SHOTS FIRED! New Research Challenges Sacred Cow of the Liberal Left
-
No you didn't. You don't even know what consent means.
WSS
Yeah i did. I literally absolutely though you were above equating consenting adults in a homosexual relationship and nambla folks. Was i wrong?
Yeah i did. I literally absolutely though you were above equating consenting adults in a homosexual relationship and nambla folks. Was i wrong?
Once more you have no idea what the cliche means. It pisses you off but you need to pretend that there's something more to it.
WSS
-
A. Cleve - you are supposed to respect his SERVICE.
B. What is one perversion of normalcy that is completely not like other
perversions of normalcy? Steve makes a solid point. Same category,
legitimate suspicion between gayness and other perversions of normalcy.
It's just self-serving liberal to try to disassociate one from another when it's in the same category.
-
A. Cleve - you are supposed to respect his SERVICE.
B. What is one perversion of normalcy that is completely not like other
perversions of normalcy? Steve makes a solid point. Same category,
legitimate suspicion between gayness and other perversions of normalcy.
It's just self-serving liberal to try to disassociate one from another when it's in the same category.
No, it's not. It's false equivalency. It's akin to saying murder and jaywalking are equal, because they're both crimes. Not to mention that the majority of child abuse crimes are perpetrated by heterosexuals.B. What is one perversion of normalcy that is completely not like other
perversions of normalcy? Steve makes a solid point. Same category,
legitimate suspicion between gayness and other perversions of normalcy.
It's just self-serving liberal to try to disassociate one from another when it's in the same category.
"That which can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidenceā. - Christopher Hitchens "The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you". - Neil deGrasse Tyson -
No, it's not. It's false equivalency. It's akin to saying murder and jaywalking are equal, because they're both crimes. Not to mention that the majority of child abuse crimes are perpetrated by heterosexuals.B. What is one perversion of normalcy that is completely not like other
perversions of normalcy? Steve makes a solid point. Same category,
legitimate suspicion between gayness and other perversions of normalcy.
It's just self-serving liberal to try to disassociate one from another when it's in the same category.
No, it's not. It's false equivalency. It's akin to saying murder and jaywalking are equal, because they're both crimes. Not to mention that the majority of child abuse crimes are perpetrated by heterosexuals.
Glad you highlight this.
If you're one of the 'blacks commit XX amount of crimes by pop % ZOMG LOOK AT THE STATS' and you can't adhere to the above quote (because the stats/facts support the notion) then you clearly have no method for rational debate because there is zero consistency in your argument. Aka, you might as well be a woman.
-
No, it's not. It's false equivalency. It's akin to saying murder and jaywalking are equal, because they're both crimes. Not to mention that the majority of child abuse crimes are perpetrated by heterosexuals.B. What is one perversion of normalcy that is completely not like other
perversions of normalcy? Steve makes a solid point. Same category,
legitimate suspicion between gayness and other perversions of normalcy.
It's just self-serving liberal to try to disassociate one from another when it's in the same category.
No, it's not. It's false equivalency. It's akin to saying murder and jaywalking are equal, because they're both crimes. Not to mention that the majority of child abuse crimes are perpetrated by heterosexuals.
Stuart
Not false equivalency. Your example is false un-equivalency??? lol
A homo is wired to want sex with someone of the same sex, a nambla dude is wired to want sex with a kid. The kid being a victim is after the fact...the nambla dudes aim is not to victimize... as a murderers aim is to murder and a jaywalkers aim is to jaywalk....his aim is getting sexual gratification.
-
No, it's not. It's false equivalency. It's akin to saying murder and jaywalking are equal, because they're both crimes. Not to mention that the majority of child abuse crimes are perpetrated by heterosexuals.
Stuart
Not false equivalency. Your example is false un-equivalency??? lol
A homo is wired to want sex with someone of the same sex, a nambla dude is wired to want sex with a kid. The kid being a victim is after the fact...the nambla dudes aim is not to victimize... as a murderers aim is to murder and a jaywalkers aim is to jaywalk....his aim is getting sexual gratification.
