Skip to content

Changes / Improvements during the Bye-Week

The Browns Board
91 32 2.9k
  • Do not start Haden. That doesn't mean don't play him. Just don't start him. He has been soft so far this year, and I think his big payday has gone to his head, and needs a reality check. He should be ashamed for letting himself get owned by old ass Steve Smith. He is past his prime and on the back 9 of his career!

    @djdawg2010 said:

    Do not start Haden. That doesn't mean don't play him. Just don't start him. He has been soft so far this year, and I think his big payday has gone to his head, and needs a reality check. He should be ashamed for letting himself get owned by old ass Steve Smith. He is past his prime and on the back 9 of his career!

    Steve smith owns nearly everyone he faces.

  • @djdawg2010 said:

    Do not start Haden. That doesn't mean don't play him. Just don't start him. He has been soft so far this year, and I think his big payday has gone to his head, and needs a reality check. He should be ashamed for letting himself get owned by old ass Steve Smith. He is past his prime and on the back 9 of his career!

    Let's be honest, its hard for any DB to cover when WR's are allowed to get away with pushing off THAT much. I mean, it wasn't even a subtle, veteran type crafty move. It was Smitty basically giving DB's the forearm shiver.

    As for fixes? I'd like this defense to play in reverse. I'd like to see 4 down looks on 1st and 2nd. Let me explain my reasoning. The Dline struggles to get pressure, more specifically, Sheard and Kruger do, when their hands aren't in the ground. Which is why play action has been effective for opposing offenses on early down. On top of that, the interior line struggles to flow laterally. I don't believe these lineman are meant to play 2 gap assignments or to just tie up space in the middle. Big Phil is a one gap player with a big wing span. Go back to his tape all the way at Baylor. He greatest successes come from using his long arms and strengths in between the guards. Rubin? He's pretty much ineffective at either position AFAIC. However this will allow Hughes, Winn and Kitchen more time in the rotation. Something along the lines of - Sheard Taylor Hughes Armonty with your backers being Kruger, Dansby, Roberston. Then you can sub in Mingo for your pass rush. This will give you the beef to stop the early down runs, stop allowing RB's to go off tackle and gives Mingo the ability to do what he really only can do, rush the passer. He's a liability at this point on the edge in run support. He just doesn't have the size. I propose using him the same way Denver uses Von Miller. Protect him on early downs, then let him get after the QB on 2nd and 3rd. Now that's not to assume you can't play a one gap 3-4 look - as you obviously can. However something must be done schematically to help this dline against the run because as of right now, the talent isn't getting it done.

    Then on 3rd you can go back to your nickel package with whomever you'd like at the 9 tech/hand in the ground/standing up/whatever. Fact is, Pettine's defenses call for good OLB's that can be effective without having their hands in the ground. We have 3 OLB's, one of them a 1st rounder the other we spent good money on, that can only half perform these roles. And unless Suggs circa early 2000's walks through the front office doors, that wont be changing anytime soon. I'd also like to point out, I'm still a huge proponent against Winn gaining that weight. The kid was so effective around his 280-285 body type. Nearly 300 pounds he just looks slow and lethargic.

    @tiamat63 said:

    I'd also like to point out, I'm still a huge proponent against Winn gaining that weight. The kid was so effective around his 280-285 body type. Nearly 300 pounds he just looks slow and lethargic.

    Missed the point on Winn earlier... could not agree more.

    His motor is at least stalled if not gone. Last year his assets inside were his quickness and energy. This year? What assets...

  • @thenew23 said:

    Too many problems on D to list... but I'll try...

    You did more than try... well done...

    Slight disagreement on Gipson for a couple reasons...

    1. Lack if hitting in secondary.

    Latest example was completion to Smith in front of him Sunday. He had no play on the ball so going low and hard was his only break-up possibility... possibly with a flip inducing hit. Instead he actually extended his arms essentially cushioning what the blow he delivered.

    2. Great centerfielder, but...

    He has not challenged a catch this year that I can recall. After looking at Smith's late catch to set up the winning FG, Gip may have been responsible for helping Haden over the top.

    I think my 4-3 argument addresses a couple of the issues you cite... Billy Winn for one; Mingo for another... also should keep blockers off of our LBs better (emphasis on "should")...

    Agree?

    @tour2ma said:

    Slight disagreement on Gipson for a couple reasons...

    2. Great centerfielder, but...

    He has not challenged a catch this year that I can recall. After looking at Smith's late catch to set up the winning FG, Gip may have been responsible for helping Haden over the top.

