Jets trade up
-
The Jets have traded up to number three with Indianapolis. They gave up this year 2 second rounders and a 2019 second rounder. The chess match as began. It's kind of odd to me if they fell in love with a player considering they could still miss out Depending on who we take or the Giants take.
-
Now if we go QB at 1 ................ Giants take Barkley, obvious Jets want a QB at 3 then we can take Chubb at 4 ....if Giants take a QB at 2 also we can get either Chubb or Barkley if Jets do indeed take a QB .....
-
Several things come to mind from this move. Number one is I think it shows the Jets believe there are only three franchise quarterback's in this draft. I think they like many others also see these three with similar floors. I think they have also now pushed Us into drafting our QB at one if there's one we really wanted over the others. The only other option would be us moving from 4 to 2 if there are those two players that we absolutely want.
-
Now if we go QB at 1 ................ Giants take Barkley, obvious Jets want a QB at 3 then we can take Chubb at 4 ....if Giants take a QB at 2 also we can get either Chubb or Barkley if Jets do indeed take a QB .....
Now if we go QB at 1 ................ Giants take Barkley, obvious Jets want a QB at 3 then we can take Chubb at 4 ....if Giants take a QB at 2 also we can get either Chubb or Barkley if Jets do indeed take a QB .....
This definitely guarantees that Chubb or Barkley will be there. I am kind of partial to Chubb myself, having him and Garret on either end would be awesome. However, if we took Barkley then I would be cool with that too.
-
Several things come to mind from this move. Number one is I think it shows the Jets believe there are only three franchise quarterback's in this draft. I think they like many others also see these three with similar floors. I think they have also now pushed Us into drafting our QB at one if there's one we really wanted over the others. The only other option would be us moving from 4 to 2 if there are those two players that we absolutely want.
The only other option would be awesome moving from 4 to 2 if there are those two players that we absolutely want
That price just jumped tremendously. only phone ringing is Gettleman in NY..they can't fall down far & Bills at #12 our now shuffling those draft cards hard..with Zona/Broncos..is their a bigger boat than the Titanic?Mikah,Chubb or Barkley could get fun at #4..don't throw the lawn furniture off the Titanic at #4..just rearrange it & get it Right..imo It's Mayfield or Darnold at #1 unless Hue or Haley gets a vote..one dude won more games with less talent & changing mechanics at this point am not a big fan of..
Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends Team Brotherhood-"It's not about You,Me or I. It's about building We"..Hue Jackson -
The Jets have just pushed all-in against the Bills. The Bills now MUST make a deal for either #2 with N.Y. Giants or with us for #4 no matter what it costs them- and it just got a LOT more expensive. What do you think the Bills would now have to give NY for #2? What would they have to give us to move out of #4 (not saying we should do it, just saying, what do you think the price today would be?)
-
To move to #2, it will cost them both 1st this year, a 1st next year, and probably a 2nd or 3rd this year as well. To move to #4 the cost would be very similar, 3 1st rounders plus additional pick perhaps in 2019. However, the Browns should not do this, they are guaranteed to get Chubb or Barkley now plus their QB of choice.
-
The Jets have just pushed all-in against the Bills. The Bills now MUST make a deal for either #2 with N.Y. Giants or with us for #4 no matter what it costs them- and it just got a LOT more expensive. What do you think the Bills would now have to give NY for #2? What would they have to give us to move out of #4 (not saying we should do it, just saying, what do you think the price today would be?)
The Jets have just pushed all-in against the Bills. The Bills now MUST make a deal for either #2 with N.Y. Giants or with us for #4 no matter what it costs them- and it just got a LOT more expensive. What do you think the Bills would now have to give NY for #2? What would they have to give us to move out of #4 (not saying we should do it, just saying, what do you think the price today would be?)
Something along the lines of the Bills two 1st rounders (#12 and #22) and next year's 2nd rounder, I would guess? Maybe more?
-
To move to #2, it will cost them both 1st this year, a 1st next year, and probably a 2nd or 3rd this year as well. To move to #4 the cost would be very similar, 3 1st rounders plus additional pick perhaps in 2019. However, the Browns should not do this, they are guaranteed to get Chubb or Barkley now plus their QB of choice.
