Pope Francis Issues Decree That Jews Should Not Be Told About Salvation In Jesus Christ

Osiris

@gftchris said:
You're a screen name, not really a tangible entity, so...

Damn, tough crowd.

Westside Steve

@jbluhm86 said:

Odin traded his eye for the ability to see the future before the Battle of Ragnarok.

A battle in which the fallen warriors from Valhalla were defeated, you blasphemer.

WSS

MLD Woody

@calfoxwc said:

No, he is not my "authority" at all. He's just a comedian, telling a joke that is germane to the topic of this post.

But, unlike God, Allah, Jesus, Jehovah, Krishna, Buddha, Ram, Shiva, Brahma, Osiris, Thor, Odin, Zeus, Huitzilopochtli, Zoroaster, and all the other made up fables....at least there is tangible evidence for George Carlin's (and the Sun's) existence.Jblu

*******************************************

You gonna worship cockroaches? they exist... have for eons, maybe. Jblu the cockroachmeister?

"well, they EXIST, therefore I like them !"

But seriously, I exist, too, but there was a time when I came close to not existing anymore, therefore,

that is tangible proof that God IS there, to me.

Magic donkey!

Clevfan4life

@jbluhm86 said:

that is a good point, where ARE those ice giants???????????

Odin 16

OldBrownsFan

that is a good point, where ARE those ice giants???????????

___________________

A casualty of global warming.

gftChris

@oldbrownsfan said:

that is a good point, where ARE those ice giants???????????

___________________

A casualty of global warming.

Many times we have disagreed, but *that* was quality.

Clevfan4life

meh, I say it was Odin

MLD Woody

@clevfan4life said:
meh, I say it was Odin

Odin's disregard for the environment!

Clevfan4life

lols

gftChris

@clevfan4life said:
meh, I say it was Odin

You believe it was Odin, because your viking priest tells you it was Odin. He knows it was Odin because Odin said he would do it, and Odin must be believed. Odin said so.

DieHardBrownsFan

@gftchris said:
You believe it was Odin, because your viking priest tells you it was Odin. He knows it was Odin because Odin said he would do it, and Odin must be believed. Odin said so.

Please children.

Clevfan4life

@diehardbrownsfan said:

Please children.

what was that gramps?

Clevfan4life

you want your ensure, was that it?

OldBrownsFan

@gftchris said:
You believe it was Odin, because your viking priest tells you it was Odin. He knows it was Odin because Odin said he would do it, and Odin must be believed. Odin said so.

Not a fan of Odin or anything but I like your reasoning.

MLD Woody

@oldbrownsfan said:
Not a fan of Odin or anything but I like your reasoning.

In jokingly making fun of that you make fun of yourself...

tiamat63

@oldbrownsfan said:

that is a good point, where ARE those ice giants???????????

___________________

A casualty of global warming.

Migration, mofo. Times is tough out there.

DieHardBrownsFan

@tiamat63 said:

Migration, mofo. Times is tough out there.

Sure thing punk.

tiamat63

@diehardbrownsfan said:
Sure thing punk.

I love how all of us are having a collective laugh and you toss in something like this.

You take yourself, and your politics, far....FAR too seriously.

OldBrownsFan

@mld-woody said:
In jokingly making fun of that you make fun of yourself...

I never debated the existence of God with atheists/unbelievers before and I quickly saw before anyone else had even said anything I was using circular reasoning. I posted an article earlier that made a good case for the existence of God without using the bible but to make the case for a personal God I have to use the bible. I have to use "what the bible says". I can use archeology discoveries to prove the accuracy of bible stories such as the story about Jericho but I cannot explain a personal God without the cross and without what the bible says about salvation. If you are talking with someone who doesn't believe the bible it is an immediate stalemate.

MLD Woody

@oldbrownsfan said:

I never debated the existence of God with atheists/unbelievers before and I quickly saw before anyone else had even said anything I was using circular reasoning. I posted an article earlier that made a good case for the existence of God without using the bible but to make the case for a personal God I have to use the bible. I have to use "what the bible says". I can use archeology discoveries to prove the accuracy of bible stories such as the story about Jericho but I cannot explain a personal God without the cross and without what the bible says about salvation. If you are talking with someone who doesn't believe the bible it is an immediate stalemate.

That's fair.

can you repost the article here?