Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Philly looking to move up for Marriota

Philly looking to move up for Marriota

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
50 Posts 22 Posters 2.0k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ballpeenB ballpeen

    @jcam222 said:

    Multiple sources are reporting there is great interest within Philly to move up. I happen to like Nick Foles and think that Chip Kellys offense was just not a good fit for him. In the year prior he was an excellent down field passer with 2900 yds, 27 TDs vs 2 INT. In my opinion he is more than just a bridge gap for us and the new OC Flip.

    Would you give our first rounder number 19 and our 2nd round pick for Philly's 1st and 2nd from 2016 AND Foles? Flame away

    Philly wants to move up. The best way to get Foles is to tade our pick at 19 for Foles, straight up. That way Philly has more ability to do so.

    Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
    • 39k Posts
    • 9k Reputation
    W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
    #12

    @ballpeen said:

    Philly wants to move up. The best way to get Foles is to tade our pick at 19 for Foles, straight up. That way Philly has more ability to do so.

    Yes. But that also means that Philadelphia doesn't see him as a franchise quarterback. So is it worth another number one for us?

    WSS

    www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
    LogicIsForSquaresL ballpeenB 2 Replies Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • Axe AxeA Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
      • 10k Posts
      • 8k Reputation
      AxeA Axe wrote on last edited by
      #13

      An old favorite on why Kelly backed out on the Bucs.....

      Chip_Kelly_NFL.gif

      Our musical works to date http://www.arielsatticmusic.com/
      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • W Westside Steve

        @ballpeen said:

        Philly wants to move up. The best way to get Foles is to tade our pick at 19 for Foles, straight up. That way Philly has more ability to do so.

        Yes. But that also means that Philadelphia doesn't see him as a franchise quarterback. So is it worth another number one for us?

        WSS

        LogicIsForSquares LogicIsForSquaresL Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
        • 10k Posts
        • 2k Reputation
        LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on last edited by
        #14

        @westside-steve said:

        Yes. But that also means that Philadelphia doesn't see him as a franchise quarterback. So is it worth another number one for us?

        WSS

        Chip Kelly just doesn't see him as a fit for his system. He has been looking for a mobile QB for awhile now. He had Vick but he is fragile.

        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • miktoxicM miktoxic

          @walterwhite said:

          This would open up a possibility of Nick Foles becoming a hot offseason commodity for those of you looking at other QB options.

          Most of us 'smart' people have been discussing this for awhile now.

          Tour2ma Tour2maT In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
          • 30k Posts
          • 6k Reputation
          Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by Tour2ma
          #15

          @miktoxic said:

          Most of us 'smart' people have been discussing this for awhile now.

          Not exactly the way I'd put it, but...

          @tour2ma said:

          But to go for Mariotta Chip needs lots of ammo...

          But to go for Mariotta Chip needs lots of ammo, like our two first rounders atop the Eagles first. Just so happens that per the latest draft pick charts #12+#19+#20 damn near = #1.

          So let's go Eagle shopping...

          Nick Foles -

          Fletcher Cox (DT) - 24-yo, Former #1, has played DE and DT, 2nd team All-Pro

          Lane Johnson (RT) - 24-yo, Former #4 overall; PED suspension, injured.

          Connor Barwin (ILB) - 28-yo, oft injured vet, but force on the field.

          No way I see all four, but Foles plus 2 and perhaps a later pick?

          "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
          tiamat63T 1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • LogicIsForSquares LogicIsForSquaresL Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
            • 10k Posts
            • 2k Reputation
            LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on last edited by LogicIsForSquares
            #16

            Foles, Lane, and Cox would be fantastic. I just don't see it happening though.

            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • jrb12711 jrb12711J Conversation Starter Reacting Well Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
              • 5k Posts
              • 1k Reputation
              jrb12711J jrb12711 wrote on last edited by
              #17

              One interesting thing about Foles as I was looking at his stats: I know some people may be turned away with his mediocre 13 TD 10 INT ratio he had before he got hurt this year. However, according to the stats he went from about 25 attempts per game in 2013 to almost 39 this past season. I liked Foles out of the draft and I think he'd be a great trade pick-up. He's got everything you wanna see in a QB other than the scramble ability but Jesus what I wouldn't give up to have a pocket passer in Cleveland.

