Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Nick Fairley Or Marcell Dareus

Nick Fairley Or Marcell Dareus

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
28 Posts 15 Posters 2.0k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • secondwave S Conversation Starter Dedicated Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
    • 431 Posts
    • 50 Reputation
    S secondwave wrote on last edited by
    #2

    Dareus.

    If people are expecting them to come out like Suh, they're mistaken. To re-iterate, Fairley didn't come off as thick, but fat. Dareus looked impressive at the combine.

    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • WRREBEL WRREBELW
      • 2k Posts
      • 87 Reputation
      WRREBELW WRREBEL wrote on last edited by
      #3

      Fairley for his celebrations alone

      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • Harry Buffalo Harry BuffaloH
        • 3k Posts
        • 241 Reputation
        Harry BuffaloH Harry Buffalo wrote on last edited by
        #4

        I think Darius just for the fact that he won't draw as many personal fouls and Fairley will. Plus Darius isn't a one hit wonder like Fairley is. Both have lied though... Fairley saying that he was 6'5" to help his draft stock and Darius saying he ran a 4.5-4.6 for the same reason. Darius does have injury concerns but they are not huge injures, just small stuff. But now there are basically swapped with each other. People are talking about Darius going first and Farley falling so we will just have to wait and see how everything pans out.

        Ruining threads since 1897.
        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • LeBrent L
          • 192 Posts
          • 7 Reputation
          L LeBrent wrote on last edited by LeBrent
          #5

          I thought they both looked great at the combine.

          When you watch Fairley on tape, his first step is probably the best in college football. The ten-yard split doesn't take into account reactions to the snap, to the o-line, ect. (Though Dareus time was unbelievable for 320 lbs).

          I'll take Fairley because I think he can be an elite 3-technique pass rushing tackle next to a more stout Rubin. That combo would be a great start to a D-line and I think they would complement each other perfectly.

          If the team is convinced Fairley is a hard-worker and doesn't have character issues than I think he would be the choice.

          I like them both a lot though.

          ClevelandFanForLifeC 1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • L LeBrent

            I thought they both looked great at the combine.

            When you watch Fairley on tape, his first step is probably the best in college football. The ten-yard split doesn't take into account reactions to the snap, to the o-line, ect. (Though Dareus time was unbelievable for 320 lbs).

            I'll take Fairley because I think he can be an elite 3-technique pass rushing tackle next to a more stout Rubin. That combo would be a great start to a D-line and I think they would complement each other perfectly.

            If the team is convinced Fairley is a hard-worker and doesn't have character issues than I think he would be the choice.

            I like them both a lot though.

            ClevelandFanForLife ClevelandFanForLifeC One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
            • 2k Posts
            • 100 Reputation
            ClevelandFanForLifeC ClevelandFanForLife wrote on last edited by
            #6

            @lebrent said:

            I thought they both looked great at the combine.

            When you watch Fairley on tape, his first step is probably the best in college football. The ten-yard split doesn't take into account reactions to the snap, to the o-line, ect. (Though Dareus time was unbelievable for 320 lbs).

            I'll take Fairley because I think he can be an elite 3-technique pass rushing tackle next to a more stout Rubin. That combo would be a great start to a D-line and I think they would complement each other perfectly.

            If the team is convinced Fairley is a hard-worker and doesn't have character issues than I think he would be the choice.

            I like them both a lot though.

            Can someone please explain to me what a 3 technique and 5 technique pass rusher is. I listened to the guys at the combine use both all the time and am lost with their definitions. Also, which one is better for a 4-3 and why. Thanks in advanced.

            once a fan, always a fan. married to a steeler fan. aaaaaaaaah! --andy
            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • LeBrent L
              • 192 Posts
              • 7 Reputation
              L LeBrent wrote on last edited by
              #7

              I'm definitely not an expert on this but I usually think of a 5-technique as a 3-4 DE. They usually line up face up with the OT. The nose-tackle plays directly opposite the center.

              In a 4-3 defense, one tackle plays between the center and a guard. The other (the 3-technique) plays just outside of the guard on the other side. The 3-technique usually is a better pass rusher and is often in a one on one with the guard.

              Here is a really good link that explains the alignment and assignments of each player in both styles of defense and compares the two. It has good pictures and explains it a lot better than I can.