Not false equivalency. Your example is false un-equivalency.
A homo is wired to want sex with someone of the same sex, a nambla dude is wired to want sex with a kid. The kid being a victim is after the fact...the nambla dudes aim is not to victimize... as a murderers aim is to murder and a jaywalkers aim is to jaywalk....his aim is getting sexual gratification.
One is between consenting adults the other is with kids. Sorry, not all 'wiring' is made the same.
-
Yeah i did. I literally absolutely though you were above equating consenting adults in a homosexual relationship and nambla folks. Was i wrong?
Once more you have no idea what the cliche means. It pisses you off but you need to pretend that there's something more to it.
WSS
Once more you have no idea what the cliche means. It pisses you off but you need to pretend that there's something more to it.
WSS
you've lost me i have no idea what you're saying now. I'm not even sure we aren't crossing threads.
-
A. Cleve - you are supposed to respect his SERVICE.
B. What is one perversion of normalcy that is completely not like other
perversions of normalcy? Steve makes a solid point. Same category,
legitimate suspicion between gayness and other perversions of normalcy.
It's just self-serving liberal to try to disassociate one from another when it's in the same category.
B. What is one perversion of normalcy that is completely not like other
perversions of normalcy? Steve makes a solid point. Same category,
legitimate suspicion between gayness and other perversions of normalcy.
It's just self-serving liberal to try to disassociate one from another when it's in the same category.
but there's no valid association. Steve, and you, are completely making it up because it fits your narrative about homosexuals. Pedophiles are an entirely different species. Is there some crossover, yeah im sure....just as there are men who engage in relationships with women but whenever they get the chance the sexually assault young girls. There is no real equivalency. You can call homosexualtiy a perversion if you want, that's your right....but to equate it as the slippery slope to allowing children to be sexually exploited, well that's indicative of a mind that has fallen low indeed.
-
No, it's not. It's false equivalency. It's akin to saying murder and jaywalking are equal, because they're both crimes. Not to mention that the majority of child abuse crimes are perpetrated by heterosexuals.B. What is one perversion of normalcy that is completely not like other
perversions of normalcy? Steve makes a solid point. Same category,
legitimate suspicion between gayness and other perversions of normalcy.
It's just self-serving liberal to try to disassociate one from another when it's in the same category.
No, it's not. It's false equivalency. It's akin to saying murder and jaywalking are equal, because they're both crimes. Not to mention that the majority of child abuse crimes are perpetrated by heterosexuals.
No, never said they were equal. Nothing of the sort. They are, in your stupid example, different...
but they are BOTH CRIMES.
they are both perverted. A more accurrate attempt would have been illegally doing barbituates and doing heroin or lsd or something.
IOW's, they are both drugs, and it isn't unwarranted to say that one has led to the other.
If someone is a deliberate lawbreaker involving drugs, of course it's a gateway to worse laws broken and worse drugs.
Steve's point, in my own words, has to do with the perversion category of behavior.
gateĀ·way drugnounplural noun: gateway drugs- a habit-forming drug that, while not itself addictive, may lead to the use of other addictive drugs."many believe that alcohol and cigarettes are gateway drugs that increase the risk of subsequent involvement with illegal drugs"It is not unreasonable to suspect perverted behavior to be a possible "gateway behavior".Having said that, there actually IS a gateway behavior category. Sometimes I amaze myself.Gateway behaviors are like gateway drugs - PoliceOneMay 25, 2010 - The validity of the gateway drug theory is still being debated, but its overall premise is undeniable: Bad behavior leads to worse behavior.
-
-
B. What is one perversion of normalcy that is completely not like other
perversions of normalcy? Steve makes a solid point. Same category,
legitimate suspicion between gayness and other perversions of normalcy.
