We Are The 53%
-
Yup. Sounds pretty typical. Everyone is sitting on cash. Banks aren't loaning it. Businesses aren't investing it. Mostly because consumers aren't spending it. Because they don't have it.
Hope you find something soon.
-
Yup. Sounds pretty typical. Everyone is sitting on cash. Banks aren't loaning it. Businesses aren't investing it. Mostly because consumers aren't spending it. Because they don't have it.
Heck
**************************************
and if Bush was pres, it would be ALL his fault, and Shep would be here being so "frightened" of our freedoms being squashed by the "evil" Cheney.
But wait ! Obamao and all his rowdy communist and radical socialist friends are in power ! Now? "Silence is golden" "mums the word" "eh.... I don't have time for the forum"
par for the corrupt thinking course.
Even Soros is saying we are headed for, or in, a double dip recession. And that is NOT Bush's fault.
-
Yup. Sounds pretty typical. Everyone is sitting on cash. Banks aren't loaning it. Businesses aren't investing it. Mostly because consumers aren't spending it. Because they don't have it.
Hope you find something soon.
Yup. Sounds pretty typical. Everyone is sitting on cash. Banks aren't loaning it. Businesses aren't investing it. Mostly because consumers aren't spending it. Because they don't have it.
Hope you find something soon.
thanks, vicious cycle, it is.
-
Yup. Sounds pretty typical. Everyone is sitting on cash. Banks aren't loaning it. Businesses aren't investing it. Mostly because consumers aren't spending it. Because they don't have it.
Hope you find something soon.
thanks, vicious cycle, it is.
thanks, vicious cycle, it is.
Yeah. Sad thing is, there are things that we can do to help, but we're not going to do them. Not in an election year.
No matter what we do, this is here to stay for a while. It's just how much bad we're willing to accept. And apparently, we're going to accept a lot of bad.
-
thanks, vicious cycle, it is.
Yeah. Sad thing is, there are things that we can do to help, but we're not going to do them. Not in an election year.
No matter what we do, this is here to stay for a while. It's just how much bad we're willing to accept. And apparently, we're going to accept a lot of bad.
Yeah. Sad thing is, there are things that we can do to help, but we're not going to do them. Not in an election year.
Like what in particular?
(Let me guess....)
WSS
-
Flawed reasoning item #452: If these people just wanted to sit (and are currently sitting) on their ass doing nothing, then why even organize and rally for change?
I'm not going to hold my breath awaiting your answer.
Not to mention occupiers are not looking for a handout. They are looking to change the grip that greed and corruption has on our political system.
1% pays for 99% of political campaigns, so who do you think politicians are going to serve? That's right! You guessed it! The 1%.
We the people deserve better. We the people, who work hard to pay off our student loans and pick up jobs below our pay rate to make ends meet, just to be laid-off a year later while in an insane amount of debt deserve better.
I'm guessing by you making this post you believe that the system is not flawed, politicians are not corrupt, and every unemployed person is just too lazy to find a job. If you disagree with the last sentence I typed then stop fighting us and join us because you ARE the 99%.
Not to mention occupiers are not looking for a handout. They are looking to change the grip that greed and corruption has on our political system.
1% pays for 99% of political campaigns, so who do you think politicians are going to serve? That's right! You guessed it! The 1%.
So who's the president?
WSS
-
Yeah. Sad thing is, there are things that we can do to help, but we're not going to do them. Not in an election year.
Like what in particular?
(Let me guess....)
WSS
Like what in particular?
(Let me guess....)
WSS
Infrastructure investments are a no brainer. Tax reform is a no brainer. Some aid to the states is a no brainer. Long term debt reduction is a no brainer. But none of this is going to happen. We're just going to sit here and pretend we can't do anything. Or we'll just do something small to say we did.
-
The end of the Iraqi conflict is a start.
-
Infrastructure investments are a no brainer. Tax reform is a no brainer. Some aid to the states is a no brainer. Long term debt reduction is a no brainer. But none of this is going to happen. We're just going to sit here and pretend we can't do anything. Or we'll just do something small to say we did. Heck
*********************************************************
Nice classy post, Heck.
Now the followup question:
Why didn't the pres you voted for... do anything about any of those during his two years with complete Dem party control of Congress?
Bush had Dems in Congress in charge, too. Could be I'm just having too much work on the farm goin on, but I see a trend. And it isn't pretty.
And...
Who on the national presidential scene, do you think WILL tackle these problems?
-
Like what in particular?
(Let me guess....)
WSS
Infrastructure investments are a no brainer. Tax reform is a no brainer. Some aid to the states is a no brainer. Long term debt reduction is a no brainer. But none of this is going to happen. We're just going to sit here and pretend we can't do anything. Or we'll just do something small to say we did.
Infrastructure investments are a no brainer. Tax reform is a no brainer. Some aid to the states is a no brainer. Long term debt reduction is a no brainer. But none of this is going to happen. We're just going to sit here and pretend we can't do anything. Or we'll just do something small to say we did.
Well I guessed right. Pass this bill now.
And I'd say it'd make things look better in the short term.
Like novocaine in an injured knee or sawdust in the transmission.
Hey the bump only needs to last through the second week of November 2012.
WSS
-
Infrastructure investments are a no brainer. Tax reform is a no brainer. Some aid to the states is a no brainer. Long term debt reduction is a no brainer. But none of this is going to happen. We're just going to sit here and pretend we can't do anything. Or we'll just do something small to say we did.
Well I guessed right. Pass this bill now.
And I'd say it'd make things look better in the short term.
Like novocaine in an injured knee or sawdust in the transmission.
