Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Edwards for Kiwi?

Edwards for Kiwi?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
38 Posts 13 Posters 3.0k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • heckofajobbrownie H
    • 6k Posts
    • 47 Reputation
    H heckofajobbrownie wrote on last edited by
    #1

    "Rumor one has the Giants trading Kiwanuka to the Browns for Edwards. Since the Browns are completely retooling, Cleveland would demand a draft pick from the Giants, as well. The Browns desperately need help on defense and Braylon Edwards could probably use a change of scenery. Newsday reported on Thursday that the Giants are not interested in a Kiwanuka for Edwards deal. The story suggests, however, that New York would part with draft picks in order to bring Edwards to the Giants."

    I don't buy the trade, but I could see some sort of other deal, especially since now we're in a great position to draft Crabtree. Give us two picks and Sinorice Moss and we'll give you Edwards. That sort of thing.

    Y 1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • H heckofajobbrownie

      "Rumor one has the Giants trading Kiwanuka to the Browns for Edwards. Since the Browns are completely retooling, Cleveland would demand a draft pick from the Giants, as well. The Browns desperately need help on defense and Braylon Edwards could probably use a change of scenery. Newsday reported on Thursday that the Giants are not interested in a Kiwanuka for Edwards deal. The story suggests, however, that New York would part with draft picks in order to bring Edwards to the Giants."

      I don't buy the trade, but I could see some sort of other deal, especially since now we're in a great position to draft Crabtree. Give us two picks and Sinorice Moss and we'll give you Edwards. That sort of thing.

      YtownBrownsBacker Y
      • 2k Posts
      • 0 Reputation
      Y YtownBrownsBacker wrote on last edited by
      #2

      @heckofajobbrownie said:

      "Rumor one has the Giants trading Kiwanuka to the Browns for Edwards. Since the Browns are completely retooling, Cleveland would demand a draft pick from the Giants, as well. The Browns desperately need help on defense and Braylon Edwards could probably use a change of scenery. Newsday reported on Thursday that the Giants are not interested in a Kiwanuka for Edwards deal. The story suggests, however, that New York would part with draft picks in order to bring Edwards to the Giants."

      I don't buy the trade, but I could see some sort of other deal, especially since now we're in a great position to draft Crabtree. Give us two picks and Sinorice Moss and we'll give you Edwards. That sort of thing.

      Philly is also looking for a #1 WR as is Minn and other teams. If the Browns want to trade Edwards, there will be suiters.

      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • Alendor A
        • 333 Posts
        • 0 Reputation
        A Alendor wrote on last edited by
        #3

        i think a trade would be dumb. if we give BE to guys looking for a #1 reciever, then we're looking for exactly what we just traded away. makes no sense. unless we can lock up another throught the draft, and i don't think we'll end up taking crabtree

        ballpeenB C 2 Replies Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • JewDago J
          • 837 Posts
          • 0 Reputation
          J JewDago wrote on last edited by
          #4

          there's two considerations here: if we make the trade before we're completely certain to get crabtree, we have no true #1 receiver and our offense is screwed. however, if we make the trade once we're sure to get crabtree, we lose leverage and can't get the same value for edwards.

          however, keeping the fifth pick, getting crabtree and getting any combination of 1/3, 1/4, 2/3 or 2/4 would allow us to vastly improve our defense while building for the future, nurturing a young WR, letting him develop a rapport with whoever's going to be our QB and possibly improving our offensive line.

          if we get the opportunity to make this trade, with what we've seen from our FO and the direction they want to go in, i think we have to make it. if we can get equitable compensation for edwards while also replacing him with a similar player, there's little to no reason why we wouldn't pull the trigger, especially considering his perceived desire to get out of cleveland as fast as he can and play in a bigger market.

          GipsG 1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • J JewDago

            there's two considerations here: if we make the trade before we're completely certain to get crabtree, we have no true #1 receiver and our offense is screwed. however, if we make the trade once we're sure to get crabtree, we lose leverage and can't get the same value for edwards.

            however, keeping the fifth pick, getting crabtree and getting any combination of 1/3, 1/4, 2/3 or 2/4 would allow us to vastly improve our defense while building for the future, nurturing a young WR, letting him develop a rapport with whoever's going to be our QB and possibly improving our offensive line.

            if we get the opportunity to make this trade, with what we've seen from our FO and the direction they want to go in, i think we have to make it. if we can get equitable compensation for edwards while also replacing him with a similar player, there's little to no reason why we wouldn't pull the trigger, especially considering his perceived desire to get out of cleveland as fast as he can and play in a bigger market.

