"Browns' hierarchy seems to prefer Derek Anderson over fan-favorite Brady Quinn"
-
okay well I'll explain a scenario for you:
He gets beat out in camp
You seem very confident. Please take Inspeca's bet, Lum. Quinn starts the season, you leave. DA starts, he leaves.
I will even sweeten it by PayPaling the winner one hundred US dollars the very day the starter is named, or you guys can name someone here you'd like to act as a sort of escrow account. Or, i could give the money to the charity of your choice in your name, complete with a receipt of payment. Your choice, but this deal needs to go down.
mz. said:
I will even sweeten it by PayPaling the winner one hundred US dollars the very day the starter is namedhow about I give you 1k if you agree to stop J.O.ing to your Brady Quinn fathead?
-
mz. said:
I will even sweeten it by PayPaling the winner one hundred US dollars the very day the starter is namedhow about I give you 1k if you agree to stop J.O.ing to your Brady Quinn fathead?
-
Greythan I'd suggest you read all my posts in this thread before you claim my logic being faulty...
I posted "Quinn should have started last year in the 1st game of the season-------Whoever called that shot (not starting Quinn) should have been fired and in retrospect, he was...."
I've also stated several times that I feel Quinn should be playing and given ample time to prove or disprove his value...
Seems you're handling my posts in the same way you use to evaluate Quinn... You take a sentence or a very small sampling and then come to a conclusion that favors your argument... At times Quinn's play show me that he is something special but other times he looks too much like Charlie Frye in his execution....BTW, the same man drafted both of those QB's.... Was he a total idiot on one selection and then a geneous on the other????? BTW, Savage drafted all 3 QB's.....
Admittedly I was out of the loop last year and didn't see over 95% of the games (didn't see one game in its entirety), but I do recall that Anderson got hurt in preseason which caused Quinn to get all the snaps in practice... That was his opportunity to COMPETE for the starting position so I don't see how Shep can claim he never got a chance... Wasn't Bernie thrown into the fire due to an injury then his play made the incumbant expendable.... Quinn had the same chance but for whatever reason couldn't pull the switch.....
And if your gonna use Quinns cameo against the niners and give creedance to the 2 dropped passes that should have gone for touchdowns then in all fairness you have to use the numerous dropped passes that Anderson had to endure when calculating his effectiveness as a passer,,,, Whats fair is fair, whats spin is spin....
It's also my opinion that the Browns have no intention in trading either QB since both are coming off an injury from last season.... There was something like 65 different starting QB's last season showing that a good backup may be the difference to a winning or losing season.... However with the Ratliff on board we might see some movement during camp if another team has a dire need and is willing to over pay.....
peace
T.Dawg
-
does anybody know who lum is?
guns don't kill kids-pitt bulls do. -
poor riff, you're just still "flabbergasted" that NFL coaches don't think shit of your boy when you got a permanent hard on for him.
As opposed to your boy DA who had zero trade offers for him. At least there are articles that circulated saying at least 2 teams offered 1st round picks this year for Quinn (along with the rumor of DEN interest when they were dropping Cutler). That is more than can be said about DA.
-
-
@shepwrite said:
When he came in, Lum, he had a 104 passer rating in his first start. It's the one and only healthy regular season game we have to go on. His only other healthy regular season play was his cameo against SF the year before... when he looked very strong and threw two TD passes that were dropped.That's what we have and it's at least promising. He did nothing to convince a team to go against the grain and NOT give their first round QB a chance to start a string of games.
You keep touting that 104 passer rating, it was against a team with a 98.5 passing defense rating. The good defenses in the NFL are allowing passers ratings in the 60s & 70s. Whoohoo, BQ threw barely better than the average quarterback did against one of the worst passing defenses in the NFL!!!
He's so awesome!
You keep touting that 104 passer rating, it was against a team with a 98.5 passing defense rating. The good defenses in the NFL are allowing passers ratings in the 60s & 70s. Whoohoo, BQ threw barely better than the average quarterback did against one of the worst passing defenses in the NFL!!!
He's so awesome!
Yawn! Remind me, what did DA do against that "fantastic" Cincy D when the playoffs were on the line?
Oh, and you are comparing what DEN did against mostly established QBs vs. a guy in his first career start. Apples and Oranges chief.
-
does anybody know who lum is?
does anybody know who lum is?
-
does anybody know who lum is?
I never imagined he was that tall or manly.
