Apparently Browns “not enamored” with any of the top QBs
-
He’s not a unicorn, he just has the discipline to put in his body what humans are supposed to eat. (Plants)
Kyrie went plant-based too, if he sticks with it he’ll be ageless as well
just got a new cook book called How Not To Die and there are some damn good plant based recipes in there so as of now I'm cooking 2-3 times a week outta that book
edit this is a edit I have also lost a few pounds since using that cook book
-
Always have your ears open. I would think every team is willing to hear about their picks. No fault in listening.
I think it is just a never say never about anything situation. If someone came knocking hard for any of the Browns picks...it behooves them to listen...even if they ultimately say no:
and what does that say along with the quote that they are not enamored with any of the QB'S When we do draft one #1 I'm sure he is not really gonna feel the love coming from are team and if you think that doe's not matter you better think again
and what does that say along with the quote that they are not enamored with any of the QB'S When we do draft one #1 I'm sure he is not really gonna feel the love coming from are team and if you think that doe's not matter you better think again
I am sure a kid who got picked number one in the NFL draft will be deeply emotionally scarred by predraft smokescreen talk....
-
-
and what does that say along with the quote that they are not enamored with any of the QB'S When we do draft one #1 I'm sure he is not really gonna feel the love coming from are team and if you think that doe's not matter you better think again
I am sure a kid who got picked number one in the NFL draft will be deeply emotionally scarred by predraft smokescreen talk....
I am sure a kid who got picked number one in the NFL draft will be deeply emotionally scarred by predraft smokescreen talk....
ya it doe's make a Shmucking difference for a young possible franchise QB coming into the league for their psyche why in the Shmuck would you even want to take a goddamn chance on anything going wrong for the face of the franchise you tell that motherShmucker all along he was their guy (even if it's not true) so you do not Shmuck with their head
but for you it's all about the money bet you were a big manziel fan when we drafted him
-
I am sure a kid who got picked number one in the NFL draft will be deeply emotionally scarred by predraft smokescreen talk....
ya it doe's make a Shmucking difference for a young possible franchise QB coming into the league for their psyche why in the Shmuck would you even want to take a goddamn chance on anything going wrong for the face of the franchise you tell that motherShmucker all along he was their guy (even if it's not true) so you do not Shmuck with their head
but for you it's all about the money bet you were a big manziel fan when we drafted him
ya it doe's make a Shmucking difference for a young possible franchise QB coming into the league for their psyche why in the Shmuck would you even want to take a goddamn chance on anything going wrong for the face of the franchise you tell that motherShmucker all along he was their guy (even if it's not true) so you do not Shmuck with their head
but for you it's all about the money bet you were a big manziel fan when we drafted him
You think these kids don’t know how the game has to be played predraft? Kids are so savvy now that they are skipping bowl games to not risk draft status.
Not quite sure where Manziel fits into your autistic screeching but no I wasn’t a fan at all.
-
He’s not a unicorn, he just has the discipline to put in his body what humans are supposed to eat. (Plants)
Kyrie went plant-based too, if he sticks with it he’ll be ageless as well
Our caveman ancestors would disagree with that notion.
-
You draft Barkley at # 1
Then the QB of the future at # 4
I see what you're saying, but if you're the BROWNS of ALL the teams in the league, you simply can't take a chance on not getting the QB you have rated the highest. There's simply no excuse, when you have the #1 and the #4 picks, NOT to draft the guy you have ranked ahead of everybody. We're the Browns, the team above all others that have been absolutely TORTURED by the QB position, and now we have the #1 pick, a chance to take whoever we want, and we need to grab the guy we like the best.
Think about what happens if we take Saquon first overall. That leaves two picks before our #4. Two chances for other teams to either draft the QB we like the best or make an insane trade with a team who wants to move up to draft one. Does Saquon look like a crazy-awesome prospect? Would he immediately help us score points? Heck yes, but NOTHING matters until you get the QB position right, and NO team knows that more than the Browns! We can pick whichever QB we want, and nothing can change that. We have the first pick and we literally get to select who we WANT. We don't get cute, we don't try to maximize our draft capital and trade down, we don't draft a RB #1, and if Saquon is available at #4, then we look at drafting him, but if it's me, I take Minkah Fitzpatrick all day. Look at the RB's who were drafted after the first round last year and still did great. Kareem Hunt? Kamara? Dorsey will find our stud RB in the 2nd or 3rd round, he's done it before.