            Gips GipsG
            • 3k Posts
            • 34 Reputation
            GipsG Gips wrote on last edited by Gips
            #5

            @jewdago said:

            there's two considerations here: if we make the trade before we're completely certain to get crabtree, we have no true #1 receiver and our offense is screwed. however, if we make the trade once we're sure to get crabtree, we lose leverage and can't get the same value for edwards.

            however, keeping the fifth pick, getting crabtree and getting any combination of 1/3, 1/4, 2/3 or 2/4 would allow us to vastly improve our defense while building for the future, nurturing a young WR, letting him develop a rapport with whoever's going to be our QB and possibly improving our offensive line.

            if we get the opportunity to make this trade, with what we've seen from our FO and the direction they want to go in, i think we have to make it. if we can get equitable compensation for edwards while also replacing him with a similar player, there's little to no reason why we wouldn't pull the trigger, especially considering his perceived desire to get out of cleveland as fast as he can and play in a bigger market.

            Im not completely sold on crabtree as an athlete the kid has great hands and the type of attitude mangini would like but he is not real fast and may have tuffness/durability issues theres a good chance he wont last in the nfl he seems he could be injury prone in the nfl mosh pit...for a WR maclin is a far better bet to stay healthy and be a consistant contributor to a successful team...

            I would take either over BE any given day Edwards has always been Mr.Dropsy if the ball isnt 5 feet over his head he cant handle it and we need to replace him asap..

            We have been rebuilding since 1964, Why stop now? GO BROWNS!
            ? J 2 Replies Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • GipsG Gips

              @jewdago said:

              there's two considerations here: if we make the trade before we're completely certain to get crabtree, we have no true #1 receiver and our offense is screwed. however, if we make the trade once we're sure to get crabtree, we lose leverage and can't get the same value for edwards.

              however, keeping the fifth pick, getting crabtree and getting any combination of 1/3, 1/4, 2/3 or 2/4 would allow us to vastly improve our defense while building for the future, nurturing a young WR, letting him develop a rapport with whoever's going to be our QB and possibly improving our offensive line.

              if we get the opportunity to make this trade, with what we've seen from our FO and the direction they want to go in, i think we have to make it. if we can get equitable compensation for edwards while also replacing him with a similar player, there's little to no reason why we wouldn't pull the trigger, especially considering his perceived desire to get out of cleveland as fast as he can and play in a bigger market.

              Im not completely sold on crabtree as an athlete the kid has great hands and the type of attitude mangini would like but he is not real fast and may have tuffness/durability issues theres a good chance he wont last in the nfl he seems he could be injury prone in the nfl mosh pit...for a WR maclin is a far better bet to stay healthy and be a consistant contributor to a successful team...

              I would take either over BE any given day Edwards has always been Mr.Dropsy if the ball isnt 5 feet over his head he cant handle it and we need to replace him asap..

              mz. ?
              • Posts
              • 0 Reputation
              ? mz. wrote on last edited by
              #6

              @gips said:

              Im not completely sold on crabtree as an athlete the kid has great hands and the type of attitude mangini would like but he is not real fast and may have tuffness/durability issues theres a good chance he wont last in the nfl he seems he could be injury prone in the nfl mosh pit...for a WR maclin is a far better bet to stay healthy and be a consistant contributor to a successful team...

              Man, I could not disagree more. But that what makes America beautiful. ๐Ÿ™‚

              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • GipsG Gips

                @jewdago said:

                there's two considerations here: if we make the trade before we're completely certain to get crabtree, we have no true #1 receiver and our offense is screwed. however, if we make the trade once we're sure to get crabtree, we lose leverage and can't get the same value for edwards.

                however, keeping the fifth pick, getting crabtree and getting any combination of 1/3, 1/4, 2/3 or 2/4 would allow us to vastly improve our defense while building for the future, nurturing a young WR, letting him develop a rapport with whoever's going to be our QB and possibly improving our offensive line.

                if we get the opportunity to make this trade, with what we've seen from our FO and the direction they want to go in, i think we have to make it. if we can get equitable compensation for edwards while also replacing him with a similar player, there's little to no reason why we wouldn't pull the trigger, especially considering his perceived desire to get out of cleveland as fast as he can and play in a bigger market.

