Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Browns vs. Steelers offensive line

Browns vs. Steelers offensive line

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
102 Posts 13 Posters 2.2k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MudflyM Mudfly

    Id say it's not even close.....we got em at 4 outta 5 positions(slam dunk) and there's even an argument that Schwartz is better than Gilbert.....but Id call that one a wash.....and you know I love scores and rankings, so just for the sake of it, here are their NFL ranks for 2014...)

    Joe Thomas(#3) beats Beachum(#5),,,,

    Bitonio(#2) crushes Foster(#18)......

    Mack(prjcts to #2) beats Pouncy(#6)

    Greco(#6) beats DeCastro(#11)...

    Schwartz(#12) falls to Gilbert(#10) (but its close)

    The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
    • 57k Posts
    • 4k Reputation
    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #4

    @mudfly said:

    Id say it's not even close.....we got em at 4 outta 5 positions(slam dunk) and there's even an argument that Schwartz is better than Gilbert.....but Id call that one a wash.....and you know I love scores and rankings, so just for the sake of it, here are their NFL ranks for 2014...)

    Joe Thomas(#3) beats Beachum(#5),,,,

    Bitonio(#2) crushes Foster(#18)......

    Mack(prjcts to #2) beats Pouncy(#6)

    Greco(#6) beats DeCastro(#11)...

    Schwartz(#12) falls to Gilbert(#10) (but its close)

    OK, explain this. Is this like these are how each player ranked among all 32 starters in the league? 1-32? Or what?

    If so, then both Beachum and Gilbert ranked higher than I would have anticipated. And so did The Schwartz at #12. The way some talk around here you would have thought he was #33.

    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • Vagitron VagitronV Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
      • 4k Posts
      • 301 Reputation
      VagitronV Vagitron wrote on last edited by Vagitron
      #5

      The steelers line played pretty well last season and it was their first under munchak. There isnt a whole lot of separation between good lines and very good lines. As long as the qb is staying clean and the offense is clicking its really all that matters. I will be curious to see where things stand after the 2015 season. Beachum is a 7th rounder playing like a first. Foster was undrafted and pouncey maybe played his best season last year with decastro healthy at his right. I'm very pleased with our line at this point. Both lines are good.

      AKA SNATCH98 or Rorbotron. The boards glorious admins decided to get cute and change my name to "homotron" Classy group of people. (Lost a bet with Columbus king and got banned for a month)
      The GipperT 1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • VagitronV Vagitron

        The steelers line played pretty well last season and it was their first under munchak. There isnt a whole lot of separation between good lines and very good lines. As long as the qb is staying clean and the offense is clicking its really all that matters. I will be curious to see where things stand after the 2015 season. Beachum is a 7th rounder playing like a first. Foster was undrafted and pouncey maybe played his best season last year with decastro healthy at his right. I'm very pleased with our line at this point. Both lines are good.

        The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
        • 57k Posts
        • 4k Reputation
        The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
        #6

        @vagitron said:

        The steelers line played pretty well last season and it was their first under munchak.

        I agree that munchak was a very sweet coup for the Steelers to obtain. I honestly think he will have a short lived life there as other teams will be after him for a HC position. (In fact....before they got Pettine I think Munchak was on their list of potentials)

        There isnt a whole lot of separation between good lines and very good lines.

        OK, but there is between bad lines and good lines.

        As long as the qb is staying clean and the offense is clicking its really all that matters.

        It helps a lot if that O line is blocking for top quality Skill players....which we know the Steelers have at QB RB and #1 WR.

        I will be curious to see where things stand after the 2015 season. Beachum is a 7th rounder playing like a first. Foster was undrafted and pouncey maybe played his best season last year with decastro healthy at his right. I'm very pleased with our line at this point. Both lines are good.

        VagitronV 1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • The GipperT The Gipper

          @vagitron said:

          The steelers line played pretty well last season and it was their first under munchak.

          I agree that munchak was a very sweet coup for the Steelers to obtain. I honestly think he will have a short lived life there as other teams will be after him for a HC position. (In fact....before they got Pettine I think Munchak was on their list of potentials)

          There isnt a whole lot of separation between good lines and very good lines.