-
Only the psychotic would think Quinn's rating matters. He doesn't have the numbers to conclude anything.
okay so why don't you tell that to shep and his "GREATEST FIRST GAME AS A STARTER PASSER RATING IN THE ENTIRE HISTORY OF BROWNS FOOTBALL" argument?
okay so why don't you tell that to shep and his "GREATEST FIRST GAME AS A STARTER PASSER RATING IN THE ENTIRE HISTORY OF BROWNS FOOTBALL" argument?
DA's numbers mean something because he's played enough games. The numbers show a 32nd ranked passer.
Quinn's 104 doesn't mean anything from a mathematical standpoint, but it does give a glimpse into what could be. Nobody here is suggesting you plug in Quinn's 104 and therefore he is a top ranked NFL QB and a proven commodity. But most here agree the glimpse from his one healthy game gives weight to the idea he deserves a solid chance. His 104 was based on a few days of prep with minimal snaps with the starting team to that point. The other games his finger was broken.
Quinn will start.
-
Question: Has any QB EVER been the league's lowest rated passer and subsequently enjoyed success?
I'm too lazy to research it, but its a curious thought.
-
Question: Has any QB EVER been the league's lowest rated passer and subsequently enjoyed success?
I'm too lazy to research it, but its a curious thought.
-
Watching DA drive us to glory last season was the emotional equivilant of being held down and having a pineapple shoved up you @ss.
Watching step on the field you got that same feeling of dread, this is going to hurt like hell and there's nothing you can do about it.
-
Question: Has any QB EVER been the league's lowest rated passer and subsequently enjoyed success?
I'm too lazy to research it, but its a curious thought.
Question: Has any QB EVER been the league's lowest rated passer and subsequently enjoyed success?
I'm too lazy to research it, but its a curious thought.
Dilfer came to mind so i looked him up. He had a 76 rating the year before his Superbowl and a 76 rating the year of his Superbowl. His career rating was 70. i'm sure there are others.
-
-
Eli Manning had a 55.4 his first year as a starter... but more importantly, had a 73something the year he won the Superbowl (same post season Shep referred to him as one of the "elite" QBs in the league) and has only topped a 77 once (took him 5 years of starting to match DA's first year efficiency rating).
If DA's still here in a few months, it's probably because the coaches feel he was affected by the concussion and surrounded by a team with issues this last season.
-
Eli Manning had a 55.4 his first year as a starter... but more importantly, had a 73something the year he won the Superbowl (same post season Shep referred to him as one of the "elite" QBs in the league) and has only topped a 77 once (took him 5 years of starting to match DA's first year efficiency rating).
If DA's still here in a few months, it's probably because the coaches feel he was affected by the concussion and surrounded by a team with issues this last season.
Eli Manning had a 55.4 his first year as a starter... but more importantly, had a 73something the year he won the Superbowl (same post season Shep referred to him as one of the "elite" QBs in the league) and has only topped a 77 once (took him 5 years of starting to match DA's first year efficiency rating).
If DA's still here in a few months, it's probably because the coaches feel he was affected by the concussion and surrounded by a team with issues this last season.
Keep in mind Eli's first year starting was as a wide eyed rookie, not a guy who was in his third season in the league (which DA was in 2007). You can knock Shep for his comment in during the 2007 post season, but what was Eli's QBR during the SB run? That's right, a 95.7 QBR. Now certainly over each guys first 31 starts they are about even. But Eli has shown more growth as a player over that span, along with growth from HS to college and college to the pros. That hasn't exactly been DA's trend.
I think DA will be here in a few months, but not because the staff feels the concussion (it was 1 in preseason week 1, he would have been over the effects long before he lost his job to Quinn) or it was a talent around him issue. But rather in the NFL it doesn't hurt to have two decent QBs on the roster. DA has good value as a back up. Plus the staff hasn't had a real chance to work with either guy, or know that much about them other than what they see on tape. What's on tape won't always tell you what play was actually called. The staff has to feel out both guys and would be unwise to make a rash decision.
-
Zombo said:
Actually, up until the last decade it was a Who's Who of Super Bowl winning qbs:
Terry Bradshaw 1970
Jim Plunkett 1972
Archie Manning 1975
Steve Deberg 1978
Doug Williams 1979
Phil Simms 1980
John Elway 1983
Vinnie Testeverde 1988
Troy Aikman 1989
Trent Dilfer 1995
Kerry Collins 1997
Jake Plummer 1999
Jon Kitna 2000
Kyle Orton 2005
Bradshaw (4), Aikman (3), Plunkett (2), Elway (2), Simms (2), Williams and Dilfer combined to win 15 Super Bowls (if you count simms twice instead of once). Throw in Mark Rypien who became the lowest rated passer subsequent to winning a SB and you have 8 different guys that won SBs that were once the lowest passer in the league. Collins made it too. Manning, Deberg, Testeverde, Plummer and Kitna all had at least decent careers after being the worst, and Orton has the potential to have a decent career .... so DA is not alone that regard.
