Skip to content

Browns vs. Steelers offensive line

Locked The Browns Board
102 13 2.2k
  • @douche-nozzle said:

    Look, I understand that you guys can't conceive of anything but the quick fix or you wouldn't be drumming for the same crap that fails for your team every year. Drafting a stud QB to play in a FUBAR organization like the Browns has never worked and it never will. Why can't you see that by trading down out of the first round and get some quality talent at core positions for a couple years, coupled with allowing a coaching staff the time to gel, might be the only way the Browns can get out of the cellar? It's only been demonstrated countless times........but I know......you guys are the best fans and you know better 😁

    The point is, the Browns have not gotten that stud QB...even though they have tried. Had one of these guys turned out like we had hoped....the way BR turned out for you (instead of being the next Cade McNown) then things would be a lot different. Bad luck at drafting those QBs has been partially responsible for the instability. If Brady Quinn had actually been the next Tom Brady don't you think that Phil Savage may still be here?

    And the other point here, my obtuse friend, is that very few if any here are advocating that the Browns go after another supposedly "stud" QB this year. And we certainly don't need to "trade down". We can, and should get "core players" at other positions at #12 and #19. They might even get a quality offensive skill player.....a Devante Parker/Maxx Williams. Or more help in the OL/DL/LB spots.

    Have you actually been contemplating anything else that is said on here.....or are you too obsessed by the lint in your navel to look outside your own little world.

  • Ban him. Keep vagitron.

  • @douche-nozzle said:

    Look, I understand that you guys can't conceive of anything but the quick fix or you wouldn't be drumming for the same crap that fails for your team every year. Drafting a stud QB to play in a FUBAR organization like the Browns has never worked and it never will. Why can't you see that by trading down out of the first round and get some quality talent at core positions for a couple years, coupled with allowing a coaching staff the time to gel, might be the only way the Browns can get out of the cellar? It's only been demonstrated countless times........but I know......you guys are the best fans and you know better 😁

    The point is, the Browns have not gotten that stud QB...even though they have tried. Had one of these guys turned out like we had hoped....the way BR turned out for you (instead of being the next Cade McNown) then things would be a lot different. Bad luck at drafting those QBs has been partially responsible for the instability. If Brady Quinn had actually been the next Tom Brady don't you think that Phil Savage may still be here?

    And the other point here, my obtuse friend, is that very few if any here are advocating that the Browns go after another supposedly "stud" QB this year. And we certainly don't need to "trade down". We can, and should get "core players" at other positions at #12 and #19. They might even get a quality offensive skill player.....a Devante Parker/Maxx Williams. Or more help in the OL/DL/LB spots.

    Have you actually been contemplating anything else that is said on here.....or are you too obsessed by the lint in your navel to look outside your own little world.

    @the-gipper said:

    The point is, the Browns have not gotten that stud QB...even though they have tried. Had one of these guys turned out like we had hoped....the way BR turned out for you (instead of being the next Cade McNown) then things would be a lot different. Bad luck at drafting those QBs has been partially responsible for the instability. If Brady Quinn had actually been the next Tom Brady don't you think that Phil Savage may still be here?

    And the other point here, my obtuse friend, is that very few if any here are advocating that the Browns go after another supposedly "stud" QB this year. And we certainly don't need to "trade down". We can, and should get "core players" at other positions at #12 and #19. They might even get a quality offensive skill player.....a Devante Parker/Maxx Williams. Or more help in the OL/DL/LB spots.

    Have you actually been contemplating anything else that is said on here.....or are you too obsessed by the lint in your navel to look outside your own little world.

    If this if that. If the Browns didn't stink they would be good. If they had better players they wouldn't lose so much. If Gipper would take his Browns goggles off he'd see his team has stunk for the last quarter century and the players on his team aren't as good as he thinks they are. Maybe the Browns have drafted some really good quarterbacks over the last 50 years, but they've had to play on crappy teams. Maybe if the Browns didn't ruin so many promising careers some of those top 10 picks would have panned out.

    So the difference between the Steelers and the Browns is luck? Got it. I guess it's better to be lucky than good. But you keep telling everyone who will listen how much better your players are and the Steelers will keep winning more games than the Browns. This is the same story every single offseason. It gets worse after the draft when you guys start projecting how your picks have perfectly solved all that ills your team. Then the season starts and about a month later the posts about "being done with this team" start. It's rather funny and very predictable.