              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • TexasAg1969 T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                • 23k Posts
                • 6k Reputation
                T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
                #18

                I find it somewhat amusing that the Browns fans are always in search of the next "savior" like Ian Malcolm of Jurassic Park always in search of "the next ex-Mrs. Malcolm".

                It would be nice to allow the new OC to find out for himself what he has on hand before the fans trade again. LOL! 😆

                jcam222J hoortaH Tour2maT B 4 Replies Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • T TexasAg1969

                  I find it somewhat amusing that the Browns fans are always in search of the next "savior" like Ian Malcolm of Jurassic Park always in search of "the next ex-Mrs. Malcolm".

                  It would be nice to allow the new OC to find out for himself what he has on hand before the fans trade again. LOL! 😆

                  jcam222 jcam222J Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                  • 3k Posts
                  • 873 Reputation
                  jcam222J jcam222 wrote on last edited by
                  #19

                  @texasag1969 said:

                  I find it somewhat amusing that the Browns fans are always in search of the next "savior" like Ian Malcolm of Jurassic Park always in search of "the next ex-Mrs. Malcolm".

                  It would be nice to allow the new OC to find out for himself what he has on hand before the fans trade again. LOL! 😆

                  So "the Browns fans", I thought there for awhile you were among and one of us.

                  We have nothing game proven on hand is the point. We WILL bring in someone who has started NFL games and won a few. I think we are simply saying Foles would be a great get. Not only has he done well he is young. If he happened to work out he could be a long term answer or great trade bait if Manziel turns from shit to shine.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • Tour2maT Tour2ma

                    @miktoxic said:

                    Most of us 'smart' people have been discussing this for awhile now.

                    Not exactly the way I'd put it, but...

                    @tour2ma said:

                    But to go for Mariotta Chip needs lots of ammo...

                    But to go for Mariotta Chip needs lots of ammo, like our two first rounders atop the Eagles first. Just so happens that per the latest draft pick charts #12+#19+#20 damn near = #1.

                    So let's go Eagle shopping...

                    Nick Foles -

                    Fletcher Cox (DT) - 24-yo, Former #1, has played DE and DT, 2nd team All-Pro

                    Lane Johnson (RT) - 24-yo, Former #4 overall; PED suspension, injured.

                    Connor Barwin (ILB) - 28-yo, oft injured vet, but force on the field.

                    No way I see all four, but Foles plus 2 and perhaps a later pick?

                    tiamat63 tiamat63T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Week One Done One Month Later One Year In Very Popular
                    • 13k Posts
                    • 5k Reputation
                    tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by
                    #20

                    @tour2ma said:

                    Not exactly the way I'd put it, but...

                    But to go for Mariotta Chip needs lots of ammo, like our two first rounders atop the Eagles first. Just so happens that per the latest draft pick charts #12+#19+#20 damn near = #1.

                    So let's go Eagle shopping...

                    Nick Foles -

                    Fletcher Cox (DT) - 24-yo, Former #1, has played DE and DT, 2nd team All-Pro

                    Lane Johnson (RT) - 24-yo, Former #4 overall; PED suspension, injured.

                    Connor Barwin (ILB) - 28-yo, oft injured vet, but force on the field.

                    No way I see all four, but Foles plus 2 and perhaps a later pick?

                    Not a chance in hell the Iggles give up Fletcher or Johnson. Those two, aside from a franchise QB are cornerstone's to that team.

                    Also, perhaps I'm not understanding the obsession with Foles? He looked great in Kelly's system year one. Not so much in year 2.

                    Sanchez looked like he might have his career and 1st round status revived the first few games under Chip, not so much after other teams had film on him.

                    Why should we look at Foles any different then we look at Sanchez?

                    jrb12711J 1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • tiamat63T tiamat63

                      @tour2ma said:

                      Not exactly the way I'd put it, but...

                      But to go for Mariotta Chip needs lots of ammo, like our two first rounders atop the Eagles first. Just so happens that per the latest draft pick charts #12+#19+#20 damn near = #1.