Baker Mayfield should be drafted #1, and the ONLY other guy I'd be ok with is Rosen. Oh, and if we draft Josh Allen, I will comb the planet to find an experimental "Total Recall" procedure and have the doctor implant memories of me being a Patriots fan because Allen looks like a complete JOKE to me. He's Paxton Lynch 2.0, and I have NO IDEA why he's getting a pass on his horrible accuracy and terrible numbers.
I see what you're saying, but if you're the BROWNS of ALL the teams in the league, you simply can't take a chance on not getting the QB you have rated the highest. There's simply no excuse, when you have the #1 and the #4 picks, NOT to draft the guy you have ranked ahead of everybody. We're the Browns, the team above all others that have been absolutely TORTURED by the QB position, and now we have the #1 pick, a chance to take whoever we want, and we need to grab the guy we like the best.
Think about what happens if we take Saquon first overall. That leaves two picks before our #4. Two chances for other teams to either draft the QB we like the best or make an insane trade with a team who wants to move up to draft one. Does Saquon look like a crazy-awesome prospect? Would he immediately help us score points? Heck yes, but NOTHING matters until you get the QB position right, and NO team knows that more than the Browns! We can pick whichever QB we want, and nothing can change that. We have the first pick and we literally get to select who we WANT. We don't get cute, we don't try to maximize our draft capital and trade down, we don't draft a RB #1, and if Saquon is available at #4, then we look at drafting him, but if it's me, I take Minkah Fitzpatrick all day. Look at the RB's who were drafted after the first round last year and still did great. Kareem Hunt? Kamara? Dorsey will find our stud RB in the 2nd or 3rd round, he's done it before.
Baker Mayfield should be drafted #1, and the ONLY other guy I'd be ok with is Rosen. Oh, and if we draft Josh Allen, I will comb the planet to find an experimental "Total Recall" procedure and have the doctor implant memories of me being a Patriots fan because Allen looks like a complete JOKE to me. He's Paxton Lynch 2.0, and I have NO IDEA why he's getting a pass on his horrible accuracy and terrible numbers.
With RB's like Guice, Michel, Penny... I'd rather get the QB #1 and Fitzpatrick #4. If they don't take a QB #1, some other team can trade up like last year and take the QB the Browns might've been planning on being there at #4.
Yeah, Barkley can return kickoffs and so can Penny. Penny set the NCAA record. I don't think either will be doing that in the NFL much if they're the bell cow.
-
this is why i said you may be a manziel fan all about the bucks huh ?
-
ya it doe's make a Shmucking difference for a young possible franchise QB coming into the league for their psyche why in the Shmuck would you even want to take a goddamn chance on anything going wrong for the face of the franchise you tell that motherShmucker all along he was their guy (even if it's not true) so you do not Shmuck with their head
but for you it's all about the money bet you were a big manziel fan when we drafted him
You think these kids don’t know how the game has to be played predraft? Kids are so savvy now that they are skipping bowl games to not risk draft status.
Not quite sure where Manziel fits into your autistic screeching but no I wasn’t a fan at all.
You think these kids don’t know how the game has to be played predraft? Kids are so savvy now that they are skipping bowl games to not risk draft status.
Not quite sure where Manziel fits into your autistic screeching but no I wasn’t a fan at all.
Shmuck draft status what the hell doe's that even mean (except from a paycheck) i'm Shmucking talking about how a franchise views you how you are set up to succeed as a 1st round qb draft pick and you sure as hell do not start off the process saying that you are not enamored with or will be listening to offers for the 1st pick
sorry you do not get it
-
You think these kids don’t know how the game has to be played predraft? Kids are so savvy now that they are skipping bowl games to not risk draft status.
Not quite sure where Manziel fits into your autistic screeching but no I wasn’t a fan at all.