  • @the-gipper said:

    The point is, the Browns have not gotten that stud QB...even though they have tried. Had one of these guys turned out like we had hoped....the way BR turned out for you (instead of being the next Cade McNown) then things would be a lot different. Bad luck at drafting those QBs has been partially responsible for the instability. If Brady Quinn had actually been the next Tom Brady don't you think that Phil Savage may still be here?

    And the other point here, my obtuse friend, is that very few if any here are advocating that the Browns go after another supposedly "stud" QB this year. And we certainly don't need to "trade down". We can, and should get "core players" at other positions at #12 and #19. They might even get a quality offensive skill player.....a Devante Parker/Maxx Williams. Or more help in the OL/DL/LB spots.

    Have you actually been contemplating anything else that is said on here.....or are you too obsessed by the lint in your navel to look outside your own little world.

    If this if that. If the Browns didn't stink they would be good. If they had better players they wouldn't lose so much. If Gipper would take his Browns goggles off he'd see his team has stunk for the last quarter century and the players on his team aren't as good as he thinks they are. Maybe the Browns have drafted some really good quarterbacks over the last 50 years, but they've had to play on crappy teams. Maybe if the Browns didn't ruin so many promising careers some of those top 10 picks would have panned out.

    So the difference between the Steelers and the Browns is luck? Got it. I guess it's better to be lucky than good. But you keep telling everyone who will listen how much better your players are and the Steelers will keep winning more games than the Browns. This is the same story every single offseason. It gets worse after the draft when you guys start projecting how your picks have perfectly solved all that ills your team. Then the season starts and about a month later the posts about "being done with this team" start. It's rather funny and very predictable.

    @trolling-for-dick said:

    If this if that. If the Browns didn't stink they would be good. If they had better players they wouldn't lose so much. If Gipper would take his Browns goggles off he'd see his team has stunk for the last quarter century and the players on his team aren't as good as he thinks they are. Maybe the Browns have drafted some really good quarterbacks over the last 50 years, but they've had to play on crappy teams. Maybe if the Browns didn't ruin so many promising careers some of those top 10 picks would have panned out.

    So the difference between the Steelers and the Browns is luck? Got it. I guess it's better to be lucky than good. But you keep telling everyone who will listen how much better your players are and the Steelers will keep winning more games than the Browns. This is the same story every single offseason. It gets worse after the draft when you guys start projecting how your picks have perfectly solved all that ills your team. Then the season starts and about a month later the posts about "being done with this team" start. It's rather funny and very predictable.

    Perfect summation. I also must say zombo or whomever changed your name (what was it before?) Knocked it out of the park with this one. I laugh my ass off every time I read trolling for dick.

  • @trolling-for-dick said:

    If this if that. If the Browns didn't stink they would be good. If they had better players they wouldn't lose so much. If Gipper would take his Browns goggles off he'd see his team has stunk for the last quarter century and the players on his team aren't as good as he thinks they are. Maybe the Browns have drafted some really good quarterbacks over the last 50 years, but they've had to play on crappy teams. Maybe if the Browns didn't ruin so many promising careers some of those top 10 picks would have panned out.

    So the difference between the Steelers and the Browns is luck? Got it. I guess it's better to be lucky than good. But you keep telling everyone who will listen how much better your players are and the Steelers will keep winning more games than the Browns. This is the same story every single offseason. It gets worse after the draft when you guys start projecting how your picks have perfectly solved all that ills your team. Then the season starts and about a month later the posts about "being done with this team" start. It's rather funny and very predictable.

    Perfect summation. I also must say zombo or whomever changed your name (what was it before?) Knocked it out of the park with this one. I laugh my ass off every time I read trolling for dick.

    @vagitron said:

    Perfect summation. I also must say zombo or whomever changed your name (what was it before?) Knocked it out of the park with this one. I laugh my ass off every time I read trolling for dick.

    Pretty catchy isn't it?

  • @vagitron said:

    Perfect summation. I also must say zombo or whomever changed your name (what was it before?) Knocked it out of the park with this one. I laugh my ass off every time I read trolling for dick.

    Pretty catchy isn't it?

    @trolling-for-dick said:

    Pretty catchy isn't it?

