later. But decades of ice loss and then an "anomalous" ice gain for a few years, specifically in that location, doesn't disprove climate change. Deniers, as evidenced by this board, love taking one specific thing, misinterpreting it, and then using it at reason to ignore the mountain of evidence on the other side.
I'll have to look into the data later.
yeah, we've been waiting for years for you to backup the crap you spew.
You can't. You just say you did.
Doesn't work, birdie.
Go ahead, swim in Egypt right on cue.
-
I'll have to look into the data later.
yeah, we've been waiting for years for you to backup the crap you spew.
You can't. You just say you did.
Doesn't work, birdie.
Go ahead, swim in Egypt right on cue.
yeah, we've been waiting for years for you to backup the crap you spew.
You can't. You just say you did.
Doesn't work, birdie.
Go ahead, swim in Egypt right on cue.
Cal, we've proven you can't read. You can't comprehend. You can't take on new facts. You're an intellectual midget. A child. A waste of space actively making this world worse for everyone in your final days.
I've posted countless times debunking your climate change deniers bullshit. Look up those threads. Read. Comprehend. For once in your pathetic, miserable life.
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
yeah, we've been waiting for years for you to backup the crap you spew.
You can't. You just say you did.
Doesn't work, birdie.
Go ahead, swim in Egypt right on cue.
Cal, we've proven you can't read. You can't comprehend. You can't take on new facts. You're an intellectual midget. A child. A waste of space actively making this world worse for everyone in your final days.
I've posted countless times debunking your climate change deniers bullshit. Look up those threads. Read. Comprehend. For once in your pathetic, miserable life.
Cal, we've proven you can't read. You can't comprehend. You can't take on new facts. You're an intellectual midget. A child. A waste of space actively making this world worse for everyone in your final days.
Cal destroys you in every post and all you do is call him names. ?
-
Cal, we've proven you can't read. You can't comprehend. You can't take on new facts. You're an intellectual midget. A child. A waste of space actively making this world worse for everyone in your final days.
Cal destroys you in every post and all you do is call him names. ?
Cal destroys you in every post and all you do is call him names. ?
Oh wow, you must not be able to read either. What a damn shame. Though I'm noticing a trend.
And I'm also realizing I'm feeding into what you do desperately want... Me to reply to you. That's depressingly clear across every thread I post in...
-
yeah, we've been waiting for years for you to backup the crap you spew.
You can't. You just say you did.
Doesn't work, birdie.
Go ahead, swim in Egypt right on cue.
Cal, we've proven you can't read. You can't comprehend. You can't take on new facts. You're an intellectual midget. A child. A waste of space actively making this world worse for everyone in your final days.
I've posted countless times debunking your climate change deniers bullshit. Look up those threads. Read. Comprehend. For once in your pathetic, miserable life.
peck *fart*
all you've ever done is bitch at other non-liberal posters and level insults at them.
You have never debunked anything, you just bitch and say you did.
and, you never never? added anything legitimate/intelligent to any political conversation around here. We have twisted your beak so many times, and you still don't get it.
Have a nice twisted beak day.
-
The whole “growing ice sheets” phenomenon could be interpreted a couple different ways in Antarctica. The phenomenon of global warming has been a thing for a few decades and theoretically we’ve been doing things to mitigate it, so this could be seen as a “see guys, the things we are doing are working!” type thing.
Based on what I've seen we're nowhere close to that yet.
Based on what I've seen we're nowhere close to that yet.
But the ice is growing!
It astounds me that the concept of global warming has such magnificent legs. That’s a news term for a storyline that captures attentions for a long, long time. Here we are in the Trump part 2 phase and it’s still a hot topic for people who don’t read the articles they post. It’s so captivating it’s not even worth reading about.
I’m open minded about it all. So open minded that l don’t even have much of an opinion about it. It’s complex stuff and there is no sense of urgency to have an opinion on it.
I already consider myself a conservationist. Clean air, clean water, parks and wildlife, l’m into it. And so are all of you. We’ve had these discussions.
It’s weird to me that global warming has become this strange sticking point to make us think that we don’t all want the same thing.
-
Based on what I've seen we're nowhere close to that yet.
But the ice is growing!
It astounds me that the concept of global warming has such magnificent legs. That’s a news term for a storyline that captures attentions for a long, long time. Here we are in the Trump part 2 phase and it’s still a hot topic for people who don’t read the articles they post. It’s so captivating it’s not even worth reading about.
I’m open minded about it all. So open minded that l don’t even have much of an opinion about it. It’s complex stuff and there is no sense of urgency to have an opinion on it.
I already consider myself a conservationist. Clean air, clean water, parks and wildlife, l’m into it. And so are all of you. We’ve had these discussions.
It’s weird to me that global warming has become this strange sticking point to make us think that we don’t all want the same thing.
But the ice is growing!
It astounds me that the concept of global warming has such magnificent legs. That’s a news term for a storyline that captures attentions for a long, long time. Here we are in the Trump part 2 phase and it’s still a hot topic for people who don’t read the articles they post. It’s so captivating it’s not even worth reading about.
I’m open minded about it all. So open minded that l don’t even have much of an opinion about it. It’s complex stuff and there is no sense of urgency to have an opinion on it.
I already consider myself a conservationist. Clean air, clean water, parks and wildlife, l’m into it. And so are all of you. We’ve had these discussions.
It’s weird to me that global warming has become this strange sticking point to make us think that we don’t all want the same thing.
Politics.
