Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. Political Discussion
  3. Militia takes over wildlife refuge

Militia takes over wildlife refuge

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Political Discussion
115 Posts 16 Posters 3.4k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jbluhm86J jbluhm86

    @westside-steve said:

    No kidding. Like the old saying only Nixon could go to China, only Democrat Justice Department's can massacre civilians!

    🙂

    WSS

    @logicisforsquares said:

    Haha I don't see this ending in Waco fashion. Janet isn't on the job.

    If this "militia" in Oregon does fire upon state or federal officials sent in to remove them peacefully, would that then make it acceptable the government to respond likewise?

    gftChris gftChrisG
    • 13k Posts
    • 428 Reputation
    gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by
    #23

    @jbluhm86 said:

    If this "militia" in Oregon does fire upon state or federal officials sent in to remove them peacefully, would that then make it acceptable the government to respond likewise?

    Judging by reactions to other things, even if they don't open fire, if they don't comply 100% with the police the police are justified in shooting them. Or if the police feel threatened.

    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • gftChris gftChrisG
      • 13k Posts
      • 428 Reputation
      gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by
      #24

      Btw, for those of a less serious disposition, there are some great hashtags out there for this, like #yallqaeda and #vanillaISIS.

      T 1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • gftChrisG gftChris

        Btw, for those of a less serious disposition, there are some great hashtags out there for this, like #yallqaeda and #vanillaISIS.

        The Cysko Kid T Conversation Starter Reacting Well Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Week One Done One Month Later One Year In
        • 15k Posts
        • 2k Reputation
        T The Cysko Kid wrote on last edited by
        #25

        @gftchris said:

        Btw, for those of a less serious disposition, there are some great hashtags out there for this, like #yallqaeda and #vanillaISIS.

        Because repuclicans are the real terrorists. Until they shoot, behead or blow anyone up this is much more like occupy or blm protests than terrorism.

        Early man walked away as modern man took control. Their minds weren't all the same and to conquer was their goal. So He built his great empires and he slaughtered his own kind, and he died a confused man and killed himself in his own mind...
        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • gftChris gftChrisG
          • 13k Posts
          • 428 Reputation
          gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by
          #26

          I think we broke Cysko...

          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • jbluhm86J jbluhm86

            @westside-steve said:

            No kidding. Like the old saying only Nixon could go to China, only Democrat Justice Department's can massacre civilians!

            🙂

            WSS

            @logicisforsquares said:

            Haha I don't see this ending in Waco fashion. Janet isn't on the job.

            If this "militia" in Oregon does fire upon state or federal officials sent in to remove them peacefully, would that then make it acceptable the government to respond likewise?

            Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
            • 39k Posts
            • 9k Reputation
            W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
            #27

            @jbluhm86 said:

            If this "militia" in Oregon does fire upon state or federal officials sent in to remove them peacefully, would that then make it acceptable the government to respond likewise?

            Yes.

            WSS

            www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • Legacy Fan Legacy FanL
              • 3k Posts
              • 197 Reputation
              Legacy FanL Legacy Fan wrote on last edited by
              #28

              Meh.

              At least they didn't burn the building down after stealing the tv's & computers from it first.

              Sure, luck means a lot in football. Not having a good quarterback is bad luck. -Don Shula
              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • gftChris gftChrisG
                • 13k Posts
                • 428 Reputation
                gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by
                #29

                On a serious note, do people support their actions? Their cause?

                OldBrownsFanO 1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
                  • 39k Posts
                  • 9k Reputation
                  W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
                  #30

                  Actually, as is the case with most protests, I don't give a fuck about their cause at all and think they are attention hog pains in the ass.

                  Less annoying but just as stupid as the Occupy Wall Street jerk offs that some of you may support.

                  WSS

                  www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
                  C 1 Reply Last reply
                  👍
                  Quote Reply
                  • Legacy Fan Legacy FanL
                    • 3k Posts
                    • 197 Reputation
                    Legacy FanL Legacy Fan wrote on last edited by
                    #31

                    Reading up on the Hammonds (ranchers in question) leads be to believe they've been jerked around pretty severely by the Feds. They've conceded and gone to prison, and it seems like there are some mall ninjas and Bundy doofuses desperately seeking attention.