    Got the above wrong...

    Just saw a replay and it was Whitner that was late over the top. So if anyone had that assignment, it was him.

    Sad thing is it was the kind of play I remember him making for SF, that made me smile when I heard we signed him. However, in SF it seemed he either picked those throws or broke up the pass with a big hit-ner.

    Good thing he did not change his name...

  • I forgot to add: start Kirksey over Robertson

  • How about putting Justin Gilbert back to catch punts?

    He was GREAT in college and Travis Benjamin is, by his own admission, scared to make a mistake

    Plus it might give Gilbert some confidence in his ability

  • Do not start Haden. That doesn't mean don't play him. Just don't start him. He has been soft so far this year, and I think his big payday has gone to his head, and needs a reality check. He should be ashamed for letting himself get owned by old ass Steve Smith. He is past his prime and on the back 9 of his career!

    @djdawg2010 said:

    Do not start Haden. That doesn't mean don't play him. Just don't start him. He has been soft so far this year, and I think his big payday has gone to his head, and needs a reality check. He should be ashamed for letting himself get owned by old ass Steve Smith. He is past his prime and on the back 9 of his career!

    wow.

    you know how many 5 star CBs steve smith has owned in his career? backend of his career yeah maybe but i bet if they played NE revis would be on him....seattle sherman would be on him. i saw (not the game) but the replay of the play that cost us the game and haden go beat with speed...barely. BUT whitner was right there with the backside help to knock him out of bounds.

    teams win games on huge clutch/lucky catches and plays.

    the first game we should have won if we had played for 60 fucking mintues. sunday we should have won for other reasons besides calling out one single player. we SHOULD be 3-0.

    just shut the fuck up.

  • "teams win games on huge clutch/lucky catches and plays"

    they also lose games when our so-called elite cb gets burned

    Haden gave up the losing TD last year against some scrub QB and a scrub Wr to JAX.

    HADEN IS NOT AS GOOD AS YOU THINK

  • On offense...

    1 - hmmm....

    I seriously have no problems with the offense. Shanahan needs to lean how to call better plays when we have the lead, like when you have a 21-17 lead against a division rival with the ball in their territory... you HAVE to go for the jugular...

    ...but other than that these guys have all exceeded my expectations. Literally, every single one of these guys...

    @thenew23 said:

    On offense...

    1 - hmmm....

    I seriously have no problems with the offense. Shanahan needs to lean how to call better plays when we have the lead, like when you have a 21-17 lead against a division rival with the ball in their territory... you HAVE to go for the jugular...

    ...but other than that these guys have all exceeded my expectations. Literally, every single one of these guys...

    I agree new I am very very impressed with how this offense has grown over the first three weeks.

    Hoyer is looking better and better. He is becoming more comfortable and consistent. He made some fantastic throws and reads Sunday. He didn't leave a whole lot on the field and we can't expect him to make every play and be the catalyst to every win. That's simply unreasonable, unrealistic, and just plain Retarded.

    The run game looks great as well. There is room for improvement but overall our O Line is growing into this zone blocking scheme nicely and our backs are simply the perfect match scheme wise. West has some incredible potential but if I'm being honest I'm even more excited about what Crowell is and can become down the line. He is such a punishing runner. He is a bit raw but my God when he takes that handoff he puts the helmet down and rockets straight up field, LOOKING for contact, being the aggressor. I'm so excited for our backfield now and in the future.

    And to the trolls calling for Manziel? Just wow... Go fuck yourselves and eat a giant bag of dicks covered in moldy cheese... Hoyer has given us the best QB play we have seen since the return. I personally love everything about him, his attitude, his mental aptitude and toughness, and his drive to make this team something special. I'm proud to have him Quarterbacking my browns!

    Now the defense... Good God where to start... There are so many issues as others have stated above...

    The D line is just plain getting owned and blown off the ball on the majority of plays. I don't get it as I KNOW we have talented players at the position group.... The most bothersome thing to me is they will have a good play stopping a run for a short gain or in the backfield and then we either get burned by a play action pass or another run. Its like they forget what they did and how they played on the previous play that worked. Were constantly allowing the opposing offense to get back ahead in the down and distance battle or give up a first down period. It's painful.

    The team needs to take a week and reevaluate our defensive talent and seriously consider some schematic changes. Its bad enough at this point that experimenting would be more beneficial than harmful.