Shmuck draft status what the hell doe's that even mean (except from a paycheck) i'm Shmucking talking about how a franchise views you how you are set up to succeed as a 1st round qb draft pick and you sure as hell do not start off the process saying that you are not enamored with or will be listening to offers for the 1st pick
sorry you do not get it
Shmuck draft status what the hell doe's that even mean (except from a paycheck) i'm Shmucking talking about how a franchise views you how you are set up to succeed as a 1st round qb draft pick and you sure as hell do not start off the process saying that you are not enamored with or will be listening to offers for the 1st pick
sorry you do not get it
If a kid’s psyche can’t handle predraft talk (that happens every year) and needs to be constantly reassured then playing professional sports may not be for them. Everyone of those kids has an agent who I am sure is giving them the rundown of how it goes. It is a business.
-
this is why i said you may be a manziel fan all about the bucks huh ?
-
He’s not a unicorn, he just has the discipline to put in his body what humans are supposed to eat. (Plants)
Kyrie went plant-based too, if he sticks with it he’ll be ageless as well
Woofing down animal based protein is what got our brains to where they are today.
-
Just had a story pop up on my phone that said Dorsey is open to trading the #1 pick. I will literally throw my own butt into a mental hospital if this happens. I could care LESS about getting more picks. What I DO care about is getting our favorite QB, and if we trade, we give other teams THREE chances to take our guy. Yeah, everyone is talking about Saquon Barkley, but let me remind everyone that when it comes time to making early picks, more teams trade up for QBs than running backs. Nobody is likely to mortgage a bunch of picks to move up to #1 for Saquon. What's that mean? That means a QB is going #1 if we trade down. Then there's the #2 pick, and the Giants already said they'd trade down too. Even if they don't, they could easily take a QB as Eli's replacement. That's two possible QBs. Then you have the Colts. I doubt they take a QB, but does anyone truly know what the hell is going on with Luck's shoulder? They could draft a QB or trade back with someone like the Broncos who want a QB. That's THREE potential chances for the Cleveland Browns to lose out on QBs. And for what? To get more picks? Yeah, because that's worked out SOOOOOOOO good for us!
Maybe John Dorsey is full of crap. Perhaps he's just posturing in the media. But if you have the #1 pick, YOU DON'T HAVE TO. I'm serious, we trade down and I'll need some strong medication. I already know we're going to with one of our early ones, I feel it. The 1 and 4 are simply too much capital for one GM to play with, and we all know how those turds just HAVE to prove how smart they are, right? It's still early, but we're now in March and things are picking up quickly. You know what would make me feel better? That in about a month or so, John Dorsey announces who the Browns are drafting #1. Remember when that used to happen every once in a while? I could be crazy, but I want to say that occasionally a team announced who they were taking #1. I'd love to hear Dorsey say, "We're taking Baker Mayfield #1, and there's nothing you can do about it. Now, if you want to talk about trading for the #4, you can call me any time, but Baker is already being fit for his Cleveland Browns jersey, so read'em and weep."
-
Smoke screen. He's just on a fishing expedition. Now if someone wanted to trade out a starting QB plus their #1 pick or more, then it might be worth listening to if that QB is really what we need.
-
He’s not a unicorn, he just has the discipline to put in his body what humans are supposed to eat. (Plants)
Kyrie went plant-based too, if he sticks with it he’ll be ageless as well
just got a new cook book called How Not To Die and there are some damn good plant based recipes in there so as of now I'm cooking 2-3 times a week outta that book
edit this is a edit I have also lost a few pounds since using that cook book
just got a new cook book called How Not To Die and there are some damn good plant based recipes in there so as of now I'm cooking 2-3 times a week outta that book
edit this is a edit I have also lost a few pounds since using that cook book
Yes sir! Michael Gregor knows his stuff.
Check our Super Immunity by Dr. Joel Fuhrman, changed my life
The less meat and dairy one eats, replaced with plants, the more alive one becomes.
-
He’s not a unicorn, he just has the discipline to put in his body what humans are supposed to eat. (Plants)
Kyrie went plant-based too, if he sticks with it he’ll be ageless as well
Woofing down animal based protein is what got our brains to where they are today.
