My Ideas
-
We are. I was simply stating that if you advocate circumcision because a 0.5% higher chance of a urinary tract infection, then would you also advocate removing all of a woman's breast tissue when no cancer is found and her family has no history of breast cancer? Of course not!
-
I'm still missing your point. 75 percent of breast cancers occur with no family history. It's extrememly prevalent.
Now, I don't favor the gov paying for all people to have circumcisions, OR abortions, Or any other medically unnecessary
procedures. It's for the individuals to take personal responsibility to buy coverage for that kind of thing.
But, abortions and circumcisions are a dominate issue.
Bringing up the nonexistent occurence of women wanting to have completely unecessary mascetomies sp? is hardly any occurence at all.
The analogy isn't valid. Circumcision and abortions are two dominate cultural issues - in every state, every where.
The circumcision issue seems to be anti-religious in nature, since abortion is a favorite liberal issue, even though it is also
completely? medically unnecessary.
-
ok forget the analogy. Bottom line is that medicaid should not be paying for nominal, unnecessary medical procedures.
By the way, it's only a nominal procedure for the parents. The baby boy has no say in it whatsoever.
Also, as a religious issue, really it's only jews that mandate having it done.
-
No, I thought it was Jews that DON'T do it.
I've taken too much of a break today, but it's a holiday.
(the Browns play tonight... GGG)
-
How about ending the medicaid coverage of circumcisions in all states. Why in the world is a completely medically unnecessary procedure covered by medicaid anywhere?
How about ending the medicaid coverage of circumcisions in all states. Why in the world is a completely medically unnecessary procedure covered by medicaid anywhere?
PE, I'm really sorry to bring up religion again, but the real answer is because the Bible says it's part of a covenant. There is no benefit to being circumcised, and you lose sensitivity (thanks for deciding for me, mom and dad). The procedure is nothing more than genital mutilation, and the only reason it's still happening today is because we've been doing it for so long without asking why we're doing it.
-
Bunker said:
there you go again talking about penises. you must like them dirty uncircumcised and full of diseases or infections. why do you think they wrote the book of leviticus? rules to live by for their own well being.
Actually, to be quite honest, some of mine grew back post-circumcision (look up skin bridge, if you want, nsfw). I was scared that girls would get weirded out by it cuz it's different, but the skin bridges are waayyyyyy more sensitive than the rest of my dick. And I don't know about you, but I prefer sex to be as pleasurable as possible. Well, that was probably TMI, but whatever.
-
It's Old Teastament. New Testament says:
Philippians 3:1–3
Finally, my brothers, rejoice in the Lord. To write the same things to you is no trouble to me and is safe for you.
2 Look out for the dogs, look out for the evildoers, look out for those who mutilate the flesh. 3 For we are the circumcision, who worship by the Spirit of God and glory in Christ Jesus and put no confidence in the flesh—
Galatians 2:1–3
Then after fourteen years I went up again to Jerusalem with Barnabas, taking Titus along with me. 2 I went up because of a revelation and set before them (though privately before those who seemed influential) the gospel that I proclaim among the Gentiles, in order to make sure I was not running or had not run in vain. 3 But even Titus, who was with me, was not forced to be circumcised, though he was a Greek.
Galatians 5:1–11
For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision counts for anything, but only faith working through love.
Galatians 6:11–16
11 See with what large letters I am writing to you with my own hand. 12 It is those who want to make a good showing in the flesh who would force you to be circumcised, and only in order that they may not be persecuted for the cross of Christ. 13 For even those who are circumcised do not themselves keep the law, but they desire to have you circumcised that they may boast in your flesh. 14 But far be it from me to boast except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, by which the world has been crucified to me, and I to the world. 15 For neither circumcision counts for anything, nor uncircumcision, but a new creation. 16 And as for all who walk by this rule, peace and mercy be upon them, and upon the Israel of God.
So there you have it. It means nothing to Jesus. It's a Jewish custom. In fact, during the holocaust, German soldiers used it as a way to identify Jewish boys.
My wife and I chose not to have our son done. I invite everyone on here to watch a video showing a helpless baby being circumcised and tell me they would still have it done to their son. We saw it and it's horrific. I don't know how anyone could make their son go through something so terrible. Who cares if he is going to remember it? I would remember the pain I put my child through.