    You've gotta laugh when you read it. Its a good one. On point Browns board summary. (You were unbiased right? Your unchanged name)

  • @vagitron said:

    Perfect summation. I also must say zombo or whomever changed your name (what was it before?) Knocked it out of the park with this one. I laugh my ass off every time I read trolling for dick.

    Pretty catchy isn't it?

    @trolling-for-dick said:

    Pretty catchy isn't it?

    By the way, when I first signed up here I was "Unbiased". I tried really hard to keep it civil but damn this is a tough crowd. I went away and didn't intend to come back but sometimes I feel like you need some backup to deal with these hellions.

  • @trolling-for-dick said:

    Pretty catchy isn't it?

    By the way, when I first signed up here I was "Unbiased". I tried really hard to keep it civil but damn this is a tough crowd. I went away and didn't intend to come back but sometimes I feel like you need some backup to deal with these hellions.

    @trolling-for-dick said:

    By the way, when I first signed up here I was "Unbiased". I tried really hard to keep it civil but damn this is a tough crowd. I went away and didn't intend to come back but sometimes I feel like you need some backup to deal with these hellions.

    Ha, I figured as much and I appreciate it. Strangely enough I like it here. I appreciate some of the better posters and I enjoy name calling the more pompous/clueless bunch. It is a tough crowd but its also enemy territory. They could perma ban me but they haven't and that's something I can appreciate. I do find it amusing that you haven't been here long but put down a perfect year to year summary of what happens on this board. It could by a psych study.

  • @trolling-for-dick said:

    By the way, when I first signed up here I was "Unbiased". I tried really hard to keep it civil but damn this is a tough crowd. I went away and didn't intend to come back but sometimes I feel like you need some backup to deal with these hellions.

    Ha, I figured as much and I appreciate it. Strangely enough I like it here. I appreciate some of the better posters and I enjoy name calling the more pompous/clueless bunch. It is a tough crowd but its also enemy territory. They could perma ban me but they haven't and that's something I can appreciate. I do find it amusing that you haven't been here long but put down a perfect year to year summary of what happens on this board. It could by a psych study.

    @vagitron said:

    Ha, I figured as much and I appreciate it. Strangely enough I like it here. I appreciate some of the better posters and I enjoy name calling the more pompous/clueless bunch. It is a tough crowd but its also enemy territory. They could perma ban me but they haven't and that's something I can appreciate. I do find it amusing that you haven't been here long but put down a perfect year to year summary of what happens on this board. It could by a psych study.

    Like I said before, I've been around for years but never posted. It's too negative. I live geographically equidistant from Cleveland, Buffalo and Pittsburgh, so I've been dealing with Browns fans my whole life. Erie is a football melting pot.

  • @vagitron said:

    Ha, I figured as much and I appreciate it. Strangely enough I like it here. I appreciate some of the better posters and I enjoy name calling the more pompous/clueless bunch. It is a tough crowd but its also enemy territory. They could perma ban me but they haven't and that's something I can appreciate. I do find it amusing that you haven't been here long but put down a perfect year to year summary of what happens on this board. It could by a psych study.

    Like I said before, I've been around for years but never posted. It's too negative. I live geographically equidistant from Cleveland, Buffalo and Pittsburgh, so I've been dealing with Browns fans my whole life. Erie is a football melting pot.

    @trolling-for-dick said:

    Like I said before, I've been around for years but never posted. It's too negative. I live geographically equidistant from Cleveland, Buffalo and Pittsburgh, so I've been dealing with Browns fans my whole life. Erie is a football melting pot.

    Ahh got ya. Yes, yes it is, I went to mercyhurst my freshman year. It was a pretty distinct mix of people from those exact areas.

  • @the-gipper said:

    The point is, the Browns have not gotten that stud QB...even though they have tried. Had one of these guys turned out like we had hoped....the way BR turned out for you (instead of being the next Cade McNown) then things would be a lot different. Bad luck at drafting those QBs has been partially responsible for the instability. If Brady Quinn had actually been the next Tom Brady don't you think that Phil Savage may still be here?

    And the other point here, my obtuse friend, is that very few if any here are advocating that the Browns go after another supposedly "stud" QB this year. And we certainly don't need to "trade down". We can, and should get "core players" at other positions at #12 and #19. They might even get a quality offensive skill player.....a Devante Parker/Maxx Williams. Or more help in the OL/DL/LB spots.

