Skip to content

On this, indigenous day, let us take a moment to remember....

Political Discussion
55 7 1.2k
  • @mld-woody said:

    So the argument is it's ok to honor Columbus, even though we know he did s bunch of awful Sheet, because some portion of the native Americans did bad things?

    The argument is, and it is pretty obvious, that if you need to be morally pure and cleanse the history books of Christopher Columbus you should not have monuments all across the United States to barbaric and savage Indian tribes that enslaved and raped each other and participated in torture and cannjbalism. That's the argument.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    The argument is, and it is pretty obvious, that if you need to be morally pure and cleanse the history books of Christopher Columbus you should not have monuments all across the United States to barbaric and savage Indian tribes that enslaved and raped each other and participated in torture and cannjbalism. That's the argument.

    WSS

    By the way that was another speech to text glitch that should have read cannibalism of course.

    WSS

  • @westside-steve said:

    The argument is, and it is pretty obvious, that if you need to be morally pure and cleanse the history books of Christopher Columbus you should not have monuments all across the United States to barbaric and savage Indian tribes that enslaved and raped each other and participated in torture and cannjbalism. That's the argument.

    WSS

    By the way that was another speech to text glitch that should have read cannibalism of course.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    By the way that was another speech to text glitch that should have read cannibalism of course.

    WSS

    Ofc. Unless u were talking about the infamous metabolic tribe? 

  • @mld-woody said:

    So the argument is it's ok to honor Columbus, even though we know he did s bunch of awful Sheet, because some portion of the native Americans did bad things?

    The argument is, and it is pretty obvious, that if you need to be morally pure and cleanse the history books of Christopher Columbus you should not have monuments all across the United States to barbaric and savage Indian tribes that enslaved and raped each other and participated in torture and cannjbalism. That's the argument.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    The argument is, and it is pretty obvious, that if you need to be morally pure and cleanse the history books of Christopher Columbus you should not have monuments all across the United States to barbaric and savage Indian tribes that enslaved and raped each other and participated in torture and cannjbalism. That's the argument.

    WSS

    Every native American?

    Cuz we know what Columbus did. It's not that you need to be morally pure. But throwing babies at rocks is probably too much. 

  • Hey Woody I understand. Situational morality for you guys.

    I bet very few members of the Nazi party ever actually killed anybody.

    WSS

  • @westside-steve said:

    The argument is, and it is pretty obvious, that if you need to be morally pure and cleanse the history books of Christopher Columbus you should not have monuments all across the United States to barbaric and savage Indian tribes that enslaved and raped each other and participated in torture and cannjbalism. That's the argument.

    WSS

    Every native American?

    Cuz we know what Columbus did. It's not that you need to be morally pure. But throwing babies at rocks is probably too much. 

    @mld-woody said:

    Every native American?

    Cuz we know what Columbus did. It's not that you need to be morally pure. But throwing babies at rocks is probably too much. 

    But they were brown babies so its cool with west side

  • Hey Woody I understand. Situational morality for you guys.

    I bet very few members of the Nazi party ever actually killed anybody.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Hey Woody I understand. Situational morality for you guys.

    I bet very few members of the Nazi party ever actually killed anybody.

    WSS

    It's.,. It's not though. 

    In your attempts to be alt right Steve you're missing it. 

    We have you claiming every native American was as bas as Columbus vs what we actually know about Columbus....

  • The Injuns were savages, who the modern goody two shoe fags like to put on a pedestal. 

  • Columbus was objectively as pooper. 

    If you're right wing, you perceive those that want to remove things that honor him as liberal. And since your Political ideology boils down to "against the other side", you need to find a way to do that 

    But you can't actually do that. You can't defend Columbus. So you have to Huey start shitting on native Americans. Based on your thoughts. Based on broad strokes. Does it actually have anything to do with Columbus and the topic ay hand? No. But you think it "pisses off the liberals" which is  how you interpret winning. And if all goes well, you'll have successfully changed the subject

    Same Sheet every time

  • Columbus was objectively as pooper. 

    If you're right wing, you perceive those that want to remove things that honor him as liberal. And since your Political ideology boils down to "against the other side", you need to find a way to do that 

    But you can't actually do that. You can't defend Columbus. So you have to Huey start shitting on native Americans. Based on your thoughts. Based on broad strokes. Does it actually have anything to do with Columbus and the topic ay hand? No. But you think it "pisses off the liberals" which is  how you interpret winning. And if all goes well, you'll have successfully changed the subject

    Same Sheet every time

    @mld-woody said:

    Columbus was objectively as pooper. 

