The MAC is Back!
-
For a team perhaps. Maybe for a QB. Although nobody will say that Marino and Moon weren’t two of the best pure passing QB’s to ever play the game and between them they have zero championships.
On my list, Hines Ward has just as many rings as his two Steeler teammates in the original list. I wouldn’t even put him close to Moss’s impact though.
If I’m not mistaken, Moss was not on any of the Patriot championship teams? So does that mean by your criteria that Ward has had more impact than Moss? Ridiculous.
-
For a team perhaps. Maybe for a QB. Although nobody will say that Marino and Moon weren’t two of the best pure passing QB’s to ever play the game and between them they have zero championships.
On my list, Hines Ward has just as many rings as his two Steeler teammates in the original list. I wouldn’t even put him close to Moss’s impact though.
If I’m not mistaken, Moss was not on any of the Patriot championship teams? So does that mean by your criteria that Ward has had more impact than Moss? Ridiculous.
For a team perhaps. Maybe for a QB. Although nobody will say that Marino and Moon weren’t two of the best pure passing QB’s to ever play the game and between them they have zero championships.
On my list, Hines Ward has just as many rings as his two Steeler teammates in the original list. I wouldn’t even put him close to Moss’s impact though.
If I’m not mistaken, Moss was not on any of the Patriot championship teams? So does that mean by your criteria that Ward has had more impact than Moss? Ridiculous.
Thaak. I defined impact for my reply. What's your definition? Stick your neck out too. Naysaying is too easy and I thought you were above that from your other posts. I have been wrong before though.
You haven't listed three players from the last ten years (or even from the same conference) either. Play JoeSixPat's game right.
And, yes, by my criteria Ward outranks Moss, doesn't he? Count the rings, that's why people play the game, not individual stats. The Steelers definitely agree Ward had more impact. Oh, yeah, you picked a SB MVP for your example, talk about impact.
In fairness to Moss he did put the Pats up with 2:50 to go in LXII before Eli got lucky.
So, to compare apples and apples, I think you should go find three guys from the same college conference who excelled at their positions with more rings for the last decade. No fair listing long snappers.
Otherwise define what you mean by impact so that I might have access to where you are coming from.
Also, ridiculous? Up your ass with ridiculous. Or maybe you could just shove that fish in your avatar up there.
-
Peyton Manning, Fred Taylor (about 12,000 Rushing yard to moss 14,000 Recieving yards at a position yards are easier to get seeing how they have 1 or 2 maybe at most 3 defenders while a RB has between 3-9 defenders at a time), Javon Kearse
hm that was pretty easy
any more questions?
Impact for me ultimately means championships. The list BuckeyeBest2 gave has far less rings than JoeSixPat's list. Joe's list has had more impact.
c-dawg said:
Impact for me ultimately means championships. The list BuckeyeBest2 gave has far less rings than JoeSixPat's list. Joe's list has had more impact.exept that logic has a huge flaw
by your logic Dan Marino never made an impact in the NFL
-
For a team perhaps. Maybe for a QB. Although nobody will say that Marino and Moon weren’t two of the best pure passing QB’s to ever play the game and between them they have zero championships.
On my list, Hines Ward has just as many rings as his two Steeler teammates in the original list. I wouldn’t even put him close to Moss’s impact though.
If I’m not mistaken, Moss was not on any of the Patriot championship teams? So does that mean by your criteria that Ward has had more impact than Moss? Ridiculous.
Thaak. I defined impact for my reply. What's your definition? Stick your neck out too. Naysaying is too easy and I thought you were above that from your other posts. I have been wrong before though.
You haven't listed three players from the last ten years (or even from the same conference) either. Play JoeSixPat's game right.
And, yes, by my criteria Ward outranks Moss, doesn't he? Count the rings, that's why people play the game, not individual stats. The Steelers definitely agree Ward had more impact. Oh, yeah, you picked a SB MVP for your example, talk about impact.