    Go Browns!

  • Here's the start :

    Pettine remained angry that the team had substitution issues and were twice called for having 12 men on the field on defense. He said had things been handled better on the sidelines, the team wouldn’t have had to burn timeouts.

    Pettine had an “air it out” meeting with the staff Monday morning. With a coach who is as direct and honest as Pettine, that meeting might not have been the most pleasant.

    http://espn.go.com/blog/cleveland-browns/post/_/id/8221/mike-pettines-frustration-at-loss-remains

    Maybe he'll light the right fires.

  • Yeah I am hoping Pettine shapes things up. I am sure watching the defense getting gashed is not sitting well with a defensively minded coach.

  • I wonder how our Defensive performance correlates to who is calling the plays. For example, do we only suck when O'neil is calling the plays or is it just all the time?

    I'm not too worried about Pettine or Shanahan. I worry about Tabor because our STs is playing very "boneheaded" this season thus far.

  • I'm so tired of this idea so many Browns fans buy into this fabricated hype that we have a good defense. It's average at best.

  • There's a tremendous difference between having an average defense with a coach like Pettine that has fielded elite squads. Or say a coach like Shurmur that honestly didn't give two shits so long as they didn't give up 40ppg and the offense completed those stupid rollouts on 3rd and short.

    I like having a coach that wants/demands better and isn't afraid to get very vocal about it.

  • I'm so tired of this idea so many Browns fans buy into this fabricated hype that we have a good defense. It's average at best.

    @walterwhite said:

    I'm so tired of this idea so many Browns fans buy into this fabricated hype that we have a good defense. It's average at best.

    We have defensive talent. If you can't see that you don't know football, I'm just not sure why it's not coming together... Scheme, playcalling, gameplanning, poor execution, etc?

  • Is replacing Cundiff realistic? And are we sure it's his fault?

    @frenchie said:

    Is replacing Cundiff realistic? And are we sure it's his fault?

    I think we have long snapper problems .

  • Maybe the long snapper has a sore knee, or shoulder, or

    has been having muscle spasms in his back, or has

    malaria.

    Dang, all these negative jumps to conclusions....

  • @djdawg2010 said:

    Do not start Haden. That doesn't mean don't play him. Just don't start him. He has been soft so far this year, and I think his big payday has gone to his head, and needs a reality check. He should be ashamed for letting himself get owned by old ass Steve Smith. He is past his prime and on the back 9 of his career!

    wow.

    you know how many 5 star CBs steve smith has owned in his career? backend of his career yeah maybe but i bet if they played NE revis would be on him....seattle sherman would be on him. i saw (not the game) but the replay of the play that cost us the game and haden go beat with speed...barely. BUT whitner was right there with the backside help to knock him out of bounds.

    teams win games on huge clutch/lucky catches and plays.

    the first game we should have won if we had played for 60 fucking mintues. sunday we should have won for other reasons besides calling out one single player. we SHOULD be 3-0.

    just shut the fuck up.

    @miktoxic said:

    wow.

    you know how many 5 star CBs steve smith has owned in his career? backend of his career yeah maybe but i bet if they played NE revis would be on him....seattle sherman would be on him. i saw (not the game) but the replay of the play that cost us the game and haden go beat with speed...barely. BUT whitner was right there with the backside help to knock him out of bounds.

    teams win games on huge clutch/lucky catches and plays.

    the first game we should have won if we had played for 60 fucking mintues. sunday we should have won for other reasons besides calling out one single player. we SHOULD be 3-0.

    just shut the fuck up.

    Woulda, coulda, shoulda, but didn't! There are no moral victories in football! The fact is we are 1-2 and not 3-0, and while there has been improvements, until the Browns figure out how to finish off the opponent when they have the opportunitity to do so, they will continue to come up short! And yes I'm aware of Steve Smith owning 5 star CBs in his career. However; he is on the back 9 of his career, and you don't let someone past his prime beat you like that in clutch time! I've always been a Haden supporter, but he has been playing soft so far this year! I didn't say bench him! I said don't start him! At any rate he'd better figure it out before the Pukers come to town again, because I'm also sick of seeing him getting his ass owned by that punk ass Antonio Brown!

  • I would not be opposed to some cuts and fa pickups. Maybe a trade?

    Obviously we need some more film study and practice.

  • I need to drink more during the games.

  • I need to drink more during the games.

    @gernthefish said:

    I need to drink more during the games.

    Go to the tavern