Woofing down animal based protein is what got our brains to where they are today.
Common misconception (funded by the meat and dairy industry)
Studies have shown through teeth analysis and fecal analysis that our ancestors at mostly starches and plants. Glucose is what fueled our brains to perform efficiently.
Yes, cavemen ate meat once in a very while (out of necessity) but hunting was not very energy efficient, and it’s not good for you. Just because it doesn’t kill you right away, doesn’t mean your arteries aren’t clogging and your IGF growth factor is spiking setting you up for cancer. (Heart attacks and cancer are higher that they have ever been in human history.)
-
Woofing down animal based protein is what got our brains to where they are today.
Common misconception (funded by the meat and dairy industry)
Studies have shown through teeth analysis and fecal analysis that our ancestors at mostly starches and plants. Glucose is what fueled our brains to perform efficiently.
Yes, cavemen ate meat once in a very while (out of necessity) but hunting was not very energy efficient, and it’s not good for you. Just because it doesn’t kill you right away, doesn’t mean your arteries aren’t clogging and your IGF growth factor is spiking setting you up for cancer. (Heart attacks and cancer are higher that they have ever been in human history.)
(Heart attacks and cancer are higher that they have ever been in human history.)
Thank you Mickey Ds and pesticides.
-
Woofing down animal based protein is what got our brains to where they are today.
Common misconception (funded by the meat and dairy industry)
Studies have shown through teeth analysis and fecal analysis that our ancestors at mostly starches and plants. Glucose is what fueled our brains to perform efficiently.
Yes, cavemen ate meat once in a very while (out of necessity) but hunting was not very energy efficient, and it’s not good for you. Just because it doesn’t kill you right away, doesn’t mean your arteries aren’t clogging and your IGF growth factor is spiking setting you up for cancer. (Heart attacks and cancer are higher that they have ever been in human history.)
Common misconception (funded by the meat and dairy industry)
Studies have shown through teeth analysis and fecal analysis that our ancestors at mostly starches and plants. Glucose is what fueled our brains to perform efficiently.
Yes, cavemen ate meat once in a very while (out of necessity) but hunting was not very energy efficient, and it’s not good for you. Just because it doesn’t kill you right away, doesn’t mean your arteries aren’t clogging and your IGF growth factor is spiking setting you up for cancer. (Heart attacks and cancer are higher that they have ever been in human history.)
Yes scientists, pediatricians, and nutritionists are totally all bought by the meat industry. Animal based protein fueled our brain development. Glucose fuels the brain but it would not have caused a change in the size and development. Coal makes a steam engine function but it requires other materials to build the engine.
time.com/4252373/meat-eating-veganism-evolution/
-
(Heart attacks and cancer are higher that they have ever been in human history.)
Thank you Mickey Ds and pesticides.
Thank you Mickey Ds and pesticides.
Yeah the cancer and heart attacks are from garbage processed food, not meat itself.
-
Just had a story pop up on my phone that said Dorsey is open to trading the #1 pick. I will literally throw my own butt into a mental hospital if this happens. I could care LESS about getting more picks. What I DO care about is getting our favorite QB, and if we trade, we give other teams THREE chances to take our guy. Yeah, everyone is talking about Saquon Barkley, but let me remind everyone that when it comes time to making early picks, more teams trade up for QBs than running backs. Nobody is likely to mortgage a bunch of picks to move up to #1 for Saquon. What's that mean? That means a QB is going #1 if we trade down. Then there's the #2 pick, and the Giants already said they'd trade down too. Even if they don't, they could easily take a QB as Eli's replacement. That's two possible QBs. Then you have the Colts. I doubt they take a QB, but does anyone truly know what the hell is going on with Luck's shoulder? They could draft a QB or trade back with someone like the Broncos who want a QB. That's THREE potential chances for the Cleveland Browns to lose out on QBs. And for what? To get more picks? Yeah, because that's worked out SOOOOOOOO good for us!
