Gary Johnson Polling at 13%
-
Gary Johnson is a wacko
I wouldn't mind seeing him in the debates, but I hate that the third party candidates are so fringe
-
I guarantee the establishment rewrites the rules to prevent it if Gary hits threshold.
-
cause your guy and his people are totally normal right?
Fuck yea
Gary Johnson supports the TPP and is a giant douche. Third party candidates historically poll higher than what they get votes though.
He's better than Jill Stein though, but Gary Johnson is no Ron Paul that's for sure.
-
cause your guy and his people are totally normal right?
Fuck yea
Gary Johnson supports the TPP and is a giant douche. Third party candidates historically poll higher than what they get votes though.
He's better than Jill Stein though, but Gary Johnson is no Ron Paul that's for sure.
-
TPP is sold with the disguise of "free trade" which the libertarians support - save for the Pauls who understand it anyway.wait the libertarian guy supports TPP? srsly?
But there's a lot more to it than that
-
TPP is sold with the disguise of "free trade" which the libertarians support - save for the Pauls who understand it anyway.wait the libertarian guy supports TPP? srsly?
But there's a lot more to it than that
-
I had no idea Gary was pro-TPP.
yeah no shit, isn't that like heresy in the libertarian party?
-
I had no idea Gary was pro-TPP.
yeah no shit, isn't that like heresy in the libertarian party?
yeah no shit, isn't that like heresy in the libertarian party?
Libertarians are pro-free trade, but the TPP is a lot more than a simple "free trade" agreement - otherwise it wouldn't be thousands of pages long.
-
wait the libertarian guy supports TPP? srsly?
Gary Johnson is a wacko
I wouldn't mind seeing him in the debates, but I hate that the third party candidates are so fringe
I mean, you're giving me a choice between a wacko, a loudmouth, and a corrupt shill. Not really many options to go around.
I guarantee the establishment rewrites the rules to prevent it if Gary hits threshold.
Oh, you know they're going to try to, but I think the cat is out of the bag on how corruptly-ran the Commission for Presidential Debates really is, and people are taking notice.
-
Clinton would pass the TPP,despite not supporting it at the moment.at the very best change a few insignificant things and call it fixed.
-
yeah no shit, isn't that like heresy in the libertarian party?
Libertarians are pro-free trade, but the TPP is a lot more than a simple "free trade" agreement - otherwise it wouldn't be thousands of pages long.
-
The concept of things like executive orders and a presidential election not being tied to senate/congress/legislative elections make it basically impossible for a third party to have a credible chance as there's no such thing as a minority or coalition government.
-
Those who love a free-for-all should probably favor a 4 party contest rather than 3. You could have a center-right comma Center left and a hard right and left.
With a 3 Party you're almost guaranteed that the majority will be unhappy.
WSS
-
He's a fake. He's big government and pro-establishment. He's actually a liberal, so he'll poach more votes from crooked Hillary than anyone else.
-
Johnson has my wasted vote. I live in WV so Trump will win in a landslide. He came here and said "I will bring coal back". No real explanation (as per usual) but the locals rejoiced.
-
He's a fake. He's big government and pro-establishment. He's actually a liberal, so he'll poach more votes from crooked Hillary than anyone else.
He's a fake. He's big government and pro-establishment. He's actually a liberal, so he'll poach more votes from crooked Hillary than anyone else.
http://reason.com/blog/2016/05/25/gary-johnsons-new-mexico-fiscal-record-d
-
Those who love a free-for-all should probably favor a 4 party contest rather than 3. You could have a center-right comma Center left and a hard right and left.
With a 3 Party you're almost guaranteed that the majority will be unhappy.
WSS
Those who love a free-for-all should probably favor a 4 party contest rather than 3. You could have a center-right comma Center left and a hard right and left.
With a 3 Party you're almost guaranteed that the majority will be unhappy.
WSS
three would be better than two, but four would be better still. I mean, there's a functional limit on how many relevant parties you can have - a hundred parties with different policies and one percent of the vote each is kinda pointless. But as I said, the system of a president who can circumvent the will of the democratically elected legislatures is not one that lends itself to compromise and collaboration.
-
I just want to see 1-on-1 because seeing Clinton get stumped is more entertaining than watching Johnson gets stumped, who nobody even cares about.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login