Skip to content

Browns vs. Steelers offensive line

Locked The Browns Board
102 13 2.2k
  • Id say it's not even close.....we got em at 4 outta 5 positions(slam dunk) and there's even an argument that Schwartz is better than Gilbert.....but Id call that one a wash.....and you know I love scores and rankings, so just for the sake of it, here are their NFL ranks for 2014...)

    Joe Thomas(#3) beats Beachum(#5),,,,

    Bitonio(#2) crushes Foster(#18)......

    Mack(prjcts to #2) beats Pouncy(#6)

    Greco(#6) beats DeCastro(#11)...

    Schwartz(#12) falls to Gilbert(#10) (but its close)

  • Id say it's not even close.....we got em at 4 outta 5 positions(slam dunk) and there's even an argument that Schwartz is better than Gilbert.....but Id call that one a wash.....and you know I love scores and rankings, so just for the sake of it, here are their NFL ranks for 2014...)

    Joe Thomas(#3) beats Beachum(#5),,,,

    Bitonio(#2) crushes Foster(#18)......

    Mack(prjcts to #2) beats Pouncy(#6)

    Greco(#6) beats DeCastro(#11)...

    Schwartz(#12) falls to Gilbert(#10) (but its close)

    @mudfly said:

    Id say it's not even close.....we got em at 4 outta 5 positions(slam dunk) and there's even an argument that Schwartz is better than Gilbert.....but Id call that one a wash.....and you know I love scores and rankings, so just for the sake of it, here are their NFL ranks for 2014...)

    Joe Thomas(#3) beats Beachum(#5),,,,

    Bitonio(#2) crushes Foster(#18)......

    Mack(prjcts to #2) beats Pouncy(#6)

    Greco(#6) beats DeCastro(#11)...

    Schwartz(#12) falls to Gilbert(#10) (but its close)

    OK, explain this. Is this like these are how each player ranked among all 32 starters in the league? 1-32? Or what?

    If so, then both Beachum and Gilbert ranked higher than I would have anticipated. And so did The Schwartz at #12. The way some talk around here you would have thought he was #33.

  • The steelers line played pretty well last season and it was their first under munchak. There isnt a whole lot of separation between good lines and very good lines. As long as the qb is staying clean and the offense is clicking its really all that matters. I will be curious to see where things stand after the 2015 season. Beachum is a 7th rounder playing like a first. Foster was undrafted and pouncey maybe played his best season last year with decastro healthy at his right. I'm very pleased with our line at this point. Both lines are good.

  • The steelers line played pretty well last season and it was their first under munchak. There isnt a whole lot of separation between good lines and very good lines. As long as the qb is staying clean and the offense is clicking its really all that matters. I will be curious to see where things stand after the 2015 season. Beachum is a 7th rounder playing like a first. Foster was undrafted and pouncey maybe played his best season last year with decastro healthy at his right. I'm very pleased with our line at this point. Both lines are good.

    @vagitron said:

    The steelers line played pretty well last season and it was their first under munchak.

    I agree that munchak was a very sweet coup for the Steelers to obtain. I honestly think he will have a short lived life there as other teams will be after him for a HC position. (In fact....before they got Pettine I think Munchak was on their list of potentials)

    There isnt a whole lot of separation between good lines and very good lines.

    OK, but there is between bad lines and good lines.

    As long as the qb is staying clean and the offense is clicking its really all that matters.

    It helps a lot if that O line is blocking for top quality Skill players....which we know the Steelers have at QB RB and #1 WR.

    I will be curious to see where things stand after the 2015 season. Beachum is a 7th rounder playing like a first. Foster was undrafted and pouncey maybe played his best season last year with decastro healthy at his right. I'm very pleased with our line at this point. Both lines are good.

  • @vagitron said:

    The steelers line played pretty well last season and it was their first under munchak.

    I agree that munchak was a very sweet coup for the Steelers to obtain. I honestly think he will have a short lived life there as other teams will be after him for a HC position. (In fact....before they got Pettine I think Munchak was on their list of potentials)

    There isnt a whole lot of separation between good lines and very good lines.

    OK, but there is between bad lines and good lines.

    As long as the qb is staying clean and the offense is clicking its really all that matters.

    It helps a lot if that O line is blocking for top quality Skill players....which we know the Steelers have at QB RB and #1 WR.

    I will be curious to see where things stand after the 2015 season. Beachum is a 7th rounder playing like a first. Foster was undrafted and pouncey maybe played his best season last year with decastro healthy at his right. I'm very pleased with our line at this point. Both lines are good.

    @the-gipper said:

    @vagitron said:

    The steelers line played pretty well last season and it was their first under munchak.

    I agree that munchak was a very sweet coup for the Steelers to obtain. I honestly think he will have a short lived life there as other teams will be after him for a HC position. (In fact....before they got Pettine I think Munchak was on their list of potentials)

    There isnt a whole lot of separation between good lines and very good lines.

