Religious freedom and abortion
-
Pharmacist refuses to fill medication for miscarriage
Shared from my Google feed
This one is going to be tricky. We've already decided that doctors cannot be forced to perform abortions and even a wink and a nod saying that tax money shouldn't go to abortion providers.
I can certainly understand religious people thinking that abortion is evil. Even some of our pro-abortion members are a little bit creeped out by it and might even admit that late-term abortions that have nothing to do with the mother's life should be banned.
The pharmacist here, in my opinion, is trying to get attention. I say let somebody else fill the prescription.
WSS
Pharmacist refuses to fill medication for miscarriage
Shared from my Google feed
This one is going to be tricky. We've already decided that doctors cannot be forced to perform abortions and even a wink and a nod saying that tax money shouldn't go to abortion providers.
I can certainly understand religious people thinking that abortion is evil. Even some of our pro-abortion members are a little bit creeped out by it and might even admit that late-term abortions that have nothing to do with the mother's life should be banned.
The pharmacist here, in my opinion, is trying to get attention. I say let somebody else fill the prescription.
WSS
Bravo. Bravo I say.
-
I think that is the answer to let someone else fill the prescription.
Miscarrage? Are you kidding? He should lose his pharmacy licence.
-
The baker's could have sidestepped the situation, maybe, by saying sure we will make the cake hope you like it, but no we're not putting two homosexuals on top. You'll have to do that when you get home.
WSS
what exactly did they want ontop of the cake? frankly if they werent being asked to cater the wedding in person just make the cake.
what exactly did they want ontop of the cake? frankly if they werent being asked to cater the wedding in person just make the cake.
Here's your cake kids. You can put your own to queer guys on top of it.
WSS
-
Meanwhile SCOTUS sided with religious freedom, now orders the lower court to revisit their
decision against the flower shop.
-
just to be clear in cases like wedding photogs,bakers,florists....these are non essential business's that i could care less if they dont want to serve gays. that being said, dont then bitch if a restsurant with gay employees tell conservative people to kick rocks.
-
This was also medication to enduce an abortion/miscarriage on an already dead fetus. Not really the buzzword action of "killing babies". If that makes any difference in this case.
-
This was also medication to enduce an abortion/miscarriage on an already dead fetus. Not really the buzzword action of "killing babies". If that makes any difference in this case.
This was also medication to enduce an abortion/miscarriage on an already dead fetus. Not really the buzzword action of "killing babies". If that makes any difference in this case.
a dead fetus is still alive u baby killer.
lols, u know it makes no difference to these people. they'd rather see women die if god so chooses but they get cancer and its off to the doctor for chemo,u know, letting nature take its course?
-
The baker's could have sidestepped the situation, maybe, by saying sure we will make the cake hope you like it, but no we're not putting two homosexuals on top. You'll have to do that when you get home.
WSS
what exactly did they want ontop of the cake? frankly if they werent being asked to cater the wedding in person just make the cake.
what exactly did they want ontop of the cake? frankly if they werent being asked to cater the wedding in person just make the cake.
Again same deal as the klan ordering cookies with swastikas from a kosher bakery. Heres the cookies boys put the swastikas on yourselves. And exactly what the couple wanted was to homesexuals standing on the cake. And speaking rationally the baker could have avoided any situation by merely saying we don't carry that particular novelty. If you want queers on top of the cake you can order them from Amazon and put them on when you get home.
WSS
-
what exactly did they want ontop of the cake? frankly if they werent being asked to cater the wedding in person just make the cake.
Again same deal as the klan ordering cookies with swastikas from a kosher bakery. Heres the cookies boys put the swastikas on yourselves. And exactly what the couple wanted was to homesexuals standing on the cake. And speaking rationally the baker could have avoided any situation by merely saying we don't carry that particular novelty. If you want queers on top of the cake you can order them from Amazon and put them on when you get home.
WSS
Again same deal as the klan ordering cookies with swastikas from a kosher bakery. Heres the cookies boys put the swastikas on yourselves. And exactly what the couple wanted was to homesexuals standing on the cake. And speaking rationally the baker could have avoided any situation by merely saying we don't carry that particular novelty. If you want queers on top of the cake you can order them from Amazon and put them on when you get home.
WSS
But you and I both know they really didn't want a cake...they wanted attention, and a lawsuit.
-
what exactly did they want ontop of the cake? frankly if they werent being asked to cater the wedding in person just make the cake.
Again same deal as the klan ordering cookies with swastikas from a kosher bakery. Heres the cookies boys put the swastikas on yourselves. And exactly what the couple wanted was to homesexuals standing on the cake. And speaking rationally the baker could have avoided any situation by merely saying we don't carry that particular novelty. If you want queers on top of the cake you can order them from Amazon and put them on when you get home.
WSS
Again same deal as the klan ordering cookies with swastikas from a kosher bakery. Heres the cookies boys put the swastikas on yourselves. And exactly what the couple wanted was to homesexuals standing on the cake. And speaking rationally the baker could have avoided any situation by merely saying we don't carry that particular novelty. If you want queers on top of the cake you can order them from Amazon and put them on when you get home.
WSS
Not exactly the same deal. Klan members choose to be in a clan. Gays don't choose to be gay. Same level as gender, race, etc. That's the major distinction
-
Baloney. Advertizing perverse sexual leanings is a deliberate choice. Most all people I've ever worked with,
you assume normality - you don't know about their sexuality in either case.
But gays "come out" - that is a choice - which has a lot to do with the culture war against Real America.
