Skip to content

Jonathan Paul Manziel

The Browns Board
16.0k 396 570.1k 1
  • Cossell says the rams take him at 2....

    Casserly says there's no way we take him till possibly 26.

    That's just today.

    Nothing to see here....

  • Derek Carr will be twice the QB Manziel could ever dream to be! 🥷

    Derek Carr will throw twice the interceptions as Manziel could ever dream of throwing.

    @poeticg said:

    Derek Carr will be twice the QB Manziel could ever dream to be! 🥷

  • I love how polarizing Johnny Douchebag is. You either love him, or hate him.

    More of us hate him, but those that love him are louder about it.

    @mld-woody said:

    I love how polarizing Johnny Douchebag is. You either love him, or hate him.

    More of us hate him, but those that love him are louder about it.

    He is Hillary Clinton

  • I don't understand what amazing talent people see in Johnny Douchebag. What have you seen on the field that is just so much better than other QBs?/

    Yeah, he runs around and buys time. Yeah, he has "moxy" (he's an arrogant prick). What else exactly?

    Mike Evans made JF

  • I don't understand what amazing talent people see in Johnny Douchebag. What have you seen on the field that is just so much better than other QBs?/

    Yeah, he runs around and buys time. Yeah, he has "moxy" (he's an arrogant prick). What else exactly?

    Mike Evans made JF

    @mld-woody said:

    I don't understand what amazing talent people see in Johnny Douchebag. What have you seen on the field that is just so much better than other QBs?/

    Yeah, he runs around and buys time. Yeah, he has "moxy" (he's an arrogant prick). What else exactly?

    Mike Evans made JF

    I think the fact that he finds ways to win football games. I see why people like him, I am on the fence about him. I think he will either be a big time bust or big time star, wont be any middle ground with him.

  • @mike-h said:

    Luckily, Farmer gets to make the decision and not you.

    People are harping on the wrong stuff. Manziel has the talent to be a good NFL QB. That's something Cleveland hasn't had in forever.

    But let's draft Derek Carr or Garoppolo instead -- lol. That logic will continue to see this team in the basement of the AFCN.

    Farmer needa to play his draft board the way he has the players ranked for the most part. If Manziel is #20 on your board picking him at 4 would be a bad move in my opinion. If he was ranked something like 6 or 7 on your board then drafting him a few slots early isnt that a big a deal.

  • Who would you rather have woody? Teddy spaghetti, the noodle man who can't throw a spiral or hit his own receiver when no one is playing defense? No thanks.

  • @mike-h said:

    Luckily, Farmer gets to make the decision and not you.

    People are harping on the wrong stuff. Manziel has the talent to be a good NFL QB. That's something Cleveland hasn't had in forever.

    But let's draft Derek Carr or Garoppolo instead -- lol. That logic will continue to see this team in the basement of the AFCN.

    So you are on record is claiming Johnny football (should we draft him) will be the best quarterback since the Browns returned to the league.

    Further that if we don't take him we will be relegated to the cellar for many more years.

    Strong words Mike.

    WSS

  • @mike-h said:

    Luckily, Farmer gets to make the decision and not you.

    People are harping on the wrong stuff. Manziel has the talent to be a good NFL QB. That's something Cleveland hasn't had in forever.

    But let's draft Derek Carr or Garoppolo instead -- lol. That logic will continue to see this team in the basement of the AFCN.

    So you are on record is claiming Johnny football (should we draft him) will be the best quarterback since the Browns returned to the league.

    Further that if we don't take him we will be relegated to the cellar for many more years.

    Strong words Mike.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    So you are on record is claiming Johnny football (should we draft him) will be the best quarterback since the Browns returned to the league.

    Further that if we don't take him we will be relegated to the cellar for many more years.

    Strong words Mike.

    WSS

    It's pretty sad that "good NFL QB" means "best quarterback since the Browns returned to the league".

  • @mld-woody said:

    I love how polarizing Johnny Douchebag is. You either love him, or hate him.

    More of us hate him, but those that love him are louder about it.

    He is Hillary Clinton

    @harry-buffalo said:

    He is Hillary Clinton

    So does that make Brandon Weeden Sarah Palin ......always screwing things up ? 🙂

  • Who would you rather have woody? Teddy spaghetti, the noodle man who can't throw a spiral or hit his own receiver when no one is playing defense? No thanks.