    OK, but there is between bad lines and good lines.

    As long as the qb is staying clean and the offense is clicking its really all that matters.

    It helps a lot if that O line is blocking for top quality Skill players....which we know the Steelers have at QB RB and #1 WR.

    I will be curious to see where things stand after the 2015 season. Beachum is a 7th rounder playing like a first. Foster was undrafted and pouncey maybe played his best season last year with decastro healthy at his right. I'm very pleased with our line at this point. Both lines are good.

    I actually think munchak is perfectly content but I wouldn't be surprised if someone comes knocking. I also wouldn't be surprised if he refused as I don't believe he enjoyed being a head coach as much...look at lebeau for example. Although he's probably more of an anamoly due to his age. Yes I agree on the jump between bad and very good. The steelers have a pretty damn good line, if the browns are better its not a noticible difference. Yes skill positions help.
  • Id say it's not even close.....we got em at 4 outta 5 positions(slam dunk) and there's even an argument that Schwartz is better than Gilbert.....but Id call that one a wash.....and you know I love scores and rankings, so just for the sake of it, here are their NFL ranks for 2014...)

    Joe Thomas(#3) beats Beachum(#5),,,,

    Bitonio(#2) crushes Foster(#18)......

    Mack(prjcts to #2) beats Pouncy(#6)

    Greco(#6) beats DeCastro(#11)...

    Schwartz(#12) falls to Gilbert(#10) (but its close)

    Hard to compare given the differing schemes employed... "emphasized" may be the better word choice since there are few "pure" schemes in this copy-cat league.

    @mudfly said:

    Greco(#6) beats DeCastro(#11)...

    I am so proud of the job John did last year...

  • Hard to compare given the differing schemes employed... "emphasized" may be the better word choice since there are few "pure" schemes in this copy-cat league.

    @mudfly said:

    Greco(#6) beats DeCastro(#11)...

    I am so proud of the job John did last year...

    @tour2ma said:

    Hard to compare given the differing schemes employed... "emphasized" may be the better word choice since there are few "pure" schemes in this copy-cat league.

    I am so proud of the job John did last year...

    Sounds like a cop out Tour. "Differing schemes"? I mean, either an OL does his job or he doesn't. I know you have gone in the past at great lengths to analyze the performances of Browns front lines.

    Are you saying you can't do the same for the Steelers because their blocking scheme varies from that used by the Browns?

  • @tour2ma said:

    Hard to compare given the differing schemes employed... "emphasized" may be the better word choice since there are few "pure" schemes in this copy-cat league.

    I am so proud of the job John did last year...

    Sounds like a cop out Tour. "Differing schemes"? I mean, either an OL does his job or he doesn't. I know you have gone in the past at great lengths to analyze the performances of Browns front lines.

    Are you saying you can't do the same for the Steelers because their blocking scheme varies from that used by the Browns?

    @the-gipper said:

    Sounds like a cop out Tour. "Differing schemes"? I mean, either an OL does his job or he doesn't. I know you have gone in the past at great lengths to analyze the performances of Browns front lines.

    Are you saying you can't do the same for the Steelers because their blocking scheme varies from that used by the Browns?

    He said the schemes run are different and they are so its hard to compare. Pretty clear.

  • Scheme should'nt matter all that much.. you can play the position.. or you simply cant.

  • Scheme should'nt matter all that much.. you can play the position.. or you simply cant.

    @nickers said:

    Scheme should'nt matter all that much.. you can play the position.. or you simply cant.

    They are asked to excel at different things in different schemes. Either way pff in October of last year ranked the Browns 1st and the Steelers 4th. Are you really going to challenge the guy that dissects offensive line play on your message board?

  • @nickers said:

    Scheme should'nt matter all that much.. you can play the position.. or you simply cant.

    They are asked to excel at different things in different schemes. Either way pff in October of last year ranked the Browns 1st and the Steelers 4th. Are you really going to challenge the guy that dissects offensive line play on your message board?

    @vagitron said:

    They are asked to excel at different things in different schemes. Either way pff in October of last year ranked the Browns 1st and the Steelers 4th. Are you really going to challenge the guy that dissects offensive line play on your message board?

    I'm not challenging anyone to anything.. I just made a simple statement.. that in most cases.. It's true.. Don't over analyze it for more than what it is.

  • @tour2ma said:

    Hard to compare given the differing schemes employed... "emphasized" may be the better word choice since there are few "pure" schemes in this copy-cat league.

    I am so proud of the job John did last year...

    Sounds like a cop out Tour. "Differing schemes"? I mean, either an OL does his job or he doesn't. I know you have gone in the past at great lengths to analyze the performances of Browns front lines.

    Are you saying you can't do the same for the Steelers because their blocking scheme varies from that used by the Browns?