                Im not completely sold on crabtree as an athlete the kid has great hands and the type of attitude mangini would like but he is not real fast and may have tuffness/durability issues theres a good chance he wont last in the nfl he seems he could be injury prone in the nfl mosh pit...for a WR maclin is a far better bet to stay healthy and be a consistant contributor to a successful team...

                I would take either over BE any given day Edwards has always been Mr.Dropsy if the ball isnt 5 feet over his head he cant handle it and we need to replace him asap..

                JewDago J
                • 837 Posts
                • 0 Reputation
                J JewDago wrote on last edited by
                #7

                @gips said:

                Im not completely sold on crabtree as an athlete the kid has great hands and the type of attitude mangini would like but he is not real fast and may have tuffness/durability issues theres a good chance he wont last in the nfl he seems he could be injury prone in the nfl mosh pit...for a WR maclin is a far better bet to stay healthy and be a consistant contributor to a successful team...

                much like mz the pussy, i also couldn't disagree more. รผber-fast guys often get away with running unpolished routes in college because they're fast enough to run away from everyone, but they then struggle in the NFL because everyone in the league is fast, while guys who actually study the position, run crisp, precise routes, can use their bodies to shield the ball from defenders and will compete to make the catch have more success.

                it's why housh had the success he did in cinci, hines ward excelled in pittsburgh and why michael irvin was successful, to cite three examples.

                i just did a quick search for crabtree's injury history, but aside from the stress fracture, i didn't find anything, so it shouldn't be all that much of a concern. obviously, you'd prefer someone who's never been injured, but a one-time thing, as long as it's not the obvious beginning of a debilitating condition, shouldn't be too worrisome.

                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • mz. ?
                  • Posts
                  • 0 Reputation
                  ? mz. wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  There's no "injury history" with Crabtree. That's garbage. He has a current injury, that's all.

                  J 1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • ? Guest

                    There's no "injury history" with Crabtree. That's garbage. He has a current injury, that's all.

                    JewDago J
                    • 837 Posts
                    • 0 Reputation
                    J JewDago wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    mz. said:

                    There's no "injury history" with Crabtree. That's garbage. He has a current injury, that's all.

                    good call. i did the search just to be sure there wasn't something i didn't know about since i'm not really a follower of texas tech.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • Aloysius ?
                      • Posts
                      • 0 Reputation
                      ? Aloysius wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      Yeah, I think Crabtree's bust factor is very low. He may not be a Calvin Johnson-type prospect, but he's got strong hands and blocks very well downfield. That, and he was amazingly productive at Texas Tech as a virtual novice at receiver (he played quarterback in high school).

                      The only thing that could be an issue is attitude. I haven't heard anything concrete, but there are rumblings that he's got a little bit of an attitude. But he's not a Percy Harvin/Kenny Britt kind of asshole.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • heckofajobbrownie H
                        • 6k Posts
                        • 47 Reputation
                        H heckofajobbrownie wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        With Winslow gone and Jurevicius 147 years old it's also a huge area of need.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • mz. ?
                          • Posts
                          • 0 Reputation
                          ? mz. wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          @shepwrite said:

                          I remember us drafting a can't miss uber-star game changing circus catcher at #3... and now we can't wait to get rid of him.

                          Sure, but do YOU want to/think it's smart to get rid of him? I sure as shit don't...

                          S 1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • mz. ?
                            • Posts
                            • 0 Reputation
                            ? mz. wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            And as to the "he's no Fitz" line of thinking, I guess you have to take what you're given.

                            Stafford is no Peyton Manning and Orakpo is no Lawrence Taylor...

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • mz. ?
                              • Posts
                              • 0 Reputation
                              ? mz. wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              @shepwrite said:

                              I like him. Just not at #5.

                              But if he's the best player available and a trade down isn't possible............................

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • damajuki D
                                • 475 Posts
                                • 0 Reputation
                                D damajuki wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                Honestly, if we can get another Day One pick this year and any other decent pick or picks for BE, I say get rid of him and then figure it out.

                                Look, Year One of any new FO is a de facto rebuilding year.

                                And the only way to enjoy a rebuilding year is to focus on the BUILDING.

                                And for building you need bricks, and lots of 'em.

                                So, I support the start from scratch philosophy 100%.

