Skip to content

On this, indigenous day, let us take a moment to remember....

Political Discussion
55 7 1.2k
  • So the argument is it's ok to honor Columbus, even though we know he did s bunch of awful Sheet, because some portion of the native Americans did bad things?

    @mld-woody said:

    So the argument is it's ok to honor Columbus, even though we know he did s bunch of awful Sheet, because some portion of the native Americans did bad things?

    Right, because a guy who landed in south america and promptly boiled people alive who wouldnt mine gold for spain....is the ewuivalent of a group of people who were slowly exterminated and pushed off their land

  • So the argument is it's ok to honor Columbus, even though we know he did s bunch of awful Sheet, because some portion of the native Americans did bad things?

    @mld-woody said:

    So the argument is it's ok to honor Columbus, even though we know he did s bunch of awful Sheet, because some portion of the native Americans did bad things?

    The argument is, and it is pretty obvious, that if you need to be morally pure and cleanse the history books of Christopher Columbus you should not have monuments all across the United States to barbaric and savage Indian tribes that enslaved and raped each other and participated in torture and cannjbalism. That's the argument.

    WSS

  • In honor of the Indians, I am changing my avatar.Ā  Go Tribe!Ā  MAGA!

  • @mld-woody said:

    So the argument is it's ok to honor Columbus, even though we know he did s bunch of awful Sheet, because some portion of the native Americans did bad things?

    The argument is, and it is pretty obvious, that if you need to be morally pure and cleanse the history books of Christopher Columbus you should not have monuments all across the United States to barbaric and savage Indian tribes that enslaved and raped each other and participated in torture and cannjbalism. That's the argument.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    and participated in torture and catabolism.

    WSS

    Inb4 edit.Ā 

  • [kuh-tab-uh-liz-uh m]

    nounĀ  Biology,Ā Physiology.

    1. destructive metabolism; the breaking down in living organisms of more complex substances into simpler ones, with the release of energy (opposed toĀ anabolism).

  • As we keep talking about freedoms, Cleve you are perfectly free to pack your shjt and leave whatever godforsaken wilderness you live on and give it back to the natives.

    WSS

  • As we keep talking about freedoms, Cleve you are perfectly free to pack your shjt and leave whatever godforsaken wilderness you live on and give it back to the natives.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    As we keep talking about freedoms, Cleve you are perfectly free to pack your shjt and leave whatever godforsaken wilderness you live on and give it back to the natives.

    WSS

    I wish i lived in the wilderness. Could have a couple big dogs then. I live in a condo...ur the one that livesout in the stix in norton, which is some drcent land. Consider urself lucky if u can have coffee on ur back porch in the morning and see nithin but trees and hear sht but the wind blowing

  • @mld-woody said:

    So the argument is it's ok to honor Columbus, even though we know he did s bunch of awful Sheet, because some portion of the native Americans did bad things?

    The argument is, and it is pretty obvious, that if you need to be morally pure and cleanse the history books of Christopher Columbus you should not have monuments all across the United States to barbaric and savage Indian tribes that enslaved and raped each other and participated in torture and cannjbalism. That's the argument.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    The argument is, and it is pretty obvious, that if you need to be morally pure and cleanse the history books of Christopher Columbus you should not have monuments all across the United States to barbaric and savage Indian tribes that enslaved and raped each other and participated in torture and cannjbalism. That's the argument.

    WSS

    By the way that was another speech to text glitch that should have read cannibalism of course.

    WSS

  • @westside-steve said:

    The argument is, and it is pretty obvious, that if you need to be morally pure and cleanse the history books of Christopher Columbus you should not have monuments all across the United States to barbaric and savage Indian tribes that enslaved and raped each other and participated in torture and cannjbalism. That's the argument.

    WSS

    By the way that was another speech to text glitch that should have read cannibalism of course.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    By the way that was another speech to text glitch that should have read cannibalism of course.

    WSS

    Ofc. Unless u were talking about the infamous metabolic tribe?Ā 

  • @mld-woody said:

    So the argument is it's ok to honor Columbus, even though we know he did s bunch of awful Sheet, because some portion of the native Americans did bad things?

    The argument is, and it is pretty obvious, that if you need to be morally pure and cleanse the history books of Christopher Columbus you should not have monuments all across the United States to barbaric and savage Indian tribes that enslaved and raped each other and participated in torture and cannjbalism. That's the argument.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    The argument is, and it is pretty obvious, that if you need to be morally pure and cleanse the history books of Christopher Columbus you should not have monuments all across the United States to barbaric and savage Indian tribes that enslaved and raped each other and participated in torture and cannjbalism. That's the argument.

    WSS

    Every native American?

    Cuz we know what Columbus did. It's not that you need to be morally pure. But throwing babies at rocks is probably too much.Ā 

  • Hey Woody I understand. Situational morality for you guys.