In fairness to Moss he did put the Pats up with 2:50 to go in LXII before Eli got lucky.
So, to compare apples and apples, I think you should go find three guys from the same college conference who excelled at their positions with more rings for the last decade. No fair listing long snappers.
Otherwise define what you mean by impact so that I might have access to where you are coming from.
Also, ridiculous? Up your ass with ridiculous. Or maybe you could just shove that fish in your avatar up there.
c-dawg said:
Thaak. I defined impact for my reply. What's your definition? Stick your neck out too. Naysaying is too easy and I thought you were above that from your other posts. I have been wrong before though.You haven't listed three players from the last ten years (or even from the same conference) either. Play JoeSixPat's game right.
And, yes, by my criteria Ward outranks Moss, doesn't he? Count the rings, that's why people play the game, not individual stats. The Steelers definitely agree Ward had more impact. Oh, yeah, you picked a SB MVP for your example, talk about impact.
In fairness to Moss he did put the Pats up with 2:50 to go in LXII before Eli got lucky.
So, to compare apples and apples, I think you should go find three guys from the same college conference who excelled at their positions with more rings for the last decade. No fair listing long snappers.
Otherwise define what you mean by impact so that I might have access to where you are coming from.
Also, ridiculous? Up your ass with ridiculous. Or maybe you could just shove that fish in your avatar up there.
Rings=TEAM accomplishment with FO, Coaching and great players all around
Impact=Individual on their own
argument over case closed
-
For a team perhaps. Maybe for a QB. Although nobody will say that Marino and Moon weren’t two of the best pure passing QB’s to ever play the game and between them they have zero championships.
On my list, Hines Ward has just as many rings as his two Steeler teammates in the original list. I wouldn’t even put him close to Moss’s impact though.
If I’m not mistaken, Moss was not on any of the Patriot championship teams? So does that mean by your criteria that Ward has had more impact than Moss? Ridiculous.
Thaak. I defined impact for my reply. What's your definition? Stick your neck out too. Naysaying is too easy and I thought you were above that from your other posts. I have been wrong before though.
You haven't listed three players from the last ten years (or even from the same conference) either. Play JoeSixPat's game right.
And, yes, by my criteria Ward outranks Moss, doesn't he? Count the rings, that's why people play the game, not individual stats. The Steelers definitely agree Ward had more impact. Oh, yeah, you picked a SB MVP for your example, talk about impact.
In fairness to Moss he did put the Pats up with 2:50 to go in LXII before Eli got lucky.
So, to compare apples and apples, I think you should go find three guys from the same college conference who excelled at their positions with more rings for the last decade. No fair listing long snappers.
Otherwise define what you mean by impact so that I might have access to where you are coming from.
Also, ridiculous? Up your ass with ridiculous. Or maybe you could just shove that fish in your avatar up there.
c-dawg said:
Thaak. I defined impact for my reply. What's your definition? Stick your neck out too. Naysaying is too easy and I thought you were above that from your other posts. I have been wrong before though.You haven't listed three players from the last ten years (or even from the same conference) either. Play JoeSixPat's game right.
And, yes, by my criteria Ward outranks Moss, doesn't he? Count the rings, that's why people play the game, not individual stats. The Steelers definitely agree Ward had more impact. Oh, yeah, you picked a SB MVP for your example, talk about impact.
In fairness to Moss he did put the Pats up with 2:50 to go in LXII before Eli got lucky.
So, to compare apples and apples, I think you should go find three guys from the same college conference who excelled at their positions with more rings for the last decade. No fair listing long snappers.
Otherwise define what you mean by impact so that I might have access to where you are coming from.
Also, ridiculous? Up your ass with ridiculous. Or maybe you could just shove that fish in your avatar up there.
