Camp Trade Down
-
Being reported Eagles had a deal to go to number 3 before the Rams/Titans trade to take the QB Cleveland passed on .....the mega trade fucked up their plans
-
Adam Schefter & MKC are tweeting that the Browns are currently in trade down talks with one team.
I doubt that they have limited their talks to just one team.
Agree, but rumor has it that they cast a line for all teams picking in the top 10 waiting for a bite.I doubt that they have limited their talks to just one team.
All it takes is one sucker.
-
Seeing what the market is within the top 8... is VERY different than "accepting an offer". Clearly they want to get a full picture of what's available before making the decision to accept or not.
This is the same as being on Shark Tank and wanting to hear all the offers before countering any one of them. Doesn't mean you don't want the first one.. it just means you want to hear everything.
It's something that a competent FO would do. I realize we reflexively see every Browns FO action as "How Much Does This New Thing Suck" ... but they actually have good ideas this time.
Seeing what the market is within the top 8... is VERY different than "accepting an offer". Clearly they want to get a full picture of what's available before making the decision to accept or not.
Schefter had actual glee in his voice when he announced on NFL Live today that we were not close to a trade.
Bit of a rivalry there with LaCanfora I'd say...
Agree, but rumor has it that they cast a line for all teams picking in the top 10 waiting for a bite.
All it takes is one sucker.
But it's better to have two...
Word is there is interest from SF and Philly.... even the Jets at 20. Both Philly and NYJ have eyes for Wentz. SF supposedly more for Goff.
-
Jets moving from 20 to 2 will cost them big .....What would be the minimum you would accept for this to happen ?
-
Matt Miller @nfldraftscout 4m4 minutes ago
Matt Miller@nfldraftscoutTeams trying to move up to #2: load that offer with late round picks. Browns rumored to want more picks not necessarily highest pick offeredTeams trying to move up to #2: load that offer with late round picks. Browns rumored to want more picks not necessarily highest pick offered
Teams trying to move up to #2: load that offer with late round picks. Browns rumored to want more picks not necessarily highest pick offered
I want the highest and the most.
-
Being reported Eagles had a deal to go to number 3 before the Rams/Titans trade to take the QB Cleveland passed on .....the mega trade fucked up their plans
Being reported Eagles had a deal to go to number 3 before the Rams/Titans trade to take the QB Cleveland passed on .....the mega trade fucked up their plans
And is that why they may be in the mix to trade with us?
-
Jets moving from 20 to 2 will cost them big .....What would be the minimum you would accept for this to happen ?
-
And is that why they may be in the mix to trade with us?
I would think so yes......
-
NFLTradeRumors.co @nfltrade_rumors 18m18 minutes ago
NFLTradeRumors.co@nfltrade_rumorsReport: Potential Trade Between #Browns & #Eagles Expected To Include 1st & 3rd-Rd Picks In 2016 & 2017 If Completed bit.ly/1Sjkk86 -
NFLTradeRumors.co @nfltrade_rumors 18m18 minutes agoNFLTradeRumors.co@nfltrade_rumorsReport: Potential Trade Between #Browns & #Eagles Expected To Include 1st & 3rd-Rd Picks In 2016 & 2017 If Completed bit.ly/1Sjkk86
NFLTradeRumors.co @nfltrade_rumors 18m18 minutes ago
Report: Potential Trade Between #Browns & #Eagles Expected To Include 1st & 3rd-Rd Picks In 2016 & 2017 If Completed
So Eagles 1st and 3rd this year and next.....thoughts ?
That Twitter account is garbage.
But no, I wouldn't take that. I'd want a first and second this year at the very least, along with a first next year.
If Wentz is gone and we can move back, still pick before 10 and pick up an extra second, we'd be able to likely come away with a very good LB, a very good WR and/or a very good DL without first three picks.
I wouldn't hate moving back to #7, getting SF's second, then getting, say, Jack, Nkemdiche and Smith.
Or, if injury worries you, getting Buckner, Spence, and Boyd.
And, of course, that opens the door to getting Lynch at #32. Not my first choice for QB, but I'd rather Lynch at #32 than Goff at #2.
I'm awesome, and I fuck dolphins. Ghoolie 12/2/2012: I have absolutely no skills, training or pride -
Jets moving from 20 to 2 will cost them big .....What would be the minimum you would accept for this to happen ?
Jets moving from 20 to 2 will cost them big .....What would be the minimum you would accept for this to happen ?
Supposedly Muhammad Wilkerson is in the mix... What's the value of 12 sack, 3-4 DE just entering his prime having missed only 5 games in 5 years to us? Certainly a first... and change...
Two problems:
- he has not yet signed his franchise tender and cannot be traded until he does; and
- He ended 2015 with a broken leg... should be fine, but you never know.
Swap ones for MW plus a 2 this year and a 1next year? Good deal for us...
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Tim- the problem is that the Eagles do not have a 2nd rounder anymore to give us. Already traded away.
-
Tim- the problem is that the Eagles do not have a 2nd rounder anymore to give us. Already traded away.
Tim- the problem is that the Eagles do not have a 2nd rounder anymore to give us. Already traded away.
Right. That's why I'd rather see about working something out with a team like SF instead.
-
Jets moving from 20 to 2 will cost them big .....What would be the minimum you would accept for this to happen ?