    Have you actually been contemplating anything else that is said on here.....or are you too obsessed by the lint in your navel to look outside your own little world.

    If this if that. If the Browns didn't stink they would be good. If they had better players they wouldn't lose so much. If Gipper would take his Browns goggles off he'd see his team has stunk for the last quarter century and the players on his team aren't as good as he thinks they are. Maybe the Browns have drafted some really good quarterbacks over the last 50 years, but they've had to play on crappy teams. Maybe if the Browns didn't ruin so many promising careers some of those top 10 picks would have panned out.

    So the difference between the Steelers and the Browns is luck? Got it. I guess it's better to be lucky than good. But you keep telling everyone who will listen how much better your players are and the Steelers will keep winning more games than the Browns. This is the same story every single offseason. It gets worse after the draft when you guys start projecting how your picks have perfectly solved all that ills your team. Then the season starts and about a month later the posts about "being done with this team" start. It's rather funny and very predictable.

    @trolling-for-dick said:

    If this if that. If the Browns didn't stink they would be good. If they had better players they wouldn't lose so much.

    I assume you are a new stupid steeler fan putting his nose into things....given your screen name. The point is.....they DO have better players. Have you been paying attention.....But the Steelers do have the quality players in the right spots....like QB, to make all the difference ultimately.

    If Gipper would take his Browns goggles off he'd see his team has stunk for the last quarter century and the players on his team aren't as good as he thinks they are. .

    Then you need to inform the neutral ranking agencies that do that sort of thing. THEY, like PFF, are the ones that put out those rankings/gradings

    Maybe the Browns have drafted some really good quarterbacks over the last 50 years, but they've had to play on crappy teams. Maybe if the Browns didn't ruin so many promising careers some of those top 10 picks would have panned out.

    Except....when they left here they sucked just as bad or worse. Please, tell us which of those former Browns QBs have gone on to glory and championships after they left here....you can't.

    So the difference between the Steelers and the Browns is luck? Got it.

    Yes, partially. You are lucky that Brady Quinn was not Tom Brady....and that BR was not Cade McNown.

    I guess it's better to be lucky than good.

    Yes, it very well be.

    But you keep telling everyone who will listen how much better your players are and the Steelers will keep winning more games than the Browns.

    Trade QBs.....and you would see that I am right.

    If you are SO confident, you would agree to that.

    This is the same story every single offseason. It gets worse after the draft when you guys start projecting how your picks have perfectly solved all that ills your team. Then the season starts and about a month later the posts about "being done with this team" start. It's rather funny and very predictable.

    With the loss of LeBeau, and BR about to go over that hill, you will be finding out fairly soon likely.

  • @trolling-for-dick said:

    If this if that. If the Browns didn't stink they would be good. If they had better players they wouldn't lose so much.

    I assume you are a new stupid steeler fan putting his nose into things....given your screen name. The point is.....they DO have better players. Have you been paying attention.....But the Steelers do have the quality players in the right spots....like QB, to make all the difference ultimately.

    If Gipper would take his Browns goggles off he'd see his team has stunk for the last quarter century and the players on his team aren't as good as he thinks they are. .

    Then you need to inform the neutral ranking agencies that do that sort of thing. THEY, like PFF, are the ones that put out those rankings/gradings

    Maybe the Browns have drafted some really good quarterbacks over the last 50 years, but they've had to play on crappy teams. Maybe if the Browns didn't ruin so many promising careers some of those top 10 picks would have panned out.

    Except....when they left here they sucked just as bad or worse. Please, tell us which of those former Browns QBs have gone on to glory and championships after they left here....you can't.

    So the difference between the Steelers and the Browns is luck? Got it.

    Yes, partially. You are lucky that Brady Quinn was not Tom Brady....and that BR was not Cade McNown.

    I guess it's better to be lucky than good.

    Yes, it very well be.

    But you keep telling everyone who will listen how much better your players are and the Steelers will keep winning more games than the Browns.

    Trade QBs.....and you would see that I am right.

    If you are SO confident, you would agree to that.