    @the-gipper said:

    Are you saying you can't do the same for the Steelers because their blocking scheme varies from that used by the Browns?

    Can't? No... I can, but not going to invest 4 hours per game as I do for the Browns. So not surprisingly I haven't evaluated the Steelers at all.

    My impression was that the Steeler O-line surprised to the upside in 2014. There were a lot more questions about them as a unit going into the season than there were coming out. Could well be the Munchak factor.

    None of which changes that our ZBS leaning scheme has different requirements than their Power leaning scheme. Yes, there is overlap in the skillsets, but they are not the same. The ZBS is more speed/ agility dependent. Case in point was Greco dropping over 20 lb from his 2013 game weight to get quicker.

  • @the-gipper said:

    Sounds like a cop out Tour. "Differing schemes"? I mean, either an OL does his job or he doesn't. I know you have gone in the past at great lengths to analyze the performances of Browns front lines.

    Are you saying you can't do the same for the Steelers because their blocking scheme varies from that used by the Browns?

    He said the schemes run are different and they are so its hard to compare. Pretty clear.

    @vagitron said:

    He said the schemes run are different and they are so its hard to compare. Pretty clear.

    I didn't misunderstand him. I just don't buy that the performance of offensive linemen can't be compared just because they run different schemes.

    Every QB out there probably runs some sort of "different scheme", yet we don't hesitate to compare Quarterbacks.....or WRs or RBs or any other position.

  • @the-gipper said:

    Are you saying you can't do the same for the Steelers because their blocking scheme varies from that used by the Browns?

    Can't? No... I can, but not going to invest 4 hours per game as I do for the Browns. So not surprisingly I haven't evaluated the Steelers at all.

    My impression was that the Steeler O-line surprised to the upside in 2014. There were a lot more questions about them as a unit going into the season than there were coming out. Could well be the Munchak factor.

    None of which changes that our ZBS leaning scheme has different requirements than their Power leaning scheme. Yes, there is overlap in the skillsets, but they are not the same. The ZBS is more speed/ agility dependent. Case in point was Greco dropping over 20 lb from his 2013 game weight to get quicker.

    @tour2ma said:

    Can't? No... I can, but not going to invest 4 hours per game as I do for the Browns. So not surprisingly I haven't evaluated the Steelers at all.

    My impression was that the Steeler O-line surprised to the upside in 2014. There were a lot more questions about them as a unit going into the season than there were coming out. Could well be the Munchak factor.

    None of which changes that our ZBS leaning scheme has different requirements than their Power leaning scheme. Yes, there is overlap in the skillsets, but they are not the same. The ZBS is more speed/ agility dependent. Case in point was Greco dropping over 20 lb from his 2013 game weight to get quicker.

    The steelers actually run a lot of zone blocking under munchak.

  • @nickers said:

    Scheme should'nt matter all that much.. you can play the position.. or you simply cant.

    They are asked to excel at different things in different schemes. Either way pff in October of last year ranked the Browns 1st and the Steelers 4th. Are you really going to challenge the guy that dissects offensive line play on your message board?

    @vagitron said:

    They are asked to excel at different things in different schemes. Either way pff in October of last year ranked the Browns 1st and the Steelers 4th. Are you really going to challenge the guy that dissects offensive line play on your message board?

    I will challenge anyone that I think is giving me the runaround.....yes. You certainly know that about me.

    A missed block is a missed block in any scheme. A made block is a made block.

    Do you think it is just "scheme" that allows a JJ Watt to be so good at what he does?

    Do you think Alex Mack could not perform...and be evaluated ...in the Steelers scheme and that Maurkice Pouncey could'n't perform...and be evaluated in the Browns scheme?

  • @the-gipper said:

    Are you saying you can't do the same for the Steelers because their blocking scheme varies from that used by the Browns?

    Can't? No... I can, but not going to invest 4 hours per game as I do for the Browns. So not surprisingly I haven't evaluated the Steelers at all.

    My impression was that the Steeler O-line surprised to the upside in 2014. There were a lot more questions about them as a unit going into the season than there were coming out. Could well be the Munchak factor.

    None of which changes that our ZBS leaning scheme has different requirements than their Power leaning scheme. Yes, there is overlap in the skillsets, but they are not the same. The ZBS is more speed/ agility dependent. Case in point was Greco dropping over 20 lb from his 2013 game weight to get quicker.

    @tour2ma said:

    Can't? No... I can, but not going to invest 4 hours per game as I do for the Browns. So not surprisingly I haven't evaluated the Steelers at all.

    OK, I can understand that. I wasn't asking for that. Just general impressions. Yes, I would expect to see the results of something "pregraded" like Mudlfly's PFF rankings.

    My impression was that the Steeler O-line surprised to the upside in 2014. There were a lot more questions about them as a unit going into the season than there were coming out. Could well be the Munchak factor.