What those guys all had in common (except Rypien) was that they were young QBs on bad teams. That's what happens. When your #1 receiver can't catch a cold and your #2 is some guy named Steptoe and your o-line constantly caves on the right and up the middle, and your running back gets you maybe 3.5, and you play the Steelers and Ravens four times and the NFC East another four .... bad things happen.
Let's take the knife out of Derek. That team sucked. The offense, the defense, the coaching ... no one was going to survive in that offense ... and no one did.
Zombo
Most of that is all well and good, but it doesn't explain away the back half of DA's 2007 season. You can also break down most of those guys and see growth and improvement from start 1 to 25, as well as from HS to college, and college to the pros.
DA of course still has a chance to develop as a QB, but based on his track record, I will be surprised if it is ever greater than a marginal improvement.
-
Zombo said:
Actually, up until the last decade it was a Who's Who of Super Bowl winning qbs:
Terry Bradshaw 1970
Jim Plunkett 1972
Archie Manning 1975
Steve Deberg 1978
Doug Williams 1979
Phil Simms 1980
John Elway 1983
Vinnie Testeverde 1988
Troy Aikman 1989
Trent Dilfer 1995
Kerry Collins 1997
Jake Plummer 1999
Jon Kitna 2000
Kyle Orton 2005
Bradshaw (4), Aikman (3), Plunkett (2), Elway (2), Simms (2), Williams and Dilfer combined to win 15 Super Bowls (if you count simms twice instead of once). Throw in Mark Rypien who became the lowest rated passer subsequent to winning a SB and you have 8 different guys that won SBs that were once the lowest passer in the league. Collins made it too. Manning, Deberg, Testeverde, Plummer and Kitna all had at least decent careers after being the worst, and Orton has the potential to have a decent career .... so DA is not alone that regard.
What those guys all had in common (except Rypien) was that they were young QBs on bad teams. That's what happens. When your #1 receiver can't catch a cold and your #2 is some guy named Steptoe and your o-line constantly caves on the right and up the middle, and your running back gets you maybe 3.5, and you play the Steelers and Ravens four times and the NFC East another four .... bad things happen.
Let's take the knife out of Derek. That team sucked. The offense, the defense, the coaching ... no one was going to survive in that offense ... and no one did.
Zombo
Most of that is all well and good, but it doesn't explain away the back half of DA's 2007 season. You can also break down most of those guys and see growth and improvement from start 1 to 25, as well as from HS to college, and college to the pros.
DA of course still has a chance to develop as a QB, but based on his track record, I will be surprised if it is ever greater than a marginal improvement.
Masters said:
Most of that is all well and good, but it doesn't explain away the back half of DA's 2007 season.the sleet vs the Jets, snow vs Buffalo, and wind in Cincy take care of that explanation.
it's tougher to pass in December. completion percentages go down. happens every year. happened to the QBs on the teams the Browns were playing against.
wanna guess Kellen Clemens' rating in the Jets game? Trent Edwards' rating in the buffalo game? Carson Palmer in Cincy? That's how it goes in weeks 14-15-16.
Quinn pumpers such as yourself just never paid any attention to QB stats before.
how's Quinn's qb rating trending by the way?
-
okay so why don't you tell that to shep and his "GREATEST FIRST GAME AS A STARTER PASSER RATING IN THE ENTIRE HISTORY OF BROWNS FOOTBALL" argument?
DA's numbers mean something because he's played enough games. The numbers show a 32nd ranked passer.
Quinn's 104 doesn't mean anything from a mathematical standpoint, but it does give a glimpse into what could be. Nobody here is suggesting you plug in Quinn's 104 and therefore he is a top ranked NFL QB and a proven commodity. But most here agree the glimpse from his one healthy game gives weight to the idea he deserves a solid chance. His 104 was based on a few days of prep with minimal snaps with the starting team to that point. The other games his finger was broken.
Quinn will start.
Quinn's 104 doesn't mean anything from a mathematical standpoint, but it does give a glimpse into what could be.
Denver wasn't expecting the dink and dunk were they? Understandable, they only had 3 days to look at tape.
Too bad for him they figured him out by halftime.
It was all downhill from there. He hasn't thrown a TD since. 9 quarters.
Has DA ever gone 9 quarters without a TD pass? Maybe Greythan should look it up.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login