Goff Or Lynch @2?
-
Agree... Goff's floor is franchise level... book it. I can't remember the last draft when I said that of a QB prospect. (Luck? Yes, but I thought his floor was higher than "franchise".) Draft position is all about odds and Goff rings the bell.
But even that is not enough to take him top five or even top ten. What makes him Top Two is he has upside... he is franchise-plus.
Here's his DraftBreakdown page with six-2015 games. For those who would pass on him... spend some time... see for yourselves... if you have not already.
I wouldn't pass on him because of a lack of talent.
The only reason I would pass on him is because I believe Wentz has the same upside, with a little lower of a floor, and that we could get Wentz with our second round pick - freeing up #2 for someone else.
That's not saying I would pass on him - I just see two scenarios that are beneficial for us in this moment.
The only reason I would pass on him is because I believe Wentz has the same upside...
Can't argue with that as I have not looked hard at Wentz yet.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Agree... Goff's floor is franchise level... book it. I can't remember the last draft when I said that of a QB prospect. (Luck? Yes, but I thought his floor was higher than "franchise".) Draft position is all about odds and Goff rings the bell.
But even that is not enough to take him top five or even top ten. What makes him Top Two is he has upside... he is franchise-plus.
Here's his DraftBreakdown page with six-2015 games. For those who would pass on him... spend some time... see for yourselves... if you have not already.
I wouldn't pass on him because of a lack of talent.
The only reason I would pass on him is because I believe Wentz has the same upside, with a little lower of a floor, and that we could get Wentz with our second round pick - freeing up #2 for someone else.
That's not saying I would pass on him - I just see two scenarios that are beneficial for us in this moment.
we could get Wentz with our second round pick - freeing up #2 for someone else.
I'm not so sure. If we pass on Goff Jerry Jones might do something silly (and taking Goff), but I could see Wentz surpassing Lynch.
I could see Wentz going by #15 to the Rams, but also see him going no later than #22 to the Texans.
Would we really want to trade up to #22 to draft a quarterback?
-
Andy Dalton's been there for what, 4 years, right?
Mare Lewis?
WSS
5 years, 5 playoffs.
Do you think if Quinn or Weeden was drafted onto Marv Lewis' team instead of ours they would have the same success?
Zombo
Zombo said:
5 years, 5 playoffs.
Do you think if Quinn or Weeden was drafted onto Marv Lewis' team instead of ours they would have the same success?
Zombo
Yes, Mr Z, I do. I'm not so sure about Brady Quinn, but I like the guy just because he's a Buckeye native, and he's Irish and a very distant cousin is related to me from Carroll County. But I think any quarterback drafted in the first round onto a solid team and stays there for many years has a hell of a better shot then a guy with one year of an offensive program a second year of a different one and then the shit can.
And I certainly think Brandon Weeden would have benefited from 5 years on a good team.
WSS
-
Neither , Trade Manziel straight up to the Rams for Sean Mannion and draft Defense and Wide Receivers.
-
The only reason I would pass on him is because I believe Wentz has the same upside...
Can't argue with that as I have not looked hard at Wentz yet.
Can't argue with that as I have not looked hard at Wentz yet.
He has flashes of brilliance, in what I've watched thus far. Goff is a more natural thrower, but the ball comes off with just as much zip as it does from Goff.
He's more of a project, but I really do like him.
I'm not so sure. If we pass on Goff Jerry Jones might do something silly (and taking Goff), but I could see Wentz surpassing Lynch.
I could see Wentz going by #15 to the Rams, but also see him going no later than #22 to the Texans.
Would we really want to trade up to #22 to draft a quarterback?
We don't have much experience moving up to #22 for a quarterback.
-
your opinion of Goff is much much higher than the consensus opinion of him currently. Which is that he is probably the top qb in the class(about 25-30% of experts still like lynch better) and will be a high first round pick, but that is due more to the fact that teams always push up the top qbs because of need. Both jameis and mariota were getting higher grades than Goff or Lynch. Goff is being graded right now as being much closer to a top 5 overall pick like a blake bortles than a luck or manning.
Not saying Goff won't turn out to be very good(or very poor...I have no idea), but there is definately not some consensus out there from the experts that he is a super duper elite qb prospect.
It's January, so let's give it some time. I think the hype train will start to build as more people watch film and study his game - also after he throws at the combine and such.
