Skip to content

Gipson pissed.

Locked The Browns Board
124 32 4.8k
  • @mark-o said:

    He CANT walk away without the Browns having the opportunity to match the offer. That's what we've been trying to get through your giant fat blockhead all night long.

    He's a restricted free agent...the Browns have control. Wait and see what he gets offered and then go from there. This really isn't that complicated for anyone who would like to have an open mind and the reading comprehension above the 3rd grade.

    You obviously are the one who can't get it.

    Say the Eagles for example part with a 2nd and we match it, and he has another great year.

    What in the fuck makes you think he's going to want to stick around in 2016 after being low balled by us?

    He'll go elsewhere, lets prevent that, getting him LOCKED DOWN NOW.

    And lets stop acting like every move Ray Farmer has made doesn't deserve question.

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by

    @walterwhite said:

    Say the Eagles for example part with a 2nd and we match it, and he has another great year.

    What in the fuck makes you think he's going to want to stick around in 2016 after being low balled by us?

    1. Since Gip is now on the open market, then by definition if we retain him, we did not "low-ball" him.

    2. As far as I know, tendering now does not preclude tagging in the future... and that can be done at least two years running. So I assume top-five pay followed by top pay ought to piss him off even more?

  • @andeftw said:

    It's Gipson's fault that he wasn't good enough to get drafted out of college. He knew all along what restricted free agency is like and the Browns made the right move.

    Let the market determine his worth and if you feel like that's fair value, you match the offer.

    Walter, you complain about the Packers and Patriots resigning their players, yet this is exactly what they did. The Packers let Cobb test the market to gauge his value and then resigned him. They risk losing Bulaga because of the same thing. The Patriots let McCourty hit the market and then matched the offer that was on the table. Both teams relied on the player's willingness to resign with his original team. If Gipson wants to stay with the Browns than all he has to do is sign an offer sheet which he thinks is fair and then hope the Browns match it.

    As an organization you have to determine what a player is worth to you and stick to that. That's how teams like the Packers and Patriots stay consistently at the top.

    Isn't that basically what the Browns did with Alex Mack last year?

    andeftwA andeftw wrote on last edited by

    @the-gipper said:

    Isn't that basically what the Browns did with Alex Mack last year?

    Mack was an unrestricted free agent and had more leverage since the transition tag was around 9 million (if I'm not mistaken). The bottom line is that with Mack they couldn't come to an agreement by the tag deadline and so the Browns opted to let the market determine his value with the option to match any offer.

    With Gipson they hold much more leverage since he is a restricted free agent and they could still franchise him next year for a fairly low cost.

    The general thinking is the same though.

  • @walterwhite said:

    Say the Eagles for example part with a 2nd and we match it, and he has another great year.

    What in the fuck makes you think he's going to want to stick around in 2016 after being low balled by us?

    1. Since Gip is now on the open market, then by definition if we retain him, we did not "low-ball" him.

    2. As far as I know, tendering now does not preclude tagging in the future... and that can be done at least two years running. So I assume top-five pay followed by top pay ought to piss him off even more?

    andeftwA andeftw wrote on last edited by

    @tour2ma said:

    1. Since Gip is now on the open market, then by definition if we retain him, we did not "low-ball" him.

    2. As far as I know, tendering now does not preclude tagging in the future... and that can be done at least two years running. So I assume top-five pay followed by top pay ought to piss him off even more?

    On top of that, what are the chances that a team is willing to part ways with a 2nd round pick for a one year rental of a player? That's the only way he'd be a free agent again in 2016...

  • jrb12711J jrb12711 wrote on last edited by

    Twitter crap aside, as much as I think Gipson is a great player he is coming off a knee injury. It's hard to tell sometimes how players come back from knee issues, even if they weren't total blow ups. Gipson will be a Brown next year, and there's nothing stopping them from working on a contract throughout the year.

    Relax, it's not like they cut him.

  • @tour2ma said:

    Here was your chance to actually know, and use, facts...

    Walter actually taking time to check or know facts?

    HA!...Thats a good one.....

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by

    @mudfly said:

    Walter actually taking time to check or know facts?

    HA!...Thats a good one.....

    It was part of the "conversation" earlier...

    To paraphrase Carlin: "My shit is fact and your facts are shit."

    @andeftw said:

    On top of that, what are the chances that a team is willing to part ways with a 2nd round pick for a one year rental of a player? That's the only way he'd be a free agent again in 2016...

    ... or if he gets no offers and does not sign an extension with us. Then we'd get him at the tender for one-year.

    Unlikely, but possible...

  • Great logic here guys.

    "It's not a big deal if we lose one of our top 5 best players as long as we get a 2nd round pick that we'll most likely blow"

    G GuNNerGatSKi wrote on last edited by

    @walterwhite said:

    Great logic here guys.

    "It's not a big deal if we lose one of our top 5 best players as long as we get a 2nd round pick that we'll most likely blow"

  • Great logic here guys.