    This is the same story every single offseason. It gets worse after the draft when you guys start projecting how your picks have perfectly solved all that ills your team. Then the season starts and about a month later the posts about "being done with this team" start. It's rather funny and very predictable.

    With the loss of LeBeau, and BR about to go over that hill, you will be finding out fairly soon likely.

    @the-gipper said:

    @trolling-for-dick said:

    With the loss of LeBeau, and BR about to go over that hill, you will be finding out fairly soon likely.

    What are we betting old man? How many off seasons are you going to call for the demise of the steelers and fail? They've been going through their down period and still finishing .500 or better. You aren't going to see a long term slump and Ben just signed a long term extension. Our offensive line is geling and our skill positions are ridiculous. The defense has been retooling the last three seasons. Soooo what are we betting? If the steelers have a winning season your name gets changed to imaloudmouthprickwithsaggyballs and if they have a losing season I will disappear for 12 calendar months. Zombo can ban me. The name change remains for 12 calendar months

  • @trolling-for-dick said:

    If this if that. If the Browns didn't stink they would be good. If they had better players they wouldn't lose so much.

    I assume you are a new stupid steeler fan putting his nose into things....given your screen name. The point is.....they DO have better players. Have you been paying attention.....But the Steelers do have the quality players in the right spots....like QB, to make all the difference ultimately.

    If Gipper would take his Browns goggles off he'd see his team has stunk for the last quarter century and the players on his team aren't as good as he thinks they are. .

    Then you need to inform the neutral ranking agencies that do that sort of thing. THEY, like PFF, are the ones that put out those rankings/gradings

    Maybe the Browns have drafted some really good quarterbacks over the last 50 years, but they've had to play on crappy teams. Maybe if the Browns didn't ruin so many promising careers some of those top 10 picks would have panned out.

    Except....when they left here they sucked just as bad or worse. Please, tell us which of those former Browns QBs have gone on to glory and championships after they left here....you can't.

    So the difference between the Steelers and the Browns is luck? Got it.

    Yes, partially. You are lucky that Brady Quinn was not Tom Brady....and that BR was not Cade McNown.

    I guess it's better to be lucky than good.

    Yes, it very well be.

    But you keep telling everyone who will listen how much better your players are and the Steelers will keep winning more games than the Browns.

    Trade QBs.....and you would see that I am right.

    If you are SO confident, you would agree to that.

    This is the same story every single offseason. It gets worse after the draft when you guys start projecting how your picks have perfectly solved all that ills your team. Then the season starts and about a month later the posts about "being done with this team" start. It's rather funny and very predictable.

    With the loss of LeBeau, and BR about to go over that hill, you will be finding out fairly soon likely.

    @the-gipper said:

    @trolling-for-dick said:

    If this if that. If the Browns didn't stink they would be good. If they had better players they wouldn't lose so much.

    I assume you are a new stupid steeler fan putting his nose into things....given your screen name. The point is.....they DO have better players. Have you been paying attention.....But the Steelers do have the quality players in the right spots....like QB, to make all the difference ultimately.

    If Gipper would take his Browns goggles off he'd see his team has stunk for the last quarter century and the players on his team aren't as good as he thinks they are. .

    Then you need to inform the neutral ranking agencies that do that sort of thing. THEY, like PFF, are the ones that put out those rankings/gradings

    Maybe the Browns have drafted some really good quarterbacks over the last 50 years, but they've had to play on crappy teams. Maybe if the Browns didn't ruin so many promising careers some of those top 10 picks would have panned out.

    Except....when they left here they sucked just as bad or worse. Please, tell us which of those former Browns QBs have gone on to glory and championships after they left here....you can't.

    So the difference between the Steelers and the Browns is luck? Got it.

    Yes, partially. You are lucky that Brady Quinn was not Tom Brady....and that BR was not Cade McNown.

    I guess it's better to be lucky than good.

    Yes, it very well be.

    But you keep telling everyone who will listen how much better your players are and the Steelers will keep winning more games than the Browns.

    Trade QBs.....and you would see that I am right.

    If you are SO confident, you would agree to that.

    This is the same story every single offseason. It gets worse after the draft when you guys start projecting how your picks have perfectly solved all that ills your team. Then the season starts and about a month later the posts about "being done with this team" start. It's rather funny and very predictable.

    With the loss of LeBeau, and BR about to go over that hill, you will be finding out fairly soon likely.