              LINK

              ClevelandFanForLifeC 1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • N Nw220

                Personally id take Dareus because i think Fairley has a higher ceiling but he also has a lower floor, another thing i considered was there 10 yard spilt which they run in the 40 Dareus was alot faster and he is alot bigger. Which means to me he has more explosing coming off the line of Scrimmage...So let me know who you got and why? Theres a very good chance they both could be there when we pick

                CLEVELandMILIDH C
                • 2k Posts
                • 52 Reputation
                C CLEVELandMILIDH wrote on last edited by
                #8

                @nw220 said:

                Personally id take Dareus because i think Fairley has a higher ceiling but he also has a lower floor, another thing i considered was there 10 yard spilt which they run in the 40 Dareus was alot faster and he is alot bigger. Which means to me he has more explosing coming off the line of Scrimmage...So let me know who you got and why? Theres a very good chance they both could be there when we pick

                You can look at the 10 yard splits and say he ran slower, but I dont think you can say he plays football slower. From what I've seen Fairley looks much quicker then Dareus. Marcell looks slow and easily blocked, Fairley's got that killer instict, and a great first step. Some of his aggressiveness is going to have to be tempered down at the next level, but that's easier to do then trying to motivate somebody to be more aggresive. I like him alot at 4-3 DT with his disruptive style, but its more likely Marcell would fall to us, who then I would chose JJ Watt over.

                1st Ezekiel Ansah, DE, BYU 3rd Darius Slay, CB, Mississippi State4th Landry Jones, QB, Oklahoma5th Earl Wolff, S, N.C. State6th Lucas Reed, TE, New Mexico
                cribbs is the manC 1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • wvdawg W
                  • 40 Posts
                  • 1 Reputation
                  W wvdawg wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  dareus's hands are amazing.. that and his size separate him from fairley

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                    • 64k Posts
                    • 8k Reputation
                    C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    Fairley's athleticism and play doesn't do diddley, for an NFL team that drafts him, and has him getting

                    arrested on weapons and assault charges, and or drug charges.

                    Darius' character is fine.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • Nw220 N
                      • 1k Posts
                      • 27 Reputation
                      N Nw220 wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      Agreed about the charcter concerns with Fairley, i see him as alot more cocky and aggroant which could be a good thing or it could make you Chad Ocho Cinco...Warren Sapp was Cocky as well but a hell of a player btw he thinks Dareus is alot better than Fairley

                      A 1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • 7moses7 7 Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Dedicated Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                        • 1k Posts
                        • 248 Reputation
                        7 7moses7 wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        Dareus with Rubin would be a great pair bringing pressure up the middle.Dareus has been a force for more than 1 year.A DE can be found in rounds 2-4 that can solidify the D Line.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • ClevelandBigDawg C
                          • 571 Posts
                          • 8 Reputation
                          C ClevelandBigDawg wrote on last edited by
                          #13

                          Neither if Green and/or Peterson are there, otherwise, Dareus

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • C CLEVELandMILIDH

                            @nw220 said:

                            Personally id take Dareus because i think Fairley has a higher ceiling but he also has a lower floor, another thing i considered was there 10 yard spilt which they run in the 40 Dareus was alot faster and he is alot bigger. Which means to me he has more explosing coming off the line of Scrimmage...So let me know who you got and why? Theres a very good chance they both could be there when we pick

                            You can look at the 10 yard splits and say he ran slower, but I dont think you can say he plays football slower. From what I've seen Fairley looks much quicker then Dareus. Marcell looks slow and easily blocked, Fairley's got that killer instict, and a great first step. Some of his aggressiveness is going to have to be tempered down at the next level, but that's easier to do then trying to motivate somebody to be more aggresive. I like him alot at 4-3 DT with his disruptive style, but its more likely Marcell would fall to us, who then I would chose JJ Watt over.

                            cribbs is the man cribbs is the manC
                            • 272 Posts
                            • 14 Reputation
                            cribbs is the manC cribbs is the man wrote on last edited by
                            #14

                            @clevelandmilidh said:

                            You can look at the 10 yard splits and say he ran slower, but I dont think you can say he plays football slower. From what I've seen Fairley looks much quicker then Dareus. Marcell looks slow and easily blocked, Fairley's got that killer instict, and a great first step. Some of his aggressiveness is going to have to be tempered down at the next level, but that's easier to do then trying to motivate somebody to be more aggresive. I like him alot at 4-3 DT with his disruptive style, but its more likely Marcell would fall to us, who then I would chose JJ Watt over.