Rings=TEAM accomplishment with FO, Coaching and great players all around
Impact=Individual on their own
argument over case closed
-
c-dawg said:
Thaak. I defined impact for my reply. What's your definition? Stick your neck out too. Naysaying is too easy and I thought you were above that from your other posts. I have been wrong before though.You haven't listed three players from the last ten years (or even from the same conference) either. Play JoeSixPat's game right.
And, yes, by my criteria Ward outranks Moss, doesn't he? Count the rings, that's why people play the game, not individual stats. The Steelers definitely agree Ward had more impact. Oh, yeah, you picked a SB MVP for your example, talk about impact.
In fairness to Moss he did put the Pats up with 2:50 to go in LXII before Eli got lucky.
So, to compare apples and apples, I think you should go find three guys from the same college conference who excelled at their positions with more rings for the last decade. No fair listing long snappers.
Otherwise define what you mean by impact so that I might have access to where you are coming from.
Also, ridiculous? Up your ass with ridiculous. Or maybe you could just shove that fish in your avatar up there.
Rings=TEAM accomplishment with FO, Coaching and great players all around
Impact=Individual on their own
argument over case closed
Rings=TEAM accomplishment with FO, Coaching and great players all around
Impact=Individual on their own
argument over case closed
The only thing closed is your mind brother.
Cuz Peyton throws to himself, Fred Taylor blocks for himself and Javon Kearse outmaneuvers the Oline all by himself. Oh yeah, and they coached themselves too and called all their own plays. Right.
"Individual on their own" is generally an impossibility in football, except for things like yards after a catch. It's a team sport there sport.
I notice you love to try to curtail discussions when you think you have a trump card. I don't think you are playing with a full deck, however.
Also, you said: "exept that logic has a huge flaw, by your logic Dan Marino never made an impact in the NFL"
Again, Dan Marino hasn't played in the last decade which was the point to JoeSixPat's challenge. Can you even focus or do you not know what decade means?
-
Rings=TEAM accomplishment with FO, Coaching and great players all around
Impact=Individual on their own
argument over case closed
The only thing closed is your mind brother.
Cuz Peyton throws to himself, Fred Taylor blocks for himself and Javon Kearse outmaneuvers the Oline all by himself. Oh yeah, and they coached themselves too and called all their own plays. Right.
"Individual on their own" is generally an impossibility in football, except for things like yards after a catch. It's a team sport there sport.
I notice you love to try to curtail discussions when you think you have a trump card. I don't think you are playing with a full deck, however.
Also, you said: "exept that logic has a huge flaw, by your logic Dan Marino never made an impact in the NFL"
Again, Dan Marino hasn't played in the last decade which was the point to JoeSixPat's challenge. Can you even focus or do you not know what decade means?
c-dawg said:
The only thing closed is your mind brother.Cuz Peyton throws to himself, Fred Taylor blocks for himself and Javon Kearse outmaneuvers the Oline all by himself. Oh yeah, and they coached themselves too and called all their own plays. Right.
"Individual on their own" is generally an impossibility in football, except for things like yards after a catch. It's a team sport there sport.
I notice you love to try to curtail discussions when you think you have a trump card. I don't think you are playing with a full deck, however.
Also, you said: "exept that logic has a huge flaw, by your logic Dan Marino never made an impact in the NFL"
Again, Dan Marino hasn't played in the last decade which was the point to JoeSixPat's challenge. Can you even focus or do you not know what decade means?
Rings=team
impact=individual
fact
discussion over
deal with it
in your opinion=Dan Marino=not a good QB since he doesnt have any rings
thats says it allabout what little you know about football
-
Rings=TEAM accomplishment with FO, Coaching and great players all around
Impact=Individual on their own
argument over case closed
The only thing closed is your mind brother.
Cuz Peyton throws to himself, Fred Taylor blocks for himself and Javon Kearse outmaneuvers the Oline all by himself. Oh yeah, and they coached themselves too and called all their own plays. Right.
"Individual on their own" is generally an impossibility in football, except for things like yards after a catch. It's a team sport there sport.