    Again, we've been through this before, in your opinion the Browns have better players at most positions. In my opinion the Steelers do. Your objective evidence is some 3rd party geeksquad site and my evidence is the fact that your team sucks and mine doesn't. Opinions mean about as much as the paper you wipe your ass with. You can have your clearly superior roster and I'll have 11-5. By the way, here's another couple opinions and guess what it means....nothing.

    http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-network-total-access/0ap3000000486176/AFC-Roster-Reset-Best-AFC-team-in-2015

    here's another....

    http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000484705/article/roster-reset-pittsburgh-steelers-atop-afc-north

    If the Browns are superior at most positions why are they rated so low to these people? I know, you don't have a qb. I feel bad about that. Your defense keeps getting more and more cred but they're still just average. What where they 23rd in the league last year?

    Lets see if you can respond without calling someone stupid. It just doesn't look good for someone of your maturity and superior intellect Gipper.

  • @the-gipper said:

    @trolling-for-dick said:

    With the loss of LeBeau, and BR about to go over that hill, you will be finding out fairly soon likely.

    What are we betting old man? How many off seasons are you going to call for the demise of the steelers and fail? They've been going through their down period and still finishing .500 or better. You aren't going to see a long term slump and Ben just signed a long term extension. Our offensive line is geling and our skill positions are ridiculous. The defense has been retooling the last three seasons. Soooo what are we betting? If the steelers have a winning season your name gets changed to imaloudmouthprickwithsaggyballs and if they have a losing season I will disappear for 12 calendar months. Zombo can ban me. The name change remains for 12 calendar months

    @vagitron said:

    What are we betting old man? How many off seasons are you going to call for the demise of the steelers and fail? They've been going through their down period and still finishing .500 or better. You aren't going to see a long term slump and Ben just signed a long term extension. Our offensive line is geling and our skill positions are ridiculous. The defense has been retooling the last three seasons. Soooo what are we betting? If the steelers have a winning season your name gets changed to imaloudmouthprickwithsaggyballs and if they have a losing season I will disappear for 12 calendar months. Zombo can ban me. The name change remains for 12 calendar months

    "imaloudmouthprickwithsaggyballs"...classic.

  • So which of you fags went home to your Steeler board and told all your buddies to raid us? That's pretty pathetic. I enjoyed some of the debates we were having and now the board sucks.

  • So which of you fags went home to your Steeler board and told all your buddies to raid us? That's pretty pathetic. I enjoyed some of the debates we were having and now the board sucks.

    @wargograw said:

    So which of you fags went home to your Steeler board and told all your buddies to raid us? That's pretty pathetic. I enjoyed some of the debates we were having and now the board sucks.

    Lol. Nozzle has been here almost as long as me. Unbiased I believe before you. No raid dude, not my style either.

  • @vagitron said:

    What are we betting old man? How many off seasons are you going to call for the demise of the steelers and fail? They've been going through their down period and still finishing .500 or better. You aren't going to see a long term slump and Ben just signed a long term extension. Our offensive line is geling and our skill positions are ridiculous. The defense has been retooling the last three seasons. Soooo what are we betting? If the steelers have a winning season your name gets changed to imaloudmouthprickwithsaggyballs and if they have a losing season I will disappear for 12 calendar months. Zombo can ban me. The name change remains for 12 calendar months

    "imaloudmouthprickwithsaggyballs"...classic.

    @trolling-for-dick said:

    "imaloudmouthprickwithsaggyballs"...classic.

    Lol. He won't take the bet.

  • @the-gipper said:

    @trolling-for-dick said:

    With the loss of LeBeau, and BR about to go over that hill, you will be finding out fairly soon likely.

    What are we betting old man? How many off seasons are you going to call for the demise of the steelers and fail? They've been going through their down period and still finishing .500 or better. You aren't going to see a long term slump and Ben just signed a long term extension. Our offensive line is geling and our skill positions are ridiculous. The defense has been retooling the last three seasons. Soooo what are we betting? If the steelers have a winning season your name gets changed to imaloudmouthprickwithsaggyballs and if they have a losing season I will disappear for 12 calendar months. Zombo can ban me. The name change remains for 12 calendar months

    @vagitron said:

    What are we betting old man? How many off seasons are you going to call for the demise of the steelers and fail?