                            JJ Watt is not fast enough to be a 4-3 DE and not big enough to be a DT, he is a 3-4 DE and does not fit in our system.

                            C 1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • N Nw220

                              Agreed about the charcter concerns with Fairley, i see him as alot more cocky and aggroant which could be a good thing or it could make you Chad Ocho Cinco...Warren Sapp was Cocky as well but a hell of a player btw he thinks Dareus is alot better than Fairley

                              akronjoe A
                              • 22 Posts
                              • 1 Reputation
                              A akronjoe wrote on last edited by
                              #15

                              @nw220 said:

                              Agreed about the charcter concerns with Fairley, i see him as alot more cocky and aggroant which could be a good thing or it could make you Chad Ocho Cinco...Warren Sapp was Cocky as well but a hell of a player btw he thinks Dareus is alot better than Fairley

                              MAKES ME THINK OF GERRARD WARREN WHO HAD A COLLEGE MEAN STREAK BUT WAS SO SO IN HIS COMMITMENT TO TRAINING.

                              DARIUS NO CONTEST, YET IF FAIRLY...TO HIGH A PICK TO OVERLOOK THE BIG IF.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • secondwave S Conversation Starter Dedicated Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                • 431 Posts
                                • 50 Reputation
                                S secondwave wrote on last edited by
                                #16

                                If only a caps button existed....oh wait

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                Quote Reply
                                • L LeBrent

                                  I'm definitely not an expert on this but I usually think of a 5-technique as a 3-4 DE. They usually line up face up with the OT. The nose-tackle plays directly opposite the center.

                                  In a 4-3 defense, one tackle plays between the center and a guard. The other (the 3-technique) plays just outside of the guard on the other side. The 3-technique usually is a better pass rusher and is often in a one on one with the guard.

                                  Here is a really good link that explains the alignment and assignments of each player in both styles of defense and compares the two. It has good pictures and explains it a lot better than I can.

                                  LINK

                                  ClevelandFanForLife ClevelandFanForLifeC One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                  • 2k Posts
                                  • 100 Reputation
                                  ClevelandFanForLifeC ClevelandFanForLife wrote on last edited by
                                  #17

                                  @lebrent said:

                                  I'm definitely not an expert on this but I usually think of a 5-technique as a 3-4 DE. They usually line up face up with the OT. The nose-tackle plays directly opposite the center.

                                  In a 4-3 defense, one tackle plays between the center and a guard. The other (the 3-technique) plays just outside of the guard on the other side. The 3-technique usually is a better pass rusher and is often in a one on one with the guard.

                                  Here is a really good link that explains the alignment and assignments of each player in both styles of defense and compares the two. It has good pictures and explains it a lot better than I can.

                                  LINK

                                  Awesome thanks a lot.

                                  once a fan, always a fan. married to a steeler fan. aaaaaaaaah! --andy
                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • cribbs is the manC cribbs is the man

                                    @clevelandmilidh said:

                                    You can look at the 10 yard splits and say he ran slower, but I dont think you can say he plays football slower. From what I've seen Fairley looks much quicker then Dareus. Marcell looks slow and easily blocked, Fairley's got that killer instict, and a great first step. Some of his aggressiveness is going to have to be tempered down at the next level, but that's easier to do then trying to motivate somebody to be more aggresive. I like him alot at 4-3 DT with his disruptive style, but its more likely Marcell would fall to us, who then I would chose JJ Watt over.

                                    JJ Watt is not fast enough to be a 4-3 DE and not big enough to be a DT, he is a 3-4 DE and does not fit in our system.

                                    CLEVELandMILIDH C
                                    • 2k Posts
                                    • 52 Reputation
                                    C CLEVELandMILIDH wrote on last edited by CLEVELandMILIDH
                                    #18

                                    @cribbs-is-the-man said:

                                    JJ Watt is not fast enough to be a 4-3 DE and not big enough to be a DT, he is a 3-4 DE and does not fit in our system.

                                    A 4.7 40 is plenty quick enough to play DE. If you wanted to bulk him up to play DT, at 6-5 290lbs he has the prototypical frame to add muscle in a NFL program.