Supposedly Muhammad Wilkerson is in the mix... What's the value of 12 sack, 3-4 DE just entering his prime having missed only 5 games in 5 years to us? Certainly a first... and change...
Two problems:
- he has not yet signed his franchise tender and cannot be traded until he does; and
- He ended 2015 with a broken leg... should be fine, but you never know.
Swap ones for MW plus a 2 this year and a 1next year? Good deal for us...
Supposedly Muhammad Wilkerson is in the mix... What's the value of 12 sack, 3-4 DE just entering his prime having missed only 5 games in 5 years to us? Certainly a first... and change...
Two problems:
- he has not yet signed his franchise tender and cannot be traded until he does; and
- He ended 2015 with a broken leg... should be fine, but you never know.
Swap ones for MW plus a 2 this year and a 1next year? Good deal for us...
Done!! Where do Muhammad & I sign?
-
Jets moving from 20 to 2 will cost them big .....What would be the minimum you would accept for this to happen ?
Supposedly Muhammad Wilkerson is in the mix... What's the value of 12 sack, 3-4 DE just entering his prime having missed only 5 games in 5 years to us? Certainly a first... and change...
Two problems:
- he has not yet signed his franchise tender and cannot be traded until he does; and
- He ended 2015 with a broken leg... should be fine, but you never know.
Swap ones for MW plus a 2 this year and a 1next year? Good deal for us...
Swap ones for MW plus a 2 this year and a 1next year? Good deal for us...
Take that and don't look back
Jets: 2016#2
Browns: MW, 2016 Jets rd1, 2016 Jets rd2, 2017 Jets rd1
Take it, take it, take it.. Wilkerson next to Shelton and Bryant is legit at all 3 DL positions for the first time since the Browns reconstituted..
-
Swap ones for MW plus a 2 this year and a 1next year? Good deal for us...
Take that and don't look back
Jets: 2016#2
Browns: MW, 2016 Jets rd1, 2016 Jets rd2, 2017 Jets rd1
Take it, take it, take it.. Wilkerson next to Shelton and Bryant is legit at all 3 DL positions for the first time since the Browns reconstituted..
Take that and don't look back
Jets: 2016#2
Browns: MW, 2016 Jets rd1, 2016 Jets rd2, 2017 Jets rd1
Take it, take it, take it.. Wilkerson next to Shelton and Bryant is legit at all 3 DL positions for the first time since the Browns reconstituted..
Not happening. Not even close. They'd get our 1st and second this year at least, we'd get their's and MW.
-
#Browns seem very likely to trade the #2 pick in the #NFLDraft, from what I've heard. But don't rule out #49ers, they have asked about pick.
It's hotting up
This one says Browns Eagles have agreed a framework
http://www.waitingfornextyear.com/2016/04/browns-eagles-nfl-draft-trade-rumors/
-
1/2 As I said yesterday, the cost to move to #2 is expected to be significantly less than moving to #1. #Eagles trying to get there, #Browns@AllbrightNFL2/2 seeing if other offers can help them leverage for more. There are other teams interested.
-
Last night, Alex Marvez reports that if the Browns and Eagles reach an agreement on a trade that would send the No. 2 overall pick to Philadelphia, it would include the two teams swapping first-round picks in 2016 with the Eagles sending the Browns two third-round picks this year, their first-rounder in 2017 and their 2017 third-round selection.
Alex Marvez@alexmarvezIF @Eagles & @Browns make deal for No. 2 overall pick, I'm told compensation includes 1st- & 3rd-rnd picks in 2016/17 @SiriusXMNFL @NFLonFOXHowever, Schefter mentioned during the interview that he believes the price to move up to No. 2 would be less than that. Eagles would like the trade completed today.
Schefter says we may take less ........here we go, are we going to be screwed again ?
-
NFLTradeRumors.co @nfltrade_rumors 18m18 minutes ago
Report: Potential Trade Between #Browns & #Eagles Expected To Include 1st & 3rd-Rd Picks In 2016 & 2017 If Completed
So Eagles 1st and 3rd this year and next.....thoughts ?
That Twitter account is garbage.
But no, I wouldn't take that. I'd want a first and second this year at the very least, along with a first next year.
If Wentz is gone and we can move back, still pick before 10 and pick up an extra second, we'd be able to likely come away with a very good LB, a very good WR and/or a very good DL without first three picks.
I wouldn't hate moving back to #7, getting SF's second, then getting, say, Jack, Nkemdiche and Smith.
Or, if injury worries you, getting Buckner, Spence, and Boyd.
And, of course, that opens the door to getting Lynch at #32. Not my first choice for QB, but I'd rather Lynch at #32 than Goff at #2.
That Twitter account is garbage.
But no, I wouldn't take that. I'd want a first and second this year at the very least, along with a first next year.
If Wentz is gone and we can move back, still pick before 10 and pick up an extra second, we'd be able to likely come away with a very good LB, a very good WR and/or a very good DL without first three picks.
I wouldn't hate moving back to #7, getting SF's second, then getting, say, Jack, Nkemdiche and Smith.
Or, if injury worries you, getting Buckner, Spence, and Boyd.
And, of course, that opens the door to getting Lynch at #32. Not my first choice for QB, but I'd rather Lynch at #32 than Goff at #2.
+1 because this is exactly how I feel. The ONLY way I'd be happy with this trade is if the Browns used those picks as ammunition to move into the early 2nd for a guy like Lynch
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login