                                I mean, good Lord, can you imagine starting any combination of Quinn, Crabtree, Orakpo, Wells, Greene, CMIII, Sintim, etc. THIS year? Four or even FIVE rookie talents in ONE draft, not even counting Day Two guys?

                                And then watching them all play together for 4-10 years, along with JT, DQ, EW, BMac, et. al.?

                                That would be worth my entertainment dollar, for sure. Far better than watching BE try to catch and DA try to throw again, anyway.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                Quote Reply
                                • Aloysius ?
                                  • Posts
                                  • 0 Reputation
                                  ? Aloysius wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  Here's what Kokinis said at the Combine when a reporter asked him about Crabtree's "speed issue":

                                  Kokinis said:

                                  "Speed issue? The only speed issue I've seen so far is him running by people, so I'm not sure what speed issue you're referring to. I think when he does time, whether here or at his school, you match it to the tape, match it to his competition, and try to project it against NFL corners and safeties and linebackers and stuff like that.

                                  I'm not too concerned about Michael's speed right now because right now on tape I see him running pretty good."

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • ? Guest

                                    @shepwrite said:

                                    I remember us drafting a can't miss uber-star game changing circus catcher at #3... and now we can't wait to get rid of him.

                                    Sure, but do YOU want to/think it's smart to get rid of him? I sure as shit don't...

                                    Solon16 S
                                    • 2k Posts
                                    • 0 Reputation
                                    S Solon16 wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    mz. said:

                                    Sure, but do YOU want to/think it's smart to get rid of him? I sure as shit don't...

                                    Absoxxxxinlootly....if we are only going to get a late round third next year when BE bolts to a big city market to promote his modeling carreer...hell yes. get a second rounder for his ass right now and draft Hakkem nicks in the second !

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    Quote Reply
                                    • Legacy Fan Legacy FanL
                                      • 3k Posts
                                      • 197 Reputation
                                      Legacy FanL Legacy Fan wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      Good thread.

                                      Over on NFL Network Dukes & Davis have Curry "falling" to us. It seems Chiefs HC Haley will take Crabtree because of his success in AZ with Fitz & Boldin.

                                      I sure hope so.

                                      Sure, luck means a lot in football. Not having a good quarterback is bad luck. -Don Shula
                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      Quote Reply
                                      • A Alendor

                                        i think a trade would be dumb. if we give BE to guys looking for a #1 reciever, then we're looking for exactly what we just traded away. makes no sense. unless we can lock up another throught the draft, and i don't think we'll end up taking crabtree

                                        ballpeen ballpeenB Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                        • 9k Posts
                                        • 2k Reputation
                                        ballpeenB ballpeen wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        @alendor said:

                                        i think a trade would be dumb. if we give BE to guys looking for a #1 reciever, then we're looking for exactly what we just traded away. makes no sense. unless we can lock up another throught the draft, and i don't think we'll end up taking crabtree

                                        I agree with your reasoning.

                                        What isn't mentioned is if Edwards is a Mangini type player.

                                        I tend to think not and would place the odds pretty high Edwards is in a new uniform to start the season.

                                        If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.
                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        Quote Reply
                                        • A Alendor

                                          i think a trade would be dumb. if we give BE to guys looking for a #1 reciever, then we're looking for exactly what we just traded away. makes no sense. unless we can lock up another throught the draft, and i don't think we'll end up taking crabtree

                                          CLEVELandMILIDH C
                                          • 2k Posts
                                          • 52 Reputation
                                          C CLEVELandMILIDH wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          @alendor said:

                                          i think a trade would be dumb. if we give BE to guys looking for a #1 reciever, then we're looking for exactly what we just traded away. makes no sense. unless we can lock up another throught the draft, and i don't think we'll end up taking crabtree

                                          Yea but if your able to get a player and a draft pick or just 2 draft picks then your able to address 2 positions on your team for 1.

                                          The cowboys gave a 1st, 3rd, and 6th for Roy Williams and a 7th, If we can get a 1st and 3rd id do it in a heartbeat.

                                          1st Ezekiel Ansah, DE, BYU 3rd Darius Slay, CB, Mississippi State4th Landry Jones, QB, Oklahoma5th Earl Wolff, S, N.C. State6th Lucas Reed, TE, New Mexico
                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Quote Reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better ๐Ÿ’—

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Theme
                                          • System
                                          • Light
                                          • Dark
                                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Forums
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Donate