Hey the bump only needs to last through the second week of November 2012.
WSS
Well I guessed right. Pass this bill now.
And I'd say it'd make things look better in the short term.
Like novocaine in an injured knee or sawdust in the transmission.
Hey the bump only needs to last through the second week of November 2012.
WSS
Yes, Steve. That's part of the point - to make things better in the short term. That's what you're trying to do. In order to help the economy recover faster. That's what Bush did in the last recession, back when Republicans believed in demand-side stimulus. But they're not being political here, only the people who are trying to help the economy recover. Got it.
You like to dismiss all policy as political in order to avoid arguing policy. This is a policy debate. I'm not arguing politics. If you disagree with the policy, you have to say why. And likening it to a novocaine shot doesn't really cut it.
Short term stimulus, long term debt reduction, tax reform. That's the game.
-
short term insurmountable? debt wrecking havoc on the value of our dollar, and ruining our credit rating, via stupid political tax money dole outs.
Long term gov growth and intervention into our daily lives.
So much debt, that Obamao won't support legimate tax reform.
Just raise them.
That's his plan - it is what he learned in college in Alinksi classes.
And Cloward-Piven is now being admitted on the left... as having a huge influence
on what is going on.
Told ya. Still deny it ?
-
Well I guessed right. Pass this bill now.
And I'd say it'd make things look better in the short term.
Like novocaine in an injured knee or sawdust in the transmission.
Hey the bump only needs to last through the second week of November 2012.
WSS
Yes, Steve. That's part of the point - to make things better in the short term. That's what you're trying to do. In order to help the economy recover faster. That's what Bush did in the last recession, back when Republicans believed in demand-side stimulus. But they're not being political here, only the people who are trying to help the economy recover. Got it.
You like to dismiss all policy as political in order to avoid arguing policy. This is a policy debate. I'm not arguing politics. If you disagree with the policy, you have to say why. And likening it to a novocaine shot doesn't really cut it.
Short term stimulus, long term debt reduction, tax reform. That's the game.
Yes, Steve. That's part of the point - to make things better in the short term. That's what you're trying to do. In order to help the economy recover faster. That's what Bush did in the last recession, back when Republicans believed in demand-side stimulus. But they're not being political here, only the people who are trying to help the economy recover. Got it.
You like to dismiss all policy as political in order to avoid arguing policy. This is a policy debate. I'm not arguing politics. If you disagree with the policy, you have to say why. And likening it to a novocaine shot doesn't really cut it.
Short term stimulus, long term debt reduction, tax reform. That's the game.
Seems like those two things are at odds.
Oh, right! That's because they are.
And of course it's political.
Otherwise your team would have done it two years ago with no hindrance and saved us all.
WSS
-
Are you saying that short term stimulus and long term debt reduction are at odds? Really?
If I'm missing your point, please let me know.
-
All these "stimuli" (as in, stimulating Dem supporters to benefit with $$$$ for their votes)...
is compounding our long term debt to horrific levels.
There IS NO long term debt reduction with this dirtbag president.
-
Are you saying that short term stimulus and long term debt reduction are at odds? Really?
If I'm missing your point, please let me know.
Are you saying that short term stimulus and long term debt reduction are at odds? Really?
If I'm missing your point, please let me know.
Yes.
I could live with just about any painful cuts and extra taxes if I could be sure it went to reducing the debt.
I don't have any faith that that would ever be done.
I think that's a potential nightmare.
You don't I understand.
(Now....
Let me guess..._)
WSS
-
Are you saying that short term stimulus and long term debt reduction are at odds? Really?
If I'm missing your point, please let me know.
Yes.
I could live with just about any painful cuts and extra taxes if I could be sure it went to reducing the debt.
I don't have any faith that that would ever be done.
I think that's a potential nightmare.
You don't I understand.
(Now....
Let me guess..._)
WSS
Yes.
I could live with just about any painful cuts and extra taxes if I could be sure it went to reducing the debt.
I don't have any faith that that would ever be done.
I think that's a potential nightmare.
You don't I understand.
(Now....
Let me guess..._)
WSS
I'm just wondering if you get that just about every major economist, left and right, is calling for some version of that right now - short term stimulus and long term debt reduction. That you think they're incompatible with one another is truly bizarre.
But this will take painful cuts and extra taxes, probably down the road when the economy is on sounder footing, so you will get your wish.
-
Yes.
I could live with just about any painful cuts and extra taxes if I could be sure it went to reducing the debt.
I don't have any faith that that would ever be done.
I think that's a potential nightmare.
You don't I understand.
(Now....
Let me guess..._)
WSS
I'm just wondering if you get that just about every major economist, left and right, is calling for some version of that right now - short term stimulus and long term debt reduction. That you think they're incompatible with one another is truly bizarre.
But this will take painful cuts and extra taxes, probably down the road when the economy is on sounder footing, so you will get your wish.
I'm just wondering if you get that just about every major economist, left and right, is calling for some version of that right now - short term stimulus and long term debt reduction. That you think they're incompatible with one another is truly bizarre.
But this will take painful cuts and extra taxes, probably down the road when the economy is on sounder footing, so you will get your wish.
My wish?
Heh.
Actually you're assuming the economy will bounce back.
I hope so but I'm afraid this may be the new normal.
And you're correct. No one is going to lean in and take one for the team.
WSS
-
That's my wish, too.
I just want some acknowledgment that you get what short term stimulus and long term debt reduction entails, and how the two things are not at odds. Do you get that?
-
Heck translation:
"I wish I could persuade Steve to agree with me on stuff, then I might
know how to sway independents on my job. It's what I do..."sniff" "
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login