Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Jets trade up

Jets trade up

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
127 Posts 32 Posters 6.3k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • O onkyoreceiver

    The Jets have just pushed all-in against the Bills.  The Bills now MUST make a deal for either #2 with N.Y. Giants or with us for #4 no matter what it costs them- and it just got a LOT more expensive.  What do you think the Bills would now have to give NY for #2?  What would they have to give us to move out of #4 (not saying we should do it, just saying, what do you think the price today would be?)

    Dutch Oven Dutch OvenD Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
    • 15k Posts
    • 8k Reputation
    Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on last edited by
    #8

    @onkyoreceiver said:

    The Jets have just pushed all-in against the Bills.  The Bills now MUST make a deal for either #2 with N.Y. Giants or with us for #4 no matter what it costs them- and it just got a LOT more expensive.  What do you think the Bills would now have to give NY for #2?  What would they have to give us to move out of #4 (not saying we should do it, just saying, what do you think the price today would be?)

    Something along the lines of the Bills two 1st rounders (#12 and #22) and next year's 2nd rounder, I would guess? Maybe more?

    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • runyon27R runyon27

      To move to #2, it will cost them both 1st this year, a 1st next year, and probably a 2nd or 3rd this year as well. To move to #4 the cost would be very similar, 3 1st rounders plus additional pick perhaps in 2019. However, the Browns should not do this, they are guaranteed to get Chubb or Barkley now plus their QB of choice.

      Dutch Oven Dutch OvenD Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
      • 15k Posts
      • 8k Reputation
      Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on last edited by
      #9

      @runyon27 said:

      To move to #2, it will cost them both 1st this year, a 1st next year, and probably a 2nd or 3rd this year as well. To move to #4 the cost would be very similar, 3 1st rounders plus additional pick perhaps in 2019. However, the Browns should not do this, they are guaranteed to get Chubb or Barkley now plus their QB of choice.

      I'd rather have Fitzpatrick over Barkley, but I agree with the spirit of this 100%

      ComeonmanC runyon27R 2 Replies Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven

        @runyon27 said:

        To move to #2, it will cost them both 1st this year, a 1st next year, and probably a 2nd or 3rd this year as well. To move to #4 the cost would be very similar, 3 1st rounders plus additional pick perhaps in 2019. However, the Browns should not do this, they are guaranteed to get Chubb or Barkley now plus their QB of choice.

        I'd rather have Fitzpatrick over Barkley, but I agree with the spirit of this 100%

        Comeonman ComeonmanC Very Popular Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Week One Done One Month Later One Year In
        • 2k Posts
        • 359 Reputation
        ComeonmanC Comeonman wrote on last edited by
        #10

        @dutch-oven said:

        I'd rather have Fitzpatrick over Barkley, but I agree with the spirit of this 100%

        Chubb or Fitz for me, but also 100% do not trade down. If anything pick 1,4 and trade back into the first. 

        Dutch OvenD 1 Reply Last reply
        👍
        Quote Reply
        • gumby73 gumby73G Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
          • 11k Posts
          • 4k Reputation
          gumby73G gumby73 wrote on last edited by
          #11

          this was bills plan to get to Colts..with Gettleman.. now add in the rape the 9'ers to bears  https://www.sbnation.com/2018/3/14/17114618/buffalo-bills-nfl-draft-2018-trade-up-quarterback  

          Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends Team Brotherhood-"It's not about You,Me or I. It's about building We"..Hue Jackson
          hoortaH 1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven

            @runyon27 said:

            To move to #2, it will cost them both 1st this year, a 1st next year, and probably a 2nd or 3rd this year as well. To move to #4 the cost would be very similar, 3 1st rounders plus additional pick perhaps in 2019. However, the Browns should not do this, they are guaranteed to get Chubb or Barkley now plus their QB of choice.

            I'd rather have Fitzpatrick over Barkley, but I agree with the spirit of this 100%

            runyon27 runyon27R Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
            • 713 Posts
            • 180 Reputation
            runyon27R runyon27 wrote on last edited by
            #12

            @dutch-oven said:

            I'd rather have Fitzpatrick over Barkley, but I agree with the spirit of this 100%

            I wouldn't hate Fitzpatrick either. None of those guys would be there if you drop to 12.

            Dutch OvenD 1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • ComeonmanC Comeonman

              @dutch-oven said:

              I'd rather have Fitzpatrick over Barkley, but I agree with the spirit of this 100%

              Chubb or Fitz for me, but also 100% do not trade down. If anything pick 1,4 and trade back into the first. 

              Dutch Oven Dutch OvenD Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
              • 15k Posts
              • 8k Reputation
              Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on last edited by
              #13

              @comeonman said:

              Chubb or Fitz for me, but also 100% do not trade down. If anything pick 1,4 and trade back into the first. 