    If you're right wing, you perceive those that want to remove things that honor him as liberal. And since your Political ideology boils down to "against the other side", you need to find a way to do that 

    But you can't actually do that. You can't defend Columbus. So you have to Huey start shitting on native Americans. Based on your thoughts. Based on broad strokes. Does it actually have anything to do with Columbus and the topic ay hand? No. But you think it "pisses off the liberals" which is  how you interpret winning. And if all goes well, you'll have successfully changed the subject

    Same Sheet every time

    And you can't defend Native Americans. Brutal Savages like so many other humans on the Earth throughout history. But you've written a complete false history of them because of your animosity toward the establishment or white people or whatever. There has been torture murder had brutality bye every group you might consider heroic through the ages. We make up a complete fake narrative.

    WSS

  • What false history had woody written about the native americans? What they did once war was declared on them is of zero consequence. White people clearly documented the kind of people they encountered when they came here. They werent no savages. Ive furnished letters from both franklin and columbus about the people they encountered. Case closef

  • What false history had woody written about the native americans? What they did once war was declared on them is of zero consequence. White people clearly documented the kind of people they encountered when they came here. They werent no savages. Ive furnished letters from both franklin and columbus about the people they encountered. Case closef

    @clevfan4life said:

    What false history had woody written about the native americans? What they did once war was declared on them is of zero consequence. White people clearly documented the kind of people they encountered when they came here. They werent no savages. Ive furnished letters from both franklin and columbus about the people they encountered. Case closef

    way too ignorant, that is.

    http://www.science20.com/news_articles/the_most_violent_era_in_america_was_before_europeans_arrived-141847

    https://www.quora.com/Was-North-America-a-peaceful-Native-American-utopia-before-the-white-man-arrived

    case closed. STFU

  • The Injuns were savages, who the modern goody two shoe fags like to put on a pedestal. 

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    The Injuns were savages, who the modern goody two shoe fags like to put on a pedestal. 

     those ignorant asses don't want to know history, it's all about a viewpoint that doesn't exist elsewhere, make them

    FEEL elite.

    They hate facts:

    (warning - description of sick torture by American Indians...)

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2396760/How-Comanche-Indians-butchered-babies-roasted-enemies-alive.html

  • 22405979_937393689750417_6145064990457044096_n.jpg?oh=22b7fff84d7ae39c6e071f09c5317d8f&oe=5A40BC0F

  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    The Injuns were savages, who the modern goody two shoe fags like to put on a pedestal. 

     those ignorant asses don't want to know history, it's all about a viewpoint that doesn't exist elsewhere, make them

    FEEL elite.

    They hate facts:

    (warning - description of sick torture by American Indians...)

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2396760/How-Comanche-Indians-butchered-babies-roasted-enemies-alive.html

    @calfoxwc said:

     those ignorant asses don't want to know history, it's all about a viewpoint that doesn't exist elsewhere, make them

    FEEL elite.

    They hate facts:

    (warning - description of sick torture by American Indians...)

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2396760/How-Comanche-Indians-butchered-babies-roasted-enemies-alive.html

    We already addressed this Sheet u dotard. Jesus Shmuck, this is about commanche's. Multiple points to be made here IF this Sheet is even true....thats just one tribe of indians. And north american indians. NOT THE SAME PEOPLE COLUMBUS ENCOUNTERED you stupid twat flap. And furthermore the north american indians that the early settlers encountered, like the people franklin wrote about....were not commanches nor did they do stuff like that. 

    Once war was declared on all of em, you cant hold anything they did against them. They were fighting for their cery existence against AN INVADER. The white man was the invadet and aggressor, thats an indisputable FACT

  • And frankly what i read about the commanches, hell i even understand that. This was in the mid to early 1800's after most of the peaceful batives already got wiped out. So the commanches went medieval, so? Aint nothing americans wouldnt do in the same circumstance.

  • @mld-woody said:

    Columbus was objectively as pooper. 

    If you're right wing, you perceive those that want to remove things that honor him as liberal. And since your Political ideology boils down to "against the other side", you need to find a way to do that 

    But you can't actually do that. You can't defend Columbus. So you have to Huey start shitting on native Americans. Based on your thoughts. Based on broad strokes. Does it actually have anything to do with Columbus and the topic ay hand? No. But you think it "pisses off the liberals" which is  how you interpret winning. And if all goes well, you'll have successfully changed the subject

    Same Sheet every time

    And you can't defend Native Americans. Brutal Savages like so many other humans on the Earth throughout history. But you've written a complete false history of them because of your animosity toward the establishment or white people or whatever. There has been torture murder had brutality bye every group you might consider heroic through the ages. We make up a complete fake narrative.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    And you can't defend Native Americans. Brutal Savages like so many other humans on the Earth throughout history. But you've written a complete false history of them because of your animosity toward the establishment or white people or whatever. There has been torture murder had brutality bye every group you might consider heroic through the ages. We make up a complete fake narrative.