I notice you love to try to curtail discussions when you think you have a trump card. I don't think you are playing with a full deck, however.
Also, you said: "exept that logic has a huge flaw, by your logic Dan Marino never made an impact in the NFL"
Again, Dan Marino hasn't played in the last decade which was the point to JoeSixPat's challenge. Can you even focus or do you not know what decade means?
c-dawg said:
The only thing closed is your mind brother.Cuz Peyton throws to himself, Fred Taylor blocks for himself and Javon Kearse outmaneuvers the Oline all by himself. Oh yeah, and they coached themselves too and called all their own plays. Right.
"Individual on their own" is generally an impossibility in football, except for things like yards after a catch. It's a team sport there sport.
I notice you love to try to curtail discussions when you think you have a trump card. I don't think you are playing with a full deck, however.
Also, you said: "exept that logic has a huge flaw, by your logic Dan Marino never made an impact in the NFL"
Again, Dan Marino hasn't played in the last decade which was the point to JoeSixPat's challenge. Can you even focus or do you not know what decade means?
Rings=team
impact=individual
fact
discussion over
deal with it
in your opinion=Dan Marino=not a good QB since he doesnt have any rings
thats says it allabout what little you know about football
-
c-dawg said:
The only thing closed is your mind brother.Cuz Peyton throws to himself, Fred Taylor blocks for himself and Javon Kearse outmaneuvers the Oline all by himself. Oh yeah, and they coached themselves too and called all their own plays. Right.
"Individual on their own" is generally an impossibility in football, except for things like yards after a catch. It's a team sport there sport.
I notice you love to try to curtail discussions when you think you have a trump card. I don't think you are playing with a full deck, however.
Also, you said: "exept that logic has a huge flaw, by your logic Dan Marino never made an impact in the NFL"
Again, Dan Marino hasn't played in the last decade which was the point to JoeSixPat's challenge. Can you even focus or do you not know what decade means?
Rings=team
impact=individual
fact
discussion over
deal with it
in your opinion=Dan Marino=not a good QB since he doesnt have any rings
thats says it allabout what little you know about football
Rings=team
impact=individual
fact
discussion over
deal with it
in your opinion=Dan Marino=not a good QB since he doesnt have any rings
thats says it allabout what little you know about football
Now I know. Mods, this is Bubby.
-
c-dawg said:
The only thing closed is your mind brother.Cuz Peyton throws to himself, Fred Taylor blocks for himself and Javon Kearse outmaneuvers the Oline all by himself. Oh yeah, and they coached themselves too and called all their own plays. Right.
"Individual on their own" is generally an impossibility in football, except for things like yards after a catch. It's a team sport there sport.
I notice you love to try to curtail discussions when you think you have a trump card. I don't think you are playing with a full deck, however.
Also, you said: "exept that logic has a huge flaw, by your logic Dan Marino never made an impact in the NFL"
Again, Dan Marino hasn't played in the last decade which was the point to JoeSixPat's challenge. Can you even focus or do you not know what decade means?
Rings=team
impact=individual
fact
discussion over
deal with it
in your opinion=Dan Marino=not a good QB since he doesnt have any rings
thats says it allabout what little you know about football
Rings=team
impact=individual
fact
discussion over
deal with it
in your opinion=Dan Marino=not a good QB since he doesnt have any rings
thats says it allabout what little you know about football
Rings: What your boyfriend bought at the jewelry store for your upcoming marriage.
Impact: Describes the new dance moves you have been showcasing on Fire Island, they are faaaaaaabulous!
Fact: Your head resides in your ass.
-
For a team perhaps. Maybe for a QB. Although nobody will say that Marino and Moon weren’t two of the best pure passing QB’s to ever play the game and between them they have zero championships.
On my list, Hines Ward has just as many rings as his two Steeler teammates in the original list. I wouldn’t even put him close to Moss’s impact though.
