On this, indigenous day, let us take a moment to remember....
-
[kuh-tab-uh-liz-uh m]
noun Biology, Physiology.
-
destructive metabolism; the breaking down in living organisms of more complex substances into simpler ones, with the release of energy (opposed to anabolism).
-
-
As we keep talking about freedoms, Cleve you are perfectly free to pack your shjt and leave whatever godforsaken wilderness you live on and give it back to the natives.
WSS
-
As we keep talking about freedoms, Cleve you are perfectly free to pack your shjt and leave whatever godforsaken wilderness you live on and give it back to the natives.
WSS
As we keep talking about freedoms, Cleve you are perfectly free to pack your shjt and leave whatever godforsaken wilderness you live on and give it back to the natives.
WSS
I wish i lived in the wilderness. Could have a couple big dogs then. I live in a condo...ur the one that livesout in the stix in norton, which is some drcent land. Consider urself lucky if u can have coffee on ur back porch in the morning and see nithin but trees and hear sht but the wind blowing
-
So the argument is it's ok to honor Columbus, even though we know he did s bunch of awful Sheet, because some portion of the native Americans did bad things?
The argument is, and it is pretty obvious, that if you need to be morally pure and cleanse the history books of Christopher Columbus you should not have monuments all across the United States to barbaric and savage Indian tribes that enslaved and raped each other and participated in torture and cannjbalism. That's the argument.
WSS
The argument is, and it is pretty obvious, that if you need to be morally pure and cleanse the history books of Christopher Columbus you should not have monuments all across the United States to barbaric and savage Indian tribes that enslaved and raped each other and participated in torture and cannjbalism. That's the argument.
WSS
By the way that was another speech to text glitch that should have read cannibalism of course.
WSS
-
The argument is, and it is pretty obvious, that if you need to be morally pure and cleanse the history books of Christopher Columbus you should not have monuments all across the United States to barbaric and savage Indian tribes that enslaved and raped each other and participated in torture and cannjbalism. That's the argument.
WSS
By the way that was another speech to text glitch that should have read cannibalism of course.
WSS
By the way that was another speech to text glitch that should have read cannibalism of course.
WSS
Ofc. Unless u were talking about the infamous metabolic tribe?
-
So the argument is it's ok to honor Columbus, even though we know he did s bunch of awful Sheet, because some portion of the native Americans did bad things?
The argument is, and it is pretty obvious, that if you need to be morally pure and cleanse the history books of Christopher Columbus you should not have monuments all across the United States to barbaric and savage Indian tribes that enslaved and raped each other and participated in torture and cannjbalism. That's the argument.
WSS
The argument is, and it is pretty obvious, that if you need to be morally pure and cleanse the history books of Christopher Columbus you should not have monuments all across the United States to barbaric and savage Indian tribes that enslaved and raped each other and participated in torture and cannjbalism. That's the argument.
WSS
Every native American?
Cuz we know what Columbus did. It's not that you need to be morally pure. But throwing babies at rocks is probably too much.
-
Hey Woody I understand. Situational morality for you guys.
I bet very few members of the Nazi party ever actually killed anybody.
WSS
-
The argument is, and it is pretty obvious, that if you need to be morally pure and cleanse the history books of Christopher Columbus you should not have monuments all across the United States to barbaric and savage Indian tribes that enslaved and raped each other and participated in torture and cannjbalism. That's the argument.
WSS
Every native American?
Cuz we know what Columbus did. It's not that you need to be morally pure. But throwing babies at rocks is probably too much.
Every native American?
Cuz we know what Columbus did. It's not that you need to be morally pure. But throwing babies at rocks is probably too much.
But they were brown babies so its cool with west side
-
Hey Woody I understand. Situational morality for you guys.
I bet very few members of the Nazi party ever actually killed anybody.
WSS
Hey Woody I understand. Situational morality for you guys.
I bet very few members of the Nazi party ever actually killed anybody.
WSS
It's.,. It's not though.
In your attempts to be alt right Steve you're missing it.
We have you claiming every native American was as bas as Columbus vs what we actually know about Columbus....
-
The Injuns were savages, who the modern goody two shoe fags like to put on a pedestal.
-
Columbus was objectively as pooper.
If you're right wing, you perceive those that want to remove things that honor him as liberal. And since your Political ideology boils down to "against the other side", you need to find a way to do that
But you can't actually do that. You can't defend Columbus. So you have to Huey start shitting on native Americans. Based on your thoughts. Based on broad strokes. Does it actually have anything to do with Columbus and the topic ay hand? No. But you think it "pisses off the liberals" which is how you interpret winning. And if all goes well, you'll have successfully changed the subject
Same Sheet every time
-
Columbus was objectively as pooper.
If you're right wing, you perceive those that want to remove things that honor him as liberal. And since your Political ideology boils down to "against the other side", you need to find a way to do that
But you can't actually do that. You can't defend Columbus. So you have to Huey start shitting on native Americans. Based on your thoughts. Based on broad strokes. Does it actually have anything to do with Columbus and the topic ay hand? No. But you think it "pisses off the liberals" which is how you interpret winning. And if all goes well, you'll have successfully changed the subject
Same Sheet every time
Columbus was objectively as pooper.
