Crabtree?
-
@shepwrite said:
...there are more athletes who can run and catch than there are openings.I don't know, Shep...
Why are the Browns always selecting the guys who can run but can't catch?
From Dennis Northcutt to Andre Davis to Quincy Morgan. The only guy that could catch was Kevin Johnson, but he couldn't run...
-Al
-
@shepwrite said:
I'd probably wait until round two and add a free agent, too.And herein lies the problem with picking in the top 5. Too many fcuking choices.
-
IMO...the two best non qb players in this draft are Crabtree and Andre Smith...if either one falls to our slot, we need to be ready to select him or answer the phones, because they will be ringing.
You would be stupid to not select them or not trade down.
-
Personally I straight up Trade edwards for Anquan Bolden cause he isn't going to be back with Cards after 09' either....pay Boldin what you'd pay edwards and get rid of the michigan whinny puossy
-
A great offensive line,especially in our division can give average skill players a chance to be above average.
Paul Brown always believed you go for the home run hitter,but lately we can't seem to find one that can
bat above the Mendoza.
Also keep this in mind,who ever we draft at #5 will more than likely hold out,be late for camp,pi$$off the
new coach and have to play catch up all preseason!
-
would crabtree improve our offense? yes, without a doubt.
the question we have to ask is what makes crabtree a great receiver. is it his speed? is he incredibly physical? is it his size? is he shifty, agile, hard to contain? leaping ability? ability to adjust to the ball and catch it no matter where it's thrown? does he run great routes?
a true number one receiver needs to run superior routes, be able to adjust to the ball and catch it no matter where it's thrown, and have at least one of the other qualities; he needs to either be a great leaper, have great size, be ridiculously physical, have great size, be shifty and hard to contain or have truly elite speed.
i haven't watched crabtree play a lot, so i'm looking for some input. what makes him great?
-
would crabtree improve our offense? yes, without a doubt.
the question we have to ask is what makes crabtree a great receiver. is it his speed? is he incredibly physical? is it his size? is he shifty, agile, hard to contain? leaping ability? ability to adjust to the ball and catch it no matter where it's thrown? does he run great routes?
a true number one receiver needs to run superior routes, be able to adjust to the ball and catch it no matter where it's thrown, and have at least one of the other qualities; he needs to either be a great leaper, have great size, be ridiculously physical, have great size, be shifty and hard to contain or have truly elite speed.
i haven't watched crabtree play a lot, so i'm looking for some input. what makes him great?
would crabtree improve our offense? yes, without a doubt.
the question we have to ask is what makes crabtree a great receiver. is it his speed? is he incredibly physical? is it his size? is he shifty, agile, hard to contain? leaping ability? ability to adjust to the ball and catch it no matter where it's thrown? does he run great routes?
a true number one receiver needs to run superior routes, be able to adjust to the ball and catch it no matter where it's thrown, and have at least one of the other qualities; he needs to either be a great leaper, have great size, be ridiculously physical, have great size, be shifty and hard to contain or have truly elite speed.
i haven't watched crabtree play a lot, so i'm looking for some input. what makes him great?
Well, Crabtree does all the above. Great route runner, speed, has great size and is very physical. Also, great hands and something like a 41" vertical leep. Best of all, he has great character and is a very grounded individual. A WR without a big ego, almost unthinkable.
-
I watch teams like the Steelers and I see them pick the best player available, not for need. They always seem to be picking the highest rated player on their board. Noted that these teams aren't usually picking in the top 10, but they don't usually pick for need.
I reason I started this thread is because NFL teams are torn on this concept. I believe this is a league with a salary cap, free agency and teams have a good amount of turnover every year.
IMO, I think you can take the best player available and can suppliment position needs through FA. Also once you get past the first round where their may be super impact type players, then you have a combination of best player available with an eye toward needs. If you need a LB and in the second round your high person on the board is a DT but two people away is a solid LB and they grade out about the same, then you take the LB.
Your opinions are very insightful because I have a problem passing on a guy that is rated way higher then the next guy on my board because of a need. If a guy like Ray Lewis in on the board with Crabtree and they are rated very close to each other, then I take the need, but I just don't think there is a defensive player who rates close to Crabtree.
BTW, Seattle has greater needs then a WR. Are they going to pick for greatest need or best player available?
Personally I believe we are in the position we are in because we have historically drafted for need and passed on the best players available. One word..................Wimbley and look at what we passed on.
-
Brown's are picking at #5 and Crabtree is still on the board. Most draft analysts say he may be the best player in the draft. He may be one of the few immediate impact players on the board. By impact, I mean a guy that can impact the number or W's and L's a team ends with.
Larry Fitzgerald type impact player. A player with great character and all the tools.
He's not a need for the Browns, who definately need defense, but he is a game changer. Can you afford to pass on him?
Receivers like this (great talent and small egos) don't come along very often and Edwards certainly hasn't shown he is a #1. Also, I can very easily see Edwards walking after this contract is up.