          OK, but there is between bad lines and good lines.

          As long as the qb is staying clean and the offense is clicking its really all that matters.

          It helps a lot if that O line is blocking for top quality Skill players....which we know the Steelers have at QB RB and #1 WR.

          I will be curious to see where things stand after the 2015 season. Beachum is a 7th rounder playing like a first. Foster was undrafted and pouncey maybe played his best season last year with decastro healthy at his right. I'm very pleased with our line at this point. Both lines are good.

          Vagitron VagitronV Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
          • 4k Posts
          • 301 Reputation
          VagitronV Vagitron wrote on last edited by Vagitron
          #7

          @the-gipper said:

          @vagitron said:

          The steelers line played pretty well last season and it was their first under munchak.

          I agree that munchak was a very sweet coup for the Steelers to obtain. I honestly think he will have a short lived life there as other teams will be after him for a HC position. (In fact....before they got Pettine I think Munchak was on their list of potentials)

          There isnt a whole lot of separation between good lines and very good lines.

          OK, but there is between bad lines and good lines.

          As long as the qb is staying clean and the offense is clicking its really all that matters.

          It helps a lot if that O line is blocking for top quality Skill players....which we know the Steelers have at QB RB and #1 WR.

          I will be curious to see where things stand after the 2015 season. Beachum is a 7th rounder playing like a first. Foster was undrafted and pouncey maybe played his best season last year with decastro healthy at his right. I'm very pleased with our line at this point. Both lines are good.

          I actually think munchak is perfectly content but I wouldn't be surprised if someone comes knocking. I also wouldn't be surprised if he refused as I don't believe he enjoyed being a head coach as much...look at lebeau for example. Although he's probably more of an anamoly due to his age. Yes I agree on the jump between bad and very good. The steelers have a pretty damn good line, if the browns are better its not a noticible difference. Yes skill positions help.
          AKA SNATCH98 or Rorbotron. The boards glorious admins decided to get cute and change my name to "homotron" Classy group of people. (Lost a bet with Columbus king and got banned for a month)
          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • MudflyM Mudfly

            Id say it's not even close.....we got em at 4 outta 5 positions(slam dunk) and there's even an argument that Schwartz is better than Gilbert.....but Id call that one a wash.....and you know I love scores and rankings, so just for the sake of it, here are their NFL ranks for 2014...)

            Joe Thomas(#3) beats Beachum(#5),,,,

            Bitonio(#2) crushes Foster(#18)......

            Mack(prjcts to #2) beats Pouncy(#6)

            Greco(#6) beats DeCastro(#11)...

            Schwartz(#12) falls to Gilbert(#10) (but its close)

            Tour2ma Tour2maT In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
            • 30k Posts
            • 6k Reputation
            Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
            #8

            Hard to compare given the differing schemes employed... "emphasized" may be the better word choice since there are few "pure" schemes in this copy-cat league.

            @mudfly said:

            Greco(#6) beats DeCastro(#11)...

            I am so proud of the job John did last year...

            "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
            The GipperT 1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • Tour2maT Tour2ma

              Hard to compare given the differing schemes employed... "emphasized" may be the better word choice since there are few "pure" schemes in this copy-cat league.

              @mudfly said:

              Greco(#6) beats DeCastro(#11)...

              I am so proud of the job John did last year...

              The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
              • 57k Posts
              • 4k Reputation
              The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
              #9

              @tour2ma said:

              Hard to compare given the differing schemes employed... "emphasized" may be the better word choice since there are few "pure" schemes in this copy-cat league.

              I am so proud of the job John did last year...

              Sounds like a cop out Tour. "Differing schemes"? I mean, either an OL does his job or he doesn't. I know you have gone in the past at great lengths to analyze the performances of Browns front lines.

              Are you saying you can't do the same for the Steelers because their blocking scheme varies from that used by the Browns?

              VagitronV Tour2maT 2 Replies Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • The GipperT The Gipper

                @tour2ma said:

                Hard to compare given the differing schemes employed... "emphasized" may be the better word choice since there are few "pure" schemes in this copy-cat league.

                I am so proud of the job John did last year...

                Sounds like a cop out Tour. "Differing schemes"? I mean, either an OL does his job or he doesn't. I know you have gone in the past at great lengths to analyze the performances of Browns front lines.

