SCOTUS - Same Sex Marriage a Right in Every State
-
Physical damage is a completely different thing. Should a man with a large penis face criminal charges for marrying a small woman? Nobody should hurt anybody for fucks sake. And the psychological damage??? That's because puritanical society will hound her like the Sisters of Magdalena.
WSS
Did she marry a man with a large penis by choice or was she forced? See these really aren't that hard. Of course you're flailing all over the place, my god I mean all over the place now sex with children is all relative cause we let two gays marry...but seriously this is getting old? If a woman wants to marry a man with a large penis....there's probably a good reason for that huh? Gee what would that be?
Did she marry a man with a large penis by choice or was she forced? See these really aren't that hard. Of course you're flailing all over the place, my god I mean all over the place now sex with children is all relative cause we let two gays marry...but seriously this is getting old? If a woman wants to marry a man with a large penis....there's probably a good reason for that huh? Gee what would that be?
Again with the mised point?
Somebody brought up physical damage. Nobody should cause physical damage to anyone no matter how old they are.
WSS
-
I'm sorry you must understand i'm hailing you from another planet and sometimes the connection is iffy, did you just say pedophilia is taboo because it pisses people off? And that consenting sex between two adults of the same gender must be viewed as the same because some people are pissed off by that? Did I really read that correct?
Apparently English is not the first language on the planet you're calling from. Sex with a prepubescent child is pedophilia. It's most certainly an unnatural fetish. Disagree?
WSS
Apparently English is not the first language on the planet you're calling from. Sex with a prepubescent child is pedophilia. It's most certainly an unnatural fetish. Disagree?
WSS
Uh yes...however in that post you were referring to said pedophilia as something that's more or less relative depending on what culture you might have been raised in. See in the modern world, and give the secular progressives their just due, they've come to the conclusion that having sex with children is pervasively damaging to them. Two children having sex with each other, while it shouldn't happen....is not the same as a grown man predating on the haplessness of small children. The empirical irrefutable evidence for this has long been in the books so put the little peener away.
-
Remember this one Chris
Remember this one Chris
England, LOL.
-
So a 2nd grader beating off to one of his cute classmates should be a punishable offense? Are you honestly making the argument that if a grown man can't have sex with a 2nd grader than neither should young boys her age? Look if I had an 8 year old and she had sex with another 8 year old boy, I would "very" upset...but mainly with myself because it showcased a major deficiency in my up bringing of her. A grown man having sex with my 8 year old daughter is a reflection on that man however. You seem to have trouble grasping this. Why?
I'd se 2nd grade is a little young for beating off but its your own logic that says its fucked up to beat off thinking of an adult which would be illegal. Is it or not?
WSS
I'd se 2nd grade is a little young for beating off but its your own logic that says its fucked up to beat off thinking of an adult which would be illegal. Is it or not?
WSS
wait wut? When did I say it's fucked up for a kid to beat off to an adult? That's actually probably the better scenario, wouldn't you agree? The kid recognizes that sexual activity between two people should start at roughly those ages where you're fully developed both physically and mentally. I will concede this issue gets murky at those ages approaching 18. But we had to arbitrarily choose an age knowing full well that some girls are fully ready to go by 16 and some women take till well over 18. All these calculations were already done for you bro.....I just feel like you're about to pull a hammy here or something with all these mental gymnastics you're trying to do equating homosexuality with other vastly depraved sexual conduct. Again the calculus was done for you long ago so just sit back and have a coke bro. Leave the heavy lifting to others.
-
Did she marry a man with a large penis by choice or was she forced? See these really aren't that hard. Of course you're flailing all over the place, my god I mean all over the place now sex with children is all relative cause we let two gays marry...but seriously this is getting old? If a woman wants to marry a man with a large penis....there's probably a good reason for that huh? Gee what would that be?
Again with the mised point?
Somebody brought up physical damage. Nobody should cause physical damage to anyone no matter how old they are.
WSS
Again with the mised point?
Somebody brought up physical damage. Nobody should cause physical damage to anyone no matter how old they are.
WSS
omg I can't believe i'm having this conversation with a grown man. If a grown woman wants to walk funny for a couple days IT"S CAUSE SHE LIKES IT YOU GIMP. What are you not getting here? If she doesn't like it then she won't marry a guy with a huge cock. Why on earth does this need to be spelled out for you? And if it's happening against her will.......what's that called genius?
-
Again with the mised point?
Somebody brought up physical damage. Nobody should cause physical damage to anyone no matter how old they are.