                    Sure, luck means a lot in football. Not having a good quarterback is bad luck. -Don Shula
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • gftChrisG gftChris

                      On a serious note, do people support their actions? Their cause?

                      OldBrownsFan OldBrownsFanO
                      • 11k Posts
                      • 3k Reputation
                      OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                      #32

                      @gftchris said:

                      On a serious note, do people support their actions? Their cause?

                      The cause might be good but I really don't know enough about it, regardless I don't agree with breaking the law and they should be held accountable for breaking the law. Also looters and arsonists in the Baltimore and Ferguson riots should be held accountable for breaking the law. Furthermore leaders of sanctuary cities that are breaking the law should be held accountable.

                      One of the problems I see is the hypocrisy going on with selective enforcement of our laws. All laws should be enforced and if they are not good laws work to change them.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • gftChris gftChrisG
                        • 13k Posts
                        • 428 Reputation
                        gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by
                        #33

                        Reason I ask is, we hear a lot about the second amendment, and what it's "really" for - an organised militia with the ability to stand up to an oppressive regime inflicting its will upon the people. I have no doubt that in the minds of the people occupying this bird sanctuary (seriously, btw?) believe that this is exactly what they're doing.

                        With that in mind, how do you feel about what they're doing, how it relates to the law and specifically the second amendment?

                        Legacy FanL 1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • jbluhm86J jbluhm86

                          @westside-steve said:

                          No kidding. Like the old saying only Nixon could go to China, only Democrat Justice Department's can massacre civilians!

                          🙂

                          WSS

                          @logicisforsquares said:

                          Haha I don't see this ending in Waco fashion. Janet isn't on the job.

                          If this "militia" in Oregon does fire upon state or federal officials sent in to remove them peacefully, would that then make it acceptable the government to respond likewise?

                          LogicIsForSquares LogicIsForSquaresL Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                          • 10k Posts
                          • 2k Reputation
                          LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on last edited by
                          #34

                          @jbluhm86 said:

                          If this "militia" in Oregon does fire upon state or federal officials sent in to remove them peacefully, would that then make it acceptable the government to respond likewise?

                          Well yes, I would say shooting at people is grounds for them to shoot back.

                          gftChrisG 1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares

                            @jbluhm86 said:

                            If this "militia" in Oregon does fire upon state or federal officials sent in to remove them peacefully, would that then make it acceptable the government to respond likewise?

                            Well yes, I would say shooting at people is grounds for them to shoot back.

                            gftChris gftChrisG
                            • 13k Posts
                            • 428 Reputation
                            gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by
                            #35

                            @logicisforsquares said:

                            Well yes, I would say shooting at people is grounds for them to shoot back.

                            Or holding a toy gun apparently.

                            LogicIsForSquaresL 1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • OldBrownsFan OldBrownsFanO
                              • 11k Posts
                              • 3k Reputation
                              OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                              #36

                              In this country we are told driving a car is a privilege and not a right...so we bend the rules and give illegal immigrants drivers licenses for what? Breaking the law? You would think voting was a right as well but it also is a privilege and not a constitutional right. The second amendment is a constitutional right to every American citizen and that should be kept in mind with every new gun law. It is not just a privilege to have firearms we have that right and it is a constant fight to keep that right. If it were not for the second amendment I have no doubt we would have had gun confiscation like in Australia and being floated today by Hillary Clinton and Obama as a model for this country.

                              The battle the militia is fighting is what we have court systems for and appeals processes for verdicts we don't agree with and I think they are wrong to think they can achieve by force what they want.

                              LogicIsForSquaresL 1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • gftChrisG gftChris

                                @logicisforsquares said:

                                Well yes, I would say shooting at people is grounds for them to shoot back.

                                Or holding a toy gun apparently.

                                LogicIsForSquares LogicIsForSquaresL Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                • 10k Posts
                                • 2k Reputation
                                LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on last edited by
                                #37

                                @gftchris said:

                                Or holding a toy gun apparently.

