Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. Political Discussion
  3. Religious freedom and abortion

Religious freedom and abortion

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Political Discussion
43 Posts 8 Posters 426 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MLD WoodyM MLD Woody

    @oldbrownsfan said:

    I think that is the answer to let someone else fill the prescription. 

    What if there isn't another pharmacist at that location that will fill it?

    Also, it sounds like this was medication to enduce a miscarriage on a fetus that had already died through natural means

    OldBrownsFan OldBrownsFanO
    • 11k Posts
    • 3k Reputation
    OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
    #5

    @mld-woody said:

    What if there isn't another pharmacist at that location that will fill it?

    Also, it sounds like this was medication to enduce a miscarriage on a fetus that had already died through natural means

    This is a simple fix. Let another pharmacist handle it. If there is not another pharmacist at the location then the pharmacist who refused can arrange with another pharmacist to do it. This should not be a problem and there were other pharmacists there that should have filled it for her, anyway 

    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • mjp28 mjp28M In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well Week One Done One Month Later One Year In
      • 18k Posts
      • 4k Reputation
      mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by mjp28
      #6

      @oldbrownsfan said:

      Losing his license would be a miscarriage of justice but he needs to make arrangements on these kinds of cases for other pharmacists. That is what I would tell him.

      This is what can happen when we get religion, politics and everything else entwined with normal business life. 

      Tell the pharmacist to go paint some signs and go protest while he looks for another profession.

      GO BUCKEYES, BROWNS, INDIANS, CAVS, YSU, NAVY and yes I like ND!
      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • Clevfan4life C Banned Very Popular
        • 24k Posts
        • 1k Reputation
        C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
        #7

        cant have these people in a free market capitalist system. if something were to happen to one of these becausevthis fukhat is imposing his religion on others...he oughtta be sued blind fir all he's worth than thrown in jail. 

        i understand peoples religious objections to certain sht but then u gotta understand certain jobs u cant have.....tuff sht

        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • Clevfan4life C Banned Very Popular
          • 24k Posts
          • 1k Reputation
          C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
          #8

          can u imagine if there was a pill that kept the gay away and some pharmacist refused to fill it.....can u imagine the outrage on the right? and there would be no "find another pharmacist" they would be call8ng for his head.

          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
            • 64k Posts
            • 8k Reputation
            C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
            #9

            No dr or pharmacist, baker or priest can be forced to violate their

            religious beliefs.

              Freedom of RELIGION, not freedom of bigotry.

            OldBrownsFanO 1 Reply Last reply
            👍
            Quote Reply
            • Clevfan4life C Banned Very Popular
              • 24k Posts
              • 1k Reputation
              C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
              #10

              ur right, and they also need to find new professions.

              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                • 64k Posts
                • 8k Reputation
                C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by calfoxwc
                #11

                https://www.ushmm.org/outreach/en/article.php?ModuleId=10007693

                Key Dates

                MARCH 1933
                SA REIGN OF TERROR AGAINST JEWS THROUGHOUT GERMANY

                The SA (Storm Troopers) attack Jewish-owned department stores in German cities in an attempt to segregate Jews from the rest of society. Local police, not yet under Nazi control, unsuccessfully attempt to stop the attacks. Members of the SA continue the rampage and enter courtrooms, dragging Jewish lawyers and judges into the streets where they are subjected to humiliating public acts. These attacks are publicized by international Jewish organizations and the press, which urge a boycott of German goods. In response, the Nazis organize a nationwide boycott of Jewish businesses in Germany, blaming Jews for anti-German tone of the international press.

                APRIL 1, 1933
                NATIONWIDE BOYCOTT OF JEWISH-OWNED BUSINESSES

                At 10:00 a.m., SA and SS members stand in front of Jewish-owned businesses throughout Germany to inform the public that the proprietors of these establishments are Jewish. The word "Jude," German for "Jew," is often smeared on store display windows, with a Star of David painted in yellow and black across the doors. Anti-Jewish signs accompany these slogans. In some towns, the SA marches through the streets singing anti-Jewish slogans and party songs. In other towns, violence accompanies the boycott; in Kiel, a Jewish lawyer is killed. The official boycott ends at midnight.

                APRIL 7, 1933
                LAW DISMISSES JEWS FROM CIVIL SERVICE

                The Nazi government enacts the Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service. This law seeks to exclude those considered to be opponents of the Nazi state—Jews and political opponents. As a result, civil service employees are forced to prove their "Aryan" descent by documenting the religion of their parents and grandparents. If unable to do so, they are dismissed from service. Hitler reluctantly concedes to President Paul von Hindenburg's demand to exempt from dismissal those civil servants who are veterans of World War I or whose close relatives had fallen in that conflict. Similar laws passed in the following weeks affect Jewish lawyers and doctors.

