Skip to content

Browns 2015 Dream Draft

The Browns Board
35 11 1.3k
  • So, Frenchie, what do you think? This mock is the best I can muster.

    This draft is going to be crazy.

  • Going NT/OL in the first round doesn't feel right to me - your draft doesn't really deal with our lack of outside pass rushers, something I think will be addressed early in the draft.

  • But that is what Eli Harold is, unless you are talking about

    a DE, which is tempting. I just think that going with Taylor and Kitchen, however it's spelled, lol,

    that an injury to Taylor means disaster again.

    Sometimes I think they could draft Shelton at 12, then Erik Armstead, DE, at 19.

    That would rock, except you have to find a solid, versatile OG/OT later, as well as

    an OLB later...

    this draft is so complicated. who knows. I sure don't.

  • But that is what Eli Harold is, unless you are talking about

    a DE, which is tempting. I just think that going with Taylor and Kitchen, however it's spelled, lol,

    that an injury to Taylor means disaster again.

    Sometimes I think they could draft Shelton at 12, then Erik Armstead, DE, at 19.

    That would rock, except you have to find a solid, versatile OG/OT later, as well as

    an OLB later...

    this draft is so complicated. who knows. I sure don't.

    @calfoxwc said:

    But that is what Eli Harold is, unless you are talking about

    a DE, which is tempting. I just think that going with Taylor and Kitchen, however it's spelled, lol,

    that an injury to Taylor means disaster again.

    Sometimes I think they could draft Shelton at 12, then Erik Armstead, DE, at 19.

    That would rock, except you have to find a solid, versatile OG/OT later, as well as

    an OLB later...

    this draft is so complicated. who knows. I sure don't.

    Sorry, I completely missed that guy - probably because it was a name I didn't recognise 😊

  • So, Frenchie, what do you think? This mock is the best I can muster.

    This draft is going to be crazy.

    @calfoxwc said:

    So, Frenchie, what do you think? This mock is the best I can muster.

    This draft is going to be crazy.

    I like Shelton, the TE (go buckeyes!) and two WR's (I can see that happening). I'm surprised by Collins and Harris in a dream draft. I think we would dream better with a NT and #1 WR in a dream first round. My fear is that NT Shelton is gone by 12 and Brown by 19. We might have to go Parker and best available NT, OLB, or OL.

  • Going NT/OL in the first round doesn't feel right to me - your draft doesn't really deal with our lack of outside pass rushers, something I think will be addressed early in the draft.

    @gftchris said:

    Going NT/OL in the first round doesn't feel right to me - your draft doesn't really deal with our lack of outside pass rushers, something I think will be addressed early in the draft.

    NT is probably a high probability in the first round. I agree that OL is a luxury given our current roster and the depth of this draft. You are right that OLB needs to be addressed early, so if not in the first round, it's a second round must!

  • So, if it's a dream draft, then my dream includes JFF or McCown playing well......here goes nothing....

    1-A - Vic Beasley - OLB (opt 2 Alvin Dupree-DE/OLB)

    1-B - Danny Shelton - DL (opt 2 Malcolm Brown-DL)

    2 - Cameron Erving - OL (opt 2 Breshard Perriman-WR)

    3 - Sammy Coates - WR (opt 2 Denzel Perriman-OLB)

    4-A - Cody Prewitt - FS/SS (opt 2 Arie Kouandijo-OG)

    4-B - Jeff Heuerman - TE (opt 2 Justin Hardy-WR)

    5 - Gerod Holliman - SS (opt 2 Chris Conley-WR)

    6-A - Justin Manton - K (opt 2 Tyler Varga-FB)

    6-B - Jordan Richards - SS (opt 2 Tony Lippett-wr)

    7 - BPA

  • That is what is tough about mocks. Mud,

    I'm not big on Prewitt much, but Holliman - wasted pick, I wouldn't

    even sign him as an UFA.

    That's how I ended up picking Harris in the third round - a very weak draft for safeties, but I

    really like Harris., and I think he's gone somewhere in the late third round and is the last

    of the safeties I'd draft, so...I had to grab him early.

    I like both of your second round options, but I figured they would both be gone, realistically.

    And Sammie Coates would be a great fit, I don't know how soft his hands are... but my mock

    kept going one way and then another, and usually I couldn't fit Sammie in until he was already

    supposed to be gone - which I think is by the end of round 2.

  • That is what is tough about mocks. Mud,

    I'm not big on Prewitt much, but Holliman - wasted pick, I wouldn't

    even sign him as an UFA.

    That's how I ended up picking Harris in the third round - a very weak draft for safeties, but I

    really like Harris., and I think he's gone somewhere in the late third round and is the last

    of the safeties I'd draft, so...I had to grab him early.

    I like both of your second round options, but I figured they would both be gone, realistically.

