What it will take for the Browns to be a consistent winner
-
A mobile Qb. Not a qb who can just scramble when a play breaks down, I'm talking about a big, fast, qb who can also run the read option. Having a qb who can move around is so important, DBs can only cover a receiver for so long. If we have a qb who can extend plays, receiver will get open no matter how bad they are. Yes, you can win without a mobile qb, but we don't have the wide reciver or guard personnel to succeed in that fashion. The game is changing, it's time to add another dimension to this offense next season.
Tahj Boyd anyone?
-
and don't worry 1000% we are taking best QB availble in next year's draft, which is good bc it's loaded with good ones.
-
and don't worry 1000% we are taking best QB availble in next year's draft, which is good bc it's loaded with good ones.
Pull it back some chief its still way too early, last year matt Barkley was the cream of the crop early on.and don't worry 1000% we are taking best QB availble in next year's draft, which is good bc it's loaded with good ones.
-
To answer the question....continuity. There has been way too much turnover.
-
And Johnny Manziel is not the answer.
-
Boyd, Hundley, Mariota. All mobile qbs with big arms.
-
Are you willing to go 2-14 to get one of those QB's?
-
Are you willing to go 2-14 to get one of those QB's?
We won't need to be that bad. Jags will get a qb, raiders have Pryor, buffalo has ej, jets have geno, Pitt has Big Ben. The only teams that will be near us in the draft that will go for a qb are the jags, then us, then Tampa bay, then maybe the titans.
-
Only gotta go 2-12 the rest of the way. Why not? Let's just suck one more year and then maybe we can get a good QB for once.
-
Only gotta go 2-12 the rest of the way. Why not? Let's just suck one more year and then maybe we can get a good QB for once.
Only gotta go 2-12 the rest of the way. Why not? Let's just suck one more year and then maybe we can get a good QB for once.
I agree, what's the point of going 4-12, 5-11, 6-10, at best 7-9 every single year? let's just get this over with..
-
A coach that has won something in the last ten years. A QB that's not afraid to fail. An OL that can open holes for running and that doesn't give up 5 sacks a week. 2 WR's that can get open AND catch the ball. Another CB that can cover, 2 safety's that can tackle,
About the ONLY thing we don't need is DL and LB
-
A coach that has won something in the last ten years. A QB that's not afraid to fail. An OL that can open holes for running and that doesn't give up 5 sacks a week. 2 WR's that can get open AND catch the ball. Another CB that can cover, 2 safety's that can tackle,
About the ONLY thing we don't need is DL and LB
A coach that has won something in the last ten years. A QB that's not afraid to fail. An OL that can open holes for running and that doesn't give up 5 sacks a week. 2 WR's that can get open AND catch the ball. Another CB that can cover, 2 safety's that can tackle,
About the ONLY thing we don't need is DL and LB
next draft and FA period has to be all offense minded in accruing talent...
-
A coach that has won something in the last ten years. A QB that's not afraid to fail. An OL that can open holes for running and that doesn't give up 5 sacks a week. 2 WR's that can get open AND catch the ball. Another CB that can cover, 2 safety's that can tackle,
About the ONLY thing we don't need is DL and LB
next draft and FA period has to be all offense minded in accruing talent...
next draft and FA period has to be all offense minded in accruing talent...
The thing that gets me, is Holmgren was a west coast offensive guy and he NEVER drafted a decent WR. The west coast offense is ALL about the WR's
"And they don't really know even what they're talkin' about And I can't imagine what empty heads can achieve." -
and don't worry 1000% we are taking best QB availble in next year's draft, which is good bc it's loaded with good ones.
and don't worry 1000% we are taking best QB availble in next year's draft, which is good bc it's loaded with good ones.
I keep hearing that and yet every time I check one out I am unimpressed. And, yes, that includes Boyd and Bridgewater...
I'm still looking for "the one"...
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
I keep hearing that and yet every time I check one out I am unimpressed. And, yes, that includes Boyd and Bridgewater...
I'm still looking for "the one"...
was Brees the "one" out of college? or Brady, or Russ Wilson, or Kaepernik.
"And they don't really know even what they're talkin' about And I can't imagine what empty heads can achieve." -
The thing that gets me, is Holmgren was a west coast offensive guy and he NEVER drafted a decent WR. The west coast offense is ALL about the WR's
Yeah,I never understood what the vision was totally...or so I thought...
-
Exactly, haven't heard one single person with any football credibility say the draft is loaded. If I was drafting #1 I'm taking J. Clowney. You don't take a player in the first 10 picks just based on need alone.I keep hearing that and yet every time I check one out I am unimpressed. And, yes, that includes Boyd and Bridgewater...
I'm still looking for "the one"...
-
no and neither were drafted in round one either.was Brees the "one" out of college? or Brady, or Russ Wilson, or Kaepernik.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login