                Copyright © United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, Washington, DC

                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • C calfoxwc

                  No dr or pharmacist, baker or priest can be forced to violate their

                  religious beliefs.

                    Freedom of RELIGION, not freedom of bigotry.

                  OldBrownsFan OldBrownsFanO
                  • 11k Posts
                  • 3k Reputation
                  OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                  #12

                  @calfoxwc said:

                  No dr or pharmacist, baker or priest can be forced to violate their

                  religious beliefs.

                    Freedom of RELIGION, not freedom of bigotry.

                  Making an accommodation for religious beliefs can usually be worked out. In this case the pharmacy should just have another pharmacist handle these cases. Simple fix,

                  C 1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan

                    @calfoxwc said:

                    No dr or pharmacist, baker or priest can be forced to violate their

                    religious beliefs.

                      Freedom of RELIGION, not freedom of bigotry.

                    Making an accommodation for religious beliefs can usually be worked out. In this case the pharmacy should just have another pharmacist handle these cases. Simple fix,

                    Clevfan4life C Banned Very Popular
                    • 24k Posts
                    • 1k Reputation
                    C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
                    #13

                    @oldbrownsfan said:

                    Making an accommodation for religious beliefs can usually be worked out. In this case the pharmacy should just have another pharmacist handle these cases. Simple fix,

                    u mean like kim davis should have allowed one of her deputy magistrates dole out the liscenses? anyway, pharmacies usually dont have multiple pharmacists on duty at the same time. and newsflash dead fetus's could seriously damage women so there is a time factor here. there are places in this country where there is one pharmacist within 50-100 sq miles or more. 

                    thos is just one of those professions thays not for religious folk. 

                    OldBrownsFanO 1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • C Clevfan4life

                      @oldbrownsfan said:

                      Making an accommodation for religious beliefs can usually be worked out. In this case the pharmacy should just have another pharmacist handle these cases. Simple fix,

                      u mean like kim davis should have allowed one of her deputy magistrates dole out the liscenses? anyway, pharmacies usually dont have multiple pharmacists on duty at the same time. and newsflash dead fetus's could seriously damage women so there is a time factor here. there are places in this country where there is one pharmacist within 50-100 sq miles or more. 

                      thos is just one of those professions thays not for religious folk. 

                      OldBrownsFan OldBrownsFanO
                      • 11k Posts
                      • 3k Reputation
                      OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by OldBrownsFan
                      #14

                      @clevfan4life said:

                      u mean like kim davis should have allowed one of her deputy magistrates dole out the liscenses? anyway, pharmacies usually dont have multiple pharmacists on duty at the same time. and newsflash dead fetus's could seriously damage women so there is a time factor here. there are places in this country where there is one pharmacist within 50-100 sq miles or more. 

                      thos is just one of those professions thays not for religious folk. 

                      The problem Kim Davis had was her name was signed to the marriage certificates to gay couples and even if another clerk handled the case her name would still be on it. They took her name off the license and it was a simple fix. Also Kim Davis went to jail for not following the law and when are the leaders of sanctuary cities going to go to jail  for not following the law? 

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      ❤
                      Quote Reply
                      • Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
                        • 39k Posts
                        • 9k Reputation
                        W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
                        #15

                        One difference is that Walgreens has a national chain and apparently has no problem selling the birth control pill. The pharmacist is merely an employee so I figure if he can't see his way clear to providing that pill time to look for some place that will support him. Same with the woman in Kentucky. The bakers were sole Proprietors. 

                        WSS

                        www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
                          • 39k Posts
                          • 9k Reputation
                          W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
                          #16

                          The baker's could have sidestepped the situation, maybe, by saying sure we will make the cake hope you like it, but no we're not putting two homosexuals on top. You'll have to do that when you get home.

                          WSS

                          www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
                          C 1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • W Westside Steve

                            The baker's could have sidestepped the situation, maybe, by saying sure we will make the cake hope you like it, but no we're not putting two homosexuals on top. You'll have to do that when you get home.

                            WSS

                            Clevfan4life C Banned Very Popular
                            • 24k Posts
                            • 1k Reputation
                            C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
                            #17

                            @westside-steve said:

                            The baker's could have sidestepped the situation, maybe, by saying sure we will make the cake hope you like it, but no we're not putting two homosexuals on top. You'll have to do that when you get home.

                            WSS

                            what exactly did they want ontop of the cake? frankly if they werent being asked to cater the wedding in person just make the cake.

                            W 2 Replies Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • W Westside Steve

                              Pharmacist refuses to fill medication for miscarriage

                              https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/walgreens-pharmacist-refused-give-woman-medication-help-miscarriage-183652430.html

                              Shared from my Google feed

                              This one is going to be tricky. We've already decided that doctors cannot be forced to perform abortions and even a wink and a nod saying that tax money shouldn't go to abortion providers.