It's just self-serving liberal to try to disassociate one from another when it's in the same category.
but there's no valid association. Steve, and you, are completely making it up because it fits your narrative about homosexuals. Pedophiles are an entirely different species. Is there some crossover, yeah im sure....just as there are men who engage in relationships with women but whenever they get the chance the sexually assault young girls. There is no real equivalency. You can call homosexualtiy a perversion if you want, that's your right....but to equate it as the slippery slope to allowing children to be sexually exploited, well that's indicative of a mind that has fallen low indeed.
but there's no valid association. Steve, and you, are completely making it up because it fits your narrative about homosexuals. Pedophiles are an entirely different species. Is there some crossover, yeah im sure....just as there are men who engage in relationships with women but whenever they get the chance the sexually assault young girls. There is no real equivalency. You can call homosexualtiy a perversion if you want, that's your right....but to equate it as the slippery slope to allowing children to be sexually exploited, well that's indicative of a mind that has fallen low indeed.
Dang, even in your rebuttal, you are admitting possible crossover.
Steve is saying that the suspicion of crossover is not unwarranted. You just agreed with him. Good job.
-
No, it's not. It's false equivalency. It's akin to saying murder and jaywalking are equal, because they're both crimes. Not to mention that the majority of child abuse crimes are perpetrated by heterosexuals.
Stuart
Not false equivalency. Your example is false un-equivalency??? lol
A homo is wired to want sex with someone of the same sex, a nambla dude is wired to want sex with a kid. The kid being a victim is after the fact...the nambla dudes aim is not to victimize... as a murderers aim is to murder and a jaywalkers aim is to jaywalk....his aim is getting sexual gratification.
A homo is wired to want sex with someone of the same sex, a nambla dude is wired to want sex with a kid.
Ah... there you have it... wires... the common thread...
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
but there's no valid association. Steve, and you, are completely making it up because it fits your narrative about homosexuals. Pedophiles are an entirely different species. Is there some crossover, yeah im sure....just as there are men who engage in relationships with women but whenever they get the chance the sexually assault young girls. There is no real equivalency. You can call homosexualtiy a perversion if you want, that's your right....but to equate it as the slippery slope to allowing children to be sexually exploited, well that's indicative of a mind that has fallen low indeed.
Dang, even in your rebuttal, you are admitting possible crossover.
Steve is saying that the suspicion of crossover is not unwarranted. You just agreed with him. Good job.
Dang, even in your rebuttal, you are admitting possible crossover.
Steve is saying that the suspicion of crossover is not unwarranted. You just agreed with him. Good job.
the 'suspicion of crossover'? You mean, people can be paedophiles regardless of their sexual orientation or gender?
-
A homo is wired to want sex with someone of the same sex, a nambla dude is wired to want sex with a kid.
Ah... there you have it... wires... the common thread...
-
not decent, law-abiding human beings.
It's about being a deviant...why deny deviancy/perversion is just a step away
from a worse deviancy/perversion?
it's baloney to do that - like an illegal immigrant breaks the law...why think he/she
won't break the law when he/she gets here?
Once a pattern is established, the progression towards further behavior is a justified suspicion.
Anything else is uncivilized, and full of dimwitsies.
-
but there's no valid association. Steve, and you, are completely making it up because it fits your narrative about homosexuals. Pedophiles are an entirely different species. Is there some crossover, yeah im sure....just as there are men who engage in relationships with women but whenever they get the chance the sexually assault young girls. There is no real equivalency. You can call homosexualtiy a perversion if you want, that's your right....but to equate it as the slippery slope to allowing children to be sexually exploited, well that's indicative of a mind that has fallen low indeed.
Dang, even in your rebuttal, you are admitting possible crossover.
Steve is saying that the suspicion of crossover is not unwarranted. You just agreed with him. Good job.
Dang, even in your rebuttal, you are admitting possible crossover.
Steve is saying that the suspicion of crossover is not unwarranted. You just agreed with him. Good job.