If I’m not mistaken, Moss was not on any of the Patriot championship teams? So does that mean by your criteria that Ward has had more impact than Moss? Ridiculous.
Thaak. I defined impact for my reply. What's your definition? Stick your neck out too. Naysaying is too easy and I thought you were above that from your other posts. I have been wrong before though.
You haven't listed three players from the last ten years (or even from the same conference) either. Play JoeSixPat's game right.
And, yes, by my criteria Ward outranks Moss, doesn't he? Count the rings, that's why people play the game, not individual stats. The Steelers definitely agree Ward had more impact. Oh, yeah, you picked a SB MVP for your example, talk about impact.
In fairness to Moss he did put the Pats up with 2:50 to go in LXII before Eli got lucky.
So, to compare apples and apples, I think you should go find three guys from the same college conference who excelled at their positions with more rings for the last decade. No fair listing long snappers.
Otherwise define what you mean by impact so that I might have access to where you are coming from.
Also, ridiculous? Up your ass with ridiculous. Or maybe you could just shove that fish in your avatar up there.
c-dawg said:
Thaak. I defined impact for my reply. What's your definition? Stick your neck out too. Naysaying is too easy and I thought you were above that from your other posts. I have been wrong before though.You haven't listed three players from the last ten years (or even from the same conference) either. Play JoeSixPat's game right.
And, yes, by my criteria Ward outranks Moss, doesn't he? Count the rings, that's why people play the game, not individual stats. The Steelers definitely agree Ward had more impact. Oh, yeah, you picked a SB MVP for your example, talk about impact.
In fairness to Moss he did put the Pats up with 2:50 to go in LXII before Eli got lucky.
So, to compare apples and apples, I think you should go find three guys from the same college conference who excelled at their positions with more rings for the last decade. No fair listing long snappers.
Otherwise define what you mean by impact so that I might have access to where you are coming from.
Also, ridiculous? Up your ass with ridiculous. Or maybe you could just shove that fish in your avatar up there.
Um, my huge list from above, are all SEC players. Check it out. Read that whole post and I actually do pick 3 players specifically to compare.
My definition of impact:
Any impact player must be at least one and preferably most if not all of the following:
1) Individually if you get the records for yardage or scoring (i.e. Jerry Rice, Randy Moss, Dan Marino)
2) Individually if you change the nature by which your position is played (i.e. Michael Vick (arguable), Peyton Manning, Lawrence Taylor, Roger Craig)
3) If you inspire others to play great around you (Ray Lewis, John Elway, Joshua Cribbs)
4) If the player’s absence (includes taking plays off) would be felt and potentially cause wins to come much tougher or losses to occur (Mike Baab, Randy Moss, Emitt Smith)
5) If just saying the name inspires fear in other players and fans (Jim Brown, Mean Joe Greene, Joe Montana, Ronnie Lott, Joshua Cribbs)
A single impact player is not likely to get you to, or win you the super bowl. But several impact players certainly can and will.
-
c-dawg said:
Thaak. I defined impact for my reply. What's your definition? Stick your neck out too. Naysaying is too easy and I thought you were above that from your other posts. I have been wrong before though.You haven't listed three players from the last ten years (or even from the same conference) either. Play JoeSixPat's game right.
And, yes, by my criteria Ward outranks Moss, doesn't he? Count the rings, that's why people play the game, not individual stats. The Steelers definitely agree Ward had more impact. Oh, yeah, you picked a SB MVP for your example, talk about impact.
In fairness to Moss he did put the Pats up with 2:50 to go in LXII before Eli got lucky.
So, to compare apples and apples, I think you should go find three guys from the same college conference who excelled at their positions with more rings for the last decade. No fair listing long snappers.
Otherwise define what you mean by impact so that I might have access to where you are coming from.
Also, ridiculous? Up your ass with ridiculous. Or maybe you could just shove that fish in your avatar up there.
Um, my huge list from above, are all SEC players. Check it out. Read that whole post and I actually do pick 3 players specifically to compare.