:neutral_face: -
This goes from a thread asking about ideas on how to fix the economy to circumcision? WTF. No wonder why it's getting harder to come back here.
Luck is Tim Couch. Big, Dumb Goofy, slow thinking QB - Ghoolie, 2-28-12 -
Well Medicaid pays for it in some states. It should not. There's some money savings for you.
-
This goes from a thread asking about ideas on how to fix the economy to circumcision? WTF. No wonder why it's getting harder to come back here.
This goes from a thread asking about ideas on how to fix the economy to circumcision? WTF. No wonder why it's getting harder to come back here.
LOL!
-
It's Old Teastament. New Testament says:
Philippians 3:1–3
Finally, my brothers, rejoice in the Lord. To write the same things to you is no trouble to me and is safe for you.
2 Look out for the dogs, look out for the evildoers, look out for those who mutilate the flesh. 3 For we are the circumcision, who worship by the Spirit of God and glory in Christ Jesus and put no confidence in the flesh—
Galatians 2:1–3
Then after fourteen years I went up again to Jerusalem with Barnabas, taking Titus along with me. 2 I went up because of a revelation and set before them (though privately before those who seemed influential) the gospel that I proclaim among the Gentiles, in order to make sure I was not running or had not run in vain. 3 But even Titus, who was with me, was not forced to be circumcised, though he was a Greek.
Galatians 5:1–11
For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision counts for anything, but only faith working through love.
Galatians 6:11–16
11 See with what large letters I am writing to you with my own hand. 12 It is those who want to make a good showing in the flesh who would force you to be circumcised, and only in order that they may not be persecuted for the cross of Christ. 13 For even those who are circumcised do not themselves keep the law, but they desire to have you circumcised that they may boast in your flesh. 14 But far be it from me to boast except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, by which the world has been crucified to me, and I to the world. 15 For neither circumcision counts for anything, nor uncircumcision, but a new creation. 16 And as for all who walk by this rule, peace and mercy be upon them, and upon the Israel of God.
So there you have it. It means nothing to Jesus. It's a Jewish custom. In fact, during the holocaust, German soldiers used it as a way to identify Jewish boys.
My wife and I chose not to have our son done. I invite everyone on here to watch a video showing a helpless baby being circumcised and tell me they would still have it done to their son. We saw it and it's horrific. I don't know how anyone could make their son go through something so terrible. Who cares if he is going to remember it? I would remember the pain I put my child through.
It's Old Teastament. New Testament says:
Philippians 3:1–3
Finally, my brothers, rejoice in the Lord. To write the same things to you is no trouble to me and is safe for you.
2 Look out for the dogs, look out for the evildoers, look out for those who mutilate the flesh. 3 For we are the circumcision, who worship by the Spirit of God and glory in Christ Jesus and put no confidence in the flesh—
Galatians 2:1–3
Then after fourteen years I went up again to Jerusalem with Barnabas, taking Titus along with me. 2 I went up because of a revelation and set before them (though privately before those who seemed influential) the gospel that I proclaim among the Gentiles, in order to make sure I was not running or had not run in vain. 3 But even Titus, who was with me, was not forced to be circumcised, though he was a Greek.
Galatians 5:1–11
For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision counts for anything, but only faith working through love.
Galatians 6:11–16
11 See with what large letters I am writing to you with my own hand. 12 It is those who want to make a good showing in the flesh who would force you to be circumcised, and only in order that they may not be persecuted for the cross of Christ. 13 For even those who are circumcised do not themselves keep the law, but they desire to have you circumcised that they may boast in your flesh. 14 But far be it from me to boast except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, by which the world has been crucified to me, and I to the world. 15 For neither circumcision counts for anything, nor uncircumcision, but a new creation. 16 And as for all who walk by this rule, peace and mercy be upon them, and upon the Israel of God.
So there you have it. It means nothing to Jesus. It's a Jewish custom. In fact, during the holocaust, German soldiers used it as a way to identify Jewish boys.
My wife and I chose not to have our son done. I invite everyone on here to watch a video showing a helpless baby being circumcised and tell me they would still have it done to their son. We saw it and it's horrific. I don't know how anyone could make their son go through something so terrible. Who cares if he is going to remember it? I would remember the pain I put my child through.