                      So let's go Eagle shopping...

                      Nick Foles -

                      Fletcher Cox (DT) - 24-yo, Former #1, has played DE and DT, 2nd team All-Pro

                      Lane Johnson (RT) - 24-yo, Former #4 overall; PED suspension, injured.

                      Connor Barwin (ILB) - 28-yo, oft injured vet, but force on the field.

                      No way I see all four, but Foles plus 2 and perhaps a later pick?

                      Not a chance in hell the Iggles give up Fletcher or Johnson. Those two, aside from a franchise QB are cornerstone's to that team.

                      Also, perhaps I'm not understanding the obsession with Foles? He looked great in Kelly's system year one. Not so much in year 2.

                      Sanchez looked like he might have his career and 1st round status revived the first few games under Chip, not so much after other teams had film on him.

                      Why should we look at Foles any different then we look at Sanchez?

                      jrb12711 jrb12711J Conversation Starter Reacting Well Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                      • 5k Posts
                      • 1k Reputation
                      jrb12711J jrb12711 wrote on last edited by
                      #21

                      @tiamat63 said:

                      Not a chance in hell the Iggles give up Fletcher or Johnson. Those two, aside from a franchise QB are cornerstone's to that team.

                      Also, perhaps I'm not understanding the obsession with Foles? He looked great in Kelly's system year one. Not so much in year 2.

                      Sanchez looked like he might have his career and 1st round status revived the first few games under Chip, not so much after other teams had film on him.

                      Why should we look at Foles any different then we look at Sanchez?

                      Well you can make an argument that the "sophomore slump" is a very real thing with QB's in the NFL. I know this past season was technically year 3, but last year was his first real time starting gig. Again, I think he's a good QB with all the things you want to see in a pocket passing QB. I just think he was a round peg in Kelly's offense because he's not mobile much at all.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • jcam222J jcam222

                        Multiple sources are reporting there is great interest within Philly to move up. I happen to like Nick Foles and think that Chip Kellys offense was just not a good fit for him. In the year prior he was an excellent down field passer with 2900 yds, 27 TDs vs 2 INT. In my opinion he is more than just a bridge gap for us and the new OC Flip.

                        Would you give our first rounder number 19 and our 2nd round pick for Philly's 1st and 2nd from 2016 AND Foles? Flame away

                        andeftw andeftwA
                        • 199 Posts
                        • 3 Reputation
                        andeftwA andeftw wrote on last edited by
                        #22

                        @jcam222 said:

                        Multiple sources are reporting there is great interest within Philly to move up. I happen to like Nick Foles and think that Chip Kellys offense was just not a good fit for him. In the year prior he was an excellent down field passer with 2900 yds, 27 TDs vs 2 INT. In my opinion he is more than just a bridge gap for us and the new OC Flip.

                        Would you give our first rounder number 19 and our 2nd round pick for Philly's 1st and 2nd from 2016 AND Foles? Flame away

                        Is the 19th pick in the draft worth a 2016 second round pick and a starting QB?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • RoyceRolls R
                          • 1k Posts
                          • 345 Reputation
                          R RoyceRolls wrote on last edited by
                          #23

                          Farmer will bring in competition at the QB position. If that competition is a late round prospect or middle of the road FA then he was responsible for the JCF pick. If, however, he uses another high round pick it starts looking like he was saddled with the JCF pick.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • T TexasAg1969

                            I find it somewhat amusing that the Browns fans are always in search of the next "savior" like Ian Malcolm of Jurassic Park always in search of "the next ex-Mrs. Malcolm".

                            It would be nice to allow the new OC to find out for himself what he has on hand before the fans trade again. LOL! 😆

                            hoorta hoortaH Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                            • 20k Posts
                            • 5k Reputation
                            hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by
                            #24

                            @texasag1969 said:

                            I find it somewhat amusing that the Browns fans are always in search of the next "savior" like Ian Malcolm of Jurassic Park always in search of "the next ex-Mrs. Malcolm".

                            It would be nice to allow the new OC to find out for himself what he has on hand before the fans trade again. LOL! 😆

                            "I don't know if our starting qb is in the building.".

