Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Todd Marinovich back in football

Todd Marinovich back in football

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
55 Posts 12 Posters 896 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • nickersN nickers

    This is a joke , right?

    Buck The Frowns B
    • 272 Posts
    • 22 Reputation
    B Buck The Frowns wrote on last edited by
    #22

    @nickers said:

    This is a joke , right?

    Not yet but it will be. He was arrested again last August. Apparently practicing his Naked Bootleg in the neighbor's back yard. He must have gone through every substance known. He is trying to numb some pain. There are some real monstrosities out there serving as sports parents, pro tennis parents can be pretty bad, but Marinovich's father takes the cake. I would describe what he did as a cross between the Pat Morita character in The Karate Kid and a Nazi breeding experiment.

    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • mjp28M mjp28

      Zombo said:

      Those guys in the 70's weren't exactly "little guys" ... I think your Mean Joe Greenes, Merlin Olsens etc. could play today ... and Blanda engineered 5 comeback wins in a row at age 43

      Zombo

      Just to complete the circle Olson and two other guys weighed 270# on the 1975 Rams. Blanda and other skilled players were getting hit by smaller dudes back then. It's strange when you go back in time and find out how your memory can play tricks on you....the steel curtain and fearsome foursome weren't really that big afterall.

      http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/ram/1975_roster.htm

      The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
      • 57k Posts
      • 4k Reputation
      The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
      #23

      @mjp28 said:

      Just to complete the circle Olson and two other guys weighed 270# on the 1975 Rams. Blanda and other skilled players were getting hit by smaller dudes back then. It's strange when you go back in time and find out how your memory can play tricks on you....the steel curtain and fearsome foursome weren't really that big afterall.

      http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/ram/1975_roster.htm

      I think you are right....YOUR memory IS playing tricks on you. As I said....the size of nearly everyone back then is no smaller now than they are today except for OL....and actually just DTs/NTs.

      DEs are about the same: Deacon Jones was 6'5" 275. Myles Garrett is 6'5" 271

      Yes, DT Joe Greene was 275. DTs today do top 300. On defense ONLY DTs are bigger now than they were in the 60/70s.

      As I said, most of the weight gain are with DTs and OL.

      So, the answer is: bullshit....Blanda et al were NOT being hit by smaller guys. Except on rare occasions.

      mjp28M GhoolieG 2 Replies Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
        • 57k Posts
        • 4k Reputation
        The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
        #24

        1964 BROWNS only two 270# DEs on the team all the rest way less.

        2017 Browns DEs: Garrett 271. Emmanuel Ogbah 269 lbs.

        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • mjp28M mjp28

          Zombo said:

          Those guys in the 70's weren't exactly "little guys" ... I think your Mean Joe Greenes, Merlin Olsens etc. could play today ... and Blanda engineered 5 comeback wins in a row at age 43

          Zombo

          1964 BROWNS only two 270# DEs on the team all the rest way less.

          NOTE: NOT THE ROSTER I WANTED BUT CLOSE:

          http://www.news-herald.com/article/HR/20141227/NEWS/141229705

          1974 SB CHAMP STEELERS Joe Green 6' 4" 275# all the rest weigh less some much less. NO 300# dudes back then.

          http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/pit/1974_roster.htm

          Some of those dudes would have trouble making a 2017 roster. Different game now, even NCAA rosters are fast strong and B-I-G.

          Zombo Z
          • 8k Posts
          • 0 Reputation
          Z Zombo wrote on last edited by
          #25

          @mjp28 said:

          1964 BROWNS only two 270# DEs on the team all the rest way less.

          NOTE: NOT THE ROSTER I WANTED BUT CLOSE:

          http://www.news-herald.com/article/HR/20141227/NEWS/141229705

          1974 SB CHAMP STEELERS Joe Green 6' 4" 275# all the rest weigh less some much less. NO 300# dudes back then.

          http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/pit/1974_roster.htm

          Some of those dudes would have trouble making a 2017 roster. Different game now, even NCAA rosters are fast strong and B-I-G.

          The lineman are bigger on both sides of the ball. Particularly on offense. Which would presume a qb like Blanda would actually be better protected today, not "killed" because the guys are bigger.

          Z

          The GipperT mjp28M 2 Replies Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • Z Zombo

            @mjp28 said:

            1964 BROWNS only two 270# DEs on the team all the rest way less.

            NOTE: NOT THE ROSTER I WANTED BUT CLOSE:

            http://www.news-herald.com/article/HR/20141227/NEWS/141229705

            1974 SB CHAMP STEELERS Joe Green 6' 4" 275# all the rest weigh less some much less. NO 300# dudes back then.

            http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/pit/1974_roster.htm

            Some of those dudes would have trouble making a 2017 roster. Different game now, even NCAA rosters are fast strong and B-I-G.