My definition of impact:
Any impact player must be at least one and preferably most if not all of the following:
1) Individually if you get the records for yardage or scoring (i.e. Jerry Rice, Randy Moss, Dan Marino)
2) Individually if you change the nature by which your position is played (i.e. Michael Vick (arguable), Peyton Manning, Lawrence Taylor, Roger Craig)
3) If you inspire others to play great around you (Ray Lewis, John Elway, Joshua Cribbs)
4) If the player’s absence (includes taking plays off) would be felt and potentially cause wins to come much tougher or losses to occur (Mike Baab, Randy Moss, Emitt Smith)
5) If just saying the name inspires fear in other players and fans (Jim Brown, Mean Joe Greene, Joe Montana, Ronnie Lott, Joshua Cribbs)
A single impact player is not likely to get you to, or win you the super bowl. But several impact players certainly can and will.
Um, my huge list from above, are all SEC players. Check it out. Read that whole post and I actually do pick 3 players specifically to compare.
My definition of impact:
Any impact player must be at least one and preferably most if not all of the following:
1) Individually if you get the records for yardage or scoring (i.e. Jerry Rice, Randy Moss, Dan Marino)
2) Individually if you change the nature by which your position is played (i.e. Michael Vick (arguable), Peyton Manning, Lawrence Taylor, Roger Craig)
3) If you inspire others to play great around you (Ray Lewis, John Elway, Joshua Cribbs)
4) If the player’s absence (includes taking plays off) would be felt and potentially cause wins to come much tougher or losses to occur (Mike Baab, Randy Moss, Emitt Smith)
5) If just saying the name inspires fear in other players and fans (Jim Brown, Mean Joe Greene, Joe Montana, Ronnie Lott, Joshua Cribbs)
A single impact player is not likely to get you to, or win you the super bowl. But several impact players certainly can and will.
Sorry for busting on your fish and your ass Thaak, that was a cheap shot. I don't take kindly to being called ridiculous, which I think was also a cheap shot.
-
Um, my huge list from above, are all SEC players. Check it out. Read that whole post and I actually do pick 3 players specifically to compare.
My definition of impact:
Any impact player must be at least one and preferably most if not all of the following:
1) Individually if you get the records for yardage or scoring (i.e. Jerry Rice, Randy Moss, Dan Marino)
2) Individually if you change the nature by which your position is played (i.e. Michael Vick (arguable), Peyton Manning, Lawrence Taylor, Roger Craig)
3) If you inspire others to play great around you (Ray Lewis, John Elway, Joshua Cribbs)
4) If the player’s absence (includes taking plays off) would be felt and potentially cause wins to come much tougher or losses to occur (Mike Baab, Randy Moss, Emitt Smith)
5) If just saying the name inspires fear in other players and fans (Jim Brown, Mean Joe Greene, Joe Montana, Ronnie Lott, Joshua Cribbs)
A single impact player is not likely to get you to, or win you the super bowl. But several impact players certainly can and will.
Sorry for busting on your fish and your ass Thaak, that was a cheap shot. I don't take kindly to being called ridiculous, which I think was also a cheap shot.
c-dawg said:
Sorry for busting on your fish and your ass Thaak, that was a cheap shot. I don't take kindly to being called ridiculous, which I think was also a cheap shot.It is only a cheap shot if it doesn’t actually apply but could based on perception.
My assertion was not a cheap shot, because your assertion was ridiculous.
-
c-dawg said:
Sorry for busting on your fish and your ass Thaak, that was a cheap shot. I don't take kindly to being called ridiculous, which I think was also a cheap shot.It is only a cheap shot if it doesn’t actually apply but could based on perception.
My assertion was not a cheap shot, because your assertion was ridiculous.
It is only a cheap shot if it doesn’t actually apply but could based on perception.
My assertion was not a cheap shot, because your assertion was ridiculous.
Ah Thaak. You failed that test like a true chump. Thought so.