    How many offseasons did the Steelers go into it without Dick LeBeau.

    They've been going through their down period and still finishing .500 or better. You aren't going to see a long term slump and Ben just signed a long term extension.

    I don't think you know what a "down period" is. When the Steelers go through a down period....we will see neither hide nor hair of you.

    But, yes, Ben will probably forestall that for a while.

    Our offensive line is geling and our skill positions are ridiculous.

    Or, perhaps they reached their apex last year and the nadir is to come. We shall see.

    The defense has been retooling the last three seasons.

    Retooling? You mean like losing high quality players? Yes, that has been happening.

    Soooo what are we betting? If the steelers have a winning season your name gets changed to imaloudmouthprickwithsaggyballs and if they have a losing season I will disappear for 12 calendar months. Zombo can ban me. The name change remains for 12 calendar months

    And if I win, you will actually come here to my office in Barberton, Ohio and you suck my dick til I come in your mouth. With video for all here to see.. You will get to see up close and personal how saggy my balls are. Once that is done, yes.

  • @the-gipper said:

    @trolling-for-dick said:

    If this if that. If the Browns didn't stink they would be good. If they had better players they wouldn't lose so much.

    I assume you are a new stupid steeler fan putting his nose into things....given your screen name. The point is.....they DO have better players. Have you been paying attention.....But the Steelers do have the quality players in the right spots....like QB, to make all the difference ultimately.

    If Gipper would take his Browns goggles off he'd see his team has stunk for the last quarter century and the players on his team aren't as good as he thinks they are. .

    Then you need to inform the neutral ranking agencies that do that sort of thing. THEY, like PFF, are the ones that put out those rankings/gradings

    Maybe the Browns have drafted some really good quarterbacks over the last 50 years, but they've had to play on crappy teams. Maybe if the Browns didn't ruin so many promising careers some of those top 10 picks would have panned out.

    Except....when they left here they sucked just as bad or worse. Please, tell us which of those former Browns QBs have gone on to glory and championships after they left here....you can't.

    So the difference between the Steelers and the Browns is luck? Got it.

    Yes, partially. You are lucky that Brady Quinn was not Tom Brady....and that BR was not Cade McNown.

    I guess it's better to be lucky than good.

    Yes, it very well be.

    But you keep telling everyone who will listen how much better your players are and the Steelers will keep winning more games than the Browns.

    Trade QBs.....and you would see that I am right.

    If you are SO confident, you would agree to that.

    This is the same story every single offseason. It gets worse after the draft when you guys start projecting how your picks have perfectly solved all that ills your team. Then the season starts and about a month later the posts about "being done with this team" start. It's rather funny and very predictable.

    With the loss of LeBeau, and BR about to go over that hill, you will be finding out fairly soon likely.

    Again, we've been through this before, in your opinion the Browns have better players at most positions. In my opinion the Steelers do. Your objective evidence is some 3rd party geeksquad site and my evidence is the fact that your team sucks and mine doesn't. Opinions mean about as much as the paper you wipe your ass with. You can have your clearly superior roster and I'll have 11-5. By the way, here's another couple opinions and guess what it means....nothing.

    http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-network-total-access/0ap3000000486176/AFC-Roster-Reset-Best-AFC-team-in-2015

    here's another....

    http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000484705/article/roster-reset-pittsburgh-steelers-atop-afc-north

    If the Browns are superior at most positions why are they rated so low to these people? I know, you don't have a qb. I feel bad about that. Your defense keeps getting more and more cred but they're still just average. What where they 23rd in the league last year?

    Lets see if you can respond without calling someone stupid. It just doesn't look good for someone of your maturity and superior intellect Gipper.

    @trolling-for-dick said:

    Again, we've been through this before, in your opinion the Browns have better players at most positions.

    No, I don't think we have. I don't remember you until this afternoon.

    And it is not my opinion......it is how the players graded out on a neutral grading site.

    In my opinion the Steelers do.

    I would be glad to leave all opinions out of it. That was the whole purpose of these threads.

    Your objective evidence is some 3rd party geeksquad site and my evidence is the fact that your team sucks and mine doesn't.

    So, if I am understanding you....if the neutral objective evidence isn't in jive with your opinon....then it is invalid....but if it is, it is valid. Gotcha.