If you're right wing, you perceive those that want to remove things that honor him as liberal. And since your Political ideology boils down to "against the other side", you need to find a way to do that
But you can't actually do that. You can't defend Columbus. So you have to Huey start shitting on native Americans. Based on your thoughts. Based on broad strokes. Does it actually have anything to do with Columbus and the topic ay hand? No. But you think it "pisses off the liberals" which is how you interpret winning. And if all goes well, you'll have successfully changed the subject
Same Sheet every time
And you can't defend Native Americans. Brutal Savages like so many other humans on the Earth throughout history. But you've written a complete false history of them because of your animosity toward the establishment or white people or whatever. There has been torture murder had brutality bye every group you might consider heroic through the ages. We make up a complete fake narrative.
WSS
-
What false history had woody written about the native americans? What they did once war was declared on them is of zero consequence. White people clearly documented the kind of people they encountered when they came here. They werent no savages. Ive furnished letters from both franklin and columbus about the people they encountered. Case closef
-
What false history had woody written about the native americans? What they did once war was declared on them is of zero consequence. White people clearly documented the kind of people they encountered when they came here. They werent no savages. Ive furnished letters from both franklin and columbus about the people they encountered. Case closef
What false history had woody written about the native americans? What they did once war was declared on them is of zero consequence. White people clearly documented the kind of people they encountered when they came here. They werent no savages. Ive furnished letters from both franklin and columbus about the people they encountered. Case closef
way too ignorant, that is.
case closed. STFU
-
The Injuns were savages, who the modern goody two shoe fags like to put on a pedestal.
The Injuns were savages, who the modern goody two shoe fags like to put on a pedestal.
those ignorant asses don't want to know history, it's all about a viewpoint that doesn't exist elsewhere, make them
FEEL elite.
They hate facts:
(warning - description of sick torture by American Indians...)
-

-
The Injuns were savages, who the modern goody two shoe fags like to put on a pedestal.
those ignorant asses don't want to know history, it's all about a viewpoint that doesn't exist elsewhere, make them
FEEL elite.
They hate facts:
(warning - description of sick torture by American Indians...)
those ignorant asses don't want to know history, it's all about a viewpoint that doesn't exist elsewhere, make them
FEEL elite.
They hate facts:
(warning - description of sick torture by American Indians...)
We already addressed this Sheet u dotard. Jesus Shmuck, this is about commanche's. Multiple points to be made here IF this Sheet is even true....thats just one tribe of indians. And north american indians. NOT THE SAME PEOPLE COLUMBUS ENCOUNTERED you stupid twat flap. And furthermore the north american indians that the early settlers encountered, like the people franklin wrote about....were not commanches nor did they do stuff like that.
Once war was declared on all of em, you cant hold anything they did against them. They were fighting for their cery existence against AN INVADER. The white man was the invadet and aggressor, thats an indisputable FACT
-
And frankly what i read about the commanches, hell i even understand that. This was in the mid to early 1800's after most of the peaceful batives already got wiped out. So the commanches went medieval, so? Aint nothing americans wouldnt do in the same circumstance.
-
Columbus was objectively as pooper.
If you're right wing, you perceive those that want to remove things that honor him as liberal. And since your Political ideology boils down to "against the other side", you need to find a way to do that
But you can't actually do that. You can't defend Columbus. So you have to Huey start shitting on native Americans. Based on your thoughts. Based on broad strokes. Does it actually have anything to do with Columbus and the topic ay hand? No. But you think it "pisses off the liberals" which is how you interpret winning. And if all goes well, you'll have successfully changed the subject
Same Sheet every time
And you can't defend Native Americans. Brutal Savages like so many other humans on the Earth throughout history. But you've written a complete false history of them because of your animosity toward the establishment or white people or whatever. There has been torture murder had brutality bye every group you might consider heroic through the ages. We make up a complete fake narrative.
WSS
And you can't defend Native Americans. Brutal Savages like so many other humans on the Earth throughout history. But you've written a complete false history of them because of your animosity toward the establishment or white people or whatever. There has been torture murder had brutality bye every group you might consider heroic through the ages. We make up a complete fake narrative.
WSS
I'm not trying to defend them. This thread was about Columbus. You've changed the subject for reasons I've already described above.
I am not calling them all heroic. I'm not writing a false history or whatever else you're going on about. You're clearly just flailing around as much as you can to get off of the subject...
-
And you can't defend Native Americans. Brutal Savages like so many other humans on the Earth throughout history. But you've written a complete false history of them because of your animosity toward the establishment or white people or whatever. There has been torture murder had brutality bye every group you might consider heroic through the ages. We make up a complete fake narrative.
WSS
I'm not trying to defend them. This thread was about Columbus. You've changed the subject for reasons I've already described above.
I am not calling them all heroic. I'm not writing a false history or whatever else you're going on about. You're clearly just flailing around as much as you can to get off of the subject...
I'm not trying to defend them. This thread was about Columbus. You've changed the subject for reasons I've already described above.
I am not calling them all heroic. I'm not writing a false history or whatever else you're going on about. You're clearly just flailing around as much as you can to get off of the subject...
Not at all. You're a hypocrite. Cleve is a hypocrite and an idiot. You don't want Columbus honored because you think he was a bad guy. You have no problem with Lake Mohawk. Or Cherokee Red soda pop.
So Columbus actually was a great Navigator whether or not he discovered America. And I understand some of you people want to sanitize the history books of anybody that wasn't politically correct four or five hundred years ago. Fair enough if that's what you decide though then we shouldn't change those things to honor tribes who are equally barbaric. Whether or not you saw a movie where they were cool.
WSS
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login