Skip to content

So, man made global warmng- "ice caps are melting! we are all goin to die..." again, NONSENSE

Political Discussion
137 9 2.2k 2
  • @calfoxwc said:

    yeah, we've been waiting for years for you to backup the crap you spew.

    You can't. You just say you did.

    Doesn't work, birdie.

    Go ahead, swim in Egypt right on cue.

    image.gif.407609fc6dde48dd7b1faa72342a487d.gif

    Cal, we've proven you can't read. You can't comprehend. You can't take on new facts. You're an intellectual midget. A child. A waste of space actively making this world worse for everyone in your final days. 

    I've posted countless times debunking your climate change deniers bullshit. Look up those threads. Read. Comprehend. For once in your pathetic, miserable life. 

    @mld-woody said:

    peck *fart*

    all you've ever done is bitch at other non-liberal posters and level insults at them.

    You have never debunked anything, you just bitch and say you did.

    and, you never never? added anything legitimate/intelligent to any political conversation around here. We have twisted your beak so many times, and you still don't get it.

    Have a nice twisted beak day.

    image.jpeg.4c31b49e55a45afa1394092e254aca24.jpeg

  • @ibleedbrown said:

    The whole “growing ice sheets” phenomenon could be interpreted a couple different ways in Antarctica. The phenomenon of global warming has been a thing for a few decades and theoretically we’ve been doing things to mitigate it, so this could be seen as a “see guys, the things we are doing are working!” type thing. 

    Based on what I've seen we're nowhere close to that yet. 

    @mld-woody said:

    Based on what I've seen we're nowhere close to that yet. 

    But the ice is growing!

    It astounds me that the concept of global warming has such magnificent legs. That’s a news term for a storyline that captures attentions for a long, long time. Here we are in the Trump part 2 phase and it’s still a hot topic for people who don’t read the articles they post. It’s so captivating it’s not even worth reading about. 

    I’m open minded about it all. So open minded that l don’t even have much of an opinion about it. It’s complex stuff and there is no sense of urgency to have an opinion on it.

    I already consider myself a conservationist. Clean air, clean water, parks and wildlife, l’m into it. And so are all of you. We’ve had these discussions. 

    It’s weird to me that global warming has become this strange sticking point to make us think that we don’t all want the same thing. 

  • @mld-woody said:

    Based on what I've seen we're nowhere close to that yet. 

    But the ice is growing!

    It astounds me that the concept of global warming has such magnificent legs. That’s a news term for a storyline that captures attentions for a long, long time. Here we are in the Trump part 2 phase and it’s still a hot topic for people who don’t read the articles they post. It’s so captivating it’s not even worth reading about. 

    I’m open minded about it all. So open minded that l don’t even have much of an opinion about it. It’s complex stuff and there is no sense of urgency to have an opinion on it.

    I already consider myself a conservationist. Clean air, clean water, parks and wildlife, l’m into it. And so are all of you. We’ve had these discussions. 

    It’s weird to me that global warming has become this strange sticking point to make us think that we don’t all want the same thing. 

    @ibleedbrown said:

    But the ice is growing!

    It astounds me that the concept of global warming has such magnificent legs. That’s a news term for a storyline that captures attentions for a long, long time. Here we are in the Trump part 2 phase and it’s still a hot topic for people who don’t read the articles they post. It’s so captivating it’s not even worth reading about. 

    I’m open minded about it all. So open minded that l don’t even have much of an opinion about it. It’s complex stuff and there is no sense of urgency to have an opinion on it.

    I already consider myself a conservationist. Clean air, clean water, parks and wildlife, l’m into it. And so are all of you. We’ve had these discussions. 

    It’s weird to me that global warming has become this strange sticking point to make us think that we don’t all want the same thing. 

    Politics. 