Curry is a solid LB and should be a very good fit. But, can you pass on a star for solid?
IMO, you take Crabtree. He is a definate #1 receiver and Edwards hasn't shown he can be that dependable #1 guy. Crabtree would also make Edwards a better receiver (he doesn't want to be regarded as a #2) and better option because he wouldn't get doubled all the time. How dynamic for Quinn...... Crabtree, Edwards and JJ or Cribbs in the slot and Winslow or Rucker at TE.
Also gives you some trade options without hurting the offense.
As far as defense, how about a guy like Barton and another FA to help solidify that unit. Some new blood and a new scheme can make that unit decent, not great. Picking Curry won't make it great either.
IMO, when the best player in the draft is there (need or not) you got to take him. You have Free Agency and also other picks in the draft for needs. You have some trade options to get additional picks also.
I see Fitzgerald and Boldin and slobber on myself thinking what Crabtree and Edwards would do to defenses. When I imagine Curry on defense I don't see that a team would have to game plan for him. No disrespect, Curry should be a very solid ILB in the 3-4. But..................................Crabtree, wow.
Brown's are picking at #5 and Crabtree is still on the board. Most draft analysts say he may be the best player in the draft. He may be one of the few immediate impact players on the board. By impact, I mean a guy that can impact the number or W's and L's a team ends with.
Larry Fitzgerald type impact player. A player with great character and all the tools.
He's not a need for the Browns, who definately need defense, but he is a game changer. Can you afford to pass on him?
Receivers like this (great talent and small egos) don't come along very often and Edwards certainly hasn't shown he is a #1. Also, I can very easily see Edwards walking after this contract is up.
Curry is a solid LB and should be a very good fit. But, can you pass on a star for solid?
IMO, you take Crabtree. He is a definate #1 receiver and Edwards hasn't shown he can be that dependable #1 guy. Crabtree would also make Edwards a better receiver (he doesn't want to be regarded as a #2) and better option because he wouldn't get doubled all the time. How dynamic for Quinn...... Crabtree, Edwards and JJ or Cribbs in the slot and Winslow or Rucker at TE.
Also gives you some trade options without hurting the offense.
As far as defense, how about a guy like Barton and another FA to help solidify that unit. Some new blood and a new scheme can make that unit decent, not great. Picking Curry won't make it great either.
IMO, when the best player in the draft is there (need or not) you got to take him. You have Free Agency and also other picks in the draft for needs. You have some trade options to get additional picks also.
I see Fitzgerald and Boldin and slobber on myself thinking what Crabtree and Edwards would do to defenses. When I imagine Curry on defense I don't see that a team would have to game plan for him. No disrespect, Curry should be a very solid ILB in the 3-4. But..................................Crabtree, wow.
Great Post Y-town, we agree on something
You are correct that Crabtree IMO will be a special player (Great) and if I am drafting I take a player like Crabtree with a chance to be great over a guy like Curry who will be a solid pro IMO but not a game changing type player which is what we need, and the only guys I see in this draft that are game changing players are Crabtree, Harvin and Maclin and # 5 is too early to take Maclin or Harvin
You are 100% correct what you say about Curry who I believe will be a good solid player but not a great player and really how much better are we going to improve on defense with just adding Curry when we require at least 2 pass rushers from the outside linebacker positions.
Barton I feel is too slow though he is solid and a run stuffer, he might be a good choice to use as a 1st-2nd down linebacker, but I believe this team needs to add speed on defense as we are a very slow defense at LB and DB
-
would crabtree improve our offense? yes, without a doubt.
the question we have to ask is what makes crabtree a great receiver. is it his speed? is he incredibly physical? is it his size? is he shifty, agile, hard to contain? leaping ability? ability to adjust to the ball and catch it no matter where it's thrown? does he run great routes?
a true number one receiver needs to run superior routes, be able to adjust to the ball and catch it no matter where it's thrown, and have at least one of the other qualities; he needs to either be a great leaper, have great size, be ridiculously physical, have great size, be shifty and hard to contain or have truly elite speed.
i haven't watched crabtree play a lot, so i'm looking for some input. what makes him great?
a true number one receiver needs to run superior routes, be able to adjust to the ball and catch it no matter where it's thrown, and have at least one of the other qualities; he needs to either be a great leaper, have great size, be ridiculously physical, have great size, be shifty and hard to contain or have truly elite speed.
i haven't watched crabtree play a lot, so i'm looking for some input. what makes him great?
Isn't this the exact same description the "experts "use to describe Calvin Johnson?
-
Crabtree is good and these type of guys dont come around in the draft that often. Braylon Edwards was a 1st rounder and he is only above average. But if you add Crabtree in there and the aspect of BE may leave thru FA when his contract is up then you have his replacement.
But just think if you have a Crabtree along with BE & K2 Now that is a threat!