            The lineman are bigger on both sides of the ball. Particularly on offense. Which would presume a qb like Blanda would actually be better protected today, not "killed" because the guys are bigger.

            Z

            The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
            • 57k Posts
            • 4k Reputation
            The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
            #26

            Zombo said:

            The lineman are bigger on both sides of the ball. Particularly on offense. Which would presume a qb like Blanda would actually be better protected today, not "killed" because the guys are bigger.

            Z

            To repeat....he was the same size as Aaron Rodgers.....and not only would he be playing behind a bigger OL, the protection rules for QBs that apply today would by all means help him.

            And, also...as I described above...it is only DTs on the defense that are bigger, not DEs. See the following:

            2017 Pro Bowl DEs:

            Khalil Mack 6'3 247

            Cameron Wake 6'3 269

            Jadaveon Clowne 6'6 267

            Everson Griffen 6'3 273

            Cliff Avril 6'3 260

            Michael Bennett 6'4 274

            1970 Pro Bowl DEs:

            Carl Eller 6'6 257

            Rich Jackson 6'3 255

            Deacon Jones 6'5 272

            Claude Humphrey 6'4 253

            Bubba Smith 6'7 266

            Jerry Mays 6'4 252

            Maybe what? A 5 pound average difference?

            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
              • 57k Posts
              • 4k Reputation
              The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
              #27

              As noted, interior DTs/NTs are much bigger now:

              2017 Pro Bowl DTs:

              Geno Atkins 6'1 302

              Ndamakong Suh 6'4 307

              Jurrell Casey 6'1 300

              Linval Joseph 6'4 323

              Gerald McCoy 6'4 295

              Fletcher Cox 6'4 298

              1970 Pro Bowl DTs

              Gary Larsen 6'5 261

              Joe Greene 6'4 276

              John Elliott 6'4 244

              Merlin Olsen 6'5 270

              Alan Page 6'4 245

              Given their respective height, I suspect that these guys could have bulked up...if required, with the right training, nutrition. But that was not called for then.

              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                • 57k Posts
                • 4k Reputation
                The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                #28

                And here are the MLBs:

                2017 Pro Bowlers (many more because players bugged out due to injury):

                Zach Brown 6'1 242

                Ryan Shazier 6'2 229

                CJ Mosley 6'2 238

                Donta Hightower 6'3 265

                Bobby Wagner 6'0 241

                Sean Lee 6'2 229

                Luke Kuechley 6'3 235

                1970 Pro Bowlers:

                Dick Butkus 6'3 245

                Willie Lanier 6'1 245

                Mick Curtis 6'3 232

                Tommy Nobis 6'2 240

                absolutely no difference...in fact, on average I think the 1970 group outweighs the 2017 group.

                (Donta Hightower is an exception...he is like 25 pounds heavier than his fellow 2017 MLBs)

                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                  • 57k Posts
                  • 4k Reputation
                  The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by The Gipper
                  #29

                  Just for shits and giggles, let's look at the QBs. This is a bit skewed because these days the QBs pussy out of the Pro Bowl...so you have 10 Pro Bowl QBs. Where, in 1970, each conference only had two QBs:

                  1970

                  John Brodie 6'1 198

                  Darryl Lamonica 6'4 215

                  Bob Griese 6'0 190

                  Fran Tarkenton 6'0 190

                  2017

                  Alex Smith 6'4 215

                  Ben R. 6'5 241

                  Derek Carr 6'3 218

                  Tom Brady 6'4 225

                  Andy Dalton 6'2 220

                  Drew Brees 6'0 209

                  Kirk Cousin 6'3 210

                  Dak Prescott 6'2 229

                  Aaron Rodgers 6'2 225

                  Matt Ryan 6'4 220

                  This group of QBs is overall taller than 1970 (I think the 1970 Pro Bowl group was pretty short...

                  thought 6'1 was a common height: Unitas, Bart Starr.

                  Others that may have made a Pro Bowl if they let in 10 guys could include the 6'5 Roman Gabriel. 6'4 Craig Morton. The 6'3 Terry Bradshaw, and a few others. But, yes, QBs today are generally taller.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • The GipperT The Gipper

                    @mjp28 said:

                    Just to complete the circle Olson and two other guys weighed 270# on the 1975 Rams. Blanda and other skilled players were getting hit by smaller dudes back then. It's strange when you go back in time and find out how your memory can play tricks on you....the steel curtain and fearsome foursome weren't really that big afterall.

                    http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/ram/1975_roster.htm

                    I think you are right....YOUR memory IS playing tricks on you. As I said....the size of nearly everyone back then is no smaller now than they are today except for OL....and actually just DTs/NTs.