                              I can certainly understand religious people thinking that abortion is evil. Even some of our pro-abortion members are a little bit creeped out by it and might even admit that late-term abortions that have nothing to do with the mother's life should be banned.

                              The pharmacist here, in my opinion, is trying to get attention. I say let somebody else fill the prescription.

                              WSS

                              DieHardBrownsFan DieHardBrownsFanD Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Collaborator Posting Machine First Post One Month Later Week One Done One Year In
                              • 28k Posts
                              • 6k Reputation
                              DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                              #18

                              @westside-steve said:

                              Pharmacist refuses to fill medication for miscarriage

                              https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/walgreens-pharmacist-refused-give-woman-medication-help-miscarriage-183652430.html

                              Shared from my Google feed

                              This one is going to be tricky. We've already decided that doctors cannot be forced to perform abortions and even a wink and a nod saying that tax money shouldn't go to abortion providers.

                              I can certainly understand religious people thinking that abortion is evil. Even some of our pro-abortion members are a little bit creeped out by it and might even admit that late-term abortions that have nothing to do with the mother's life should be banned.

                              The pharmacist here, in my opinion, is trying to get attention. I say let somebody else fill the prescription.

                              WSS

                              Bravo.  Bravo I say.

                              "You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970.
                              1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • mjp28M mjp28

                                @oldbrownsfan said:

                                I think that is the answer to let someone else fill the prescription. 

                                Miscarrage? Are you kidding? He should lose his pharmacy licence.

                                DieHardBrownsFan DieHardBrownsFanD Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Collaborator Posting Machine First Post One Month Later Week One Done One Year In
                                • 28k Posts
                                • 6k Reputation
                                DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                                #19

                                @mjp28 said:

                                Miscarrage? Are you kidding? He should lose his pharmacy licence.

                                No he shouldn't.  It's there policy that they do not have to fill a prescription.  He does have to arrange for some other store to take care of it, which he did.

                                "You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970.
                                1 Reply Last reply
                                👍
                                Quote Reply
                                • C Clevfan4life

                                  @westside-steve said:

                                  The baker's could have sidestepped the situation, maybe, by saying sure we will make the cake hope you like it, but no we're not putting two homosexuals on top. You'll have to do that when you get home.

                                  WSS

                                  what exactly did they want ontop of the cake? frankly if they werent being asked to cater the wedding in person just make the cake.

                                  Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
                                  • 39k Posts
                                  • 9k Reputation
                                  W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
                                  #20

                                  @clevfan4life said:

                                  what exactly did they want ontop of the cake? frankly if they werent being asked to cater the wedding in person just make the cake.

                                  Here's your cake kids. You can put your own to queer guys on top of it. 

                                  WSS

                                  www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  👍
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                                    • 64k Posts
                                    • 8k Reputation
                                    C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                                    #21

                                    Meanwhile SCOTUS sided with religious freedom, now orders the lower court to revisit their

                                    decision against the flower shop.

                                    https://www.theblaze.com/news/2018/06/25/scotus-lower-court-must-rehear-flower-shop-case-in-light-of-recent-gay-wedding-cake-ruling

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    Quote Reply
                                    • Clevfan4life C Banned Very Popular
                                      • 24k Posts
                                      • 1k Reputation
                                      C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
                                      #22

                                      just to be clear in cases like wedding photogs,bakers,florists....these are non essential business's that i could care less if they dont want to serve gays. that being said, dont then bitch if a restsurant with gay employees tell conservative people to kick rocks. 

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      Quote Reply
                                      • MLD Woody MLD WoodyM Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular First Post Collaborator Posting Machine Reacting Well One Month Later One Year In Week One Done
                                        • 33k Posts
                                        • 3k Reputation
                                        MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by
                                        #23

                                        This was also medication to enduce an abortion/miscarriage on an already dead fetus. Not really the buzzword action of "killing babies". If that makes any difference in this case.

                                        Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody!
                                        C 1 Reply Last reply
                                        Quote Reply
                                        • MLD WoodyM MLD Woody

                                          This was also medication to enduce an abortion/miscarriage on an already dead fetus. Not really the buzzword action of "killing babies". If that makes any difference in this case.

                                          Clevfan4life C Banned Very Popular
                                          • 24k Posts
                                          • 1k Reputation
                                          C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
                                          #24

                                          @mld-woody said:

                                          This was also medication to enduce an abortion/miscarriage on an already dead fetus. Not really the buzzword action of "killing babies". If that makes any difference in this case.

                                          a dead fetus is still alive u baby killer. 

                                          lols, u know it makes no difference to these people. they'd rather see women die if god so chooses but they get cancer and its off to the doctor for chemo,u know, letting nature take its course?

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Quote Reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Theme
                                          • System
                                          • Light
                                          • Dark
                                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Forums
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Donate