    And the last time I noticed, my team was sucking its way to a 31-10 win.

    Opinions mean about as much as the paper you wipe your ass with. You can have your clearly superior roster and I'll have 11-5. By the way, here's another couple opinions and guess what it means....nothing.

    http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-network-total-access/0ap3000000486176/AFC-Roster-Reset-Best-AFC-team-in-2015

    here's another....

    http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000484705/article/roster-reset-pittsburgh-steelers-atop-afc-north

    If the Browns are superior at most positions why are they rated so low to these people?

    Because like you and your asshole, everyone has an opinion. That is just those guys opinions. Their opinions are no better than yours or mine. The objective, statistical evidence however that you don't want to hear says otherwise.

    And, of course the other explanation is simple as well......When you base your opinion solely on one aspect of a team....the offensive skill players.....the Steelers come out ahead. Who has ever argued that.

    I know, you don't have a qb. I feel bad about that. Your defense keeps getting more and more cred but they're still just average. What where they 23rd in the league last year?

    They were 9th in scoring defense....23rd in yards. (who really cares how many yards a team gives up if they stop the opposition from scoring? Which would you prefer?)

    Lets see if you can respond without calling someone stupid. It just doesn't look good for someone of your maturity and superior intellect Gipper.

    You are right. I don't have to call you stupid. Everyone is aware of it without my having to say so.

  • @vagitron said:

    What are we betting old man? How many off seasons are you going to call for the demise of the steelers and fail?

    How many offseasons did the Steelers go into it without Dick LeBeau.

    They've been going through their down period and still finishing .500 or better. You aren't going to see a long term slump and Ben just signed a long term extension.

    I don't think you know what a "down period" is. When the Steelers go through a down period....we will see neither hide nor hair of you.

    But, yes, Ben will probably forestall that for a while.

    Our offensive line is geling and our skill positions are ridiculous.

    Or, perhaps they reached their apex last year and the nadir is to come. We shall see.

    The defense has been retooling the last three seasons.

    Retooling? You mean like losing high quality players? Yes, that has been happening.

    Soooo what are we betting? If the steelers have a winning season your name gets changed to imaloudmouthprickwithsaggyballs and if they have a losing season I will disappear for 12 calendar months. Zombo can ban me. The name change remains for 12 calendar months

    And if I win, you will actually come here to my office in Barberton, Ohio and you suck my dick til I come in your mouth. With video for all here to see.. You will get to see up close and personal how saggy my balls are. Once that is done, yes.

    @the-gipper said:

    @vagitron said:

    What are we betting old man? How many off seasons are you going to call for the demise of the steelers and fail?

    How many offseasons did the Steelers go into it without Dick LeBeau.

    They've been going through their down period and still finishing .500 or better. You aren't going to see a long term slump and Ben just signed a long term extension.

    I don't think you know what a "down period" is. When the Steelers go through a down period....we will see neither hide nor hair of you.

    But, yes, Ben will probably forestall that for a while.

    Our offensive line is geling and our skill positions are ridiculous.

    Or, perhaps they reached their apex last year and the nadir is to come. We shall see.

    The defense has been retooling the last three seasons.

    Retooling? You mean like losing high quality players? Yes, that has been happening.

    Soooo what are we betting? If the steelers have a winning season your name gets changed to imaloudmouthprickwithsaggyballs and if they have a losing season I will disappear for 12 calendar months. Zombo can ban me. The name change remains for 12 calendar months

    And if I win, you will actually come here to my office in Barberton, Ohio and you suck my dick til I come in your mouth. With video for all here to see.. You will get to see up close and personal how saggy my balls are. Once that is done, yes.

    You means guys retiring? Three of which would have continued to play if the steelers wanted them to play. I'm also not surprised you won't take that bet, you talk a big game but when a harmless bet is put into play you deflect it elsewhere. How about I drive out to barberton and drag your old ass around your parking lot? Bet still stands, mod can sign off on it to make it official.

    Edit: and why is so much stock being put into Coach lebeau? How did our defense rank last season? How did our offense rank last season? Butler has been in lebeau's shadow the entire time lebeau coached in Pittsburgh. He's turned down several interviews for promotion elsewhere. I'm pretty sure the steelers have something in butler. Soooo how about that bet Thomas?