I'm not sure who is, but seems like to me everybody is saying Goff is the top prospect - anybody still saying Lynch is probably out of their mind anyway.
He has very few flaws, I haven't really seen anybody saying anything significantly bad about him other than "Utah!" - which was a bad game, but it's much worse on paper than it actually looks on film.
We just need a franchise guy who can be good for many years, not necessarily a Peyton or Luck.
Bortles is OK, but I don't think he's really comparable to Goff in terms of the type of prospect he was.
It's January, so let's give it some time. I think the hype train will start to build as more people watch film and study his game - also after he throws at the combine and such.
I'm not sure who is, but seems like to me everybody is saying Goff is the top prospect - anybody still saying Lynch is probably out of their mind anyway.
He has very few flaws, I haven't really seen anybody saying anything significantly bad about him other than "Utah!" - which was a bad game, but it's much worse on paper than it actually looks on film.
We just need a franchise guy who can be good for many years, not necessarily a Peyton or Luck.
Bortles is OK, but I don't think he's really comparable to Goff in terms of the type of prospect he was.
heck until the birmingham bowl where lynch sucked, lynch was listed as 1 and goff 2 in terms of qb rankings on the espn ticker(which either tracks mcshay or kiper...cant remember which). Bortles' grade is going to be pretty similar to Goff. And of course goff is going to get a lot of hype....just as any top 10 overall qb will get leading up to the draft. So did joey harrington, mark sanchez, byron leftwich, etc.....it's not going to be as much positive hype surrounding goff comign out as jameis or mariota last year. Everything I read is saying neither qb in this years class has as much hype or is thought to be as good as those two coming out. This yeah goff will likely be the first qb off the board(and due to need at the position a very high pick no doubt which will garner some attention), but he's just not drawing the sort of raves nationally that the more famous prospects over the years have....
-
It's January, so let's give it some time. I think the hype train will start to build as more people watch film and study his game - also after he throws at the combine and such.
I'm not sure who is, but seems like to me everybody is saying Goff is the top prospect - anybody still saying Lynch is probably out of their mind anyway.
He has very few flaws, I haven't really seen anybody saying anything significantly bad about him other than "Utah!" - which was a bad game, but it's much worse on paper than it actually looks on film.
We just need a franchise guy who can be good for many years, not necessarily a Peyton or Luck.
Bortles is OK, but I don't think he's really comparable to Goff in terms of the type of prospect he was.
heck until the birmingham bowl where lynch sucked, lynch was listed as 1 and goff 2 in terms of qb rankings on the espn ticker(which either tracks mcshay or kiper...cant remember which). Bortles' grade is going to be pretty similar to Goff. And of course goff is going to get a lot of hype....just as any top 10 overall qb will get leading up to the draft. So did joey harrington, mark sanchez, byron leftwich, etc.....it's not going to be as much positive hype surrounding goff comign out as jameis or mariota last year. Everything I read is saying neither qb in this years class has as much hype or is thought to be as good as those two coming out. This yeah goff will likely be the first qb off the board(and due to need at the position a very high pick no doubt which will garner some attention), but he's just not drawing the sort of raves nationally that the more famous prospects over the years have....
but he's just not drawing the sort of raves nationally that the more famous prospects over the years have....
Not exactly the best way to evaluate a prospect.
Idk about the Bortles comparison. You're comparing raves/ratings and stuff - when I look at the players Bortles and Goff are two pretty different types of quarterbacks.
Goff is a franchise QB. Won't be a journey man, won't be a bench rider. Not only that, but his ceiling is pretty damn high too.
If I'm Hue, he's my guy.
-
Zombo said:
5 years, 5 playoffs.
Do you think if Quinn or Weeden was drafted onto Marv Lewis' team instead of ours they would have the same success?
Zombo
Quinn yes, Weeden no.
Andy Dalton isn't transcendent talent. He's a smart, accurate QB with some balls on him surrounded by some talented players and coached by a smart coach.
I'd venture that 14-18 active QB's could do the same there.
Quinn yes, Weeden no.
Andy Dalton isn't transcendent talent. He's a smart, accurate QB with some balls on him surrounded by some talented players and coached by a smart coach.
I'd venture that 14-18 active QB's could do the same there.
And one inactive one, apparently.
Zombo
--Brady Quinn? Really??
-
Zombo said:
5 years, 5 playoffs.