You provide a huge list of SEC players only to fail in naming three that outpaced JoeSixPat's list. You say that Harvin and others have the potential to be better than Moss. That doesn't cut it.
I say that you have the potential to be a world class turd burglar.
Oh, go ahead and stick that ridiculous fish back up your ridiculous ass.
-
It is only a cheap shot if it doesn’t actually apply but could based on perception.
My assertion was not a cheap shot, because your assertion was ridiculous.
Ah Thaak. You failed that test like a true chump. Thought so.
You provide a huge list of SEC players only to fail in naming three that outpaced JoeSixPat's list. You say that Harvin and others have the potential to be better than Moss. That doesn't cut it.
I say that you have the potential to be a world class turd burglar.
Oh, go ahead and stick that ridiculous fish back up your ridiculous ass.
c-dawg said:
Ah Thaak. You failed that test like a true chump. Thought so.You provide a huge list of SEC players only to fail in naming three that outpaced JoeSixPat's list. You say that Harvin and others have the potential to be better than Moss. That doesn't cut it.
I say that you have the potential to be a world class turd burglar.
Oh, go ahead and stick that ridiculous fish back up your ridiculous ass.
What’s your malfunction man?
I named two that were far and away more impact than two on his list. Go re-read my post. If you can’t figure out the two I listed, I might just list them for you again.
I can’t name one that has had more impact than Moss. But there are impact players from the SEC that are WR’s.
-
c-dawg said:
Ah Thaak. You failed that test like a true chump. Thought so.You provide a huge list of SEC players only to fail in naming three that outpaced JoeSixPat's list. You say that Harvin and others have the potential to be better than Moss. That doesn't cut it.
I say that you have the potential to be a world class turd burglar.
Oh, go ahead and stick that ridiculous fish back up your ridiculous ass.
What’s your malfunction man?
I named two that were far and away more impact than two on his list. Go re-read my post. If you can’t figure out the two I listed, I might just list them for you again.
I can’t name one that has had more impact than Moss. But there are impact players from the SEC that are WR’s.
What’s your malfunction man?
I named two that were far and away more impact than two on his list. Go re-read my post. If you can’t figure out the two I listed, I might just list them for you again.
I can’t name one that has had more impact than Moss. But there are impact players from the SEC that are WR’s.
Biggest problem with you; you can only work with your own definition. Others' definitions are ridiculous. You started the name calling, and now wanna be the voice of reason. Nice. Put it with the fish, you know where...
I read your post, too, so no need to threaten to relist them...Oh, and by my definition Ben and Harrison's titles trump Peyton and Haynesworth's titles.
-
What’s your malfunction man?
I named two that were far and away more impact than two on his list. Go re-read my post. If you can’t figure out the two I listed, I might just list them for you again.
I can’t name one that has had more impact than Moss. But there are impact players from the SEC that are WR’s.
Biggest problem with you; you can only work with your own definition. Others' definitions are ridiculous. You started the name calling, and now wanna be the voice of reason. Nice. Put it with the fish, you know where...
I read your post, too, so no need to threaten to relist them...Oh, and by my definition Ben and Harrison's titles trump Peyton and Haynesworth's titles.
c-dawg said:
Biggest problem with you; you can only work with your own definition. Others' definitions are ridiculous. You started the name calling, and now wanna be the voice of reason. Nice. Put it with the fish, you know where...I read your post, too, so no need to threaten to relist them...Oh, and by my definition Ben and Harrison's titles trump Peyton and Haynesworth's titles.
I’m more than willing to listen to what others have to say. But by your definition the Steeler’s long snapper is more of an impact player than Peyton Manning.
Ridiculous.
-
And this is on the main BROWNS board why?
And this is on the main BROWNS board why?
It's fun conversation this time of year K-town! I like the high intensity it brings. BTW, welcome aboard! Glad to see you getting involved in the mix!
- Tom F.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login