-
Baloney. Advertizing perverse sexual leanings is a deliberate choice. Most all people I've ever worked with,
you assume normality - you don't know about their sexuality in either case.
But gays "come out" - that is a choice - which has a lot to do with the culture war against Real America.
Baloney. Advertizing perverse sexual leanings is a deliberate choice. Most all people I've ever worked with,
you assume normality - you don't know about their sexuality in either case.
But gays "come out" - that is a choice - which has a lot to do with the culture war against Real America.
Those damn gay people making the choice to "come out". How dare they. So perverse. Why can't they just not do anything that would indicate they're gay in anyway, and live with that hidden away. Geez
-
Again same deal as the klan ordering cookies with swastikas from a kosher bakery. Heres the cookies boys put the swastikas on yourselves. And exactly what the couple wanted was to homesexuals standing on the cake. And speaking rationally the baker could have avoided any situation by merely saying we don't carry that particular novelty. If you want queers on top of the cake you can order them from Amazon and put them on when you get home.
WSS
Not exactly the same deal. Klan members choose to be in a clan. Gays don't choose to be gay. Same level as gender, race, etc. That's the major distinction
Not exactly the same deal. Klan members choose to be in a clan. Gays don't choose to be gay. Same level as gender, race, etc. That's the major distinction
Creed. You forgot that one or sidestepped it.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/creed
WSS
-
Baloney. Advertizing perverse sexual leanings is a deliberate choice. Most all people I've ever worked with,
you assume normality - you don't know about their sexuality in either case.
But gays "come out" - that is a choice - which has a lot to do with the culture war against Real America.
Those damn gay people making the choice to "come out". How dare they. So perverse. Why can't they just not do anything that would indicate they're gay in anyway, and live with that hidden away. Geez
Those damn gay people making the choice to "come out". How dare they. So perverse. Why can't they just not do anything that would indicate they're gay in anyway, and live with that hidden away. Geez
normal people don't shove their sexuality in your beak, woodpecker, hetero or not.
-
Those damn gay people making the choice to "come out". How dare they. So perverse. Why can't they just not do anything that would indicate they're gay in anyway, and live with that hidden away. Geez
normal people don't shove their sexuality in your beak, woodpecker, hetero or not.
normal people don't shove their sexuality in your beak, woodpecker, hetero or not.
i tacitly agree with this however two men or two women holding hands or giving each other a peck in public is not offensive nor shoving their sexuality in ur face. parading down the streets like they do in san fran now thats a diff story, but that only happens in very select places and its not normal behavior for 90% of gay people.
if i owned a restaurant and two people took the "get a room" challenge, it woyldnt matter to me if they were a straight or gay couple. on this issue tho i can find some common ground with u. i too intensely dislike public displays of affection/sexuality that deliberately go too far.
-
well, it isn't heteros who are going to a bakery, on purpose of instigating a confrontation, that they KNOW won't want to serve them ...
it's gay "couples".
every time.
-
Not exactly the same deal. Klan members choose to be in a clan. Gays don't choose to be gay. Same level as gender, race, etc. That's the major distinction
Creed. You forgot that one or sidestepped it.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/creed
WSS
Creed. You forgot that one or sidestepped it.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/creed
WSS
Oh, then I disagree with that. I'd prefer to keep it to genetics and religion.
Refusing KKK members, refusing liberals, refusing Steelers fans... Go for it.
Refusing women, blacks, gays, Christians. No go.
At least that's where I fall
-
normal people don't shove their sexuality in your beak, woodpecker, hetero or not.
i tacitly agree with this however two men or two women holding hands or giving each other a peck in public is not offensive nor shoving their sexuality in ur face. parading down the streets like they do in san fran now thats a diff story, but that only happens in very select places and its not normal behavior for 90% of gay people.
if i owned a restaurant and two people took the "get a room" challenge, it woyldnt matter to me if they were a straight or gay couple. on this issue tho i can find some common ground with u. i too intensely dislike public displays of affection/sexuality that deliberately go too far.
i tacitly agree with this however two men or two women holding hands or giving each other a peck in public is not offensive nor shoving their sexuality in ur face. parading down the streets like they do in san fran now thats a diff story, but that only happens in very select places and its not normal behavior for 90% of gay people.
if i owned a restaurant and two people took the "get a room" challenge, it woyldnt matter to me if they were a straight or gay couple. on this issue tho i can find some common ground with u. i too intensely dislike public displays of affection/sexuality that deliberately go too far.
Right.
It's clear though that "shoving their sexuality in your face" means different things to Cal for hetero vs gay couples.
-
i tacitly agree with this however two men or two women holding hands or giving each other a peck in public is not offensive nor shoving their sexuality in ur face. parading down the streets like they do in san fran now thats a diff story, but that only happens in very select places and its not normal behavior for 90% of gay people.
if i owned a restaurant and two people took the "get a room" challenge, it woyldnt matter to me if they were a straight or gay couple. on this issue tho i can find some common ground with u. i too intensely dislike public displays of affection/sexuality that deliberately go too far.
Right.
It's clear though that "shoving their sexuality in your face" means different things to Cal for hetero vs gay couples.
Right.
It's clear though that "shoving their sexuality in your face" means different things to Cal for hetero vs gay couples.
Some of you guys pretend to be men of the world but has anyone ever been to a gay pride parade? Anybody?
WSS
-
ever hear of a heterosexual (normal, healthy) pride parade?
only sick sombietches have groteque parades about their sexuality.
Those perverted images...like a woodpecker humping a tree, and blaming
straight people for his splinters.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login