    WSS

    I'm not trying to defend them. This thread was about Columbus. You've changed the subject for reasons I've already described above. 

    I am not calling them all heroic. I'm not writing a false history or whatever else you're going on about. You're clearly just flailing around as much as you can to get off of the subject...

  • @westside-steve said:

    And you can't defend Native Americans. Brutal Savages like so many other humans on the Earth throughout history. But you've written a complete false history of them because of your animosity toward the establishment or white people or whatever. There has been torture murder had brutality bye every group you might consider heroic through the ages. We make up a complete fake narrative.

    WSS

    I'm not trying to defend them. This thread was about Columbus. You've changed the subject for reasons I've already described above. 

    I am not calling them all heroic. I'm not writing a false history or whatever else you're going on about. You're clearly just flailing around as much as you can to get off of the subject...

    @mld-woody said:

    I'm not trying to defend them. This thread was about Columbus. You've changed the subject for reasons I've already described above. 

    I am not calling them all heroic. I'm not writing a false history or whatever else you're going on about. You're clearly just flailing around as much as you can to get off of the subject...

    Not at all. You're a hypocrite. Cleve is a hypocrite and an idiot. You don't want Columbus honored because you think he was a bad guy. You have no problem with Lake Mohawk. Or Cherokee Red soda pop.

    So Columbus actually was a great Navigator whether or not he discovered America. And I understand some of you people want to sanitize the history books of anybody that wasn't politically correct four or five hundred years ago. Fair enough if that's what you decide though then we shouldn't change those things to honor tribes who are equally barbaric. Whether or not you saw a movie where they were cool.

    WSS

  • And Shmuck the Cuyahoga River!  Name it the Cleveland River!  Ditto Cuyahoga County!

  • @mld-woody said:

    I'm not trying to defend them. This thread was about Columbus. You've changed the subject for reasons I've already described above. 

    I am not calling them all heroic. I'm not writing a false history or whatever else you're going on about. You're clearly just flailing around as much as you can to get off of the subject...

    Not at all. You're a hypocrite. Cleve is a hypocrite and an idiot. You don't want Columbus honored because you think he was a bad guy. You have no problem with Lake Mohawk. Or Cherokee Red soda pop.

    So Columbus actually was a great Navigator whether or not he discovered America. And I understand some of you people want to sanitize the history books of anybody that wasn't politically correct four or five hundred years ago. Fair enough if that's what you decide though then we shouldn't change those things to honor tribes who are equally barbaric. Whether or not you saw a movie where they were cool.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Not at all. You're a hypocrite. Cleve is a hypocrite and an idiot. You don't want Columbus honored because you think he was a bad guy. You have no problem with Lake Mohawk. Or Cherokee Red soda pop.

    So Columbus actually was a great Navigator whether or not he discovered America. And I understand some of you people want to sanitize the history books of anybody that wasn't politically correct four or five hundred years ago. Fair enough if that's what you decide though then we shouldn't change those things to honor tribes who are equally barbaric. Whether or not you saw a movie where they were cool.

    WSS

    Ur not going to create an equivalency between a man who had babies smashed over rocks and ONE tribe of indians who went medieval at the end of their time. Im also not going to let you broad stroke north american indians with the people columbus encountered in the carribean. I know ur an idiot, dotard and a moron and ur not coming off that position if ur life deoended on it......but im not letting u muddy up an issue thats pretty clear.

    Columbus was a sexual predator who sent girls and boys as young as 9 back to spain to be sex slaves in king ferdinands court. No amount of scalping done by the commanche can equate to what columbus did in an entirely different part of of the hemisphere.

    furthermore, as to ur point that if we dont want to honor columbus we shouldnt honor native americans either cause scalped a ngr or two.......fine. Then ill be expecting some form of participation from u, west side stevie...in next years opening day protests against the cleveland INDIANS!! Some native americans have been pushing for an abolition to all these "supposed" honorrific gestures toward indian culture like the washington redskins etc, etc. Nice corner u backed urself into stevie

  • 200.gif