                            Ag, you're being reasonable- some Johnny thumpers on the other board are gonna kill themselves.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • W Westside Steve

                              @ballpeen said:

                              Philly wants to move up. The best way to get Foles is to tade our pick at 19 for Foles, straight up. That way Philly has more ability to do so.

                              Yes. But that also means that Philadelphia doesn't see him as a franchise quarterback. So is it worth another number one for us?

                              WSS

                              ballpeen ballpeenB Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                              • 9k Posts
                              • 2k Reputation
                              ballpeenB ballpeen wrote on last edited by
                              #25

                              @westside-steve said:

                              Yes. But that also means that Philadelphia doesn't see him as a franchise quarterback. So is it worth another number one for us?

                              WSS

                              I am not necessiarly saying that is what we should do, but on a hypothetical note, you don't always need a "franchise" guy. A good solid QB works as well. I think Foles is that. I don't think spending a 1st rounder for a proven solid QB who still has some upside is a bad trade.

                              I think the Philly deal is they want a QB who can do more with his feet. A better system fit which could really open their offense.

                              If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.
                              miktoxicM 1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • ballpeenB ballpeen

                                @westside-steve said:

                                Yes. But that also means that Philadelphia doesn't see him as a franchise quarterback. So is it worth another number one for us?

                                WSS

                                I am not necessiarly saying that is what we should do, but on a hypothetical note, you don't always need a "franchise" guy. A good solid QB works as well. I think Foles is that. I don't think spending a 1st rounder for a proven solid QB who still has some upside is a bad trade.

                                I think the Philly deal is they want a QB who can do more with his feet. A better system fit which could really open their offense.

                                miktoxic miktoxicM
                                • 13k Posts
                                • 1k Reputation
                                miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
                                #26

                                @ballpeen said:

                                I am not necessiarly saying that is what we should do, but on a hypothetical note, you don't always need a "franchise" guy. A good solid QB works as well. I think Foles is that. I don't think spending a 1st rounder for a proven solid QB who still has some upside is a bad trade.

                                I think the Philly deal is they want a QB who can do more with his feet. A better system fit which could really open their offense.

                                well if he can't get mariotta, we have a guy on the bench who is supposed to be mobile. trade that dud straight up for foles.

                                T 1 Reply Last reply
                                Quote Reply
                                • miktoxicM miktoxic

                                  @ballpeen said:

                                  I am not necessiarly saying that is what we should do, but on a hypothetical note, you don't always need a "franchise" guy. A good solid QB works as well. I think Foles is that. I don't think spending a 1st rounder for a proven solid QB who still has some upside is a bad trade.

                                  I think the Philly deal is they want a QB who can do more with his feet. A better system fit which could really open their offense.

                                  well if he can't get mariotta, we have a guy on the bench who is supposed to be mobile. trade that dud straight up for foles.

                                  TexasAg1969 T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                  • 23k Posts
                                  • 6k Reputation
                                  T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by TexasAg1969
                                  #27

                                  @miktoxic said:

                                  well if he can't get mariotta, we have a guy on the bench who is supposed to be mobile. trade that dud straight up for foles.

                                  And we can get a bidding war going between him and Jerrah!

                                  I am sure most are aware that JM had originally committed to Chip at Oregon before switching closer to home with the A&M offer.

                                  plus the price would not be near as high as it will be for Mariota.

                                  gftChrisG 1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • T TexasAg1969

                                    @miktoxic said:

                                    well if he can't get mariotta, we have a guy on the bench who is supposed to be mobile. trade that dud straight up for foles.

                                    And we can get a bidding war going between him and Jerrah!

                                    I am sure most are aware that JM had originally committed to Chip at Oregon before switching closer to home with the A&M offer.

                                    plus the price would not be near as high as it will be for Mariota.

                                    gftChris gftChrisG
                                    • 13k Posts
                                    • 428 Reputation
                                    gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by
                                    #28

                                    @texasag1969 said:

                                    And we can get a bidding war going between him and Jerrah!

                                    I am sure most are aware that JM had originally committed to Chip at Oregon before switching closer to home with the A&M offer.

                                    I was under the impression that was because Oregon wouldn't play him at QB though?