    The science and experts will tell you we need to make some real changes to avoid serious consequences down the road

    Those changes will impact certain powerful lobbies, like oil and gas

    Those lobbies fund politicians that will prevent regulations and push for "free market" policies that allow the companies to continue to make money

    Those politicians push views to their constituents and you get the politicization of a scientific issue

  • and. excuses why "they couldn't read it" coming soon:

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1112950/

    Many climate change scientists do not agree that global warming is happening

  • The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change asserts the conclusion that most (more than 50 per cent) of the post-1950 global warming is due to human activity, chiefly greenhouse gas emissions and land use change. But it does not survey its own contributors, let alone anyone else, so we do not know how many
  • Despite searching just over a year's worth of the scientific literature on global warming and climate change, one man's exhaustive search could turn up only a single paper that dissented from the ...
  • more and more HONEST scientists are coming around to agree with

    mmgw NOT BEING a crisis

    Following the U.S. Senate's vote today on a global warming measure (see today's AP article: Senate Defeats Climate Change Measure,) it is an opportune time to examine the recent and quite remarkable momentum shift taking place in climate science. Many former believers in catastrophic man-made global warming have
  • Only a 5 spot. A minor meltdown. Come on Calf.

  • READ THIS, woodpecker. haha, haha, haha.

    https://nypost.com/2023/08/09/climate-scientist-admits-the-overwhelming-consensus-is-manufactured/

    Scientist admits the ‘overwhelming consensus’ on the climate change crisis is ‘manufactured’

  • READ THIS, woodpecker. haha, haha, haha.

    https://nypost.com/2023/08/09/climate-scientist-admits-the-overwhelming-consensus-is-manufactured/

    Scientist admits the ‘overwhelming consensus’ on the climate change crisis is ‘manufactured’

    @calfoxwc said:

    READ THIS, woodpecker. haha, haha, haha.

    https://nypost.com/2023/08/09/climate-scientist-admits-the-overwhelming-consensus-is-manufactured/

    Scientist admits the ‘overwhelming consensus’ on the climate change crisis is ‘manufactured’

    There’s 7, in to manic meltdown territory.

  • @ibleedbrown said:

    But the ice is growing!

    It astounds me that the concept of global warming has such magnificent legs. That’s a news term for a storyline that captures attentions for a long, long time. Here we are in the Trump part 2 phase and it’s still a hot topic for people who don’t read the articles they post. It’s so captivating it’s not even worth reading about. 

    I’m open minded about it all. So open minded that l don’t even have much of an opinion about it. It’s complex stuff and there is no sense of urgency to have an opinion on it.

    I already consider myself a conservationist. Clean air, clean water, parks and wildlife, l’m into it. And so are all of you. We’ve had these discussions. 

    It’s weird to me that global warming has become this strange sticking point to make us think that we don’t all want the same thing. 

    Politics. 

    The science and experts will tell you we need to make some real changes to avoid serious consequences down the road

    Those changes will impact certain powerful lobbies, like oil and gas

    Those lobbies fund politicians that will prevent regulations and push for "free market" policies that allow the companies to continue to make money

    Those politicians push views to their constituents and you get the politicization of a scientific issue

    @mld-woody said:

    Politics. 

    The science and experts will tell you we need to make some real changes to avoid serious consequences down the road

    Those changes will impact certain powerful lobbies, like oil and gas

    Those lobbies fund politicians that will prevent regulations and push for "free market" policies that allow the companies to continue to make money

    Those politicians push views to their constituents and you get the politicization of a scientific issue

    REAL CHANGES?

    Like giving the EU billions of dollars so they can down the planetary thermostat?

    You’re fucking hilarious. ? 

  • @mld-woody said:

    Politics. 

    The science and experts will tell you we need to make some real changes to avoid serious consequences down the road

    Those changes will impact certain powerful lobbies, like oil and gas

    Those lobbies fund politicians that will prevent regulations and push for "free market" policies that allow the companies to continue to make money

    Those politicians push views to their constituents and you get the politicization of a scientific issue

    REAL CHANGES?

    Like giving the EU billions of dollars so they can down the planetary thermostat?

    You’re fucking hilarious. ? 

    @canton-dawg said:

    REAL CHANGES?

    Like giving the EU billions of dollars so they can down the planetary thermostat?

    You’re fucking hilarious. ? 

    If that’s your hang up about global warming then those things aren’t mutually exclusive. You can be pro, anti or ambivalent about global warming and not be supportive of giving money to the EU. You can be not in favor of giving money to the EU simply because you’re not in favor of giving money to the EU.  