              I wonder how far back into the 1st round the #33 and #35 picks could get the Browns? (Not saying they should do this, just curious)

              ComeonmanC 1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • runyon27R runyon27

                @dutch-oven said:

                I'd rather have Fitzpatrick over Barkley, but I agree with the spirit of this 100%

                I wouldn't hate Fitzpatrick either. None of those guys would be there if you drop to 12.

                Dutch Oven Dutch OvenD Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                • 15k Posts
                • 8k Reputation
                Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on last edited by
                #14

                @runyon27 said:

                I wouldn't hate Fitzpatrick either. None of those guys would be there if you drop to 12.

                Maybe Derwin James or Denzel Ward? But not Fitzpatrick, yes. 

                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven

                  @comeonman said:

                  Chubb or Fitz for me, but also 100% do not trade down. If anything pick 1,4 and trade back into the first. 

                  I wonder how far back into the 1st round the #33 and #35 picks could get the Browns? (Not saying they should do this, just curious)

                  Comeonman ComeonmanC Very Popular Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Week One Done One Month Later One Year In
                  • 2k Posts
                  • 359 Reputation
                  ComeonmanC Comeonman wrote on last edited by
                  #15

                  @dutch-oven said:

                  I wonder how far back into the 1st round the #33 and #35 picks could get the Browns? (Not saying they should do this, just curious)

                  Definitely not saying they should unless someone just happens to fall that they like, but I would imagine only around 20 at best 

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • jcam222 jcam222J Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                    • 3k Posts
                    • 873 Reputation
                    jcam222J jcam222 wrote on last edited by jcam222
                    #16

                    How surprised would you be if we take Barkley/Chubb in the 1st round? Follow with someone like Lamar Jackson or Mike White in round 2? Not asking if you'd like it but rather if you'd be surprised by it. Barkley is definitely not out of the question as Hydes deal in all practicality can be 1 year deal. I'm also not convinced they don't see Tyrod as a multi year solution at QB. You don't give up a 2nd rounder for a 1 year rental QB. 

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • SD_Tom S Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                      • 994 Posts
                      • 260 Reputation
                      S SD_Tom wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      I figured some team would trade up to go for a QB.

                      All the more reason for the Browns to get it right at #1.... and It does look more likely we'll be able to get Chubb at #4. Him with Garrett and Ogunjobi would be awesome 

                      The GipperT 1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • Momszer M
                        • 101 Posts
                        • 7 Reputation
                        M Momszer wrote on last edited by
                        #18

                        They didn't. It was a 3rd rounder.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • onkyoreceiver O Conversation Starter Dedicated Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                          • 97 Posts
                          • 48 Reputation
                          O onkyoreceiver wrote on last edited by onkyoreceiver
                          #19

                          The reality is that with the offensive weapons we have ALREADY amassed (not including potentially Barkley) Tyrod Taylor could possibly play MUCH better than he did in Buffalo.  I don't know all what went down in Buffalo but it  seemed like an extremely toxic situation for Taylor to have to deal with (organization-wise to say nothing of talent-wise).  He may well be a much better QB in Cleveland, all things considered.  There is the possibility he can be more than just a bridge here.  Not saying don't take our QB @ #1, just that Taylor could potentially be the best QB moving forward the next several years.  It's one possibility.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          👍
                          Quote Reply
                          • Canton Mike Canton MikeC
                            • 4k Posts
                            • 2k Reputation
                            Canton MikeC Canton Mike wrote on last edited by Canton Mike
                            #20

                            QB @ #1 & we're good at 4. That being said, IF the Bills call us after #3 is taken, then that means the guy they want at 4 is still there. THAT'S when the price goes through the roof for #4. For me to even consider it (not saying I would), the price would be AT LEAST 12, 22, and (2) 2nd rounders this year.

                            If you're hungry enough, you'll eat damn near anything. 🙄

                            Mike

                            IN DORSEY I TRUST
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            👍
                            Quote Reply
                            • LogicIsForSquares LogicIsForSquaresL Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                              • 10k Posts
                              • 2k Reputation
                              LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on last edited by
                              #21

                              Dorsey may be getting a call from the Bills and have them by the short and curlies if he chooses to hear them out.

                              Hanging out and getting one of Chubb, Fitzpatrick, or Ward doesn’t hurt my feelings at all.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • S SD_Tom

                                I figured some team would trade up to go for a QB.

                                All the more reason for the Browns to get it right at #1.... and It does look more likely we'll be able to get Chubb at #4. Him with Garrett and Ogunjobi would be awesome 

                                The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                                • 57k Posts
                                • 4k Reputation
                                The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                                #22

                                @sd_tom said:

                                I figured some team would trade up to go for a QB.

                                All the more reason for the Browns to get it right at #1.... and It does look more likely we'll be able to get Chubb at #4. Him with Garrett and Ogunjobi would be awesome 

                                Does anyone have a clue as to who is being targeted by the Jets?    Why do I think it is likely Rosen.  Or, are they enamored with Baker Mayfield.  Or, are they just willing to take any of 3 guys.