                Are you saying you can't do the same for the Steelers because their blocking scheme varies from that used by the Browns?

                Vagitron VagitronV Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                • 4k Posts
                • 301 Reputation
                VagitronV Vagitron wrote on last edited by
                #10

                @the-gipper said:

                Sounds like a cop out Tour. "Differing schemes"? I mean, either an OL does his job or he doesn't. I know you have gone in the past at great lengths to analyze the performances of Browns front lines.

                Are you saying you can't do the same for the Steelers because their blocking scheme varies from that used by the Browns?

                He said the schemes run are different and they are so its hard to compare. Pretty clear.

                AKA SNATCH98 or Rorbotron. The boards glorious admins decided to get cute and change my name to "homotron" Classy group of people. (Lost a bet with Columbus king and got banned for a month)
                The GipperT 1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • nickers nickersN Conversation Starter Dedicated Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                  • 14k Posts
                  • 5k Reputation
                  nickersN nickers wrote on last edited by
                  #11

                  Scheme should'nt matter all that much.. you can play the position.. or you simply cant.

                  Nickers...."There are no old running QB's in the NFL "~Sam Rutigliano~
                  VagitronV 1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • nickersN nickers

                    Scheme should'nt matter all that much.. you can play the position.. or you simply cant.

                    Vagitron VagitronV Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                    • 4k Posts
                    • 301 Reputation
                    VagitronV Vagitron wrote on last edited by Vagitron
                    #12

                    @nickers said:

                    Scheme should'nt matter all that much.. you can play the position.. or you simply cant.

                    They are asked to excel at different things in different schemes. Either way pff in October of last year ranked the Browns 1st and the Steelers 4th. Are you really going to challenge the guy that dissects offensive line play on your message board?

                    AKA SNATCH98 or Rorbotron. The boards glorious admins decided to get cute and change my name to "homotron" Classy group of people. (Lost a bet with Columbus king and got banned for a month)
                    nickersN The GipperT Tour2maT 3 Replies Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • VagitronV Vagitron

                      @nickers said:

                      Scheme should'nt matter all that much.. you can play the position.. or you simply cant.

                      They are asked to excel at different things in different schemes. Either way pff in October of last year ranked the Browns 1st and the Steelers 4th. Are you really going to challenge the guy that dissects offensive line play on your message board?

                      nickers nickersN Conversation Starter Dedicated Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                      • 14k Posts
                      • 5k Reputation
                      nickersN nickers wrote on last edited by
                      #13

                      @vagitron said:

                      They are asked to excel at different things in different schemes. Either way pff in October of last year ranked the Browns 1st and the Steelers 4th. Are you really going to challenge the guy that dissects offensive line play on your message board?

                      I'm not challenging anyone to anything.. I just made a simple statement.. that in most cases.. It's true.. Don't over analyze it for more than what it is.

                      Nickers...."There are no old running QB's in the NFL "~Sam Rutigliano~
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • The GipperT The Gipper

                        @tour2ma said:

                        Hard to compare given the differing schemes employed... "emphasized" may be the better word choice since there are few "pure" schemes in this copy-cat league.

                        I am so proud of the job John did last year...

                        Sounds like a cop out Tour. "Differing schemes"? I mean, either an OL does his job or he doesn't. I know you have gone in the past at great lengths to analyze the performances of Browns front lines.

                        Are you saying you can't do the same for the Steelers because their blocking scheme varies from that used by the Browns?

                        Tour2ma Tour2maT In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                        • 30k Posts
                        • 6k Reputation
                        Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
                        #14

                        @the-gipper said:

                        Are you saying you can't do the same for the Steelers because their blocking scheme varies from that used by the Browns?

                        Can't? No... I can, but not going to invest 4 hours per game as I do for the Browns. So not surprisingly I haven't evaluated the Steelers at all.

                        My impression was that the Steeler O-line surprised to the upside in 2014. There were a lot more questions about them as a unit going into the season than there were coming out. Could well be the Munchak factor.

                        None of which changes that our ZBS leaning scheme has different requirements than their Power leaning scheme. Yes, there is overlap in the skillsets, but they are not the same. The ZBS is more speed/ agility dependent. Case in point was Greco dropping over 20 lb from his 2013 game weight to get quicker.