Great post, and you're absolutely right, it's a Jewish custom, but then why do so many Americans have it done? Because they don't know why they're getting it done. Americans are mostly Christian, not Jewish. They just know that it's been going on for so long that they just decide to do it. Only recently have doctors begun speaking out against it. Good on you for choosing not to torture your child.
-
Because Bunker and Cal like to gossip like tabloid bitches, I will put my 2 cents in to try to fix the economy. Ok, I am sure all I am going to get from those dumb asses the reasons why it won't work (I mean Obama), and nothing constructive, but what do you expect? They have been tea bagged.
All fooking ideologies aside.
The housing industry is what caused this mess. The housing bubble. Now what does a store do if they have too much inventory? You reduce the price and sell it half off. I understand that there are people out there who didn't buy into the "I can own a $300,000 home while working at McDonalds" thing. There are some people who did. The banks need to reduce their inventory by selling these homes and existing foreclosed homes back to the current homeowner to refinance or sell the home at say 1/2 off. Now I would just do this for homes sitting in inventory say 1-2 years, etc.
I think some of these people need a second chance. The ones who had no control over their circumstances.
See why these fooking bankers need to do this, is because the US almost defaulted on the debt we absorbed from Fannie Fooks and Freddie Gay. $4 trillion dollars and now these fooks are making HUGE profits? Fook you. They need to be forced to do this. Yes, I know people here will say government has no reason to intervene in business, bullshit, they fooking made it their business when they helped these assholes out. Which was the right thing to do, they had no choice.
That is how you make the rich pay back. You think the government can just tax Buffit personally? No. You tax (I use that term lightly) an industry (banks, Fannie Fooks and Freddie Gay) that cannot move overseas, Real Estate. What the fook are they going to do? Pack up and go to India. Hell no.
We need to get people back to work, period. I could be off on my estimates here, but before the recession, 7% of the jobs in the US were construction related. If people are able to purchase homes, this could happen. With the reduced housing prices, real people could afford a house. Then real people could get back to work to buy those houses.
So Cal and Bunker and ideas without mentioning ANY president?
Because Bunker and Cal like to gossip like tabloid bitches, I will put my 2 cents in to try to fix the economy. Ok, I am sure all I am going to get from those dumb asses the reasons why it won't work (I mean Obama), and nothing constructive, but what do you expect? They have been tea bagged.
All fooking ideologies aside.
The housing industry is what caused this mess. The housing bubble. Now what does a store do if they have too much inventory? You reduce the price and sell it half off. I understand that there are people out there who didn't buy into the "I can own a $300,000 home while working at McDonalds" thing. There are some people who did. The banks need to reduce their inventory by selling these homes and existing foreclosed homes back to the current homeowner to refinance or sell the home at say 1/2 off. Now I would just do this for homes sitting in inventory say 1-2 years, etc.
I think some of these people need a second chance. The ones who had no control over their circumstances.
See why these fooking bankers need to do this, is because the US almost defaulted on the debt we absorbed from Fannie Fooks and Freddie Gay. $4 trillion dollars and now these fooks are making HUGE profits? Fook you. They need to be forced to do this. Yes, I know people here will say government has no reason to intervene in business, bullshit, they fooking made it their business when they helped these assholes out. Which was the right thing to do, they had no choice.
That is how you make the rich pay back. You think the government can just tax Buffit personally? No. You tax (I use that term lightly) an industry (banks, Fannie Fooks and Freddie Gay) that cannot move overseas, Real Estate. What the fook are they going to do? Pack up and go to India. Hell no.
We need to get people back to work, period. I could be off on my estimates here, but before the recession, 7% of the jobs in the US were construction related. If people are able to purchase homes, this could happen. With the reduced housing prices, real people could afford a house. Then real people could get back to work to buy those houses.
So Cal and Bunker and ideas without mentioning ANY president?
I like your efforts I disagree with your causes and a good bit of your solutions but I do agree with your intent and attempt.