                    DEs are about the same: Deacon Jones was 6'5" 275. Myles Garrett is 6'5" 271

                    Yes, DT Joe Greene was 275. DTs today do top 300. On defense ONLY DTs are bigger now than they were in the 60/70s.

                    As I said, most of the weight gain are with DTs and OL.

                    So, the answer is: bullshit....Blanda et al were NOT being hit by smaller guys. Except on rare occasions.

                    mjp28 mjp28M In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well Week One Done One Month Later One Year In
                    • 18k Posts
                    • 4k Reputation
                    mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by
                    #30

                    @the-gipper said:

                    I think you are right....YOUR memory IS playing tricks on you. As I said....the size of nearly everyone back then is no smaller now than they are today except for OL....and actually just DTs/NTs.

                    DEs are about the same: Deacon Jones was 6'5" 275. Myles Garrett is 6'5" 271

                    Yes, DT Joe Greene was 275. DTs today do top 300. On defense ONLY DTs are bigger now than they were in the 60/70s.

                    As I said, most of the weight gain are with DTs and OL.

                    So, the answer is: bullshit....Blanda et al were NOT being hit by smaller guys. Except on rare occasions.

                    I was replying to the Joe Greene and Merlin Olsen comment, they were the biggest guys on their teams and smaller than most NCAA and PRO players today. The 250, 260 guys would get crushed by the 300 and 310 today.

                    GO BUCKEYES, BROWNS, INDIANS, CAVS, YSU, NAVY and yes I like ND!
                    The GipperT 1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • Z Zombo

                      @mjp28 said:

                      1964 BROWNS only two 270# DEs on the team all the rest way less.

                      NOTE: NOT THE ROSTER I WANTED BUT CLOSE:

                      http://www.news-herald.com/article/HR/20141227/NEWS/141229705

                      1974 SB CHAMP STEELERS Joe Green 6' 4" 275# all the rest weigh less some much less. NO 300# dudes back then.

                      http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/pit/1974_roster.htm

                      Some of those dudes would have trouble making a 2017 roster. Different game now, even NCAA rosters are fast strong and B-I-G.

                      The lineman are bigger on both sides of the ball. Particularly on offense. Which would presume a qb like Blanda would actually be better protected today, not "killed" because the guys are bigger.

                      Z

                      mjp28 mjp28M In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well Week One Done One Month Later One Year In
                      • 18k Posts
                      • 4k Reputation
                      mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by
                      #31

                      Zombo said:

                      The lineman are bigger on both sides of the ball. Particularly on offense. Which would presume a qb like Blanda would actually be better protected today, not "killed" because the guys are bigger.

                      Z

                      But getting hit by today's bigger defensive players would have ended his career earlier.....hypothetically of course because 2000 guys can't play 1960 and 1970 guys. I'll bet anything if you ask them now they would agree that today's players are stronger, faster, bigger, deadlier.

                      All I've heard comment on it agree.

                      GO BUCKEYES, BROWNS, INDIANS, CAVS, YSU, NAVY and yes I like ND!
                      Z The GipperT 2 Replies Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • mjp28 mjp28M In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well Week One Done One Month Later One Year In
                        • 18k Posts
                        • 4k Reputation
                        mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by
                        #32

                        In the NFL, quarterbacks are bigger than ever. How big? At 6-foot-5 and 250 pounds, Cam Newton is bigger than most offensive linemen in the 1960s.

                        http://www.businessinsider.com/nfl-offensive-lineman-are-big-2011-10/#1920s-pierre-garon-wr-washington-redskins-1

                        Of course, nowadays, offensive linemen are much bigger than that. The average guard, tackle, or center in the NFL in 2015 is 6-foot-5, 312 pounds.

                        Of the 159 players who have started at least four games as an offensive lineman since the start of the 2014 season, only 23 weigh less than 300 pounds and 39 weigh at least 320 pounds.

                        To put the sizes in perspective, let's compare the average size for an offensive lineman through the years to an active player.

                        In the 1940s, the average offensive lineman was the same size as today's tall running backs, 6-foot-1, 221 pounds.

                        In the 1950s, the average offensive lineman was the same size as a quarterback today, 6-foot-2, 234 pounds.

                        In the 1960s, the average offensive lineman was the same size as today's linebackers, 6-foot-3, 251 pounds.

                        In the 1970s, the average offensive lineman was the same size as today's outside linebackers, 6-foot-3, 255 pounds.