    None of which changes that our ZBS leaning scheme has different requirements than their Power leaning scheme. Yes, there is overlap in the skillsets, but they are not the same. The ZBS is more speed/ agility dependent. Case in point was Greco dropping over 20 lb from his 2013 game weight to get quicker.

    Sure, sure. But the question remains "how well did each player perform" within the given scheme that a team utilizes.

    Again, no, not asking you to do that. Its not that big of a deal. I just thought that there may be some central grading system that looks at it. NFL.com, PFF, whatever.

  • @tour2ma said:

    Can't? No... I can, but not going to invest 4 hours per game as I do for the Browns. So not surprisingly I haven't evaluated the Steelers at all.

    My impression was that the Steeler O-line surprised to the upside in 2014. There were a lot more questions about them as a unit going into the season than there were coming out. Could well be the Munchak factor.

    None of which changes that our ZBS leaning scheme has different requirements than their Power leaning scheme. Yes, there is overlap in the skillsets, but they are not the same. The ZBS is more speed/ agility dependent. Case in point was Greco dropping over 20 lb from his 2013 game weight to get quicker.

    The steelers actually run a lot of zone blocking under munchak.

    @vagitron said:

    The steelers actually run a lot of zone blocking under munchak.

    No doubt... I've seen examples of you running it in highlights. As I said there are few pure schemes anymore. But my impression was that the Steelers did not emphasize the ZBS to the extent that we did and were not as proficient as we were running it. Shades of the chicken and egg debate...

    And FYI... we deemphasized the ZBS in the middle third of the season. The period after Mack went down and before McDonald/ Seymore developed late.

  • @tour2ma said:

    Can't? No... I can, but not going to invest 4 hours per game as I do for the Browns. So not surprisingly I haven't evaluated the Steelers at all.

    OK, I can understand that. I wasn't asking for that. Just general impressions. Yes, I would expect to see the results of something "pregraded" like Mudlfly's PFF rankings.

    My impression was that the Steeler O-line surprised to the upside in 2014. There were a lot more questions about them as a unit going into the season than there were coming out. Could well be the Munchak factor.

    None of which changes that our ZBS leaning scheme has different requirements than their Power leaning scheme. Yes, there is overlap in the skillsets, but they are not the same. The ZBS is more speed/ agility dependent. Case in point was Greco dropping over 20 lb from his 2013 game weight to get quicker.

    Sure, sure. But the question remains "how well did each player perform" within the given scheme that a team utilizes.

    Again, no, not asking you to do that. Its not that big of a deal. I just thought that there may be some central grading system that looks at it. NFL.com, PFF, whatever.

    @the-gipper said:

    @tour2ma said:

    Can't? No... I can, but not going to invest 4 hours per game as I do for the Browns. So not surprisingly I haven't evaluated the Steelers at all.

    OK, I can understand that. I wasn't asking for that. Just general impressions. Yes, I would expect to see the results of something "pregraded" like Mudlfly's PFF rankings.

    My impression was that the Steeler O-line surprised to the upside in 2014. There were a lot more questions about them as a unit going into the season than there were coming out. Could well be the Munchak factor.

    None of which changes that our ZBS leaning scheme has different requirements than their Power leaning scheme. Yes, there is overlap in the skillsets, but they are not the same. The ZBS is more speed/ agility dependent. Case in point was Greco dropping over 20 lb from his 2013 game weight to get quicker.

    Sure, sure. But the question remains "how well did each player perform" within the given scheme that a team utilizes.

    Again, no, not asking you to do that. Its not that big of a deal. I just thought that there may be some central grading system that looks at it. NFL.com, PFF, whatever.

    As of last October Browns 1st, Steelers 4th according to PFF. I already posted the same above.

  • @nickers said:

    Scheme should'nt matter all that much.. you can play the position.. or you simply cant.

    They are asked to excel at different things in different schemes. Either way pff in October of last year ranked the Browns 1st and the Steelers 4th. Are you really going to challenge the guy that dissects offensive line play on your message board?

    @vagitron said:

    Are you really going to challenge the guy that dissects offensive line play on your message board?

    Thanks, but nothing sacred about my O-line grades... Just a guy with an interest, a little O-line experience in the distant past and a lot of time to kill.

  • @vagitron said:

    Are you really going to challenge the guy that dissects offensive line play on your message board?

    Thanks, but nothing sacred about my O-line grades... Just a guy with an interest, a little O-line experience in the distant past and a lot of time to kill.

    @tour2ma said:

    Thanks, but nothing sacred about my O-line grades... Just a guy with an interest, a little O-line experience in the distant past and a lot of time to kill.

    No problem and I know its just your opinion. My point was nickers doesn't evaluate anything. Yet he wanted to question your stance with nothing more than a "nah uh"