WSS
omg I can't believe i'm having this conversation with a grown man. If a grown woman wants to walk funny for a couple days IT"S CAUSE SHE LIKES IT YOU GIMP. What are you not getting here? If she doesn't like it then she won't marry a guy with a huge cock. Why on earth does this need to be spelled out for you? And if it's happening against her will.......what's that called genius?
omg I can't believe i'm having this conversation with a grown man. If a grown woman wants to walk funny for a couple days IT"S CAUSE SHE LIKES IT YOU GIMP. What are you not getting here? If she doesn't like it then she won't marry a guy with a huge cock. Why on earth does this need to be spelled out for you? And if it's happening against her will.......what's that called genius?
Sorry you can't understand the conversation. There isn't any point in going further with you until you do.
Try to follow the trail of conversations if you care to. If not just move along.
WSS
-
Apparently English is not the first language on the planet you're calling from. Sex with a prepubescent child is pedophilia. It's most certainly an unnatural fetish. Disagree?
WSS
Uh yes...however in that post you were referring to said pedophilia as something that's more or less relative depending on what culture you might have been raised in. See in the modern world, and give the secular progressives their just due, they've come to the conclusion that having sex with children is pervasively damaging to them. Two children having sex with each other, while it shouldn't happen....is not the same as a grown man predating on the haplessness of small children. The empirical irrefutable evidence for this has long been in the books so put the little peener away.
Uh yes...however in that post you were referring to said pedophilia as something that's more or less relative depending on what culture you might have been raised in. See in the modern world, and give the secular progressives their just due, they've come to the conclusion that having sex with children is pervasively damaging to them. Two children having sex with each other, while it shouldn't happen....is not the same as a grown man predating on the haplessness of small children. The empirical irrefutable evidence for this has long been in the books so put the little peener away.
no it isn't, and it wasn't. I'm talking about other cultures and which 13 and 14 year olds are regularly sexually active. at the point of puberty. Which is scientifically natural in the animal kingdom of which we are a part. quit trying to sound so f****** incredulous and read something once in awhile.
WSS
-
Bottom line again since you are too lazy or stupid, is this: we have plenty of laws, many of them based on sexuality, that are in place for no scientific reason except for the fact they piss us, you and me and just about everyone, off.
That's why homosexuality has previously been illegal. Because it pisses people off. not because there's any harm that comes from it.
WSS
-
Bottom line again since you are too lazy or stupid, is this: we have plenty of laws, many of them based on sexuality, that are in place for no scientific reason except for the fact they piss us, you and me and just about everyone, off.
That's why homosexuality has previously been illegal. Because it pisses people off. not because there's any harm that comes from it.
WSS
Bottom line again since you are too lazy or stupid, is this: we have plenty of laws, many of them based on sexuality, that are in place for no scientific reason except for the fact they piss us, you and me and just about everyone, off.
That's why homosexuality has previously been illegal. Because it pisses people off. not because there's any harm that comes from it.
WSS
As I said, we've done the heavy lifting on this previously and concluded that 13 or 14 year old girls were on the high avg not even close yet to being mature enough to make their own decisions. I don't know if i'd use the term "scientific" but it was more than just "it pisses us off". Having 13 and 14 year old girls marrying off that early basically negates the rest of their lives...they're used as baby chattle than thrown away. So yes you're correct in part that it became an issue of contention that half our species was being used such...but we also concluded it a kind of scientific way that this practice wasn't just bad for the individual girls but then also bad for the rest of us. Empirical observation was our friend.
And you're also correct that homosexuality was illegal because it pissed a certain group of people off, but you were also making the morally relative point that sex with children then...because it was at one time legit, should be brought back into the conversation if we're just gonna let any old perversity stand. And my point, as well as others, is that it's not even remotely comparable. I don't live on the same planet that you do, my world is not morally relative. I have the innate ability to parse out what's right and wrong based on "everyone's" greater good. Probably because I cared to read up on those that went before me and, like I said, did all of this heavy lifting already. I'm in zero mood to debate some of these past issues we got over like was slavery really all that bad as some conservatives have put forth in recent times. Justice Clarence fucking Thomas, a black man himself, just the other day stated that "slaves didn't lose their dignity or humanity because the govt allowed them to be enslaved". So you're not alone Steve, plenty of people still don't get it....some with very very very high positions in our society.
-
I barely come on this site anymore. But I knew this would be a hot topic among some of the leftist lemmings, so here you go...
First off since this ruling came about you have pedofiles wanting the same rights.
Looks like we are all going to go to hell in a hand basket.
Just wait until some creepy child lover sues to marry your 10 year old girl or boy.
........ #LoveWins Am I correct? That is the marching cries from all of the idiots on social media. So be it your daughter will be able to marry at any age and whomever she wants.
