Pope Francis Issues Decree That Jews Should Not Be Told About Salvation In Jesus Christ
-
Please children.
what was that gramps?
-
you want your ensure, was that it?
-
meh, I say it was Odin
You believe it was Odin, because your viking priest tells you it was Odin. He knows it was Odin because Odin said he would do it, and Odin must be believed. Odin said so.
You believe it was Odin, because your viking priest tells you it was Odin. He knows it was Odin because Odin said he would do it, and Odin must be believed. Odin said so.
Not a fan of Odin or anything but I like your reasoning.
-
Not a fan of Odin or anything but I like your reasoning.
In jokingly making fun of that you make fun of yourself...
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
that is a good point, where ARE those ice giants???????????
___________________
A casualty of global warming.
that is a good point, where ARE those ice giants???????????
___________________
A casualty of global warming.
Migration, mofo. Times is tough out there.
-
that is a good point, where ARE those ice giants???????????
___________________
A casualty of global warming.
Migration, mofo. Times is tough out there.
-
Sure thing punk.
I love how all of us are having a collective laugh and you toss in something like this.
You take yourself, and your politics, far....FAR too seriously.
-
Not a fan of Odin or anything but I like your reasoning.
In jokingly making fun of that you make fun of yourself...
In jokingly making fun of that you make fun of yourself...
I never debated the existence of God with atheists/unbelievers before and I quickly saw before anyone else had even said anything I was using circular reasoning. I posted an article earlier that made a good case for the existence of God without using the bible but to make the case for a personal God I have to use the bible. I have to use "what the bible says". I can use archeology discoveries to prove the accuracy of bible stories such as the story about Jericho but I cannot explain a personal God without the cross and without what the bible says about salvation. If you are talking with someone who doesn't believe the bible it is an immediate stalemate.
-
In jokingly making fun of that you make fun of yourself...
I never debated the existence of God with atheists/unbelievers before and I quickly saw before anyone else had even said anything I was using circular reasoning. I posted an article earlier that made a good case for the existence of God without using the bible but to make the case for a personal God I have to use the bible. I have to use "what the bible says". I can use archeology discoveries to prove the accuracy of bible stories such as the story about Jericho but I cannot explain a personal God without the cross and without what the bible says about salvation. If you are talking with someone who doesn't believe the bible it is an immediate stalemate.
I never debated the existence of God with atheists/unbelievers before and I quickly saw before anyone else had even said anything I was using circular reasoning. I posted an article earlier that made a good case for the existence of God without using the bible but to make the case for a personal God I have to use the bible. I have to use "what the bible says". I can use archeology discoveries to prove the accuracy of bible stories such as the story about Jericho but I cannot explain a personal God without the cross and without what the bible says about salvation. If you are talking with someone who doesn't believe the bible it is an immediate stalemate.
That's fair.
can you repost the article here?
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
Sure thing punk.
I love how all of us are having a collective laugh and you toss in something like this.
You take yourself, and your politics, far....FAR too seriously.
-
I never debated the existence of God with atheists/unbelievers before and I quickly saw before anyone else had even said anything I was using circular reasoning. I posted an article earlier that made a good case for the existence of God without using the bible but to make the case for a personal God I have to use the bible. I have to use "what the bible says". I can use archeology discoveries to prove the accuracy of bible stories such as the story about Jericho but I cannot explain a personal God without the cross and without what the bible says about salvation. If you are talking with someone who doesn't believe the bible it is an immediate stalemate.
That's fair.
can you repost the article here?
That's fair.
can you repost the article here?
This is not the article I was looking for but it is from a former atheist who became a believer in God:
http://notashamedofthegospel.com/apologetics/proof-that-god-exists/
-
His argument really doesn't hold water. It all makes sense up until the end. Basically he says, nothing existed, then it did, so god must have done it. The reason it can't be something like the multiverse theory is that we don't have concrete evidence for it...
... ok... but where is the concrete evidence for god? You know, the thing he supposedly "proved".
You can't prove a god exists. You can show scenarios in which a god doesn't have to exist to be where we are today, but you can't prove god exists. Technically you can't prove god doesn't exist either. As we develop as a society there seems to be less and less of a need for a god though. Less things we need to explain with superstition.
-
well, woodygaypeckerhead, you can't prove mmgw is caused by burning fossil fuels.
Really, you can't prove mmgw exists, since there is plenty of evidence to the contrary.
-
That's fair.
can you repost the article here?
This is not the article I was looking for but it is from a former atheist who became a believer in God:
http://notashamedofthegospel.com/apologetics/proof-that-god-exists/
This is not the article I was looking for but it is from a former atheist who became a believer in God:
http://notashamedofthegospel.com/apologetics/proof-that-god-exists/
That is some pretty bogus logic:
"By taking a look at the world around us, we can see that it was designed and created by a supreme Being."
Some people might think that, others might not. It is not an absolute truth, far from it.
===============================
The fact that there are universal morals that we all share show that we all have a conscience, and that God is the one who wrote what is right and wrong in our hearts.
I think it's quite evident there is not a set of universal morals, even just on this board, let alone the wider world, and the as-yet-untouched tribes.
===============================
- Premise 1 – Something exists
- Premise 2 – Nothing cannot create something
- Conclusion – Something must have always existed
What created the something? Assuming god is outside of our universe and has existed for greater levels of eternity than we could ever experience, what took him so long to build this universe? And what is he doing at the moment? Is he just playing the sims?