Maybe John Dorsey is full of crap. Perhaps he's just posturing in the media. But if you have the #1 pick, YOU DON'T HAVE TO. I'm serious, we trade down and I'll need some strong medication. I already know we're going to with one of our early ones, I feel it. The 1 and 4 are simply too much capital for one GM to play with, and we all know how those turds just HAVE to prove how smart they are, right? It's still early, but we're now in March and things are picking up quickly. You know what would make me feel better? That in about a month or so, John Dorsey announces who the Browns are drafting #1. Remember when that used to happen every once in a while? I could be crazy, but I want to say that occasionally a team announced who they were taking #1. I'd love to hear Dorsey say, "We're taking Baker Mayfield #1, and there's nothing you can do about it. Now, if you want to talk about trading for the #4, you can call me any time, but Baker is already being fit for his Cleveland Browns jersey, so read'em and weep."
Just had a story pop up on my phone that said Dorsey is open to trading the #1 pick. I will literally throw my own butt into a mental hospital if this happens. I could care LESS about getting more picks. What I DO care about is getting our favorite QB, and if we trade, we give other teams THREE chances to take our guy. Yeah, everyone is talking about Saquon Barkley, but let me remind everyone that when it comes time to making early picks, more teams trade up for QBs than running backs. Nobody is likely to mortgage a bunch of picks to move up to #1 for Saquon. What's that mean? That means a QB is going #1 if we trade down. Then there's the #2 pick, and the Giants already said they'd trade down too. Even if they don't, they could easily take a QB as Eli's replacement. That's two possible QBs. Then you have the Colts. I doubt they take a QB, but does anyone truly know what the hell is going on with Luck's shoulder? They could draft a QB or trade back with someone like the Broncos who want a QB. That's THREE potential chances for the Cleveland Browns to lose out on QBs. And for what? To get more picks? Yeah, because that's worked out SOOOOOOOO good for us!
Maybe John Dorsey is full of crap. Perhaps he's just posturing in the media. But if you have the #1 pick, YOU DON'T HAVE TO. I'm serious, we trade down and I'll need some strong medication. I already know we're going to with one of our early ones, I feel it. The 1 and 4 are simply too much capital for one GM to play with, and we all know how those turds just HAVE to prove how smart they are, right? It's still early, but we're now in March and things are picking up quickly. You know what would make me feel better? That in about a month or so, John Dorsey announces who the Browns are drafting #1. Remember when that used to happen every once in a while? I could be crazy, but I want to say that occasionally a team announced who they were taking #1. I'd love to hear Dorsey say, "We're taking Baker Mayfield #1, and there's nothing you can do about it. Now, if you want to talk about trading for the #4, you can call me any time, but Baker is already being fit for his Cleveland Browns jersey, so read'em and weep."
Dorsey is just doing what every good GM has to do. That is Listen. There is so much that still needs to be determined before the browns are on the clock and so many factors could change their draft strategy. What if they sign Kirk Cousins? They are not going to be selecting a qb #1 at that point. What if the Giants offer the #2 and OBJ for the #1 pick? or the Jets offer Leonard Williams, Robby Anderson, their #6 pick, plus a 2019 mid-rounder for the #1 pick? What if it's not the #1 pick, but the #4 pick and AZ offers Peterson and the #15 pick? Trading down does not always mean draft picks. SO much still needs to be determined before the Browns make a decision that, it is in the Browns best interest to weigh ALL of their options, not just a qb at #1. Honestly, I like most of the qb's in this draft and would be perfectly fine with any of them. They all have their flaws but they all have strong points. What happens if the Browns determine there is no difference between Allen and White or Lauletta? Why take Allen at #1 or #4 when you know you are going to get either of those guys in the second or third AND you can add players to the mix. I'm not saying this is the direction they should go, but this could very well be a possibility.
Let's not forget, Kizer is still on this roster. He had a bad year last year, but he is only 21 years old and everyone knew he needed time to develop when he came out. He could make a big jump in-between his first and second year (see Goff) and really open the browns eyes. Especially if they bring on a veteran such as McCarron or Bradford or Keenum where the browns then feel good about the qb position for a few years. You don't have to take a qb at #1 then. You could take one of the later round guys and develop them along with Kizer.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login