Now here is another one, Why is it Blacks hate Gay people?
If you ask me nobody won anything with this ruling. ... well maybe the attorneys won
gay divorice court
pedofile suing to marry a 9 year old child
and the list can go on.
-
I barely come on this site anymore. But I knew this would be a hot topic among some of the leftist lemmings, so here you go...
First off since this ruling came about you have pedofiles wanting the same rights.
Looks like we are all going to go to hell in a hand basket.
Just wait until some creepy child lover sues to marry your 10 year old girl or boy.
........ #LoveWins Am I correct? That is the marching cries from all of the idiots on social media. So be it your daughter will be able to marry at any age and whomever she wants.
Now here is another one, Why is it Blacks hate Gay people?
If you ask me nobody won anything with this ruling. ... well maybe the attorneys won
gay divorice court
pedofile suing to marry a 9 year old child
and the list can go on.
I barely come on this site anymore. But I knew this would be a hot topic among some of the leftist lemmings, so here you go...
First off since this ruling came about you have pedofiles wanting the same rights.
Looks like we are all going to go to hell in a hand basket.
Just wait until some creepy child lover sues to marry your 10 year old girl or boy.
........ #LoveWins Am I correct? That is the marching cries from all of the idiots on social media. So be it your daughter will be able to marry at any age and whomever she wants.
Now here is another one, Why is it Blacks hate Gay people?
If you ask me nobody won anything with this ruling. ... well maybe the attorneys won
gay divorice court
pedofile suing to marry a 9 year old child
and the list can go on.
The only potential slippery slope here is that polyamorists (sp?) will want to marry each other. I think that will fall flat but it will be worth a discussion seeing as that at one point in our history polygamy wasn't hardly frowned upon. The notion though that this is going to migrate to animals and, as you put it, marrying your 10 year old child....that's just impudent hyperbole. To even contemplate that allowing two adult women or men to marry each other is somehow going to open the door to child fucking is the absence of a rational mind. Will some of these evil pieces of shit that want to fuck your 10 year old without consequences try to make the argument? Of course. But it holds no rational water. End of discussion.
-
I find this offensive. I don't give a fuck what gay struggle you think you've been through this is a dishonor.
-
I find this offensive. I don't give a fuck what gay struggle you think you've been through this is a dishonor.
I find this offensive. I don't give a fuck what gay struggle you think you've been through this is a dishonor.
i completely agree. That picture got a facepallm out of me for sure
-
I find this offensive. I don't give a fuck what gay struggle you think you've been through this is a dishonor.
i completely agree. That picture got a facepallm out of me for sure
i completely agree. That picture got a facepallm out of me for sure
I get the argument gay people or any other oppressed people would make....but that was war, leave that where it belonged.
-
-
i completely agree. That picture got a facepallm out of me for sure
I get the argument gay people or any other oppressed people would make....but that was war, leave that where it belonged.
I get the argument gay people or any other oppressed people would make....but that was war, leave that where it belonged.
Gee that's amusing coming from a lib.... what about the war on women, the war on minorities, the war on children, the war on the poor and elderly?
-
i completely agree. That picture got a facepallm out of me for sure
I get the argument gay people or any other oppressed people would make....but that was war, leave that where it belonged.
I get the argument gay people or any other oppressed people would make....but that was war, leave that where it belonged.
"Oppressed"? Awwwww...are being overcome by those touchy feely compassionate liberal emotions again Cleve?
I agree however... those "heterosexual only" drinking fountains gotta go.
-
I get the argument gay people or any other oppressed people would make....but that was war, leave that where it belonged.
Gee that's amusing coming from a lib.... what about the war on women, the war on minorities, the war on children, the war on the poor and elderly?
Stuart said:
Gee that's amusing coming from a lib.... what about the war on women, the war on minorities, the war on children, the war on the poor and elderly?
Cleve must be a busy guy what with his being the person who said all of those things during press conferences.
As a general rule, any politician that says "a war on (insert something)" is generally just trying to make their opponents look like assholes when really it should only be used in a sentence like "we declared a war on (insert country)".
-
Stuart said:
Charge WSS with a pointless analogy then expand on it? Way to take a stand.
Your life is pointless, want me to expand on that? I can. I'm here for you bro. You can always count on me to expand ad infinitum to you how useless, meaningless and pointless your existence is.
Your life is pointless, want me to expand on that? I can. I'm here for you bro. You can always count on me to expand ad infinitum to you how useless, meaningless and pointless your existence is.
Still mad because I said you remind me of Michael Moore?lol
But yes please feel free to expand!...interested to hear from one who recently found meaning to his life by trolling all day on this message board.
-
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login