SCOTUS - Same Sex Marriage a Right in Every State
-
I barely come on this site anymore. But I knew this would be a hot topic among some of the leftist lemmings, so here you go...
First off since this ruling came about you have pedofiles wanting the same rights.
Looks like we are all going to go to hell in a hand basket.
Just wait until some creepy child lover sues to marry your 10 year old girl or boy.
........ #LoveWins Am I correct? That is the marching cries from all of the idiots on social media. So be it your daughter will be able to marry at any age and whomever she wants.
Now here is another one, Why is it Blacks hate Gay people?

If you ask me nobody won anything with this ruling. ... well maybe the attorneys won
gay divorice court
pedofile suing to marry a 9 year old child
and the list can go on.
I barely come on this site anymore. But I knew this would be a hot topic among some of the leftist lemmings, so here you go...
First off since this ruling came about you have pedofiles wanting the same rights.
Looks like we are all going to go to hell in a hand basket.
Just wait until some creepy child lover sues to marry your 10 year old girl or boy.
........ #LoveWins Am I correct? That is the marching cries from all of the idiots on social media. So be it your daughter will be able to marry at any age and whomever she wants.
Now here is another one, Why is it Blacks hate Gay people?

If you ask me nobody won anything with this ruling. ... well maybe the attorneys won
gay divorice court
pedofile suing to marry a 9 year old child
and the list can go on.
The only potential slippery slope here is that polyamorists (sp?) will want to marry each other. I think that will fall flat but it will be worth a discussion seeing as that at one point in our history polygamy wasn't hardly frowned upon. The notion though that this is going to migrate to animals and, as you put it, marrying your 10 year old child....that's just impudent hyperbole. To even contemplate that allowing two adult women or men to marry each other is somehow going to open the door to child fucking is the absence of a rational mind. Will some of these evil pieces of shit that want to fuck your 10 year old without consequences try to make the argument? Of course. But it holds no rational water. End of discussion.
-
I find this offensive. I don't give a fuck what gay struggle you think you've been through this is a dishonor.

-
I find this offensive. I don't give a fuck what gay struggle you think you've been through this is a dishonor.

I find this offensive. I don't give a fuck what gay struggle you think you've been through this is a dishonor.

i completely agree. That picture got a facepallm out of me for sure
-
I find this offensive. I don't give a fuck what gay struggle you think you've been through this is a dishonor.

i completely agree. That picture got a facepallm out of me for sure
i completely agree. That picture got a facepallm out of me for sure
I get the argument gay people or any other oppressed people would make....but that was war, leave that where it belonged.
-

-
i completely agree. That picture got a facepallm out of me for sure
I get the argument gay people or any other oppressed people would make....but that was war, leave that where it belonged.
I get the argument gay people or any other oppressed people would make....but that was war, leave that where it belonged.
Gee that's amusing coming from a lib.... what about the war on women, the war on minorities, the war on children, the war on the poor and elderly?
-
i completely agree. That picture got a facepallm out of me for sure
I get the argument gay people or any other oppressed people would make....but that was war, leave that where it belonged.
I get the argument gay people or any other oppressed people would make....but that was war, leave that where it belonged.
"Oppressed"? Awwwww...are being overcome by those touchy feely compassionate liberal emotions again Cleve?
I agree however... those "heterosexual only" drinking fountains gotta go.
-
I get the argument gay people or any other oppressed people would make....but that was war, leave that where it belonged.
Gee that's amusing coming from a lib.... what about the war on women, the war on minorities, the war on children, the war on the poor and elderly?
Stuart said:
Gee that's amusing coming from a lib.... what about the war on women, the war on minorities, the war on children, the war on the poor and elderly?
Cleve must be a busy guy what with his being the person who said all of those things during press conferences.
As a general rule, any politician that says "a war on (insert something)" is generally just trying to make their opponents look like assholes when really it should only be used in a sentence like "we declared a war on (insert country)".
-
Stuart said:
Charge WSS with a pointless analogy then expand on it? Way to take a stand.
Your life is pointless, want me to expand on that? I can. I'm here for you bro. You can always count on me to expand ad infinitum to you how useless, meaningless and pointless your existence is.
Your life is pointless, want me to expand on that? I can. I'm here for you bro. You can always count on me to expand ad infinitum to you how useless, meaningless and pointless your existence is.
Still mad because I said you remind me of Michael Moore?lol
But yes please feel free to expand!...interested to hear from one who recently found meaning to his life by trolling all day on this message board.
-
and scene....
-
pony show lol
-
and scene....
and scene....
Yeah that funny. I like when he asks "what else would you throw? And the guys like "I don't know. Couscous? Skittles?"
-
I believe I stated this before, the denial of service, the religious implications aside - what type of mind is it that says "fine, i'll sue you for NOT wanting to do business with me".
If someone doesn't want to accept my money, so be it. I leave and move on to another business.
I'm all for marriage equality but this is.... wrong.
-
I was never against civil unions, on this board.
You can call civil unions "binkieboo", whatever.
Just don't call it marriage. It is not. Right now, I think the liberal
"okay, you can have freedom of religion and speech, but expect consequences"
And it is going to bounce right back at them for this belligerent militancy by gays forcing the issue.
Liberal mantra - "live and let live, and we get to decide who gets to...."
-
I'd be all for civil unions but on a day to day basis you didn't hear shit from conservatives on the 'sanctity' of marriage until queers wanted theirs.
No talk of the high divorce rated amongst heterosexual couples. No talk of infidelity that plagues straight unions at a reported rate more disproportionate than gay couples. Not even really making mention how marriage for the bulk of human history has been little more than a business contract that promised a dowry and a son.
Part of me wanted marriage equality so I could enjoy the false rage that comes from a lot of the right wing on this issue.
Also, if civil unions were to have the same rights as marriage, yet for gay couples - then what's the point of calling it anything else? Nobody is going to say to their family were 'civilly unioned"
So by wanting to call it something other than what it really is would be just using smoke and mirrors to make yourself feel better about the topic. A true cosmetic approach.
That aside, This Is Still Wrong. I have a couple of gay friends and family members that are wonderful people who wouldn't even begin go consider this type of action. My hope is that this is simply a con by a gay couple for the sake of being money hungry and not a representation of the community at large.
-
I was never against civil unions, on this board.
You can call civil unions "binkieboo", whatever.
Just don't call it marriage. It is not. Right now, I think the liberal
"okay, you can have freedom of religion and speech, but expect consequences"
And it is going to bounce right back at them for this belligerent militancy by gays forcing the issue.
Liberal mantra - "live and let live, and we get to decide who gets to...."
I was never against civil unions, on this board.
You can call civil unions "binkieboo", whatever.
Just don't call it marriage. It is not. Right now, I think the liberal
"okay, you can have freedom of religion and speech, but expect consequences"
And it is going to bounce right back at them for this belligerent militancy by gays forcing the issue.
Liberal mantra - "live and let live, and we get to decide who gets to...."
-
This ruling shit all over single moms hoping for alimony/child support. Or it should if applied appropriately.
Not that I'm for it.
-
Chic-fila-a is introducing a mayonaise filled footlong chicken dog to commemorate the event........
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login