                                    1st Ezekiel Ansah, DE, BYU 3rd Darius Slay, CB, Mississippi State4th Landry Jones, QB, Oklahoma5th Earl Wolff, S, N.C. State6th Lucas Reed, TE, New Mexico
                                    N 1 Reply Last reply
                                    Quote Reply
                                    • C CLEVELandMILIDH

                                      @cribbs-is-the-man said:

                                      JJ Watt is not fast enough to be a 4-3 DE and not big enough to be a DT, he is a 3-4 DE and does not fit in our system.

                                      A 4.7 40 is plenty quick enough to play DE. If you wanted to bulk him up to play DT, at 6-5 290lbs he has the prototypical frame to add muscle in a NFL program.

                                      Nw220 N
                                      • 1k Posts
                                      • 27 Reputation
                                      N Nw220 wrote on last edited by Nw220
                                      #19

                                      @clevelandmilidh said:

                                      A 4.7 40 is plenty quick enough to play DE. If you wanted to bulk him up to play DT, at 6-5 290lbs he has the prototypical frame to add muscle in a NFL program.

                                      In my opinon hes not a fast enough end for the 4-3, a high 4.7 is not a great enough pass rush to have when in the 4-3 you need dynamite ends to get the QB, ala Freeny,Mathis etc..

                                      C 1 Reply Last reply
                                      Quote Reply
                                      • N Nw220

                                        @clevelandmilidh said:

                                        A 4.7 40 is plenty quick enough to play DE. If you wanted to bulk him up to play DT, at 6-5 290lbs he has the prototypical frame to add muscle in a NFL program.

                                        In my opinon hes not a fast enough end for the 4-3, a high 4.7 is not a great enough pass rush to have when in the 4-3 you need dynamite ends to get the QB, ala Freeny,Mathis etc..

                                        CLEVELandMILIDH C
                                        • 2k Posts
                                        • 52 Reputation
                                        C CLEVELandMILIDH wrote on last edited by
                                        #20

                                        @nw220 said:

                                        In my opinon hes not a fast enough end for the 4-3, a high 4.7 is not a great enough pass rush to have when in the 4-3 you need dynamite ends to get the QB, ala Freeny,Mathis etc..

                                        There aren't any DE's in this draft running 4.4's, 4.6 is the best time I've seen a DL run. Watt will make up for that one tenth of a second with his effort and long length and he's got the ability to play either DE or DT.

                                        1st Ezekiel Ansah, DE, BYU 3rd Darius Slay, CB, Mississippi State4th Landry Jones, QB, Oklahoma5th Earl Wolff, S, N.C. State6th Lucas Reed, TE, New Mexico
                                        N 1 Reply Last reply
                                        Quote Reply
                                        • C CLEVELandMILIDH

                                          @nw220 said:

                                          In my opinon hes not a fast enough end for the 4-3, a high 4.7 is not a great enough pass rush to have when in the 4-3 you need dynamite ends to get the QB, ala Freeny,Mathis etc..

                                          There aren't any DE's in this draft running 4.4's, 4.6 is the best time I've seen a DL run. Watt will make up for that one tenth of a second with his effort and long length and he's got the ability to play either DE or DT.

                                          Nw220 N
                                          • 1k Posts
                                          • 27 Reputation
                                          N Nw220 wrote on last edited by Nw220
                                          #21

                                          @clevelandmilidh said:

                                          There aren't any DE's in this draft running 4.4's, 4.6 is the best time I've seen a DL run. Watt will make up for that one tenth of a second with his effort and long length and he's got the ability to play either DE or DT.

                                          I love Watt as a player but i think theres just way to many ppl ahead of him i would take, Peterson,Green or Dareus...If there gone that means Bowers or Fairley might be there and id take them ahead of him as well...And i think Von Miller may be the second best player in this draft and would love for the Browns to grab him..No disrespect to Watt i just see alot of other players that would be there that id rather have tham him..

                                          O and btw way there was a DE from Nevada who ran the fatest 40 time ever for a D-lineman this year, he also led the Ncaa FB Divison1 in tackles for loss

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Quote Reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Theme
                                          • System
                                          • Light
                                          • Dark
                                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Forums
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Donate