    I bet very few members of the Nazi party ever actually killed anybody.

    WSS

  • @westside-steve said:

    The argument is, and it is pretty obvious, that if you need to be morally pure and cleanse the history books of Christopher Columbus you should not have monuments all across the United States to barbaric and savage Indian tribes that enslaved and raped each other and participated in torture and cannjbalism. That's the argument.

    WSS

    Every native American?

    Cuz we know what Columbus did. It's not that you need to be morally pure. But throwing babies at rocks is probably too much.Ā 

    @mld-woody said:

    Every native American?

    Cuz we know what Columbus did. It's not that you need to be morally pure. But throwing babies at rocks is probably too much.Ā 

    But they were brown babies so its cool with west side

  • Hey Woody I understand. Situational morality for you guys.

    I bet very few members of the Nazi party ever actually killed anybody.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Hey Woody I understand. Situational morality for you guys.

    I bet very few members of the Nazi party ever actually killed anybody.

    WSS

    It's.,. It's not though.Ā 

    In your attempts to be alt right Steve you're missing it.Ā 

    We have you claiming every native American was as bas as Columbus vs what we actually know about Columbus....

  • The Injuns were savages, who the modern goody two shoe fags like to put on a pedestal.Ā 

  • Columbus was objectively as pooper.Ā 

    If you're right wing, you perceive those that want to remove things that honor him as liberal. And since your Political ideology boils down to "against the other side", you need to find a way to do thatĀ 

    But you can't actually do that. You can't defend Columbus. So you have to Huey start shitting on native Americans. Based on your thoughts. Based on broad strokes. Does it actually have anything to do with Columbus and the topic ay hand? No. But you think it "pisses off the liberals" which isĀ  how you interpret winning. And if all goes well, you'll have successfully changed the subject

    Same Sheet every time

  • Columbus was objectively as pooper.Ā 

    If you're right wing, you perceive those that want to remove things that honor him as liberal. And since your Political ideology boils down to "against the other side", you need to find a way to do thatĀ 

    But you can't actually do that. You can't defend Columbus. So you have to Huey start shitting on native Americans. Based on your thoughts. Based on broad strokes. Does it actually have anything to do with Columbus and the topic ay hand? No. But you think it "pisses off the liberals" which isĀ  how you interpret winning. And if all goes well, you'll have successfully changed the subject

    Same Sheet every time

    @mld-woody said:

    Columbus was objectively as pooper.Ā 

    If you're right wing, you perceive those that want to remove things that honor him as liberal. And since your Political ideology boils down to "against the other side", you need to find a way to do thatĀ 

    But you can't actually do that. You can't defend Columbus. So you have to Huey start shitting on native Americans. Based on your thoughts. Based on broad strokes. Does it actually have anything to do with Columbus and the topic ay hand? No. But you think it "pisses off the liberals" which isĀ  how you interpret winning. And if all goes well, you'll have successfully changed the subject

    Same Sheet every time

    And you can't defend Native Americans. Brutal Savages like so many other humans on the Earth throughout history. But you've written a complete false history of them because of your animosity toward the establishment or white people or whatever. There has been torture murder had brutality bye every group you might consider heroic through the ages. We make up a complete fake narrative.

    WSS

  • What false history had woody written about the native americans? What they did once war was declared on them is of zero consequence. White people clearly documented the kind of people they encountered when they came here. They werent no savages. Ive furnished letters from both franklin and columbus about the people they encountered. Case closef

  • What false history had woody written about the native americans? What they did once war was declared on them is of zero consequence. White people clearly documented the kind of people they encountered when they came here. They werent no savages. Ive furnished letters from both franklin and columbus about the people they encountered. Case closef

    @clevfan4life said:

    What false history had woody written about the native americans? What they did once war was declared on them is of zero consequence. White people clearly documented the kind of people they encountered when they came here. They werent no savages. Ive furnished letters from both franklin and columbus about the people they encountered. Case closef

    way too ignorant, that is.

    http://www.science20.com/news_articles/the_most_violent_era_in_america_was_before_europeans_arrived-141847

    https://www.quora.com/Was-North-America-a-peaceful-Native-American-utopia-before-the-white-man-arrived

    case closed. STFU

  • The Injuns were savages, who the modern goody two shoe fags like to put on a pedestal.Ā 

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    The Injuns were savages, who the modern goody two shoe fags like to put on a pedestal.Ā 

    Ā those ignorant asses don't want to know history, it's all about a viewpoint that doesn't exist elsewhere, make them

    FEEL elite.

    They hate facts:

    (warning - description of sick torture by American Indians...)

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2396760/How-Comanche-Indians-butchered-babies-roasted-enemies-alive.html

  • 22405979_937393689750417_6145064990457044096_n.jpg?oh=22b7fff84d7ae39c6e071f09c5317d8f&oe=5A40BC0F