Do you think if Quinn or Weeden was drafted onto Marv Lewis' team instead of ours they would have the same success?
Zombo
Yes, Mr Z, I do. I'm not so sure about Brady Quinn, but I like the guy just because he's a Buckeye native, and he's Irish and a very distant cousin is related to me from Carroll County. But I think any quarterback drafted in the first round onto a solid team and stays there for many years has a hell of a better shot then a guy with one year of an offensive program a second year of a different one and then the shit can.
And I certainly think Brandon Weeden would have benefited from 5 years on a good team.
WSS
Yes, Mr Z, I do. I'm not so sure about Brady Quinn, but I like the guy just because he's a Buckeye native, and he's Irish and a very distant cousin is related to me from Carroll County. But I think any quarterback drafted in the first round onto a solid team and stays there for many years has a hell of a better shot then a guy with one year of an offensive program a second year of a different one and then the shit can.
And I certainly think Brandon Weeden would have benefited from 5 years on a good team.
WSS
...and then applied for Social Security.
Well, let's hope Hue builds that strong team and the QB we brings in gets that patience, because if he is good enough, then we'll be that team with that guy.
Zombo
-
He will probably get more patience if they overpay for him. The perception will be that he's more valuable.
WSS
-
Hugh Jackson will make a deal for AJ McCarron. AJ knows the system and we're a step ahead at the gate.
-
Hugh Jackson will make a deal for AJ McCarron. AJ knows the system and we're a step ahead at the gate.
Hugh Jackson will make a deal for AJ McCarron. AJ knows the system and we're a step ahead at the gate.
No.
Zombo
-
Hugh Jackson will make a deal for AJ McCarron. AJ knows the system and we're a step ahead at the gate.
Hugh Jackson will make a deal for AJ McCarron. AJ knows the system and we're a step ahead at the gate.
Ha!.....doubt that will happen.....
Browns and Bungles wont be making any deals with each other anytime soon....
AND....if the Bungles were willing to trade him to their rivals..... then wouldnt you wonder why?
-
Quinn yes, Weeden no.
Andy Dalton isn't transcendent talent. He's a smart, accurate QB with some balls on him surrounded by some talented players and coached by a smart coach.
I'd venture that 14-18 active QB's could do the same there.
And one inactive one, apparently.
Zombo
--Brady Quinn? Really??
Zombo said:
And one inactive one, apparently.
Zombo
--Brady Quinn? Really??
Surround Brady Quinn with enough talent and he'd be fine.
It's how he excelled at Notre Dame.
I'm awesome, and I fuck dolphins. Ghoolie 12/2/2012: I have absolutely no skills, training or pride -
I agree 100% TCPO. I all so feel that if we had a Tom Brady at QB he would make guys like us look like Pro Bowl wide outs. It has been to long since we knew what it was like to win. The closest was 07 when we had Anderception as our QB but it was bullshit, We had a guy who was way past his prime in JJ a wanna be star in K2 and our number 1 wr was BE who only caught a pass when he felt like it but they kept us in the games. I just want wins and I want them now.
-
Agree. Put Andy Dalton on the Browns and he would have been cut after 2 years.
Does a Brady Quinn or Brandon Weeden become a star with the Bengals and take them to the playoffs five straight years?
I lean more toward we have drafted shitty QBs than our shitty team has ruined QBs.
Zombo
Zombo said:
Does a Brady Quinn or Brandon Weeden become a star with the Bengals and take them to the playoffs five straight years?
I lean more toward we have drafted shitty QBs than our shitty team has ruined QBs.
Zombo
Denial is a river in Egypt. At least you and JM have one thing in common.
-
Zombo said:
And one inactive one, apparently.
Zombo
--Brady Quinn? Really??
Surround Brady Quinn with enough talent and he'd be fine.
It's how he excelled at Notre Dame.
Surround Brady Quinn with enough talent and he'd be fine.
It's how he excelled at Notre Dame.
Ok.
Good call. He was good in college.
Zombo
-
Zombo said:
Does a Brady Quinn or Brandon Weeden become a star with the Bengals and take them to the playoffs five straight years?
I lean more toward we have drafted shitty QBs than our shitty team has ruined QBs.
Zombo
Denial is a river in Egypt. At least you and JM have one thing in common.
Denial is a river in Egypt. At least you and JM have one thing in common.
??? You think Quinn and Weeden are good QBs that were ruined by the Browns?
Zombo
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login