                                OR....do they have a hard on for Barkley????   No?  Its a thought.  

                                runyon27R OrionO 2 Replies Last reply
                                Quote Reply
                                • The GipperT The Gipper

                                  @sd_tom said:

                                  I figured some team would trade up to go for a QB.

                                  All the more reason for the Browns to get it right at #1.... and It does look more likely we'll be able to get Chubb at #4. Him with Garrett and Ogunjobi would be awesome 

                                  Does anyone have a clue as to who is being targeted by the Jets?    Why do I think it is likely Rosen.  Or, are they enamored with Baker Mayfield.  Or, are they just willing to take any of 3 guys.

                                  OR....do they have a hard on for Barkley????   No?  Its a thought.  

                                  runyon27 runyon27R Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                                  • 713 Posts
                                  • 180 Reputation
                                  runyon27R runyon27 wrote on last edited by
                                  #23

                                  @the-gipper said:

                                  Does anyone have a clue as to who is being targeted by the Jets?    Why do I think it is likely Rosen.  Or, are they enamored with Baker Mayfield.  Or, are they just willing to take any of 3 guys.

                                  OR....do they have a hard on for Barkley????   No?  Its a thought.  

                                  Everyone in Jets land believes its a QB and not Barkley. Rosen or Mayfield seem likely to me, but I suppose Allen could be target as well.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • mjp28 mjp28M In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well Week One Done One Month Later One Year In
                                    • 18k Posts
                                    • 4k Reputation
                                    mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by
                                    #24

                                    Winners - those getting more picks and the best available talent 

                                    Losers - those overreaching for the quarterbacks in this draft

                                    The BROWNS might not be done trading, we'll see on that, it will be a memorable draft this year. They should do very well.

                                    GO BUCKEYES, BROWNS, INDIANS, CAVS, YSU, NAVY and yes I like ND!
                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    👍
                                    Quote Reply
                                    • stillmotion stillmotionS Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                      • 2k Posts
                                      • 453 Reputation
                                      stillmotionS stillmotion wrote on last edited by
                                      #25

                                      Bills will trade to #2 or try to get our #1. Likely the Jets want Rosen, I think. Giants could easily trade to #3 from #2 if they had to. We probably have to stand pat and take a QB at #1, or end up with the last one of Rosen, Allen, Mayfield, and D'Arnold most likely.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      Quote Reply
                                      • Bigalow80 B
                                        • 306 Posts
                                        • 127 Reputation
                                        B Bigalow80 wrote on last edited by
                                        #26

                                        The Browns are in an interesting spot, no doubt. IMOP, They have to take a qb at #1 now. No excuses. Dorsey is a dice roller and is not afraid to take chances on upside. I would love to see his qb board. As much as I get excited about each qb, they all scare me. Darnold has the least amount of fear factor, so I'm definitely leaning that way. Not to mention, he is the youngest of the bunch at 20 years old.

                                        But where it gets interesting is in the scenarios: 

                                        1) Three qb's go in the top 3 picks. Giants, Bills, Dolphins or Miami make the pick at #2. It doesn't matter. That leaves chubb, barkley, nelson, and fitzpatrick on the board at #4. If they choose a player, in this scenario if they want to take a player and not trade back, I think it's chubb. They have two dominant DE's whom are young for the next 4 years. Fans will scream for Barkley but there is enough depth in the class and Dorsey has NEVER taken a first round RB

                                        2.) Same scenario as above, only Buffalo calls because the Giants make a pick at #2. If I'm Cleveland I ask for this: #12, 22, 53, 56 and Tre'davious White. If they are willing to make this deal, I take it. I then turn around and call denver and offer them 2 of the 5 second round picks that I have plus #12, to move up to #5. I still take Chubb at #5, but now you have not only bolstered the secondary with White, but you also added the best defender in the draft and still have 3 second round picks.

                                        3.) Surprise everyone...Take Chubb at #1 and draft your qb at #4

                                        4.) Draft Barkley at #1 and take your qb at #4 not caring whom falls to you

                                        5.) Shock the World..Take Barkley at #1 and Chubb at #4 then trade up to grab whichever qb falls. I think the floor is Miami for the top 4 at #11. This would take a ton of balls, use up lots of draft capital, and have a lot of faith.

                                        6.) Out think themselves, and not take a qb until one of their late 2nd round picks and believe TT is going to lead them for the next 5 yrs

                                        jcam222J Gunz41G OrionO 3 Replies Last reply
                                        👍
                                        Quote Reply
                                        • SD_Tom S Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                          • 994 Posts
                                          • 260 Reputation
                                          S SD_Tom wrote on last edited by
                                          #27

                                          Jets and Giants seem to have Rosen high on their list 

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Quote Reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Theme
                                          • System
                                          • Light
                                          • Dark
                                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Forums
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Donate