                        "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
                        VagitronV The GipperT 2 Replies Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • VagitronV Vagitron

                          @the-gipper said:

                          Sounds like a cop out Tour. "Differing schemes"? I mean, either an OL does his job or he doesn't. I know you have gone in the past at great lengths to analyze the performances of Browns front lines.

                          Are you saying you can't do the same for the Steelers because their blocking scheme varies from that used by the Browns?

                          He said the schemes run are different and they are so its hard to compare. Pretty clear.

                          The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                          • 57k Posts
                          • 4k Reputation
                          The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                          #15

                          @vagitron said:

                          He said the schemes run are different and they are so its hard to compare. Pretty clear.

                          I didn't misunderstand him. I just don't buy that the performance of offensive linemen can't be compared just because they run different schemes.

                          Every QB out there probably runs some sort of "different scheme", yet we don't hesitate to compare Quarterbacks.....or WRs or RBs or any other position.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • Tour2maT Tour2ma

                            @the-gipper said:

                            Are you saying you can't do the same for the Steelers because their blocking scheme varies from that used by the Browns?

                            Can't? No... I can, but not going to invest 4 hours per game as I do for the Browns. So not surprisingly I haven't evaluated the Steelers at all.

                            My impression was that the Steeler O-line surprised to the upside in 2014. There were a lot more questions about them as a unit going into the season than there were coming out. Could well be the Munchak factor.

                            None of which changes that our ZBS leaning scheme has different requirements than their Power leaning scheme. Yes, there is overlap in the skillsets, but they are not the same. The ZBS is more speed/ agility dependent. Case in point was Greco dropping over 20 lb from his 2013 game weight to get quicker.

                            Vagitron VagitronV Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                            • 4k Posts
                            • 301 Reputation
                            VagitronV Vagitron wrote on last edited by
                            #16

                            @tour2ma said:

                            Can't? No... I can, but not going to invest 4 hours per game as I do for the Browns. So not surprisingly I haven't evaluated the Steelers at all.

                            My impression was that the Steeler O-line surprised to the upside in 2014. There were a lot more questions about them as a unit going into the season than there were coming out. Could well be the Munchak factor.

                            None of which changes that our ZBS leaning scheme has different requirements than their Power leaning scheme. Yes, there is overlap in the skillsets, but they are not the same. The ZBS is more speed/ agility dependent. Case in point was Greco dropping over 20 lb from his 2013 game weight to get quicker.

                            The steelers actually run a lot of zone blocking under munchak.

                            AKA SNATCH98 or Rorbotron. The boards glorious admins decided to get cute and change my name to "homotron" Classy group of people. (Lost a bet with Columbus king and got banned for a month)
                            Tour2maT 1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • VagitronV Vagitron

                              @nickers said:

                              Scheme should'nt matter all that much.. you can play the position.. or you simply cant.

                              They are asked to excel at different things in different schemes. Either way pff in October of last year ranked the Browns 1st and the Steelers 4th. Are you really going to challenge the guy that dissects offensive line play on your message board?

                              The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                              • 57k Posts
                              • 4k Reputation
                              The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                              #17

                              @vagitron said:

                              They are asked to excel at different things in different schemes. Either way pff in October of last year ranked the Browns 1st and the Steelers 4th. Are you really going to challenge the guy that dissects offensive line play on your message board?

                              I will challenge anyone that I think is giving me the runaround.....yes. You certainly know that about me.

                              A missed block is a missed block in any scheme. A made block is a made block.

                              Do you think it is just "scheme" that allows a JJ Watt to be so good at what he does?

                              Do you think Alex Mack could not perform...and be evaluated ...in the Steelers scheme and that Maurkice Pouncey could'n't perform...and be evaluated in the Browns scheme?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • Tour2maT Tour2ma

                                @the-gipper said:

                                Are you saying you can't do the same for the Steelers because their blocking scheme varies from that used by the Browns?

                                Can't? No... I can, but not going to invest 4 hours per game as I do for the Browns. So not surprisingly I haven't evaluated the Steelers at all.