                                A realistic looking toy gun that is being carried by someone pointing it at strangers. But lets all act like it was a good boy who was carrying a neon orange squirt gun.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                Quote Reply
                                • OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan

                                  In this country we are told driving a car is a privilege and not a right...so we bend the rules and give illegal immigrants drivers licenses for what? Breaking the law? You would think voting was a right as well but it also is a privilege and not a constitutional right. The second amendment is a constitutional right to every American citizen and that should be kept in mind with every new gun law. It is not just a privilege to have firearms we have that right and it is a constant fight to keep that right. If it were not for the second amendment I have no doubt we would have had gun confiscation like in Australia and being floated today by Hillary Clinton and Obama as a model for this country.

                                  The battle the militia is fighting is what we have court systems for and appeals processes for verdicts we don't agree with and I think they are wrong to think they can achieve by force what they want.

                                  LogicIsForSquares LogicIsForSquaresL Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                  • 10k Posts
                                  • 2k Reputation
                                  LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on last edited by
                                  #38

                                  @oldbrownsfan said:

                                  The battle the militia is fighting is what we have court systems for and appeals processes for verdicts we don't agree with and I think they are wrong to think they can achieve by force what they want.

                                  This.

                                  gftChrisG 1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • gftChrisG gftChris

                                    Reason I ask is, we hear a lot about the second amendment, and what it's "really" for - an organised militia with the ability to stand up to an oppressive regime inflicting its will upon the people. I have no doubt that in the minds of the people occupying this bird sanctuary (seriously, btw?) believe that this is exactly what they're doing.

                                    With that in mind, how do you feel about what they're doing, how it relates to the law and specifically the second amendment?

                                    Legacy Fan Legacy FanL
                                    • 3k Posts
                                    • 197 Reputation
                                    Legacy FanL Legacy Fan wrote on last edited by
                                    #39

                                    @gftchris said:

                                    Reason I ask is, we hear a lot about the second amendment, and what it's "really" for - an organised militia with the ability to stand up to an oppressive regime inflicting its will upon the people. I have no doubt that in the minds of the people occupying this bird sanctuary (seriously, btw?) believe that this is exactly what they're doing.

                                    With that in mind, how do you feel about what they're doing, how it relates to the law and specifically the second amendment?

                                    the "bird sanctuary " was arbitrarily assigned to that land by the Feds. It was family grazing land prior. The reasons the "birds" showed up was from the changes that were made to the land by the family essentially creating a natural oasis-like irrigation system for their herds.

                                    I'd also be upset if the govt just came and said "mine"

                                    Sure, luck means a lot in football. Not having a good quarterback is bad luck. -Don Shula
                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    Quote Reply
                                    • LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares

                                      @oldbrownsfan said:

                                      The battle the militia is fighting is what we have court systems for and appeals processes for verdicts we don't agree with and I think they are wrong to think they can achieve by force what they want.

                                      This.

                                      gftChris gftChrisG
                                      • 13k Posts
                                      • 428 Reputation
                                      gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by
                                      #40

                                      @logicisforsquares said:

                                      This.

                                      Seems like you're both saying that that militia has no place in modern society?

                                      LogicIsForSquaresL OldBrownsFanO 2 Replies Last reply
                                      Quote Reply
                                      • gftChrisG gftChris

                                        @logicisforsquares said:

                                        This.

                                        Seems like you're both saying that that militia has no place in modern society?

                                        LogicIsForSquares LogicIsForSquaresL Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                        • 10k Posts
                                        • 2k Reputation
                                        LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on last edited by
                                        #41

                                        @gftchris said:

                                        Seems like you're both saying that that militia has no place in modern society?

                                        It doesn't apply to this situation. If it was used anytime someone felt wronged by a government official, there would be standoffs over parking tickets.

                                        If the government is rounding people up or cooking the books on elections then those are definitely times that a militia would be important.

                                        gftChrisG 1 Reply Last reply
                                        Quote Reply
                                        • DieHardBrownsFan DieHardBrownsFanD Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Collaborator Posting Machine First Post One Month Later Week One Done One Year In
                                          • 28k Posts
                                          • 6k Reputation
                                          DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                                          #42

                                          God save the Queen...

                                          "You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970.
                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Quote Reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Theme
                                          • System
                                          • Light
                                          • Dark
                                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Forums
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Donate