    "It's not a big deal if we lose one of our top 5 best players as long as we get a 2nd round pick that we'll most likely blow"

    G GuNNerGatSKi wrote on last edited by

    @walterwhite said:

    Great logic here guys.

    "It's not a big deal if we lose one of our top 5 best players as long as we get a 2nd round pick that we'll most likely blow"

    You truely are dumber than a box of rocks. Have you taken your medication today?

    What part of what the Brown's did is illogical? They essentially did what they did with Mack without the transition tag and WITH compensation should they decide not to match an offer, something that they would not have received with Mack. And if I remember correctly your stupid, narrow minded, oblivious ass LOVED what they did with Mack last year.

    You need help dude. Either that or you are a Zombo/Gipper troll bot!

  • B BaconHound wrote on last edited by

    One of my the few smart moves by the Browns, just like Robertson. You have to use these contract options to maximize your cap

  • WalterWhiteW WalterWhite wrote on last edited by WalterWhite

    Let's let a young pro bowl player walk so we can get a 2nd round rookie who we hope becomes a pro bowler.

  • Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by

  • @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Nobody is calling you a troll. We're calling you stupid, because that's what you are.

    You just think you know what you're talking about, when in reality you're very, very, very stupid.

    You can't handle the facts fuck boy

    B BitchTits wrote on last edited by

    @walterwhite said:

    You can't handle the facts fuck boy

    Are people really this stupid? I mean we are not going to lose him. Macks deal included option years because that is what the Jaguars (I believe) offered him to make it a tough pill for the Browns. Gipson doesn't have ANY option years as of yet. Let him go out and see what he is worth. What people think he is worth, and what other teams value him at could be very different.

  • Let's let a young pro bowl player walk so we can get a 2nd round rookie who we hope becomes a pro bowler.

    B BitchTits wrote on last edited by

    @walterwhite said:

    Let's let a young pro bowl player walk so we can get a 2nd round rookie who we hope becomes a pro bowler.

    This is the same post you made on page 2. So i guess you really are just trolling.

  • gumby73G gumby73 wrote on last edited by

    This all started as a Rant against Farmer. Farmer did it again, the BEST thing for THE player. Get fair Market Value for the Kid on a offer sheet. We sign him to it and he goes No Where. Good for Gipson !!

  • Let's let a young pro bowl player walk so we can get a 2nd round rookie who we hope becomes a pro bowler.

    Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on last edited by

    @walterwhite said:

    Let's let a young pro bowl player walk so we can get a 2nd round rookie who we hope becomes a pro bowler.

    You are literally the dumbest fucking person that has existed. I bet your dads are so proud.

  • @walterwhite said:

    Let's let a young pro bowl player walk so we can get a 2nd round rookie who we hope becomes a pro bowler.

    You are literally the dumbest fucking person that has existed. I bet your dads are so proud.

    WalterWhiteW WalterWhite wrote on last edited by WalterWhite

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    You are literally the dumbest fucking person that has existed. I bet your dads are so proud.

    Still recovering after you got layed the fuck out with facts? I busted your lip and gave you a black eye of facts.

    Ouch. Gotta burn fuck boy

  • WalterWhiteW WalterWhite wrote on last edited by

    DawgPoundNation.com ‏@DawgPoundNation 3m

    DawgPoundNation.net@DawgPoundNation
    Legitimately, if you're just going to sit there not doing anything @Browns, at least pay my man @Gipson_duos24.
    3 minutes ago
    DawgPoundNation.net@DawgPoundNation
    Legitimately, if you're just going to sit there not doing anything @Browns, at least pay my man @Gipson_duos24.

    Legitimately, if you're just going to sit there not doing anything @Browns, at least pay my man @Gipson_duos24.

  • @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    You are literally the dumbest fucking person that has existed. I bet your dads are so proud.

    Still recovering after you got layed the fuck out with facts? I busted your lip and gave you a black eye of facts.

    Ouch. Gotta burn fuck boy

    Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on last edited by

    @walterwhite said:

    Still recovering after you got layed the fuck out with facts? I busted your lip and gave you a black eye of facts.

    Ouch. Gotta burn fuck boy

    I'd love to know what world you live in.

  • @walterwhite said:

    Still recovering after you got layed the fuck out with facts? I busted your lip and gave you a black eye of facts.

    Ouch. Gotta burn fuck boy

    I'd love to know what world you live in.

    WalterWhiteW WalterWhite wrote on last edited by

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    I'd love to know what world you live in.

    giphy.gif

  • @walterwhite said:

    Still recovering after you got layed the fuck out with facts? I busted your lip and gave you a black eye of facts.

    Ouch. Gotta burn fuck boy

    I'd love to know what world you live in.

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    I'd love to know what world you live in.

    As a full page of topics will attest... Twitter-world...

  • @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    I'd love to know what world you live in.

    As a full page of topics will attest... Twitter-world...

    WalterWhiteW WalterWhite wrote on last edited by

    @tour2ma said:

    As a full page of topics will attest... Twitter-world...

    I report facts, news, and logic.

    Tim Couch Pulls Out is too busy at Wal Mart scratching his ass and picking his nose to know what's going on.