                                My impression was that the Steeler O-line surprised to the upside in 2014. There were a lot more questions about them as a unit going into the season than there were coming out. Could well be the Munchak factor.

                                None of which changes that our ZBS leaning scheme has different requirements than their Power leaning scheme. Yes, there is overlap in the skillsets, but they are not the same. The ZBS is more speed/ agility dependent. Case in point was Greco dropping over 20 lb from his 2013 game weight to get quicker.

                                The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                                • 57k Posts
                                • 4k Reputation
                                The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                                #18

                                @tour2ma said:

                                Can't? No... I can, but not going to invest 4 hours per game as I do for the Browns. So not surprisingly I haven't evaluated the Steelers at all.

                                OK, I can understand that. I wasn't asking for that. Just general impressions. Yes, I would expect to see the results of something "pregraded" like Mudlfly's PFF rankings.

                                My impression was that the Steeler O-line surprised to the upside in 2014. There were a lot more questions about them as a unit going into the season than there were coming out. Could well be the Munchak factor.

                                None of which changes that our ZBS leaning scheme has different requirements than their Power leaning scheme. Yes, there is overlap in the skillsets, but they are not the same. The ZBS is more speed/ agility dependent. Case in point was Greco dropping over 20 lb from his 2013 game weight to get quicker.

                                Sure, sure. But the question remains "how well did each player perform" within the given scheme that a team utilizes.

                                Again, no, not asking you to do that. Its not that big of a deal. I just thought that there may be some central grading system that looks at it. NFL.com, PFF, whatever.

                                VagitronV 1 Reply Last reply
                                Quote Reply
                                • VagitronV Vagitron

                                  @tour2ma said:

                                  Can't? No... I can, but not going to invest 4 hours per game as I do for the Browns. So not surprisingly I haven't evaluated the Steelers at all.

                                  My impression was that the Steeler O-line surprised to the upside in 2014. There were a lot more questions about them as a unit going into the season than there were coming out. Could well be the Munchak factor.

                                  None of which changes that our ZBS leaning scheme has different requirements than their Power leaning scheme. Yes, there is overlap in the skillsets, but they are not the same. The ZBS is more speed/ agility dependent. Case in point was Greco dropping over 20 lb from his 2013 game weight to get quicker.

                                  The steelers actually run a lot of zone blocking under munchak.

                                  Tour2ma Tour2maT In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                                  • 30k Posts
                                  • 6k Reputation
                                  Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by Tour2ma
                                  #19

                                  @vagitron said:

                                  The steelers actually run a lot of zone blocking under munchak.

                                  No doubt... I've seen examples of you running it in highlights. As I said there are few pure schemes anymore. But my impression was that the Steelers did not emphasize the ZBS to the extent that we did and were not as proficient as we were running it. Shades of the chicken and egg debate...

                                  And FYI... we deemphasized the ZBS in the middle third of the season. The period after Mack went down and before McDonald/ Seymore developed late.

                                  "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • The GipperT The Gipper

                                    @tour2ma said:

                                    Can't? No... I can, but not going to invest 4 hours per game as I do for the Browns. So not surprisingly I haven't evaluated the Steelers at all.

                                    OK, I can understand that. I wasn't asking for that. Just general impressions. Yes, I would expect to see the results of something "pregraded" like Mudlfly's PFF rankings.

                                    My impression was that the Steeler O-line surprised to the upside in 2014. There were a lot more questions about them as a unit going into the season than there were coming out. Could well be the Munchak factor.

                                    None of which changes that our ZBS leaning scheme has different requirements than their Power leaning scheme. Yes, there is overlap in the skillsets, but they are not the same. The ZBS is more speed/ agility dependent. Case in point was Greco dropping over 20 lb from his 2013 game weight to get quicker.

                                    Sure, sure. But the question remains "how well did each player perform" within the given scheme that a team utilizes.

                                    Again, no, not asking you to do that. Its not that big of a deal. I just thought that there may be some central grading system that looks at it. NFL.com, PFF, whatever.

                                    Vagitron VagitronV Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                    • 4k Posts
                                    • 301 Reputation
                                    VagitronV Vagitron wrote on last edited by
                                    #20

                                    @the-gipper said:

                                    @tour2ma said:

                                    Can't? No... I can, but not going to invest 4 hours per game as I do for the Browns. So not surprisingly I haven't evaluated the Steelers at all.