The science and experts will tell you we need to make some real changes to avoid serious consequences down the road
Those changes will impact certain powerful lobbies, like oil and gas
Those lobbies fund politicians that will prevent regulations and push for "free market" policies that allow the companies to continue to make money
Those politicians push views to their constituents and you get the politicization of a scientific issue
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
and. excuses why "they couldn't read it" coming soon:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1112950/
Many climate change scientists do not agree that global warming is happening
-
-
Nov 25, 2019Climate scientists are speaking out against grossly exaggerated claims about global warming. Getty. Environmental journalists and advocates have in recent weeks made a number of apocalyptic ...
-
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change asserts the conclusion that most (more than 50 per cent) of the post-1950 global warming is due to human activity, chiefly greenhouse gas emissions and land use change. But it does not survey its own contributors, let alone anyone else, so we do not know how many -
-
Despite searching just over a year's worth of the scientific literature on global warming and climate change, one man's exhaustive search could turn up only a single paper that dissented from the ...
-
more and more HONEST scientists are coming around to agree with
mmgw NOT BEING a crisis
U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works
Following the U.S. Senate's vote today on a global warming measure (see today's AP article: Senate Defeats Climate Change Measure,) it is an opportune time to examine the recent and quite remarkable momentum shift taking place in climate science. Many former believers in catastrophic man-made global warming have -
Only a 5 spot. A minor meltdown. Come on Calf.
-
READ THIS, woodpecker. haha, haha, haha.
https://nypost.com/2023/08/09/climate-scientist-admits-the-overwhelming-consensus-is-manufactured/
Scientist admits the ‘overwhelming consensus’ on the climate change crisis is ‘manufactured’
-
READ THIS, woodpecker. haha, haha, haha.
https://nypost.com/2023/08/09/climate-scientist-admits-the-overwhelming-consensus-is-manufactured/
Scientist admits the ‘overwhelming consensus’ on the climate change crisis is ‘manufactured’
READ THIS, woodpecker. haha, haha, haha.
https://nypost.com/2023/08/09/climate-scientist-admits-the-overwhelming-consensus-is-manufactured/
Scientist admits the ‘overwhelming consensus’ on the climate change crisis is ‘manufactured’
There’s 7, in to manic meltdown territory.
-
But the ice is growing!
It astounds me that the concept of global warming has such magnificent legs. That’s a news term for a storyline that captures attentions for a long, long time. Here we are in the Trump part 2 phase and it’s still a hot topic for people who don’t read the articles they post. It’s so captivating it’s not even worth reading about.
I’m open minded about it all. So open minded that l don’t even have much of an opinion about it. It’s complex stuff and there is no sense of urgency to have an opinion on it.
I already consider myself a conservationist. Clean air, clean water, parks and wildlife, l’m into it. And so are all of you. We’ve had these discussions.
It’s weird to me that global warming has become this strange sticking point to make us think that we don’t all want the same thing.
Politics.
The science and experts will tell you we need to make some real changes to avoid serious consequences down the road
Those changes will impact certain powerful lobbies, like oil and gas
Those lobbies fund politicians that will prevent regulations and push for "free market" policies that allow the companies to continue to make money
Those politicians push views to their constituents and you get the politicization of a scientific issue
Politics.
The science and experts will tell you we need to make some real changes to avoid serious consequences down the road
Those changes will impact certain powerful lobbies, like oil and gas
Those lobbies fund politicians that will prevent regulations and push for "free market" policies that allow the companies to continue to make money
Those politicians push views to their constituents and you get the politicization of a scientific issue
REAL CHANGES?
Like giving the EU billions of dollars so they can down the planetary thermostat?
You’re fucking hilarious. ?
-
Politics.
The science and experts will tell you we need to make some real changes to avoid serious consequences down the road
Those changes will impact certain powerful lobbies, like oil and gas
Those lobbies fund politicians that will prevent regulations and push for "free market" policies that allow the companies to continue to make money
Those politicians push views to their constituents and you get the politicization of a scientific issue
REAL CHANGES?
Like giving the EU billions of dollars so they can down the planetary thermostat?
You’re fucking hilarious. ?
REAL CHANGES?
Like giving the EU billions of dollars so they can down the planetary thermostat?
You’re fucking hilarious. ?
If that’s your hang up about global warming then those things aren’t mutually exclusive. You can be pro, anti or ambivalent about global warming and not be supportive of giving money to the EU. You can be not in favor of giving money to the EU simply because you’re not in favor of giving money to the EU.
-
READ THIS, woodpecker. haha, haha, haha.
https://nypost.com/2023/08/09/climate-scientist-admits-the-overwhelming-consensus-is-manufactured/
Scientist admits the ‘overwhelming consensus’ on the climate change crisis is ‘manufactured’
There’s 7, in to manic meltdown territory.
There’s 7, in to manic meltdown territory.
Yeah I'm very over his Google search post tantrums. All on shit that has been covered before on here. All shit he ignored then and will ignore now.
Though it is always hilarious when he posts an article he thinks backs him up and then it says the opposite
-
There’s 7, in to manic meltdown territory.
Yeah I'm very over his Google search post tantrums. All on shit that has been covered before on here. All shit he ignored then and will ignore now.
Though it is always hilarious when he posts an article he thinks backs him up and then it says the opposite
*fart*
and yet, you miss the point, still.
I often post articles with both sides presented, to show your stupid
one-sided alarmist crap is complete nonsense.
You peck "the science says..." when we can easily show the science
is not conclusive, because so many scientists disagree.
You run and hide from all the facts, but you are just another one of the left-wing hacks.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login