There are many scientific theories of how the universe cam into existence. Not many of them that I think of start with an absolute nothing.
===========================
You can tell me about the climate of Mars, or about Kepler-186f, and I’ll again say that there’s no concrete evidence that other life forms exist on those planets or anywhere else. - agree
On the other hand, the evidence for the Christian God is much more concrete. - wholeheartedly disagree. The evidence for a god is circumstantial at best, and circular and contradictory at worst. The evidence for life on other planets is circumstantial at best, but there's no "there must be life on other planets because the book says so and the book was written by someone from another planet, we know because the book says so" pseudo-logic involved.
===========================
Both Hawking and Lawrence Krauss propose that it’s theoretically possible for the universe to have come from nothing using M-theory, string theory, and quantum physics to do away with God as being the creator.
However, there are major flaws to M-theory, and there are a number of respected physicists who point out these flaws.
Uh-huh, one of the proposed theories is not perfect, therefore all are irrelevant, and we can conveniently ignore the works of the greatest minds of the 21st century. Gotcha.
===========================
I'm not going to poo-poo your personal beliefs (at least I'll try), but when you try to bring religion to a logic fight, you're going to lose.
-
Here is one of the the main problems I see with being an atheist and good argument for existence of God:
Nothing Cannot Create Something
The definition of nothing is no-thing. It isn’t anything, and it doesn’t have the power to do anything.
Nothing can also be defined as the state of non-being
So as we look at the vast universe which we know had a beginning (as the bible states) the atheists will say it all came from nothing? What logic is that?
-
Here is one of the the main problems I see with being an atheist and good argument for existence of God:
Nothing Cannot Create Something
The definition of nothing is no-thing. It isn’t anything, and it doesn’t have the power to do anything.
Nothing can also be defined as the state of non-being
So as we look at the vast universe which we know had a beginning (as the bible states) the atheists will say it all came from nothing? What logic is that?
Here is one of the the main problems I see with being an atheist and good argument for existence of God:
Nothing Cannot Create Something
The definition of nothing is no-thing. It isn’t anything, and it doesn’t have the power to do anything.
Nothing can also be defined as the state of non-being
So as we look at the vast universe which we know had a beginning (as the bible states) the atheists will say it all came from nothing? What logic is that?
I can understand that that's a difficult thing to wrap your head around, but there are some theories at the moment that are quite promising. The general idea at the moment is that this universe is coming from a larger universe of many more dimensions, with many, many universes, like bubbles on your bath tub. You might ask where did the bath tub come from, but unfortunately, we can't know that, or even make a guess to be honest. We're observing four dimensions out of a theorised 30+ so it's difficult to draw real conclusions.
Either way, using an absence of fact as a proof of god is a sure fire way to have an ever reducing set of proof, and if that's your go to, home run reason why god must exist, I think you'll be in trouble. Maybe not you personally, I doubt we'll find the answer to the problem in our life times, but religion in general.
If it makes you feel better to believe that a god created the universe, then absolutely, more power to you. I don't doubt it helps you lead a better, happier life, and if it means you feel more inclined to spread your happiness around those less fortunate then have at it. Just don't expect anybody to agree that there's a logical proof that it happened.
-
Here is one of the the main problems I see with being an atheist and good argument for existence of God:
Nothing Cannot Create Something
The definition of nothing is no-thing. It isn’t anything, and it doesn’t have the power to do anything.
Nothing can also be defined as the state of non-being
So as we look at the vast universe which we know had a beginning (as the bible states) the atheists will say it all came from nothing? What logic is that?
I can understand that that's a difficult thing to wrap your head around, but there are some theories at the moment that are quite promising. The general idea at the moment is that this universe is coming from a larger universe of many more dimensions, with many, many universes, like bubbles on your bath tub. You might ask where did the bath tub come from, but unfortunately, we can't know that, or even make a guess to be honest. We're observing four dimensions out of a theorised 30+ so it's difficult to draw real conclusions.
Either way, using an absence of fact as a proof of god is a sure fire way to have an ever reducing set of proof, and if that's your go to, home run reason why god must exist, I think you'll be in trouble. Maybe not you personally, I doubt we'll find the answer to the problem in our life times, but religion in general.
If it makes you feel better to believe that a god created the universe, then absolutely, more power to you. I don't doubt it helps you lead a better, happier life, and if it means you feel more inclined to spread your happiness around those less fortunate then have at it. Just don't expect anybody to agree that there's a logical proof that it happened.
Just don't expect anybody to agree that there's a logical proof that it happened.
Amigo hundreds of trillions more universes that all came from nothing doesn't sound much more logical to me. But again if it makes you happy and helps you lead a better life...
WSS
-
Amigo hundreds of trillions more universes that all came from nothing doesn't sound much more logical to me. But again if it makes you happy and helps you lead a better life...
WSS
There's not a proof that it happened yet, I'm not asking anybody to accept it as fact, just saying 'this is the current thinking' - it's very much the cutting edge of physics. People aren't even sure on the conjecture yet, let alone how to test it. But that's the general idea.
-
The general idea at the moment is that this universe is coming from a larger universe of many more dimensions, with many, many universes, like bubbles on your bath tub.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Maybe you are on to something with this line of thought:
In my Father's house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you. And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto myself; that where I am, there ye may be also. (John 14:2,3—KJV)
-
The Bible did it
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better đź’—
Register Login