Skip to content

# 12 and # 19

The Browns Board
64 35 3.5k
  • @hunt-daddy said:

    I'll stay with the off topic part. Fournette is real good, but he's no Nick Chubb.

    I would take either , haven't watched much Georgia, was Gurley better?

    @5150k9 said:

    I would take either , haven't watched much Georgia, was Gurley better?

    Gurley has more natural talent and athleticism for the position, but it's hard to argue what Chubb has done this season, especially this game against the third best rush defense in the nation.

  • Yes, Gurely is better

  • OK, depth at OL .... (not that it matters) but folks down in Lexington say Dupree is going to move up...coach stoops wasnt playing him correctly...dude is a freak ---and had some impact against good talent. The FA market looks good either side of the ball. It should be interesting how the organization grades out what we have currently.

    Im thinking the only position im happy with on offense is RB ... and yet ,already saw a mock the Browns taking Gurley(Sp)...hell of a back, but we already showed that movie...i think were set with our young backs

    Defense line might be the real weakness....hard to imagine with the treasure we spent. Everyone is saying NT.

    who knows.

    Bermeck (we should be happy...no major coaching changes, and our owner isnt in prison (yet)

  • I saw in somebody's mock they had us taking the OT from Stanford I think, big guy 6-8, 315 beast they said. Andrus Peat.

    @topdawg31 said:

    I saw in somebody's mock they had us taking the OT from Stanford I think, big guy 6-8, 315 beast they said. Andrus Peat.

    He hasn't declared yet, but if he does he will likely not be available by #12. We'd have to trade into him and there are too many good OT's out there to justify that this year. One of those is still likely available at #19, so I would not be surprised to see a better run stopper taken at #12.

  • For the 12 amd 19 pick, the best thing to do for the draft would be have Pettine and farmer go to Johnny and say - what do you need in this draft to help you succeed? What players out there do you think your game would blend with best?

    It's important that your pieces on offense for optimally

  • For the 12 amd 19 pick, the best thing to do for the draft would be have Pettine and farmer go to Johnny and say - what do you need in this draft to help you succeed? What players out there do you think your game would blend with best?

    It's important that your pieces on offense for optimally

    @tacosman said:

    For the 12 amd 19 pick, the best thing to do for the draft would be have Pettine and farmer go to Johnny and say - what do you need in this draft to help you succeed? What players out there do you think your game would blend with best?

    It's important that your pieces on offense for optimally

    Hilarious

  • For the 12 amd 19 pick, the best thing to do for the draft would be have Pettine and farmer go to Johnny and say - what do you need in this draft to help you succeed? What players out there do you think your game would blend with best?

    It's important that your pieces on offense for optimally

    @tacosman said:

    For the 12 amd 19 pick, the best thing to do for the draft would be have Pettine and farmer go to Johnny and say - what do you need in this draft to help you succeed? What players out there do you think your game would blend with best?

    It's important that your pieces on offense for optimally

    Lol, Johnny can't even learn a playbook and we're going to let him draft for us now?

  • For the 12 amd 19 pick, the best thing to do for the draft would be have Pettine and farmer go to Johnny and say - what do you need in this draft to help you succeed? What players out there do you think your game would blend with best?

    It's important that your pieces on offense for optimally

    @tacosman said:

    For the 12 amd 19 pick, the best thing to do for the draft would be have Pettine and farmer go to Johnny and say - what do you need in this draft to help you succeed? What players out there do you think your game would blend with best?

    It's important that your pieces on offense for optimally

    LMAO... priceless.

  • There's always a premium placed on offensive tackles and after the incredible impact that the past class of WRs had this season I wouldn't wait to pick up players in those spots if the FO has identified them as areas of weakness. Solid interior linemen are often found in the 2nd round and beyond.

  • I do not understand the thinking of D-line over O-line...

    It took only one injury to decimate our O-line. It took three to diminish our D-line.

    @texasag1969 said:

    For Tour: Tracking to Jan 15 Deadline.

    http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000441570/article/tracking-underclassmen-intentions-for-2015-nfl-draft

    Thank you, my Ag-ish friend... some talent declaring, more deciding.

    One thing I just learned was this whole "draft grade request process"... did not know it existed until now.

    @tour2ma said:

    I do not understand the thinking of D-line over O-line....

    Probably because our defense ranked dead last out of all teams this year in run defense, allowing an average of over 140 yards rushing per game. Or maybe the fact that the teams we play next year have some of the best running backs in the game, including Le'Veon Bell (twice), Marshawn Lynch, Jeremy Hill (twice), Jamaal Charles, Frank Gore, etc, that will fucking CRUCIFY us unless we get some serious additions to the D-Line. Take your pick.

  • For the 12 amd 19 pick, the best thing to do for the draft would be have Pettine and farmer go to Johnny and say - what do you need in this draft to help you succeed? What players out there do you think your game would blend with best?

    It's important that your pieces on offense for optimally

    @tacosman said:

    For the 12 amd 19 pick, the best thing to do for the draft would be have Pettine and farmer go to Johnny and say - what do you need in this draft to help you succeed? What players out there do you think your game would blend with best?

    It's important that your pieces on offense for optimally

    I think it's time for you to stop hittin' the blue there, Heisenberg, and come back to fucking reality.