    And Sammie Coates would be a great fit, I don't know how soft his hands are... but my mock

    kept going one way and then another, and usually I couldn't fit Sammie in until he was already

    supposed to be gone - which I think is by the end of round 2.

    @calfoxwc said:

    That is what is tough about mocks. Mud,

    I'm not big on Prewitt much, but Holliman - wasted pick, I wouldn't

    even sign him as an UFA.

    That's how I ended up picking Harris in the third round - a very weak draft for safeties, but I

    really like Harris., and I think he's gone somewhere in the late third round and is the last

    of the safeties I'd draft, so...I had to grab him early.

    I like both of your second round options, but I figured they would both be gone, realistically.

    And Sammie Coates would be a great fit, I don't know how soft his hands are... but my mock

    kept going one way and then another, and usually I couldn't fit Sammie in until he was already

    supposed to be gone - which I think is by the end of round 2.

    Yeah...Im not that high on Holliman either....I just have this nervous twitch about getting some safeties this year.....

    Gotta say...it's really hard to mock when no one else is taking players off the board.....dont know whos gonna be there or not, but def tried to keep it real on who might......

  • About Collins - he is a solid upgrade at OG and ROT, with the ability

    to flip to the LT postion if he needed to, he could step in at LOG and Bitonio

    could move to LT if that is really an option.... Those guys don't grow on trees -

    and the Browns need him insurance wise in case Joe Thomas GOD FOREBID,

    gets malaria or something and has to sit out a while....

    "they say" that Collins is one of the safest picks in the first round.

    I really like Cameron Irving, but I would be surprised if he is still there

    at the middle of round two. No way he gets to the third round, I think.

  • It's hard to mock for the Browns because we have 10 picks and are likely not going to draft 10 players. There will be a trade somewhere and my guess is its for a QB...

  • I see a lot of defenseive picks. I guess I'm the only one that thinks 3 and outs on this team are a problem.

  • You mean.... offense...too -many- three and outs? 😉

  • How about Brandon Scherff

  • I see a lot of defenseive picks. I guess I'm the only one that thinks 3 and outs on this team are a problem.

    @alkid3 said:

    I see a lot of defenseive picks. I guess I'm the only one that thinks 3 and outs on this team are a problem.

    It really boils down to the team & coaches philosophy....which is defense.....

    And both Pettine and Farmer have publicly stated(recently) that they are focused on building a dominant defense and will approach this draft with that goal in mind.....

    And the reality is that our run defense was clearly our achilles heel this past season. The O moved the ball really well and we were a top scoring scoring team...until our QB forgot how to play.......

    So, yeah....3 and outs were an issue....but QB seems to be the reason.....and thats just 1 pick(if there is even one they like)....

  • @alkid3 said:

    I see a lot of defenseive picks. I guess I'm the only one that thinks 3 and outs on this team are a problem.

    It really boils down to the team & coaches philosophy....which is defense.....

    And both Pettine and Farmer have publicly stated(recently) that they are focused on building a dominant defense and will approach this draft with that goal in mind.....

    And the reality is that our run defense was clearly our achilles heel this past season. The O moved the ball really well and we were a top scoring scoring team...until our QB forgot how to play.......

    So, yeah....3 and outs were an issue....but QB seems to be the reason.....and thats just 1 pick(if there is even one they like)....

    @mudfly said:

    It really boils down to the team & coaches philosophy....which is defense.....

    And both Pettine and Farmer have publicly stated(recently) that they are focused on building a dominant defense and will approach this draft with that goal in mind.....

    And the reality is that our run defense was clearly our achilles heel this past season. The O moved the ball really well and we were a top scoring scoring team...until our QB forgot how to play.......

    So, yeah....3 and outs were an issue....but QB seems to be the reason.....and thats just 1 pick(if there is even one they like)....

    QB play deteriorated after our run game deteriorated after our O-line couldn't cope with Mack's injury. The PAP which was working so well early in the season faltered, and teams challenged us to beat them in the air, which we couldn't. So, either new QB and/or more consistent run game.

  • I kind of chalk that up to Mack getting hurt......which(I assume) will be corrected with his return and the development of some backup players like Bowe(for example).....and possibly, a middling pick for G/C......

    But, in terms of this discussion and the draft "going offense".....dont see it.....not one bit......

  • I agree - like you said, our O was doing what it needed to to win games until our run game ground to a halt. People still respected it for a few games after Mack's injury, but once we stopped going over 140 ypg, they zoned in on our QB, which didn't hold up.

    Mack doesn't get injured, or we have competent backups that don't cause such a huge dropoff, and we're in much better shape.

    Personally, I'm thinking, if it aligns with BPA, I'd look at going OLB and either NT/WR in the first round. Then look at picking up an extra 2 with our excess of picks, and get either NT/WR and OL in the second.

    Just my 2c.

  • yep....Id say we're pretty much on the same page.....