                                    T 1 Reply Last reply
                                    Quote Reply
                                    • gftChrisG gftChris

                                      @texasag1969 said:

                                      And we can get a bidding war going between him and Jerrah!

                                      I am sure most are aware that JM had originally committed to Chip at Oregon before switching closer to home with the A&M offer.

                                      I was under the impression that was because Oregon wouldn't play him at QB though?

                                      TexasAg1969 T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                      • 23k Posts
                                      • 6k Reputation
                                      T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by TexasAg1969
                                      #29

                                      @gftchris said:

                                      I was under the impression that was because Oregon wouldn't play him at QB though?

                                      No that was Mack brown at Texas that was only offering as a safety. Kelly wanted him as a QB.

                                      PS-the fact that JM won the Heisman while Mack lacked a QB is one of the main reasons Texas fired Brown. Manziel was a life long Longhorn fan but would not go anywhere that would not play him as a QB. MB never lived that choice down. Biggest recruiting mistake of an otherwise illustrious recruiting career at Texas.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      👍
                                      Quote Reply
                                      • T TexasAg1969

                                        I find it somewhat amusing that the Browns fans are always in search of the next "savior" like Ian Malcolm of Jurassic Park always in search of "the next ex-Mrs. Malcolm".

                                        It would be nice to allow the new OC to find out for himself what he has on hand before the fans trade again. LOL! 😆

                                        Tour2ma Tour2maT In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                                        • 30k Posts
                                        • 6k Reputation
                                        Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
                                        #30

                                        @texasag1969 said:

                                        I find it somewhat amusing that the Browns fans are always in search of the next "savior" like Ian Malcolm of Jurassic Park always in search of "the next ex-Mrs. Malcolm".

                                        It would be nice to allow the new OC to find out for himself what he has on hand before the fans trade again. LOL! 😆

                                        That's why we're here... to amuse you.

                                        You always have to be looking for your next QB... especially since we don't have one right now.

                                        @tiamat63 said:

                                        Not a chance in hell the Iggles give up Fletcher or Johnson. Those two, aside from a franchise QB are cornerstone's to that team.

                                        Also, perhaps I'm not understanding the obsession with Foles? He looked great in Kelly's system year one. Not so much in year 2.

                                        Sanchez looked like he might have his career and 1st round status revived the first few games under Chip, not so much after other teams had film on him.

                                        Why should we look at Foles any different then we look at Sanchez?

                                        Like jrb, I liked Foles coming out of AZ. He was my sleeper QB in the class of 2012. He's done nothing but reinforce my opinion that he has nice, NFL-grade, role QB potential. Again, as jrb pointed out, as a role guy in his Chip debut he prospered. As "the guy" in year two, he stumbled. I'm happy with going after him as a piece; I do not see "the guy" in him or anyone else we might have a shot at.

                                        As for the trade, you never know unless you ask... I agree that Cox is probably untouchable, but he and Barwin would certainly address needs whereas Johnson would "merely" be an upgrade.

                                        Who knows who else we have on roster that Chip likes?

                                        "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        Quote Reply
                                        • jcam222J jcam222

                                          Multiple sources are reporting there is great interest within Philly to move up. I happen to like Nick Foles and think that Chip Kellys offense was just not a good fit for him. In the year prior he was an excellent down field passer with 2900 yds, 27 TDs vs 2 INT. In my opinion he is more than just a bridge gap for us and the new OC Flip.

                                          Would you give our first rounder number 19 and our 2nd round pick for Philly's 1st and 2nd from 2016 AND Foles? Flame away

                                          Erie Dawg Erie DawgE
                                          • 2k Posts
                                          • 74 Reputation
                                          Erie DawgE Erie Dawg wrote on last edited by
                                          #31

                                          @jcam222 said:

                                          Would you give our first rounder number 19 and our 2nd round pick for Philly's 1st and 2nd from 2016 AND Foles? Flame away

                                          if what you are saying is we lease our picks this year and get back potentially slightly less in draft picks next year for foles, yes, do it.
                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Quote Reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Theme
                                          • System
                                          • Light
                                          • Dark
                                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Forums
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Donate