                        In the 1980s, the average offensive lineman was the same size as today's defensive ends, 6-foot-4, 272 pounds.

                        In the 1990s, the average offensive lineman was the same size as today's bigger defensive ends, 6-foot-4, 300 pounds.

                        In the 2000s, the average offensive lineman was the same size as today's centers, 6-foot-4, 313 pounds.

                        In 2015, the Bryan Bulaga is the average offensive lineman at 6-foot-5, 312 pounds.

                        GO BUCKEYES, BROWNS, INDIANS, CAVS, YSU, NAVY and yes I like ND!
                        The GipperT 1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • mjp28M mjp28

                          Zombo said:

                          The lineman are bigger on both sides of the ball. Particularly on offense. Which would presume a qb like Blanda would actually be better protected today, not "killed" because the guys are bigger.

                          Z

                          But getting hit by today's bigger defensive players would have ended his career earlier.....hypothetically of course because 2000 guys can't play 1960 and 1970 guys. I'll bet anything if you ask them now they would agree that today's players are stronger, faster, bigger, deadlier.

                          All I've heard comment on it agree.

                          Zombo Z
                          • 8k Posts
                          • 0 Reputation
                          Z Zombo wrote on last edited by
                          #33

                          @mjp28 said:

                          But getting hit by today's bigger defensive players would have ended his career earlier.....hypothetically of course because 2000 guys can't play 1960 and 1970 guys. I'll bet anything if you ask them now they would agree that today's players are stronger, faster, bigger, deadlier.

                          All I've heard comment on it agree.

                          Not saying the players aren't physically more impressive. I'm saying he could still be a 40 year old 3rd string qb in this era coming off the bench leading comebacks

                          Brunnell, Moon, Testeverde, Flutie, Deberg ...all played in to their 40s in this era, none of them died.

                          Zombo

                          mjp28M The GipperT 2 Replies Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • The GipperT The Gipper

                            @mjp28 said:

                            Just to complete the circle Olson and two other guys weighed 270# on the 1975 Rams. Blanda and other skilled players were getting hit by smaller dudes back then. It's strange when you go back in time and find out how your memory can play tricks on you....the steel curtain and fearsome foursome weren't really that big afterall.

                            http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/ram/1975_roster.htm

                            I think you are right....YOUR memory IS playing tricks on you. As I said....the size of nearly everyone back then is no smaller now than they are today except for OL....and actually just DTs/NTs.

                            DEs are about the same: Deacon Jones was 6'5" 275. Myles Garrett is 6'5" 271

                            Yes, DT Joe Greene was 275. DTs today do top 300. On defense ONLY DTs are bigger now than they were in the 60/70s.

                            As I said, most of the weight gain are with DTs and OL.

                            So, the answer is: bullshit....Blanda et al were NOT being hit by smaller guys. Except on rare occasions.

                            Ghoolie GhoolieG One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                            • 2k Posts
                            • 1k Reputation
                            GhoolieG Ghoolie wrote on last edited by
                            #34

                            @the-gipper said:

                            I think you are right....YOUR memory IS playing tricks on you. As I said....the size of nearly everyone back then is no smaller now than they are today except for OL....and actually just DTs/NTs.

                            DEs are about the same: Deacon Jones was 6'5" 275. Myles Garrett is 6'5" 271

                            Yes, DT Joe Greene was 275. DTs today do top 300. On defense ONLY DTs are bigger now than they were in the 60/70s.

                            As I said, most of the weight gain are with DTs and OL.

                            So, the answer is: bullshit....Blanda et al were NOT being hit by smaller guys. Except on rare occasions.

                            Point of parlimentary procedure, today's players have greater muscle mass and speed. The impact today is far harder than in Blanda's day. Hence the much shorter NFL career expectancy today.

                            Players today don't use steroids any longer. Steroids which the liver converted to testosterone in the liver were the first technology to make more muscular, leaner players. Deacon Jones never had the muscle mass and speed that Garrett has, Today, all players take testosterone to get super lean and put on more muscle mass.

                            They are different Gipper, absolutely. In his day, at 6' 2" and 230 - 235 Jim Brown was a big back. Today, he would be average size. It isn't that today's players are bigger weight wise, as much as they have more muscle mass. If you look at individual size, your argument holds some water, but if you take the entire fraternity of football players? Today's guys would crush the 1964 Browns.Monte Clark at 6' 6" 265 was indeed big, but he was not built like today's guys.

                            Bigger? I think they are, and for sure collectively as the league. Those old guys were smooth skinned. These kids today are monsters.