First off, the housing bubble was a culmination of deficit spending and war mongering. The deficit spending was started by St Reagan, who has never been credited with the rushing America to broke. He started the fiasco. After Clinton attempted to fix the mess. Bush started a bunch of new messes. Under his regime we started two unfunded wars that cost us two trillion dollars so far! Under his realm we created incentives for corporations to move factories and profits overseas tax free which they have done in record numbers. Under his watch we created loan loss reserves minimums for banks from 10% to 1%. He decreed that everyone needed to own a home. The banks ran with those two bonehead ideas and made a loan available to anyone who could breathe to buy a house whether they could afford it or not. BOOM A HOUSING BUBBLE AND HUGE BUST destroying the majorirty of decent jobs not already sent overseas by the tax incentive to move factories overseas. Worse we lowered taxes while increasing spending to ungodly excess. So that is where we are. Further under Bush we nearly tripled the already bloated defense spending to where we are now. We have not ended the useless wars in Iraq and Afghan and defense spending about equals all of the rest of the world while we cannot beat a bunch of insurgents but do maintain 60 overseas bases
The fix. Raise taxes on the eltite. Create incentives to bring factories back to the US. Create funding for infrastructure projects. Increase the payments on SS and medicare to unlimited income. Cut defense spending in half by closing most of the overseas bases and eliminating the duplication among the services while increasing readiness and capablity Tax all Churches like any other business that is what they are in essence. Delete the vast majority of tax deductions including real estate and institute a graduated flat tax of 10% over 25K 15% over 50K 20% over 120K and 30% over 400K
The jobs would come back the factories would come back the deficit would decrease and business would expand
Trickle down economics is a proven failure..................BIG TIME....................the right not only wants to sustain but increase it..................and guarantee the USA crumbles
The secret of a strong society is a strong middle class independent of the form of government...............
runaway capitalism which breeds runaway greed is the fastest way to destroy an economy.....................
just ask the Greeks, The Romans, the Spanish, the Brits and the real live today viewing the USA
-
And under Obama, we've got troops in THREE conflict zones. We've got a plan to fix the debt 17 years down the line, after Obama's second term, and after the Elephant that will be there for the next 8 years. It's not politics, it's a political theater.
The only difference I see between the parties is that one pretends to care about science, but at the same time they're cutting out the shuttle program.
-
The fix. Raise taxes on the eltite. Create incentives to bring factories back to the US. Rich4nothin
**********************************************
Oh, raise those taxes on the rich, Rich ! That's rich!!!! It's rich folk who own the factories. Tax them so high they will move THEMSELVES elsewhere !
Then raise taxes on those nasty corps so they will leave faster too !
But, then, create.......eh.... lower taxes so they will come right back again? Bass-ackwards pseudo-logic, Rich....
***********************************************
Create funding for infrastructure projects. Increase the payments on SS and medicare to unlimited income.
***********************************************
Oopsie, Richie ! LOL. Your iconic moronic failure ObaMAO spent us into near permanent debt now. We don't HAVE THE FREAKIN MONEY FOR those projects.
I mean, if we DID raise the money for those projects, it would have to go for paying off our INSANE NATIONAL FREAKIN DEBT.
***********************************************
Cut defense spending in half by closing most of the overseas bases and eliminating the duplication among the services while increasing readiness and capablity
**********************************************
I wouldn't mind closing some bases that are not really needed anymore. Which ones, oh generalizing generalizer? But the fighter that the Navy needs that can land
on an aircraft carrier is not necessarily the fighter that the Air Force needs for long distance raids But where possible, yeah.
*********************************************
Tax all Churches like any other business that is what they are in essence.
*****************************************************
If you are going to go after churches, why not go after all
tax exempt orgs? Like the NEA and all the "ea's" in all the states? And AARP?
they are in the big business of supporting a certain....political ...party......
*****************************************************
Delete the vast majority of tax deductions including real estate and institute a graduated flat tax of 10% over 25K 15% over 50K 20% over 120K and 30% over 400K
*****************************************************
Oh, mindless grasshopper. The first thing that would do, is to kill off most all landowners, especially farmers. It would
hit the large farmers insanely, and it would cause food prices to skyrocket past anyone's scariest imagination.
Too much jaw flappy, and too little thought, oh, Richiewan.
-
Churches are not taxed because it's in the constitution, first amendment.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"
taxing churches would violate this amendment.
:neutral_face: -
Churches are not taxed because it's in the constitution, first amendment.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"
taxing churches would violate this amendment.