-
He is the type of layer that makes me feel like this, " I dont think wr is our weekest point or our biggest need...... But ill be damned if he doesn't make our Offence look very VERY VERY interesting..."
K2 BE MC and JH with BQ throwing the rock..... shits like clevage... I cant turn away!
-
I also believe that Braylon Might Walk after his contract is up, but we have some amazing receiver draft classes coming up in the next few years. There will be players better than crabtree in the next few drafts, believe me, especially guys like this....
Dez Bryant
They dont make them any Bigger, and any Faster than this guys. If he was entering this year he'd be top 5. Look at those hands as well!
Theres your braylon replacement
-
D-E-F-E-N-S-E
I agree 100% that this team needs to vastly improve its defense. MY question is do you pass on a guy tagged as a superstar for a guy that is noted as being solid? Who will impact the W/L column the best? How solid would a defensive player picked at #37 be?
In FA I can get a Crowder or a Scott who are better then solid, as Curry is being talked about. But, I can't find a Crabtree in FA.
I'm not saying that you should always pick the best available or highest rated player on your list over need, but when their is a vast dfference on how high they are rated, then I think you have to consider who would have the greater influence on wins and losses.
There's no right definitive answer. It all depends how high you are on a player and how much you think he can improve your team. Also do you feel that someone at #37 could help you just as much. We need to acquire more draft picks and be active in FA, then you can have this conversation closer to draft day.
-
I watch teams like the Steelers and I see them pick the best player available, not for need. They always seem to be picking the highest rated player on their board. Noted that these teams aren't usually picking in the top 10, but they don't usually pick for need.
I reason I started this thread is because NFL teams are torn on this concept. I believe this is a league with a salary cap, free agency and teams have a good amount of turnover every year.
IMO, I think you can take the best player available and can suppliment position needs through FA. Also once you get past the first round where their may be super impact type players, then you have a combination of best player available with an eye toward needs. If you need a LB and in the second round your high person on the board is a DT but two people away is a solid LB and they grade out about the same, then you take the LB.
Your opinions are very insightful because I have a problem passing on a guy that is rated way higher then the next guy on my board because of a need. If a guy like Ray Lewis in on the board with Crabtree and they are rated very close to each other, then I take the need, but I just don't think there is a defensive player who rates close to Crabtree.
BTW, Seattle has greater needs then a WR. Are they going to pick for greatest need or best player available?
Personally I believe we are in the position we are in because we have historically drafted for need and passed on the best players available. One word..................Wimbley and look at what we passed on.
IMO, I think you can take the best player available and can suppliment position needs through FA. Also once you get past the first round where their may be super impact type players, then you have a combination of best player available with an eye toward needs. I
I agree and have been saying so for years.
FA is all about needs. Teams don't sign the BPA in FA, they sign guys they need.
Unless the pick makes absolutely no sense at all....BPA is a qb, and you have a pro-bowl qb....take the best player. Period.
First picks are usually signed to 6-7 year deals.....your needs now won't be like that in 5 years.
If you have 2 players rated the same, sure, use immediate needs as the guide, but for the long term health of the team, you are goofy not to select the BPA.
-
Crabtree is like every other over hyped WR. They play good in college, not in the NFL. Crabtree doesn't have blazing fast speed, has ok height, and absolutely no body mass behind him and will be pushed all over the NFL field. I doubt the guy even gets off the line of scrimmage against a decent NFL CB.
Why all the hate on Braylon Edwards? The guy was absolutely one of the BEST Wide Recievers in 2007. 2008 comes around, he gets stepped on by Donte, and is sidelined. He plays the first few games with a torn open ankle. He plays the first few games with an offensive line not protecting the QB, letting him get hit after every single throw. He plays the first few games getting laid out by DA balls, and injures his shoulder. He is no playing on a flesh wound on the back of his ankle being restiched every week, and a bum shoulder. The guy plays tough, just has mental issues w/ getting nailed everytime he catches the ball across the middle.
Randy Moss didn't play too hot in Oakland. Chad Johnson has had "off" year, TO has had off years, all the good WR's aren't going to give you a 1200yards season w/ 16TDs every year.
Who ever is casting a vote to trade Edwards is an absolute complete idiot and should turn in their browns hat and jersey, because they have no idea on football.
Last I recall Quinn didn't exactly have a stellar first few starts, and this is the guy who was coming otu of College and was "NFL ready". What happened to NFL ready? Only game he looked good in was the game they let him dink and dunk Joe Montana style to save him from having to throw down field. What was quinns longest complettion out of 3 games and how many times did he do that? last time I remember Quinn throwing deep was in pre-season to Steptoe and it was thrown SHORT, PICKED OFF, and Steptoe stripped it out he guys arms and ran it. Should we trade Quinn too beause he didn't live up to his hype?
Get a grip on reality, You draft Crabtree and this is year #2 we didn't have a first round pick, because he is a waste of a pick.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login