                            The Cleveland Browns have the hardest hit players in the NFL
                            The GipperT 1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • Z Zombo

                              @mjp28 said:

                              But getting hit by today's bigger defensive players would have ended his career earlier.....hypothetically of course because 2000 guys can't play 1960 and 1970 guys. I'll bet anything if you ask them now they would agree that today's players are stronger, faster, bigger, deadlier.

                              All I've heard comment on it agree.

                              Not saying the players aren't physically more impressive. I'm saying he could still be a 40 year old 3rd string qb in this era coming off the bench leading comebacks

                              Brunnell, Moon, Testeverde, Flutie, Deberg ...all played in to their 40s in this era, none of them died.

                              Zombo

                              mjp28 mjp28M In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well Week One Done One Month Later One Year In
                              • 18k Posts
                              • 4k Reputation
                              mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by
                              #35

                              Zombo said:

                              Not saying the players aren't physically more impressive. I'm saying he could still be a 40 year old 3rd string qb in this era coming off the bench leading comebacks

                              Brunnell, Moon, Testeverde, Flutie, Deberg ...all played in to their 40s in this era, none of them died.

                              Zombo

                              Flutie was the amazing one to me out of that bunch small but a smart gamer. And if you keep yourself in decent shape now and are versatile enough you can always find a job as a backup QB with the rate QBs are going down now even with all the protect the QB rules now.

                              GO BUCKEYES, BROWNS, INDIANS, CAVS, YSU, NAVY and yes I like ND!
                              1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • mjp28M mjp28

                                @the-gipper said:

                                I think you are right....YOUR memory IS playing tricks on you. As I said....the size of nearly everyone back then is no smaller now than they are today except for OL....and actually just DTs/NTs.

                                DEs are about the same: Deacon Jones was 6'5" 275. Myles Garrett is 6'5" 271

                                Yes, DT Joe Greene was 275. DTs today do top 300. On defense ONLY DTs are bigger now than they were in the 60/70s.

                                As I said, most of the weight gain are with DTs and OL.

                                So, the answer is: bullshit....Blanda et al were NOT being hit by smaller guys. Except on rare occasions.

                                I was replying to the Joe Greene and Merlin Olsen comment, they were the biggest guys on their teams and smaller than most NCAA and PRO players today. The 250, 260 guys would get crushed by the 300 and 310 today.

                                The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                                • 57k Posts
                                • 4k Reputation
                                The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                                #36

                                @mjp28 said:

                                I was replying to the Joe Greene and Merlin Olsen comment, they were the biggest guys on their teams and smaller than most NCAA and PRO players today. The 250, 260 guys would get crushed by the 300 and 310 today.

                                You are trying to do a dance. That is not what your original post implied. You asserted it for basically every position.

                                Besides....what would you rather have....a 270 lb. Joe Greene and Merlin Olsen...or some of the 300 pound blobs that play these days.

                                I would put my money on the old guys to handle things. And, as I said....if those guys had needed to put on and extra 25 pounds to play today, they easily could have done so.

                                hoortaH 1 Reply Last reply
                                Quote Reply
                                • mjp28M mjp28

                                  Zombo said:

                                  The lineman are bigger on both sides of the ball. Particularly on offense. Which would presume a qb like Blanda would actually be better protected today, not "killed" because the guys are bigger.

                                  Z

                                  But getting hit by today's bigger defensive players would have ended his career earlier.....hypothetically of course because 2000 guys can't play 1960 and 1970 guys. I'll bet anything if you ask them now they would agree that today's players are stronger, faster, bigger, deadlier.

                                  All I've heard comment on it agree.

                                  The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                                  • 57k Posts
                                  • 4k Reputation
                                  The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                                  #37

                                  @mjp28 said:

                                  But getting hit by today's bigger defensive players would have ended his career earlier.....hypothetically of course because 2000 guys can't play 1960 and 1970 guys. I'll bet anything if you ask them now they would agree that today's players are stronger, faster, bigger, deadlier.

                                  All I've heard comment on it agree.

                                  Again....maybe 2 defensive players of today are bigger than they were in those days. The DTs. I have demonstrated the fact that the DEs, LBs, DBs are NOT any bigger today than they were then. And I don't agree that today's players are stronger, faster, or deadlier...only a couple of them are bigger (OL and DTs...and that is it).

                                  Do you really think that the likes of Ryan Shazier and Christian Kirksey are deadlier than Dick Butkus and Ray Nitschke were? And you forgot one critical term: tougher.

                                  They have different training techniques now perhaps....that is all.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • mjp28M mjp28

                                    In the NFL, quarterbacks are bigger than ever. How big? At 6-foot-5 and 250 pounds, Cam Newton is bigger than most offensive linemen in the 1960s.