Churches are not taxed because it's in the constitution, first amendment.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"
taxing churches would violate this amendment.
Disagree totally with your illogical conclusion that taxing chruches violates the first amendment. Free exercise of relligion has nothing to do with taxing of their profits as a business. Using your logic nothing can be taxed according to the first amendment.
-
The fix. Raise taxes on the eltite. Create incentives to bring factories back to the US. Rich4nothin
**********************************************
Oh, raise those taxes on the rich, Rich ! That's rich!!!! It's rich folk who own the factories. Tax them so high they will move THEMSELVES elsewhere !
Then raise taxes on those nasty corps so they will leave faster too !
But, then, create.......eh.... lower taxes so they will come right back again? Bass-ackwards pseudo-logic, Rich....
***********************************************
Create funding for infrastructure projects. Increase the payments on SS and medicare to unlimited income.
***********************************************
Oopsie, Richie ! LOL. Your iconic moronic failure ObaMAO spent us into near permanent debt now. We don't HAVE THE FREAKIN MONEY FOR those projects.
I mean, if we DID raise the money for those projects, it would have to go for paying off our INSANE NATIONAL FREAKIN DEBT.
***********************************************
Cut defense spending in half by closing most of the overseas bases and eliminating the duplication among the services while increasing readiness and capablity
**********************************************
I wouldn't mind closing some bases that are not really needed anymore. Which ones, oh generalizing generalizer? But the fighter that the Navy needs that can land
on an aircraft carrier is not necessarily the fighter that the Air Force needs for long distance raids But where possible, yeah.
*********************************************
Tax all Churches like any other business that is what they are in essence.
*****************************************************
If you are going to go after churches, why not go after all
tax exempt orgs? Like the NEA and all the "ea's" in all the states? And AARP?
they are in the big business of supporting a certain....political ...party......
*****************************************************
Delete the vast majority of tax deductions including real estate and institute a graduated flat tax of 10% over 25K 15% over 50K 20% over 120K and 30% over 400K
*****************************************************
Oh, mindless grasshopper. The first thing that would do, is to kill off most all landowners, especially farmers. It would
hit the large farmers insanely, and it would cause food prices to skyrocket past anyone's scariest imagination.
Too much jaw flappy, and too little thought, oh, Richiewan.
The fix. Raise taxes on the eltite. Create incentives to bring factories back to the US. Rich4nothin
**********************************************
Oh, raise those taxes on the rich, Rich ! That's rich!!!! It's rich folk who own the factories. Tax them so high they will move THEMSELVES elsewhere !
Then raise taxes on those nasty corps so they will leave faster too !
But, then, create.......eh.... lower taxes so they will come right back again? Bass-ackwards pseudo-logic, Rich....
***********************************************
Create funding for infrastructure projects. Increase the payments on SS and medicare to unlimited income.
***********************************************
Oopsie, Richie ! LOL. Your iconic moronic failure ObaMAO spent us into near permanent debt now. We don't HAVE THE FREAKIN MONEY FOR those projects.
I mean, if we DID raise the money for those projects, it would have to go for paying off our INSANE NATIONAL FREAKIN DEBT.
***********************************************
Cut defense spending in half by closing most of the overseas bases and eliminating the duplication among the services while increasing readiness and capablity
**********************************************
I wouldn't mind closing some bases that are not really needed anymore. Which ones, oh generalizing generalizer? But the fighter that the Navy needs that can land
on an aircraft carrier is not necessarily the fighter that the Air Force needs for long distance raids But where possible, yeah.
*********************************************
Tax all Churches like any other business that is what they are in essence.
*****************************************************
If you are going to go after churches, why not go after all
tax exempt orgs? Like the NEA and all the "ea's" in all the states? And AARP?
they are in the big business of supporting a certain....political ...party......
*****************************************************
Delete the vast majority of tax deductions including real estate and institute a graduated flat tax of 10% over 25K 15% over 50K 20% over 120K and 30% over 400K
*****************************************************
Oh, mindless grasshopper. The first thing that would do, is to kill off most all landowners, especially farmers. It would
hit the large farmers insanely, and it would cause food prices to skyrocket past anyone's scariest imagination.
Too much jaw flappy, and too little thought, oh, Richiewan.