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    Who would you rather have woody? Teddy spaghetti, the noodle man who can't throw a spiral or hit his own receiver when no one is playing defense? No thanks.

    I don't want any QB at 4. But yeah, I'd rather have Teddy than Johnny Douchebag.

  • @westside-steve said:

    So you are on record is claiming Johnny football (should we draft him) will be the best quarterback since the Browns returned to the league.

    Further that if we don't take him we will be relegated to the cellar for many more years.

    Strong words Mike.

    WSS

    It's pretty sad that "good NFL QB" means "best quarterback since the Browns returned to the league".

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    It's pretty sad that "good NFL QB" means "best quarterback since the Browns returned to the league".

    if the bar is Couch/Holcomb/Anderson...it's sad but true.

    i'd be ok w JF at 26. or BB. or DC. but none at 4.

    anyone ie evans/gilbert/robinson/mathews > the QBs.

  • not in recent history will there be sooooo many people to each soooo much shit when all the dust has cleared although it might take a couple of years. (either pro or con JF).

    the guy isn't even on a team yet (let alone the browns) and everyone is ready to kill each other.

    it must be the '666' tattooed underneath his hairline.

  • This time next week, most of us will finally be able to discuss who we picked, while a few of us will still complain about Johnny Scramble. At least it will finally be over one way or the other. I don't want JS, but if we pick him I hope he succeeds because I hate saying I told you so (but will).

  • @mike-h said:

    People read what they want to apparently.

    I think he's a lot better than most here want to give him credit for, for whatever motive.

    I like Blake B and Manziel, I'm pretty sure that's understood by now.

    I don't see how else I could have read it. But I'm not picking on you sir. Just getting your take. There must have been some thing recently to change your mind since, if I'm not mistaken you started out in the Bridgewater camp.

    WSS

  • If we take Manziel it will make it almost impossible for Hoyer to be the starter... While many of us would understand the concept of sitting Manziel for a year - I can't say the same for Joe Blow casual fan.

    That said... if we take a QB at #4 I think you need to start him regardless of who it is (Bortles, Manziel, Carr, etc) out of principle. Otherwise it is a waste of a pick on an immediate starter.

  • If we see Manziel get picked at #4, it is going to be because Haslam does what he has promised not to do and that is pull rank on the guy he hired to run the team.

  • If we take Manziel it will make it almost impossible for Hoyer to be the starter... While many of us would understand the concept of sitting Manziel for a year - I can't say the same for Joe Blow casual fan.

    That said... if we take a QB at #4 I think you need to start him regardless of who it is (Bortles, Manziel, Carr, etc) out of principle. Otherwise it is a waste of a pick on an immediate starter.

    @loyalty said:

    If we take Manziel it will make it almost impossible for Hoyer to be the starter... While many of us would understand the concept of sitting Manziel for a year - I can't say the same for Joe Blow casual fan.

    That said... if we take a QB at #4 I think you need to start him regardless of who it is (Bortles, Manziel, Carr, etc) out of principle. Otherwise it is a waste of a pick on an immediate starter.

    which is why they shouldn't take a QB at 4....none of them are ready to play outta the gate, if one feels they should start outta principle (which I highly disagree with).
  • @loyalty said:

    If we take Manziel it will make it almost impossible for Hoyer to be the starter... While many of us would understand the concept of sitting Manziel for a year - I can't say the same for Joe Blow casual fan.

    That said... if we take a QB at #4 I think you need to start him regardless of who it is (Bortles, Manziel, Carr, etc) out of principle. Otherwise it is a waste of a pick on an immediate starter.

    which is why they shouldn't take a QB at 4....none of them are ready to play outta the gate, if one feels they should start outta principle (which I highly disagree with).

    @choco said:

    which is why they shouldn't take a QB at 4....none of them are ready to play outta the gate, if one feels they should start outta principle (which I highly disagree with).

    I disagree with that fully. There is no head coach who has ever preferred to start a rookie QB, regardless of draft position. Play the best option on the roster. If thats Hoyer, so be it. Ignore the pressure to play him, and focus on getting him ready to play.
  • I think a QB should be taken with the 2nd 1st rounder whether it's 26 or we trade up. I like Mike Evans, Khalil Mack, Watkins, and of course if we took Teddy I would not be that mad.