                                    http://www.businessinsider.com/nfl-offensive-lineman-are-big-2011-10/#1920s-pierre-garon-wr-washington-redskins-1

                                    Of course, nowadays, offensive linemen are much bigger than that. The average guard, tackle, or center in the NFL in 2015 is 6-foot-5, 312 pounds.

                                    Of the 159 players who have started at least four games as an offensive lineman since the start of the 2014 season, only 23 weigh less than 300 pounds and 39 weigh at least 320 pounds.

                                    To put the sizes in perspective, let's compare the average size for an offensive lineman through the years to an active player.

                                    In the 1940s, the average offensive lineman was the same size as today's tall running backs, 6-foot-1, 221 pounds.

                                    In the 1950s, the average offensive lineman was the same size as a quarterback today, 6-foot-2, 234 pounds.

                                    In the 1960s, the average offensive lineman was the same size as today's linebackers, 6-foot-3, 251 pounds.

                                    In the 1970s, the average offensive lineman was the same size as today's outside linebackers, 6-foot-3, 255 pounds.

                                    In the 1980s, the average offensive lineman was the same size as today's defensive ends, 6-foot-4, 272 pounds.

                                    In the 1990s, the average offensive lineman was the same size as today's bigger defensive ends, 6-foot-4, 300 pounds.

                                    In the 2000s, the average offensive lineman was the same size as today's centers, 6-foot-4, 313 pounds.

                                    In 2015, the Bryan Bulaga is the average offensive lineman at 6-foot-5, 312 pounds.

                                    The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                                    • 57k Posts
                                    • 4k Reputation
                                    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                                    #38

                                    @mjp28 said:

                                    In the NFL, quarterbacks are bigger than ever. How big? At 6-foot-5 and 250 pounds, Cam Newton is bigger than most offensive linemen in the 1960s.

                                    http://www.businessinsider.com/nfl-offensive-lineman-are-big-2011-10/#1920s-pierre-garon-wr-washington-redskins-1

                                    Of course, nowadays, offensive linemen are much bigger than that. The average guard, tackle, or center in the NFL in 2015 is 6-foot-5, 312 pounds.

                                    Of the 159 players who have started at least four games as an offensive lineman since the start of the 2014 season, only 23 weigh less than 300 pounds and 39 weigh at least 320 pounds.

                                    To put the sizes in perspective, let's compare the average size for an offensive lineman through the years to an active player.

                                    In the 1940s, the average offensive lineman was the same size as today's tall running backs, 6-foot-1, 221 pounds.

                                    In the 1950s, the average offensive lineman was the same size as a quarterback today, 6-foot-2, 234 pounds.

                                    In the 1960s, the average offensive lineman was the same size as today's linebackers, 6-foot-3, 251 pounds.

                                    In the 1970s, the average offensive lineman was the same size as today's outside linebackers, 6-foot-3, 255 pounds.

                                    In the 1980s, the average offensive lineman was the same size as today's defensive ends, 6-foot-4, 272 pounds.

                                    In the 1990s, the average offensive lineman was the same size as today's bigger defensive ends, 6-foot-4, 300 pounds.

                                    In the 2000s, the average offensive lineman was the same size as today's centers, 6-foot-4, 313 pounds.

                                    In 2015, the Bryan Bulaga is the average offensive lineman at 6-foot-5, 312 pounds.

                                    Again.....the point that offensive linemen are fatter now is not disputed. They are the only position besides DTs that have gotten bigger.

                                    DEs are the same. DBs are the same. LBs are the same. RBs are the same. WRs may actually be overall smaller now.

                                    QBs are slightly taller. (but we have 6-0 QBs today...as they had then....and we have 6-4 QBs now that they had then. Now we may just have a few more in the taller range.

                                    FlugelF 1 Reply Last reply
                                    Quote Reply
                                    • Z Zombo

                                      @mjp28 said:

                                      But getting hit by today's bigger defensive players would have ended his career earlier.....hypothetically of course because 2000 guys can't play 1960 and 1970 guys. I'll bet anything if you ask them now they would agree that today's players are stronger, faster, bigger, deadlier.

                                      All I've heard comment on it agree.

                                      Not saying the players aren't physically more impressive. I'm saying he could still be a 40 year old 3rd string qb in this era coming off the bench leading comebacks

                                      Brunnell, Moon, Testeverde, Flutie, Deberg ...all played in to their 40s in this era, none of them died.