Rich people do not own corporations. That is why they are corporations because thousands of shareholders including indivduals, other corporations and nations and governments own them. Further, raising individual tax rates has nothing to do with factories and where they are. Corporate tax rates do however. What I proposed lowers corporate tax rates and eliminates the loopholes which now result in them allowing foreign profits to not be taxed penned in by the Bush Admin which is why corporations moved all the jobs overseas and use other loopholes to pay no taxes. I did suggest Obama create tax incentives to move factories back to the USA.
I will not answer your stupidity about Obama spending as Bush created the debt nigntmare and it was thrown over the fence to Obama in the face of an economy nearly in total collapse. I will say this though the eight Bush budget years added 6 trillion dollars to the national debt not counting the two trillion unfunded monies spent on two useless wars. Hmm 8 trillion dollars. So go ahead blame the 800 billion Obama spent on the stimulus to get us 14 trillion in hock
Your illogical defense of Air Force long range bombers was illogical. They are unecessary. The Air Force did not exist in WWII and that was the last war we won. Since we have tied one and lost going on three and the Air has not done any significant fighting since Korea. Obviously, you know jack about the need for long Range Air Bombers. We have 60 bases around the world. What purpose does a base in Germany serve or Japan each supporting 50,000 troops? What purpose does an aircraft development agency for each the Army, the Navy, and the Air Force serve when we are only developing one aircraft?
Further, the tax position I stated would make a fair tax for all rather than allowing crooked corporations and crooked farmers abuse the the tax code via loopholes. 40 % of US corporations pay no tax including many fortune 500 companies. Churches are for profit organizations, any for profit organization should be taxed. Non profits that can demonstrate NO profit will owe no tax, so your bs about that is bs, and makes no sense.
Cal, I learned long ago that your are illogical and in denial and do not use fact or data to reach the abysmal conclusions you believe So I will just let you shiitt yourself as usual in unsubstantiated factless bs as above. I say the following which you cannot defeat with data. Trickle down economics proved a dismal failure as a result of Reagan and Bush resuliting in destruction of America's middle class. Further millions of good blue collar jobs were destroyed during the Bush years more than any other period. Further the job growth rate overtime is usually arount 20%, it was negative for the whole Bush term. Further the average wealth of an American shrank during the Bush years. Further we had the lowest taxes on record during the Bush years. Further we added 8 trillion dollars of new debt during the Bush years. Further during the Bush years with lowest taxes in nearly a century we had a tremendous exodus of factories and jobs go overseas. Further American company profits are at record levels yet no jobs are being created, why because they already been sent overseas. So you want to keep doing this exercise of self destruction. Good Thinking Cal.
So Cal we are done discussing anything about the economy because your destructive political view is based on denial illogical totally factless bullshit to support an inane view forced on the people by a certain party. You drank the cool aid Have fun plowing yur garden You know jack about economics or our military and the excess deificit spending of your party and military spending explosiion of your party which is triple what it was when Clinton left office when we still had Two Towers in NY.
We just finished the worst decade since the depression and you want to continue the stupidity that created the worst decade since the depression Brilliant Cal, just brilliant.........bye bye this discussion is over. Talking to a box a rocks is a waste of time
-
Well, I don't think that churches should be able to own hundred of acres of land tax-free. Limit it to 25 acres tax free per parish or whatever. And churches involved in politics need to be taxed.
-
Well, I don't think that churches should be able to own hundred of acres of land tax-free. Limit it to 25 acres tax free per parish or whatever. And churches involved in politics need to be taxed.
Well, I don't think that churches should be able to own hundred of acres of land tax-free. Limit it to 25 acres tax free per parish or whatever. And churches involved in politics need to be taxed.
Why should they get anything tax free? You make a profit you pay taxes. I will concede that land a church is on up to five acres get a significant reduction in real estate tax. Everything over five get the same rate as other properties. On your other statement a lot of Church pastors speak out on politics regularly.
-
The liberal loonies are always trying to control everyones freedom of speech.
Hell maybe some would be in favor of making Christians where a star on their shirt.
What do you guys want, a totalitarian take over by the US Government.
Maybe you would be in favor of a National religion so the US Government can control what is allowed to be preached from the pulpit. If the preacher speaks against a politician they can be sent to prison.
You better wake up before its to late.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login