  • For the 12 amd 19 pick, the best thing to do for the draft would be have Pettine and farmer go to Johnny and say - what do you need in this draft to help you succeed? What players out there do you think your game would blend with best?

    It's important that your pieces on offense for optimally

    @tacosman said:

    For the 12 amd 19 pick, the best thing to do for the draft would be have Pettine and farmer go to Johnny and say - what do you need in this draft to help you succeed? What players out there do you think your game would blend with best?

    It's important that your pieces on offense for optimally

    Thats Hilarious, I gotta admit you have a great sense of humor. I about fell out of my chair on that 1.

  • For the Rose Bowl:

    I've watched 80% of Oregon games over the past two years. Here is my watch list.

    Arik Armstead DE, #9 - Huge and athletic. Is 6-8, 280 and uses it to eat up space. Great prospect to add to the Defensive line. He played great against Michigan State. After the playoffs and the combine, this guy will rise to a Top 20 Pick.

    Byron Marshall WR/RB, #9 - Marshall has always impressed me because of his vision and burst, however, now he is showing his versatility. This year he moved to slot receiver/back and has flourished. I could see him going in the 4th like DeAnthony Thomas. While not as dynamic, Marshall has more polish.

    Marcus Mariota - I know there is no chance we would get him on the Browns, however, some members need to watch him to realize that he is not a running quarterback. Also they will see that he progresses through his reads and has excellent pocket movement. So many people post responses incorrectly about Mariota.

    Joe Walker ILB, #35 - Always around the ball. Walker is an excellent run stuffer with good size. The last linebacker I remember seeing pop up this much was Kiko Alonso. Walker isn't the athlete Alonso is, however he's a steady force and should make the NFL. Probably stays in school for next season, but should be a solid Day 3 pick.

  • i want to sell what tacos is using. i can retire in a month. must be good stuff.

  • i want to sell what tacos is using. i can retire in a month. must be good stuff.

    @lbc-mike said:

    i want to sell what tacos is using. i can retire in a month. must be good stuff.

    I'm still working and would fail my drug test.

  • All I'm saying is that if you spend a first round draft pick on your qb, it would make sense to then spend your next first round pick on a player that goes well with the style of your first round qb. This is common sense.

  • What do people think about Danny Shelton? Sounds like just what the doctor ordered at NT for our defense: nine sacks, 88 tackles, 16.5 for a loss. At 339 pounds a good space eater/ run stuffer with pas rush ability.

  • All I'm saying is that if you spend a first round draft pick on your qb, it would make sense to then spend your next first round pick on a player that goes well with the style of your first round qb. This is common sense.

    @tacosman said:

    All I'm saying is that if you spend a first round draft pick on your qb, it would make sense to then spend your next first round pick on a player that goes well with the style of your first round qb. This is common sense.

    So far Johnny's style is to pee his pants on the field. We need the best O-line in football history.

  • What do people think about Danny Shelton? Sounds like just what the doctor ordered at NT for our defense: nine sacks, 88 tackles, 16.5 for a loss. At 339 pounds a good space eater/ run stuffer with pas rush ability.

    @osiris said:

    What do people think about Danny Shelton? Sounds like just what the doctor ordered at NT for our defense: nine sacks, 88 tackles, 16.5 for a loss. At 339 pounds a good space eater/ run stuffer with pas rush ability.

    is Phil gone next year?

  • @tour2ma said:

    I do not understand the thinking of D-line over O-line....

    Probably because our defense ranked dead last out of all teams this year in run defense, allowing an average of over 140 yards rushing per game. Or maybe the fact that the teams we play next year have some of the best running backs in the game, including Le'Veon Bell (twice), Marshawn Lynch, Jeremy Hill (twice), Jamaal Charles, Frank Gore, etc, that will fucking CRUCIFY us unless we get some serious additions to the D-Line. Take your pick.

    @jbluhm86 said:

    Probably because our defense ranked dead last out of all teams this year in run defense, allowing an average of over 140 yards rushing per game. Or maybe the fact that the teams we play next year have some of the best running backs in the game, including Le'Veon Bell (twice), Marshawn Lynch, Jeremy Hill (twice), Jamaal Charles, Frank Gore, etc, that will fucking CRUCIFY us unless we get some serious additions to the D-Line. Take your pick.

    Nothing you said was wrong, but I think that is "analysis light".

    We started with a new scheme that we were told would take until at least game 6 to learn. Almost on schedule the D came together and then the injuries started and never stopped. Every D-line starter missed time as did most of our LB crew... some were hurt twice. We had to start names that were not even on our practice squad at the beginning of the season, just to have enough bodies.

    Contrast the above accounting with an O-line that started off well, rapidly rose to acclaim and then was essentially undone by one player going down.

    Like I said... it's hard for me to understand any case for our D-line needs outweighing our O-line.

    @tacosman said:

    All I'm saying is that if you spend a first round draft pick on your qb, it would make sense to then spend your next first round pick on a player that goes well with the style of your first round qb. This is common sense.

    No. What you said was "ask Johnny"... and that is a whole other level of stupid. Which is hard to believe possible when you start with it's Johnny's job.