                                    OK, I can understand that. I wasn't asking for that. Just general impressions. Yes, I would expect to see the results of something "pregraded" like Mudlfly's PFF rankings.

                                    My impression was that the Steeler O-line surprised to the upside in 2014. There were a lot more questions about them as a unit going into the season than there were coming out. Could well be the Munchak factor.

                                    None of which changes that our ZBS leaning scheme has different requirements than their Power leaning scheme. Yes, there is overlap in the skillsets, but they are not the same. The ZBS is more speed/ agility dependent. Case in point was Greco dropping over 20 lb from his 2013 game weight to get quicker.

                                    Sure, sure. But the question remains "how well did each player perform" within the given scheme that a team utilizes.

                                    Again, no, not asking you to do that. Its not that big of a deal. I just thought that there may be some central grading system that looks at it. NFL.com, PFF, whatever.

                                    As of last October Browns 1st, Steelers 4th according to PFF. I already posted the same above.

                                    AKA SNATCH98 or Rorbotron. The boards glorious admins decided to get cute and change my name to "homotron" Classy group of people. (Lost a bet with Columbus king and got banned for a month)
                                    The GipperT 1 Reply Last reply
                                    Quote Reply
                                    • VagitronV Vagitron

                                      @nickers said:

                                      Scheme should'nt matter all that much.. you can play the position.. or you simply cant.

                                      They are asked to excel at different things in different schemes. Either way pff in October of last year ranked the Browns 1st and the Steelers 4th. Are you really going to challenge the guy that dissects offensive line play on your message board?

                                      Tour2ma Tour2maT In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                                      • 30k Posts
                                      • 6k Reputation
                                      Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
                                      #21

                                      @vagitron said:

                                      Are you really going to challenge the guy that dissects offensive line play on your message board?

                                      Thanks, but nothing sacred about my O-line grades... Just a guy with an interest, a little O-line experience in the distant past and a lot of time to kill.

                                      "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
                                      VagitronV 1 Reply Last reply
                                      Quote Reply
                                      • Tour2maT Tour2ma

                                        @vagitron said:

                                        Are you really going to challenge the guy that dissects offensive line play on your message board?

                                        Thanks, but nothing sacred about my O-line grades... Just a guy with an interest, a little O-line experience in the distant past and a lot of time to kill.

                                        Vagitron VagitronV Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                        • 4k Posts
                                        • 301 Reputation
                                        VagitronV Vagitron wrote on last edited by
                                        #22

                                        @tour2ma said:

                                        Thanks, but nothing sacred about my O-line grades... Just a guy with an interest, a little O-line experience in the distant past and a lot of time to kill.

                                        No problem and I know its just your opinion. My point was nickers doesn't evaluate anything. Yet he wanted to question your stance with nothing more than a "nah uh"

                                        AKA SNATCH98 or Rorbotron. The boards glorious admins decided to get cute and change my name to "homotron" Classy group of people. (Lost a bet with Columbus king and got banned for a month)
                                        nickersN 1 Reply Last reply
                                        Quote Reply
                                        • VagitronV Vagitron

                                          @tour2ma said:

                                          Thanks, but nothing sacred about my O-line grades... Just a guy with an interest, a little O-line experience in the distant past and a lot of time to kill.

                                          No problem and I know its just your opinion. My point was nickers doesn't evaluate anything. Yet he wanted to question your stance with nothing more than a "nah uh"

                                          nickers nickersN Conversation Starter Dedicated Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                                          • 14k Posts
                                          • 5k Reputation
                                          nickersN nickers wrote on last edited by
                                          #23

                                          @vagitron said:

                                          No problem and I know its just your opinion. My point was nickers doesn't evaluate anything. Yet he wanted to question your stance with nothing more than a "nah uh"

                                          I was'nt questioning Tours stance, Ding dong

                                          Nickers...."There are no old running QB's in the NFL "~Sam Rutigliano~
                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Quote Reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Theme
                                          • System
                                          • Light
                                          • Dark
                                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Forums
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Donate