To move to #2, it will cost them both 1st this year, a 1st next year, and probably a 2nd or 3rd this year as well. To move to #4 the cost would be very similar, 3 1st rounders plus additional pick perhaps in 2019. However, the Browns should not do this, they are guaranteed to get Chubb or Barkley now plus their QB of choice.
I'd rather have Fitzpatrick over Barkley, but I agree with the spirit of this 100%
-
To move to #2, it will cost them both 1st this year, a 1st next year, and probably a 2nd or 3rd this year as well. To move to #4 the cost would be very similar, 3 1st rounders plus additional pick perhaps in 2019. However, the Browns should not do this, they are guaranteed to get Chubb or Barkley now plus their QB of choice.
I'd rather have Fitzpatrick over Barkley, but I agree with the spirit of this 100%
I'd rather have Fitzpatrick over Barkley, but I agree with the spirit of this 100%
Chubb or Fitz for me, but also 100% do not trade down. If anything pick 1,4 and trade back into the first.
-
this was bills plan to get to Colts..with Gettleman.. now add in the rape the 9'ers to bears https://www.sbnation.com/2018/3/14/17114618/buffalo-bills-nfl-draft-2018-trade-up-quarterback
Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends Team Brotherhood-"It's not about You,Me or I. It's about building We"..Hue Jackson -
To move to #2, it will cost them both 1st this year, a 1st next year, and probably a 2nd or 3rd this year as well. To move to #4 the cost would be very similar, 3 1st rounders plus additional pick perhaps in 2019. However, the Browns should not do this, they are guaranteed to get Chubb or Barkley now plus their QB of choice.
I'd rather have Fitzpatrick over Barkley, but I agree with the spirit of this 100%
I'd rather have Fitzpatrick over Barkley, but I agree with the spirit of this 100%
I wouldn't hate Fitzpatrick either. None of those guys would be there if you drop to 12.
-
I'd rather have Fitzpatrick over Barkley, but I agree with the spirit of this 100%
Chubb or Fitz for me, but also 100% do not trade down. If anything pick 1,4 and trade back into the first.
Chubb or Fitz for me, but also 100% do not trade down. If anything pick 1,4 and trade back into the first.
I wonder how far back into the 1st round the #33 and #35 picks could get the Browns? (Not saying they should do this, just curious)
-
I'd rather have Fitzpatrick over Barkley, but I agree with the spirit of this 100%
I wouldn't hate Fitzpatrick either. None of those guys would be there if you drop to 12.
-
Chubb or Fitz for me, but also 100% do not trade down. If anything pick 1,4 and trade back into the first.
I wonder how far back into the 1st round the #33 and #35 picks could get the Browns? (Not saying they should do this, just curious)
I wonder how far back into the 1st round the #33 and #35 picks could get the Browns? (Not saying they should do this, just curious)
Definitely not saying they should unless someone just happens to fall that they like, but I would imagine only around 20 at best
-
How surprised would you be if we take Barkley/Chubb in the 1st round? Follow with someone like Lamar Jackson or Mike White in round 2? Not asking if you'd like it but rather if you'd be surprised by it. Barkley is definitely not out of the question as Hydes deal in all practicality can be 1 year deal. I'm also not convinced they don't see Tyrod as a multi year solution at QB. You don't give up a 2nd rounder for a 1 year rental QB.
-
The reality is that with the offensive weapons we have ALREADY amassed (not including potentially Barkley) Tyrod Taylor could possibly play MUCH better than he did in Buffalo. I don't know all what went down in Buffalo but it seemed like an extremely toxic situation for Taylor to have to deal with (organization-wise to say nothing of talent-wise). He may well be a much better QB in Cleveland, all things considered. There is the possibility he can be more than just a bridge here. Not saying don't take our QB @ #1, just that Taylor could potentially be the best QB moving forward the next several years. It's one possibility.
-
QB @ #1 & we're good at 4. That being said, IF the Bills call us after #3 is taken, then that means the guy they want at 4 is still there. THAT'S when the price goes through the roof for #4. For me to even consider it (not saying I would), the price would be AT LEAST 12, 22, and (2) 2nd rounders this year.
If you're hungry enough, you'll eat damn near anything.
Mike
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login