  • @calfoxwc said:

    READ THIS, woodpecker. haha, haha, haha.

    https://nypost.com/2023/08/09/climate-scientist-admits-the-overwhelming-consensus-is-manufactured/

    Scientist admits the ‘overwhelming consensus’ on the climate change crisis is ‘manufactured’

    There’s 7, in to manic meltdown territory.

    @ibleedbrown said:

    There’s 7, in to manic meltdown territory.

    Yeah I'm very over his Google search post tantrums. All on shit that has been covered before on here. All shit he ignored then and will ignore now. 

    Though it is always hilarious when he posts an article he thinks backs him up and then it says the opposite 

  • @ibleedbrown said:

    There’s 7, in to manic meltdown territory.

    Yeah I'm very over his Google search post tantrums. All on shit that has been covered before on here. All shit he ignored then and will ignore now. 

    Though it is always hilarious when he posts an article he thinks backs him up and then it says the opposite 

    @mld-woody said:

    *fart*

    and yet, you miss the point, still.

    I often post articles with both sides presented, to show your stupid

    one-sided alarmist crap is complete nonsense.

      You peck "the science says..." when we can easily show the science

    is not conclusive, because so many scientists disagree.

      You run and hide from all the facts, but you are just another one of the left-wing hacks.

    image.thumb.jpeg.3c92beace65284356f8c75e129cd2353.jpeg

  • @mld-woody said:

    *fart*

    and yet, you miss the point, still.

    I often post articles with both sides presented, to show your stupid

    one-sided alarmist crap is complete nonsense.

      You peck "the science says..." when we can easily show the science

    is not conclusive, because so many scientists disagree.

      You run and hide from all the facts, but you are just another one of the left-wing hacks.

    image.thumb.jpeg.3c92beace65284356f8c75e129cd2353.jpeg

    @calfoxwc said:

    and yet, you miss the point, still.

    I often post articles with both sides presented, to show your stupid

    one-sided alarmist crap is complete nonsense.

      You peck "the science says..." when we can easily show the science

    is not conclusive, because so many scientists disagree.

      You run and hide from all the facts, but you are just another one of the left-wing hacks.

    image.thumb.jpeg.3c92beace65284356f8c75e129cd2353.jpeg

    You truly live in your own, made up reality 

  • @mld-woody said:

    *fart*

    and yet, you miss the point, still.

    I often post articles with both sides presented, to show your stupid

    one-sided alarmist crap is complete nonsense.

      You peck "the science says..." when we can easily show the science

    is not conclusive, because so many scientists disagree.

      You run and hide from all the facts, but you are just another one of the left-wing hacks.

    image.thumb.jpeg.3c92beace65284356f8c75e129cd2353.jpeg

    @calfoxwc said:

    and yet, you miss the point, still.

    I often post articles with both sides presented, to show your stupid

    one-sided alarmist crap is complete nonsense.

      You peck "the science says..." when we can easily show the science

    is not conclusive, because so many scientists disagree.

      You run and hide from all the facts, but you are just another one of the left-wing hacks.

    image.thumb.jpeg.3c92beace65284356f8c75e129cd2353.jpeg

    It’s become crystal clear that you don’t even read the articles you post. You put so little effort into it that you don’t even know you can’t read an article, like in the OP. 

    It puts the rest of us in a position where it’s not worth our time to read and discuss them with you because you don’t even know what you posted. It’s not a recipe that raises the bar on intellectual discourse here. 

    It may be that the best you have to offer us is spam, zany antics and woodpecker memes. 

  • I don't see you guys backing up your opinions with useful info.

  • JaxJ Jax

    I don't see you guys backing up your opinions with useful info.

    @jax said:

    I don't see you guys backing up your opinions with useful info.

    Well we know for sure Woody never will.. He just spews what the lib media tells him to...

  • He may point to a hurricane or something for good measure.

  • JaxJ Jax

    He may point to a hurricane or something for good measure.

    @jax said:

    He may point to a hurricane or something for good measure.

    Or a typhoon in southeast Asia...