Crossover is everywhere in life cal. So in essence you've then concluded becausebmany heterosexuals abuse children that maybe we should look at how hererosexuality is a gateway to abusing children of the opposite sex. Goid job twisting urself into that fallacious hole
-
Its all in ur head cal. There is not an ounce, not one single gram of evidence that hoosexuality is gateway behaviornto abusing children. Just as you cant link heterosexual activity as a direct precursor to pedophilia. Ur making it all up. Puling it clean out yer arse
-
not decent, law-abiding human beings.
It's about being a deviant...why deny deviancy/perversion is just a step away
from a worse deviancy/perversion?
it's baloney to do that - like an illegal immigrant breaks the law...why think he/she
won't break the law when he/she gets here?
Once a pattern is established, the progression towards further behavior is a justified suspicion.
Anything else is uncivilized, and full of dimwitsies.
not decent, law-abiding human beings.
It's about being a deviant...why deny deviancy/perversion is just a step away
from a worse deviancy/perversion?
it's baloney to do that - like an illegal immigrant breaks the law...why think he/she
won't break the law when he/she gets here?
Once a pattern is established, the progression towards further behavior is a justified suspicion.
Anything else is uncivilized, and full of dimwitsies.
You aren't automatically a deviant because you're gay.
To suggest that being gay takes you one step closer to being a pedophile is a fucked up set of non-logic thinking that I have a hard time wrapping my head around.
-
not a logical extension. If a white person commits a crime, does that mean all white people
might commit crime?
it's nonsense. You are confusing patterns of behavior with identity. All gay people do not act out
on their perversion, I would suppose....
A hetero pedophile.... wouldn't you suspect that pedophile of doing the crime again?
or a different related crime, worse than they did before? We're talking about the slippery slope
of deviant behavior.
Crossing the line of normalcy lends itself to crossing the line further. I don't see what's so tough about understanding that.
-
not a logical extension. If a white person commits a crime, does that mean all white people
might commit crime?
it's nonsense. You are confusing patterns of behavior with identity. All gay people do not act out
on their perversion, I would suppose....
A hetero pedophile.... wouldn't you suspect that pedophile of doing the crime again?
or a different related crime, worse than they did before? We're talking about the slippery slope
of deviant behavior.
Crossing the line of normalcy lends itself to crossing the line further. I don't see what's so tough about understanding that.
not a logical extension. If a white person commits a crime, does that mean all white people
might commit crime?
it's nonsense. You are confusing patterns of behavior with identity. All gay people do not act out
on their perversion, I would suppose....
A hetero pedophile.... wouldn't you suspect that pedophile of doing the crime again?
or a different related crime, worse than they did before? We're talking about the slippery slope
of deviant behavior.
Crossing the line of normalcy lends itself to crossing the line further. I don't see what's so tough about understanding that.
I think the rub is that you are comparing gay people to pedos. Just because I am willing to speed when I am late to work does not mean that I am more likely to fall down some rabbit hole of becoming a heroin dealer. Because while I am willing to deviate from the preferred speed limit, that does not mean that I am willing to deviate from the norm of not selling heroin.
-
To suggest that being gay takes you one step closer to being a pedophile is a fucked up set of non-logic thinking that I have a hard time wrapping my head around. Tiam
**********************************************
I'm not suggesting that. I'm suggesting, (not having much of an idea, actually, but thinkin), that acting out in
an abnormal, perverse way sexually, ...what is the problem of acting worse in the same trend?
Let's put it this way - if some nut goes around driving and shooting out windows....why would anybody think
"well gee, he'll never go around shooting people...why would we think that? That's not "fair""
If a violent person is apt to be violent, why put non-violent perspectives on the degree of violence that perpetrator would
commit next? See? That's a rational progression of suspicion.
I think it's strange that "3 %" of the population gets all this support. Libs need their votes that bad? Why not just get
all the votes from pedophiles, murderes, ex-cons of violent crimes, raping illegals and islamic refugees....?
Once someone breaks the law, legally or natural law speaking-wise, why is it so tough for bleeding heart liberals to
get, that that someone would also break other laws by commiting worse crimes?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better š
Register Login