                                      Zombo

                                      The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                                      • 57k Posts
                                      • 4k Reputation
                                      The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                                      #39

                                      Zombo said:

                                      Not saying the players aren't physically more impressive. I'm saying he could still be a 40 year old 3rd string qb in this era coming off the bench leading comebacks

                                      Brunnell, Moon, Testeverde, Flutie, Deberg ...all played in to their 40s in this era, none of them died.

                                      Zombo

                                      And Blanda was 6'2 220.

                                      10 starting QBs in the league last year were 6'2 or under. (including Griffin)

                                      This year, if DeShaun Watson and Cody Kessler start that would be 2 others that I can think of off the top of my head that are 6'2.

                                      (and Kessler is only 215 lbs.).

                                      So....if whomever claims that a QB that size can't play the game now.....10-11-12 teams need to start looking for new QBs.

                                      And I guess that means they would advocate for Osweiler over Kessler.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      Quote Reply
                                      • GhoolieG Ghoolie

                                        @the-gipper said:

                                        I think you are right....YOUR memory IS playing tricks on you. As I said....the size of nearly everyone back then is no smaller now than they are today except for OL....and actually just DTs/NTs.

                                        DEs are about the same: Deacon Jones was 6'5" 275. Myles Garrett is 6'5" 271

                                        Yes, DT Joe Greene was 275. DTs today do top 300. On defense ONLY DTs are bigger now than they were in the 60/70s.

                                        As I said, most of the weight gain are with DTs and OL.

                                        So, the answer is: bullshit....Blanda et al were NOT being hit by smaller guys. Except on rare occasions.

                                        Point of parlimentary procedure, today's players have greater muscle mass and speed. The impact today is far harder than in Blanda's day. Hence the much shorter NFL career expectancy today.

                                        Players today don't use steroids any longer. Steroids which the liver converted to testosterone in the liver were the first technology to make more muscular, leaner players. Deacon Jones never had the muscle mass and speed that Garrett has, Today, all players take testosterone to get super lean and put on more muscle mass.

                                        They are different Gipper, absolutely. In his day, at 6' 2" and 230 - 235 Jim Brown was a big back. Today, he would be average size. It isn't that today's players are bigger weight wise, as much as they have more muscle mass. If you look at individual size, your argument holds some water, but if you take the entire fraternity of football players? Today's guys would crush the 1964 Browns.Monte Clark at 6' 6" 265 was indeed big, but he was not built like today's guys.

                                        Bigger? I think they are, and for sure collectively as the league. Those old guys were smooth skinned. These kids today are monsters.

                                        The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                                        • 57k Posts
                                        • 4k Reputation
                                        The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                                        #40

                                        @ghoolie said:

                                        Point of parlimentary procedure, today's players have greater muscle mass and speed. The impact today is far harder than in Blanda's day. Hence the much shorter NFL career expectancy today.

                                        Players today don't use steroids any longer. Steroids which the liver converted to testosterone in the liver were the first technology to make more muscular, leaner players. Deacon Jones never had the muscle mass and speed that Garrett has, Today, all players take testosterone to get super lean and put on more muscle mass.

                                        They are different Gipper, absolutely. In his day, at 6' 2" and 230 - 235 Jim Brown was a big back. Today, he would be average size. It isn't that today's players are bigger weight wise, as much as they have more muscle mass. If you look at individual size, your argument holds some water, but if you take the entire fraternity of football players? Today's guys would crush the 1964 Browns.Monte Clark at 6' 6" 265 was indeed big, but he was not built like today's guys.

                                        Bigger? I think they are, and for sure collectively as the league. Those old guys were smooth skinned. These kids today are monsters.

                                        I was just looking at their height and weight.......and I conceded that today's players have different nutritional advantages....(performance enhancement drug advantages?) and do more weight training. But mjp implied that SIMPLY due to their height/weight that those players would be killed. And of course, that is absurd..because overall except for OL and DTs they are the same height/weight. Given the same weight training/conditioning/nutrition...and drugs? those players would have been able to perform just fine in today's game.

                                        Besides....it seems like there was a suggestion that players in the 60s and 70s didn't know what a fucking bar bell was. They sure as fuck did. For the most part they were lifting dead weights....and didn't have the machines players use today. They knew how to lift and curl a 100 pound dumbell.

                                        GhoolieG 1 Reply Last reply
                                        Quote Reply
                                        • The GipperT The Gipper

                                          @mjp28 said:

                                          In the NFL, quarterbacks are bigger than ever. How big? At 6-foot-5 and 250 pounds, Cam Newton is bigger than most offensive linemen in the 1960s.

                                          http://www.businessinsider.com/nfl-offensive-lineman-are-big-2011-10/#1920s-pierre-garon-wr-washington-redskins-1

                                          Of course, nowadays, offensive linemen are much bigger than that. The average guard, tackle, or center in the NFL in 2015 is 6-foot-5, 312 pounds.

                                          Of the 159 players who have started at least four games as an offensive lineman since the start of the 2014 season, only 23 weigh less than 300 pounds and 39 weigh at least 320 pounds.

                                          To put the sizes in perspective, let's compare the average size for an offensive lineman through the years to an active player.

                                          In the 1940s, the average offensive lineman was the same size as today's tall running backs, 6-foot-1, 221 pounds.

                                          In the 1950s, the average offensive lineman was the same size as a quarterback today, 6-foot-2, 234 pounds.

                                          In the 1960s, the average offensive lineman was the same size as today's linebackers, 6-foot-3, 251 pounds.

                                          In the 1970s, the average offensive lineman was the same size as today's outside linebackers, 6-foot-3, 255 pounds.

                                          In the 1980s, the average offensive lineman was the same size as today's defensive ends, 6-foot-4, 272 pounds.

                                          In the 1990s, the average offensive lineman was the same size as today's bigger defensive ends, 6-foot-4, 300 pounds.

                                          In the 2000s, the average offensive lineman was the same size as today's centers, 6-foot-4, 313 pounds.

                                          In 2015, the Bryan Bulaga is the average offensive lineman at 6-foot-5, 312 pounds.

                                          Again.....the point that offensive linemen are fatter now is not disputed. They are the only position besides DTs that have gotten bigger.

                                          DEs are the same. DBs are the same. LBs are the same. RBs are the same. WRs may actually be overall smaller now.

                                          QBs are slightly taller. (but we have 6-0 QBs today...as they had then....and we have 6-4 QBs now that they had then. Now we may just have a few more in the taller range.

                                          Flugel FlugelF Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                          • 11k Posts
                                          • 6k Reputation
                                          FlugelF Flugel wrote on last edited by
                                          #41

                                          @the-gipper said:

                                          Again.....the point that offensive linemen are fatter now is not disputed. They are the only position besides DTs that have gotten bigger.

                                          DEs are the same. DBs are the same. LBs are the same. RBs are the same. WRs may actually be overall smaller now.

                                          QBs are slightly taller. (but we have 6-0 QBs today...as they had then....and we have 6-4 QBs now that they had then. Now we may just have a few more in the taller range.

                                          RBs are not the same. Greg Pruitt was 190 lbs and Walter Payton didn't weigh that much more. Dorsett wasn't much different. Now days, if they're only 205 lbs - the concern is they aren't big enough for a full workload. Most of your RBs now range between 215 and 225 lbs and higher. Way different than the 70s and 80s aside from a few exceptions to the rules and/or Pittsburgh Steeroids.

                                          WRs seem bigger overall to me today here's some examples and I'm leaving a bunch of guys out:

                                          Kenny Britt is 6'3"

                                          Julio Jones is 6'3"

                                          Dez Bryant is 6'2"

                                          Kelvin Benjamin is 6'5"

                                          Mike Evans is 6'5"

                                          Cameron Meredith is 6'3"

                                          Brandon Marshall is 6'4"

                                          Larry Fitzgerald is 6'3"

                                          AJ Green is 6'4"

                                          Terrelle Pryor is 6'4"

                                          Martavis Bryant is 6'4"

                                          Damryius Thomas is 6'3"

                                          Allen Robinson is 6'4"

                                          LaQuan Treadwell is 6'2"

                                          Marvin Jones Jr is 6'2"

                                          Jordan Matthews is 6'3"

                                          Cooper Kupp is 6'2"

                                          Josh Reynolds is 6'3"

                                          Adam Thielen is 6'2"

                                          Jordy Nelson is 6'3"

                                          Noah Brown is 6'2"

                                          Bandon Coleman is 6'6"

                                          Michael Thomas is 6'3"

                                          Rueben Randle is 6'2"

                                          Corey Davis is 6'3"

                                          Tajae Sharpe is 6'2"

                                          Eric Decker is 6'3"

                                          Quincy Enunwa is 6'2"

                                          Josh Hunter is 6'4"

                                          Darrius Heward-Bey is 6'2"

                                          Tyler Boyd is 6'2"

                                          DeVante Parker is 6'3"

                                          Calvin Johnson is 6'5" (retired a couple years ago-but considered this era)

                                          I welcome the only Defensive Coordinator to earn a Superbowl Ring in New Orleans while understanding Revenge of the Nerds is a sequel. "Come get some!"
                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Quote Reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Theme
                                          • System
                                          • Light
                                          • Dark
                                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Forums
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Donate